Roku Competitors

Charter Communications (NASDAQ:CHTR) and Roku (NASDAQ:ROKU) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Charter Communications and Roku's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Charter Communications has higher revenue and earnings than Roku. Roku is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charter Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

70.1% of Charter Communications shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.2% of Roku shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Charter Communications shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.7% of Roku shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Charter Communications and Roku, as provided by MarketBeat.

Charter Communications presently has a consensus target price of $687.1304, suggesting a potential upside of 6.64%. Roku has a consensus target price of $404.8846, suggesting a potential upside of 7.53%. Given Roku's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Roku is more favorable than Charter Communications.

Profitability

This table compares Charter Communications and Roku's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Charter Communications has a beta of 1, suggesting that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Roku has a beta of 1.95, suggesting that its share price is 95% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Charter Communications beats Roku on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Liberty Broadband (NASDAQ:LBRDK) and Roku (NASDAQ:ROKU) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Liberty Broadband and Roku's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Liberty Broadband has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Roku. Roku is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Broadband, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

56.0% of Liberty Broadband shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.2% of Roku shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.8% of Liberty Broadband shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.7% of Roku shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Liberty Broadband and Roku, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Liberty Broadband currently has a consensus price target of $181.80, suggesting a potential upside of 17.01%. Roku has a consensus price target of $404.8846, suggesting a potential upside of 7.53%. Given Liberty Broadband's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Liberty Broadband is more favorable than Roku.

Profitability

This table compares Liberty Broadband and Roku's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Liberty Broadband has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Roku has a beta of 1.95, meaning that its share price is 95% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Liberty Broadband beats Roku on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Liberty Broadband (NASDAQ:LBRDA) and Roku (NASDAQ:ROKU) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Risk & Volatility

Liberty Broadband has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Roku has a beta of 1.95, meaning that its share price is 95% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

12.1% of Liberty Broadband shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.2% of Roku shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.3% of Liberty Broadband shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.7% of Roku shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Liberty Broadband and Roku's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Liberty Broadband has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Roku. Roku is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Broadband, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Liberty Broadband and Roku, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Liberty Broadband currently has a consensus price target of $185.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 23.25%. Roku has a consensus price target of $404.8846, suggesting a potential upside of 7.53%. Given Liberty Broadband's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Liberty Broadband is more favorable than Roku.

Profitability

This table compares Liberty Broadband and Roku's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Liberty Broadband beats Roku on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Roku (NASDAQ:ROKU) and Rogers Communications (NYSE:RCI) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Risk & Volatility

Roku has a beta of 1.95, indicating that its share price is 95% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Rogers Communications has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its share price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

64.2% of Roku shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.5% of Rogers Communications shares are held by institutional investors. 22.7% of Roku shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Roku and Rogers Communications' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Rogers Communications has higher revenue and earnings than Roku. Roku is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rogers Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Roku and Rogers Communications' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Roku and Rogers Communications, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Roku currently has a consensus target price of $404.8846, suggesting a potential upside of 7.53%. Rogers Communications has a consensus target price of $68.6250, suggesting a potential upside of 41.73%. Given Rogers Communications' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Rogers Communications is more favorable than Roku.

Summary

Rogers Communications beats Roku on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

DISH Network (NASDAQ:DISH) and Roku (NASDAQ:ROKU) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

DISH Network has a beta of 2, suggesting that its share price is 100% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Roku has a beta of 1.95, suggesting that its share price is 95% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for DISH Network and Roku, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

DISH Network currently has a consensus price target of $39.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 4.36%. Roku has a consensus price target of $404.8846, suggesting a potential upside of 7.53%. Given Roku's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Roku is more favorable than DISH Network.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares DISH Network and Roku's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

DISH Network has higher revenue and earnings than Roku. Roku is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DISH Network, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

42.5% of DISH Network shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.2% of Roku shares are held by institutional investors. 53.5% of DISH Network shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.7% of Roku shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares DISH Network and Roku's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

DISH Network beats Roku on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Roku (NASDAQ:ROKU) and Discovery (NASDAQ:DISCA) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

Roku has a beta of 1.95, suggesting that its stock price is 95% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Discovery has a beta of 1.53, suggesting that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Roku and Discovery, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Roku currently has a consensus price target of $404.8846, suggesting a potential upside of 7.53%. Discovery has a consensus price target of $39.05, suggesting a potential upside of 4.58%. Given Roku's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Roku is more favorable than Discovery.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Roku and Discovery's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Discovery has higher revenue and earnings than Roku. Roku is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Discovery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

64.2% of Roku shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.8% of Discovery shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.7% of Roku shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Discovery shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Roku and Discovery's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.