Go Pro

RingCentral (RNG) Competitors

RingCentral logo
$36.96 +2.31 (+6.67%)
Closing price 06/26/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$37.12 +0.16 (+0.44%)
As of 06/26/2026 07:53 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

RNG vs. FIVN, ZM, GFL, TOST, and TRU

Should you buy RingCentral stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares RingCentral with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with RingCentral include Five9 (FIVN), Zoom Communications (ZM), GFL Environmental (GFL), Toast (TOST), and TransUnion (TRU).

How does RingCentral compare to Five9?

Five9 (NASDAQ:FIVN) and RingCentral (NYSE:RNG) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Five9 had 9 more articles in the media than RingCentral. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Five9 and 4 mentions for RingCentral. RingCentral's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Five9's score of 0.69 indicating that RingCentral is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Five9
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
RingCentral
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

96.6% of Five9 shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.6% of RingCentral shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Five9 shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of RingCentral shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

RingCentral has higher revenue and earnings than Five9. Five9 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RingCentral, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Five9$1.17B1.39$39.42M$0.6632.30
RingCentral$2.55B1.22$43.39M$0.9439.32

Five9 has a net margin of 4.87% compared to RingCentral's net margin of 3.31%. Five9's return on equity of 12.66% beat RingCentral's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Five94.87% 12.66% 5.52%
RingCentral 3.31%-33.75%12.40%

Five9 has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RingCentral has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Five9 presently has a consensus target price of $25.93, suggesting a potential upside of 21.62%. RingCentral has a consensus target price of $43.00, suggesting a potential upside of 16.34%. Given Five9's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Five9 is more favorable than RingCentral.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Five9
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
RingCentral
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Summary

Five9 and RingCentral tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does RingCentral compare to Zoom Communications?

Zoom Communications (NASDAQ:ZM) and RingCentral (NYSE:RNG) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Zoom Communications currently has a consensus price target of $109.33, suggesting a potential upside of 26.43%. RingCentral has a consensus price target of $43.00, suggesting a potential upside of 16.34%. Given Zoom Communications' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Zoom Communications is more favorable than RingCentral.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Zoom Communications
0 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
RingCentral
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Zoom Communications has higher revenue and earnings than RingCentral. Zoom Communications is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RingCentral, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zoom Communications$4.87B5.21$1.90B$6.8112.70
RingCentral$2.55B1.22$43.39M$0.9439.32

Zoom Communications has a net margin of 41.99% compared to RingCentral's net margin of 3.31%. Zoom Communications' return on equity of 11.87% beat RingCentral's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zoom Communications41.99% 11.87% 9.69%
RingCentral 3.31%-33.75%12.40%

66.5% of Zoom Communications shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.6% of RingCentral shares are held by institutional investors. 8.8% of Zoom Communications shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of RingCentral shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Zoom Communications had 15 more articles in the media than RingCentral. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Zoom Communications and 4 mentions for RingCentral. Zoom Communications' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat RingCentral's score of 0.79 indicating that Zoom Communications is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Zoom Communications
10 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
RingCentral
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Zoom Communications has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RingCentral has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Zoom Communications beats RingCentral on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does RingCentral compare to GFL Environmental?

GFL Environmental (NYSE:GFL) and RingCentral (NYSE:RNG) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

64.7% of GFL Environmental shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.6% of RingCentral shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.7% of GFL Environmental shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of RingCentral shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

RingCentral has a net margin of 3.31% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of 3.09%. GFL Environmental's return on equity of 4.53% beat RingCentral's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GFL Environmental3.09% 4.53% 1.78%
RingCentral 3.31%-33.75%12.40%

GFL Environmental pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. RingCentral pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. GFL Environmental pays out 21.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RingCentral pays out 31.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. GFL Environmental has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

GFL Environmental has higher revenue and earnings than RingCentral. RingCentral is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GFL Environmental, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GFL Environmental$4.73B2.83$2.74B$0.32116.84
RingCentral$2.55B1.22$43.39M$0.9439.32

In the previous week, GFL Environmental had 4 more articles in the media than RingCentral. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for GFL Environmental and 4 mentions for RingCentral. RingCentral's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat GFL Environmental's score of 0.54 indicating that RingCentral is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
GFL Environmental
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
RingCentral
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RingCentral has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

GFL Environmental currently has a consensus target price of $55.00, suggesting a potential upside of 47.10%. RingCentral has a consensus target price of $43.00, suggesting a potential upside of 16.34%. Given GFL Environmental's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe GFL Environmental is more favorable than RingCentral.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GFL Environmental
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
RingCentral
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Summary

GFL Environmental beats RingCentral on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does RingCentral compare to Toast?

