S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
Log in
NASDAQ:ZM

Zoom Video Communications Competitors

$337.43
-5.66 (-1.65 %)
(As of 03/5/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$314.38
Now: $337.43
$347.75
50-Day Range
$341.57
MA: $395.34
$444.51
52-Week Range
$100.88
Now: $337.43
$588.84
Volume8.26 million shs
Average Volume6.08 million shs
Market Capitalization$96.51 billion
P/E Ratio432.60
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta-1.46

Competitors

Zoom Video Communications (NASDAQ:ZM) Vs. BIDU, SNAP, TWTR, PINS, INFO, and TTD

Should you be buying ZM stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "computer programming, data processing, & other computer related" are considered alternatives and competitors to Zoom Video Communications, including Baidu (BIDU), Snap (SNAP), Twitter (TWTR), Pinterest (PINS), IHS Markit (INFO), and The Trade Desk (TTD).

Baidu (NASDAQ:BIDU) and Zoom Video Communications (NASDAQ:ZM) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Baidu and Zoom Video Communications, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Baidu041402.78
Zoom Video Communications2101402.46

Baidu presently has a consensus target price of $245.4706, suggesting a potential downside of 6.21%. Zoom Video Communications has a consensus target price of $436.9565, suggesting a potential upside of 29.50%. Given Zoom Video Communications' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Zoom Video Communications is more favorable than Baidu.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

49.4% of Baidu shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.0% of Zoom Video Communications shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.7% of Baidu shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 24.3% of Zoom Video Communications shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Baidu and Zoom Video Communications' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baidu$15.43 billion5.79$296 million$5.3648.83
Zoom Video Communications$622.66 million154.99$25.31 million$0.093,749.22

Baidu has higher revenue and earnings than Zoom Video Communications. Baidu is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zoom Video Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Baidu has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Zoom Video Communications has a beta of -1.46, suggesting that its stock price is 246% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Baidu and Zoom Video Communications' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Baidu22.66%10.78%6.14%
Zoom Video Communications17.10%27.93%14.44%

Summary

Baidu beats Zoom Video Communications on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Snap (NYSE:SNAP) and Zoom Video Communications (NASDAQ:ZM) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Snap and Zoom Video Communications, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Snap182802.73
Zoom Video Communications2101402.46

Snap presently has a consensus target price of $65.2059, suggesting a potential upside of 13.54%. Zoom Video Communications has a consensus target price of $436.9565, suggesting a potential upside of 29.50%. Given Zoom Video Communications' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Zoom Video Communications is more favorable than Snap.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

47.5% of Snap shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.0% of Zoom Video Communications shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.3% of Zoom Video Communications shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Snap and Zoom Video Communications' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Snap$1.72 billion50.49$-1,033,660,000.00($0.75)-76.57
Zoom Video Communications$622.66 million154.99$25.31 million$0.093,749.22

Zoom Video Communications has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Snap. Snap is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zoom Video Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Snap has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Zoom Video Communications has a beta of -1.46, suggesting that its stock price is 246% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Snap and Zoom Video Communications' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Snap-49.74%-48.53%-24.44%
Zoom Video Communications17.10%27.93%14.44%

Summary

Zoom Video Communications beats Snap on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Twitter (NYSE:TWTR) and Zoom Video Communications (NASDAQ:ZM) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Twitter and Zoom Video Communications, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Twitter1221502.37
Zoom Video Communications2101402.46

Twitter presently has a consensus target price of $61.3553, suggesting a potential downside of 8.36%. Zoom Video Communications has a consensus target price of $436.9565, suggesting a potential upside of 29.50%. Given Zoom Video Communications' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Zoom Video Communications is more favorable than Twitter.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

73.2% of Twitter shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.0% of Zoom Video Communications shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Twitter shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 24.3% of Zoom Video Communications shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Twitter and Zoom Video Communications' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Twitter$3.46 billion15.45$1.47 billion$1.9933.64
Zoom Video Communications$622.66 million154.99$25.31 million$0.093,749.22

Twitter has higher revenue and earnings than Zoom Video Communications. Twitter is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zoom Video Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Twitter has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Zoom Video Communications has a beta of -1.46, suggesting that its stock price is 246% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Twitter and Zoom Video Communications' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Twitter-31.70%-12.42%-7.89%
Zoom Video Communications17.10%27.93%14.44%

Summary

Zoom Video Communications beats Twitter on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Pinterest (NYSE:PINS) and Zoom Video Communications (NASDAQ:ZM) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Pinterest and Zoom Video Communications' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pinterest$1.14 billion37.48$-1,361,370,000.00($3.24)-21.03
Zoom Video Communications$622.66 million154.99$25.31 million$0.093,749.22

Zoom Video Communications has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pinterest. Pinterest is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zoom Video Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Pinterest and Zoom Video Communications' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Pinterest-26.81%-14.42%-12.19%
Zoom Video Communications17.10%27.93%14.44%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

58.2% of Pinterest shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.0% of Zoom Video Communications shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.3% of Zoom Video Communications shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Pinterest has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Zoom Video Communications has a beta of -1.46, suggesting that its stock price is 246% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Pinterest and Zoom Video Communications, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Pinterest092202.71
Zoom Video Communications2101402.46

Pinterest presently has a consensus target price of $75.85, suggesting a potential upside of 11.31%. Zoom Video Communications has a consensus target price of $436.9565, suggesting a potential upside of 29.50%. Given Zoom Video Communications' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Zoom Video Communications is more favorable than Pinterest.

Summary

Zoom Video Communications beats Pinterest on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

IHS Markit (NYSE:INFO) and Zoom Video Communications (NASDAQ:ZM) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares IHS Markit and Zoom Video Communications' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
IHS Markit$4.29 billion8.40$502.70 million$2.3239.14
Zoom Video Communications$622.66 million154.99$25.31 million$0.093,749.22

IHS Markit has higher revenue and earnings than Zoom Video Communications. IHS Markit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zoom Video Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares IHS Markit and Zoom Video Communications' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
IHS Markit20.31%11.03%5.71%
Zoom Video Communications17.10%27.93%14.44%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

93.8% of IHS Markit shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.0% of Zoom Video Communications shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of IHS Markit shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.3% of Zoom Video Communications shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

IHS Markit has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Zoom Video Communications has a beta of -1.46, meaning that its stock price is 246% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for IHS Markit and Zoom Video Communications, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
IHS Markit071002.59
Zoom Video Communications2101402.46

IHS Markit presently has a consensus price target of $83.00, suggesting a potential downside of 8.60%. Zoom Video Communications has a consensus price target of $436.9565, suggesting a potential upside of 29.50%. Given Zoom Video Communications' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Zoom Video Communications is more favorable than IHS Markit.

The Trade Desk (NASDAQ:TTD) and Zoom Video Communications (NASDAQ:ZM) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares The Trade Desk and Zoom Video Communications' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Trade Desk$661.06 million46.89$108.32 million$2.27288.18
Zoom Video Communications$622.66 million154.99$25.31 million$0.093,749.22

The Trade Desk has higher revenue and earnings than Zoom Video Communications. The Trade Desk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zoom Video Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares The Trade Desk and Zoom Video Communications' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Trade Desk19.31%19.65%7.56%
Zoom Video Communications17.10%27.93%14.44%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

66.4% of The Trade Desk shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.0% of Zoom Video Communications shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.0% of The Trade Desk shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.3% of Zoom Video Communications shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

The Trade Desk has a beta of 2.59, meaning that its stock price is 159% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Zoom Video Communications has a beta of -1.46, meaning that its stock price is 246% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for The Trade Desk and Zoom Video Communications, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Trade Desk07902.56
Zoom Video Communications2101402.46

The Trade Desk presently has a consensus price target of $773.5789, suggesting a potential upside of 18.25%. Zoom Video Communications has a consensus price target of $436.9565, suggesting a potential upside of 29.50%. Given Zoom Video Communications' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Zoom Video Communications is more favorable than The Trade Desk.

Ad Legacy Research
Man Gets Into a Tesla… What Happens Next Will Shock Everyone (Video)
"Hi, I'm Jeff Brown… I'm about to get in this Tesla and drive up to a location just a few miles from here to show you Elon Musk's next big project… What happens next will shock you…"

Zoom Video Communications Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Baidu logo
BIDU
Baidu
1.5$261.72-0.4%$89.27 billion$15.43 billion26.33
Snap logo
SNAP
Snap
1.4$57.43-0.5%$86.62 billion$1.72 billion-76.57Analyst Report
Twitter logo
TWTR
Twitter
1.3$66.95-0.3%$53.44 billion$3.46 billion-48.51Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Increase in Short Interest
Pinterest logo
PINS
Pinterest
1.4$68.14-1.0%$42.83 billion$1.14 billion-106.47Insider Selling
Gap Down
IHS Markit logo
INFO
IHS Markit
1.6$90.81-1.7%$36.01 billion$4.29 billion41.85Increase in Short Interest
The Trade Desk logo
TTD
The Trade Desk
1.8$654.17-2.1%$30.99 billion$661.06 million224.03Insider Selling
High Trading Volume
Yandex logo
YNDX
Yandex
1.6$63.63-1.4%$20.66 billion$2.83 billion187.15
Wix.com logo
WIX
Wix.com
1.6$308.73-1.5%$17.18 billion$761.09 million-119.66
GDS logo
GDS
GDS
1.3$90.00-1.3%$16.82 billion$592.15 million-173.08Upcoming Earnings
High Trading Volume
LINE logo
LN
LINE
0.4$51.98-0.0%$12.52 billion$2.12 billion-28.56
Weibo logo
WB
Weibo
1.4$53.98-4.1%$12.22 billion$1.77 billion25.11Upcoming Earnings
Unusual Options Activity
Gap Up
FactSet Research Systems logo
FDS
FactSet Research Systems
1.4$314.25-2.9%$11.93 billion$1.49 billion31.94Insider Selling
News Coverage
Gap Up
Dada Nexus logo
DADA
Dada Nexus
1.3$32.51-0.9%$7.59 billion$437.76 million-8.47Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
TripAdvisor logo
TRIP
TripAdvisor
1.3$51.50-0.4%$6.94 billion$1.56 billion-34.11Analyst Upgrade
Gap Down
Chindata Group logo
CD
Chindata Group
1.1$18.64-2.0%$6.70 billion$120.74 million0.00Gap Down
OCFT
OneConnect Financial Technology
1.6$16.84-3.3%$6.57 billion$330.51 million-70.17
HUYA logo
HUYA
HUYA
1.4$26.17-1.1%$5.71 billion$1.20 billion53.41
Medallia logo
MDLA
Medallia
1.6$31.80-18.9%$4.78 billion$402.46 million-33.13Earnings Announcement
Unusual Options Activity
News Coverage
Gap Down
Sabre logo
SABR
Sabre
1.3$15.05-1.7%$4.78 billion$3.97 billion-4.40Gap Down
DOYU
DouYu International
1.1$14.70-6.6%$4.67 billion$1.04 billion40.83Gap Up
Magnite logo
MGNI
Magnite
1.6$39.10-3.4%$4.52 billion$156.41 million-64.10Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
21Vianet Group logo
VNET
21Vianet Group
1.0$33.33-1.7%$4.50 billion$544.25 million-11.74Analyst Report
Rackspace Technology logo
RXT
Rackspace Technology
2.2$20.04-2.0%$4.12 billionN/A0.00Insider Selling
Cardlytics logo
CDLX
Cardlytics
1.1$128.06-1.6%$3.57 billion$210.43 million-76.23Earnings Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
High Trading Volume
Unusual Options Activity
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Down
Switch logo
SWCH
Switch
1.7$14.15-1.3%$3.40 billion$462.31 million108.85Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
High Trading Volume
Unusual Options Activity
Analyst Revision
Pluralsight logo
PS
Pluralsight
1.2$20.56-1.2%$3.00 billion$316.91 million-18.86Insider Selling
YALA
Yalla Group
0.2$19.63-4.5%$2.81 billionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
SVMK logo
SVMK
SVMK
1.6$17.66-0.9%$2.55 billion$307.42 million-25.23Analyst Downgrade
Eventbrite logo
EB
Eventbrite
1.1$22.74-0.6%$2.08 billion$326.80 million-9.02Earnings Announcement
High Trading Volume
Gap Down
Health Catalyst logo
HCAT
Health Catalyst
1.6$46.20-1.7%$2.03 billion$154.94 million-20.53Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Model N logo
MODN
Model N
1.2$43.00-4.1%$1.51 billion$161.06 million-104.88Gap Up
EverQuote logo
EVER
EverQuote
2.0$40.94-0.3%$1.14 billion$248.81 million-132.06Insider Selling
Decrease in Short Interest
GAN logo
GAN
GAN
1.0$25.14-3.1%$920.75 million$29.97 million0.00Decrease in Short Interest
HealthStream logo
HSTM
HealthStream
1.2$23.35-0.6%$735.39 million$254.11 million44.90Analyst Revision
QTT
Qutoutiao
0.5$2.46-15.0%$714.22 million$790.85 million-2.96Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Gap Down
Sify Technologies logo
SIFY
Sify Technologies
1.2$3.94-31.5%$706.14 million$326.31 million0.00Unusual Options Activity
News Coverage
Gap Up
Aurora Mobile logo
JG
Aurora Mobile
0.5$4.79-1.7%$554.56 million$130.21 million-22.81Gap Down
TrueCar logo
TRUE
TrueCar
1.2$4.95-4.6%$515.27 million$353.88 million-29.12Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
Gap Up
LIZI
Lizhi
1.3$7.27-9.2%$332.48 million$169.58 million-7.20Upcoming Earnings
ESSC
East Stone Acquisition
0.2$10.01-0.5%$177.17 millionN/A0.00
Alithya Group logo
ALYA
Alithya Group
0.6$2.16-0.0%$110.32 million$210.26 million-3.66Increase in Short Interest
Synacor logo
SYNC
Synacor
0.7$2.17-0.0%$86.03 million$121.85 million-7.23Upcoming Earnings
Increase in Short Interest
CNET
ZW Data Action Technologies
0.5$2.36-4.2%$61.51 million$58.08 million-13.88Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
PT
Pintec Technology
0.6$1.20-0.8%$51.69 million$184.61 million0.00Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Jianpu Technology logo
JT
Jianpu Technology
1.0$2.15-4.2%$45.40 million$234.18 million-0.90Gap Down
GIGM
GigaMedia
0.6$3.18-1.6%$35.15 million$6.64 million-31.80Increase in Short Interest
Professional Diversity Network logo
IPDN
Professional Diversity Network
0.4$2.53-0.4%$32.44 million$5.03 million0.00Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
MOXC
Moxian
0.3$1.99-8.5%$32.22 million$370,000.000.00Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Up
AutoWeb logo
AUTO
AutoWeb
1.5$2.42-2.9%$31.87 million$113.98 million-3.56Upcoming Earnings
OBLG
Oblong
1.1$3.70-2.7%$28.67 million$12.83 million0.00Gap Up
This page was last updated on 3/7/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.