Toast (NYSE:TOST) and RingCentral (NYSE:RNG) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Toast presently has a consensus price target of $37.62, suggesting a potential upside of 38.52%. RingCentral has a consensus price target of $43.00, suggesting a potential upside of 16.34%. Given Toast's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Toast is more favorable than RingCentral.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Toast
0 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78
RingCentral
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Toast has a net margin of 6.39% compared to RingCentral's net margin of 3.31%. Toast's return on equity of 20.86% beat RingCentral's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Toast6.39% 20.86% 13.84%
RingCentral 3.31%-33.75%12.40%

82.9% of Toast shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.6% of RingCentral shares are held by institutional investors. 10.0% of Toast shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of RingCentral shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Toast has higher revenue and earnings than RingCentral. RingCentral is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Toast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Toast$6.15B2.28$342M$0.6541.78
RingCentral$2.55B1.22$43.39M$0.9439.32

Toast has a beta of 1.76, suggesting that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RingCentral has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Toast and Toast both had 4 articles in the media. RingCentral's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Toast's score of 0.48 indicating that RingCentral is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Toast
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
RingCentral
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Toast beats RingCentral on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does RingCentral compare to TransUnion?

RingCentral (NYSE:RNG) and TransUnion (NYSE:TRU) are both business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

RingCentral presently has a consensus price target of $43.00, indicating a potential upside of 16.34%. TransUnion has a consensus price target of $91.47, indicating a potential upside of 29.89%. Given TransUnion's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe TransUnion is more favorable than RingCentral.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
RingCentral
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
TransUnion
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.64

TransUnion has a net margin of 14.91% compared to RingCentral's net margin of 3.31%. TransUnion's return on equity of 16.09% beat RingCentral's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RingCentral3.31% -33.75% 12.40%
TransUnion 14.91%16.09%6.62%

98.6% of RingCentral shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.3% of RingCentral shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of TransUnion shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TransUnion has higher revenue and earnings than RingCentral. TransUnion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RingCentral, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RingCentral$2.55B1.22$43.39M$0.9439.32
TransUnion$4.58B2.97$455.40M$3.6119.51

In the previous week, TransUnion had 7 more articles in the media than RingCentral. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for TransUnion and 4 mentions for RingCentral. TransUnion's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat RingCentral's score of 0.79 indicating that TransUnion is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
RingCentral
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
TransUnion
6 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

RingCentral has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TransUnion has a beta of 1.56, meaning that its share price is 56% more volatile than the broader market.

RingCentral pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. TransUnion pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. RingCentral pays out 31.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TransUnion pays out 13.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TransUnion has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

TransUnion beats RingCentral on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get RingCentral News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RNG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RNG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RNG vs. The Competition

MetricRingCentralInternet Software/Services IndustryComputer SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.12B$12.27B$37.74B$23.31B
Dividend Yield0.87%15.93%3.30%4.07%
P/E Ratio39.3228.98171.6231.64
Price / Sales1.2227.40622.6921.38
Price / Cash5.5116.2146.0224.80
Price / Book-5.363.279.504.74
Net Income$43.39M$492.46M$1.07B$1.07B
7 Day Performance5.52%0.18%-0.19%0.99%
1 Month Performance-11.95%-3.75%-1.82%0.46%
1 Year Performance32.63%5.54%155.52%25.30%

RingCentral Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RNG
RingCentral
4.2328 of 5 stars
$36.96
+6.7%
$43.00
+16.3%
+32.6%$3.12B$2.55B39.327,378
FIVN
Five9
4.8917 of 5 stars
$20.66
-2.7%
$25.93
+25.5%
-20.3%$1.63B$1.15B31.302,910
ZM
Zoom Communications
4.5675 of 5 stars
$94.25
+0.6%
$109.33
+16.0%
+10.3%$27.47B$4.87B13.847,438
GFL
GFL Environmental
4.452 of 5 stars
$35.99
+0.0%
$55.00
+52.8%
-24.8%$12.90B$4.73B112.4614,850
TOST
Toast
4.5973 of 5 stars
$25.07
+1.0%
$37.62
+50.0%
-38.1%$12.81B$6.15B38.586,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:RNG) was last updated on 6/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners