Go Pro

Fiverr International (FVRR) Competitors

Fiverr International logo
$11.13 0.00 (-0.04%)
Closing price 06/26/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$11.06 -0.07 (-0.64%)
As of 09:06 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FVRR vs. UPWK, FIVN, NEO, DXC, and PRSU

Should you buy Fiverr International stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Fiverr International with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Fiverr International include Upwork (UPWK), Five9 (FIVN), NeoGenomics (NEO), DXC Technology (DXC), and Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality (PRSU). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does Fiverr International compare to Upwork?

Upwork (NASDAQ:UPWK) and Fiverr International (NYSE:FVRR) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Upwork has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fiverr International has a beta of 1.41, indicating that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

77.7% of Upwork shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.0% of Fiverr International shares are held by institutional investors. 4.9% of Upwork shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of Fiverr International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Upwork has higher revenue and earnings than Fiverr International. Upwork is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fiverr International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Upwork$787.78M1.31$115.43M$0.8110.28
Fiverr International$429.22M0.93$20.98M$0.7814.26

In the previous week, Upwork had 8 more articles in the media than Fiverr International. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Upwork and 2 mentions for Fiverr International. Fiverr International's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Upwork's score of 0.15 indicating that Fiverr International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Upwork
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Fiverr International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Upwork presently has a consensus price target of $15.50, indicating a potential upside of 86.07%. Fiverr International has a consensus price target of $19.30, indicating a potential upside of 73.47%. Given Upwork's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Upwork is more favorable than Fiverr International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Upwork
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.23
Fiverr International
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.08

Upwork has a net margin of 13.81% compared to Fiverr International's net margin of 6.70%. Upwork's return on equity of 17.92% beat Fiverr International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Upwork13.81% 17.92% 8.54%
Fiverr International 6.70%17.22%7.71%

Summary

Upwork beats Fiverr International on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fiverr International compare to Five9?

Five9 (NASDAQ:FIVN) and Fiverr International (NYSE:FVRR) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

Five9 has higher revenue and earnings than Fiverr International. Fiverr International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Five9, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Five9$1.15B1.42$39.42M$0.6632.30
Fiverr International$429.22M0.93$20.98M$0.7814.26

Five9 presently has a consensus price target of $25.93, suggesting a potential upside of 21.62%. Fiverr International has a consensus price target of $19.30, suggesting a potential upside of 73.47%. Given Fiverr International's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Fiverr International is more favorable than Five9.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Five9
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Fiverr International
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.08

In the previous week, Five9 had 11 more articles in the media than Fiverr International. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Five9 and 2 mentions for Fiverr International. Five9's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Fiverr International's score of 0.25 indicating that Five9 is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Five9
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fiverr International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Five9 has a beta of 1.45, meaning that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fiverr International has a beta of 1.41, meaning that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

96.6% of Five9 shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.0% of Fiverr International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Five9 shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of Fiverr International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fiverr International has a net margin of 6.70% compared to Five9's net margin of 4.87%. Fiverr International's return on equity of 17.22% beat Five9's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Five94.87% 12.66% 5.52%
Fiverr International 6.70%17.22%7.71%

Summary

Five9 beats Fiverr International on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fiverr International compare to NeoGenomics?

NeoGenomics (NASDAQ:NEO) and Fiverr International (NYSE:FVRR) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

NeoGenomics presently has a consensus price target of $13.86, indicating a potential downside of 2.21%. Fiverr International has a consensus price target of $19.30, indicating a potential upside of 73.47%. Given Fiverr International's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fiverr International is more favorable than NeoGenomics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NeoGenomics
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42
Fiverr International
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.08

Fiverr International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NeoGenomics. NeoGenomics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fiverr International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NeoGenomics$727.33M2.54-$108.03M-$0.77N/A
Fiverr International$429.22M0.93$20.98M$0.7814.26

In the previous week, NeoGenomics had 4 more articles in the media than Fiverr International. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for NeoGenomics and 2 mentions for Fiverr International. NeoGenomics' average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Fiverr International's score of 0.25 indicating that NeoGenomics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NeoGenomics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Fiverr International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

NeoGenomics has a beta of 1.82, suggesting that its share price is 82% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fiverr International has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

98.5% of NeoGenomics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.0% of Fiverr International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of NeoGenomics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of Fiverr International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fiverr International has a net margin of 6.70% compared to NeoGenomics' net margin of -13.30%. Fiverr International's return on equity of 17.22% beat NeoGenomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NeoGenomics-13.30% -2.80% -1.72%
Fiverr International 6.70%17.22%7.71%

Summary

NeoGenomics and Fiverr International tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fiverr International compare to DXC Technology?

DXC Technology (NYSE:DXC) and Fiverr International (NYSE:FVRR) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Fiverr International has a net margin of 6.70% compared to DXC Technology's net margin of 0.14%. DXC Technology's return on equity of 17.24% beat Fiverr International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DXC Technology0.14% 17.24% 4.35%
Fiverr International 6.70%17.22%7.71%

DXC Technology currently has a consensus price target of $12.75, suggesting a potential upside of 44.95%. Fiverr International has a consensus price target of $19.30, suggesting a potential upside of 73.47%. Given Fiverr International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fiverr International is more favorable than DXC Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DXC Technology
4 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.60
Fiverr International
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.08

DXC Technology has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fiverr International has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, DXC Technology had 13 more articles in the media than Fiverr International. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for DXC Technology and 2 mentions for Fiverr International. DXC Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Fiverr International's score of 0.25 indicating that DXC Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
DXC Technology
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Fiverr International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Fiverr International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than DXC Technology. Fiverr International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DXC Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DXC Technology$12.64B0.11$18M$0.06146.60
Fiverr International$429.22M0.93$20.98M$0.7814.26

96.2% of DXC Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.0% of Fiverr International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of DXC Technology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of Fiverr International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Fiverr International beats DXC Technology on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fiverr International compare to Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality?

Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality (NYSE:PRSU) and Fiverr International (NYSE:FVRR) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

89.9% of Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.0% of Fiverr International shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.9% of Fiverr International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality has a beta of 1.41, meaning that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fiverr International has a beta of 1.41, meaning that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

Fiverr International has a net margin of 6.70% compared to Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality's net margin of 6.19%. Fiverr International's return on equity of 17.22% beat Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality6.19% 5.30% 3.54%
Fiverr International 6.70%17.22%7.71%

Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality has higher revenue and earnings than Fiverr International. Fiverr International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality$452.42M3.31$22.67M$0.9955.33
Fiverr International$429.22M0.93$20.98M$0.7814.26

Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality currently has a consensus target price of $47.00, suggesting a potential downside of 14.20%. Fiverr International has a consensus target price of $19.30, suggesting a potential upside of 73.47%. Given Fiverr International's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fiverr International is more favorable than Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Fiverr International
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.08

In the previous week, Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality and Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality both had 2 articles in the media. Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Fiverr International's score of 0.25 indicating that Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fiverr International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality beats Fiverr International on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fiverr International News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FVRR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FVRR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FVRR vs. The Competition

MetricFiverr InternationalINTERNET COMMERCE IndustryRetail SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$400.14M$67.07B$26.34B$23.30B
Dividend YieldN/A1.81%175.36%4.08%
P/E Ratio14.2617.2920.9731.64
Price / Sales0.9311.903.7621.03
Price / Cash4.4325.6915.1218.60
Price / Book0.976.146.234.75
Net Income$20.98M$2.48B$960.18M$1.07B
7 Day Performance11.20%1.81%2.40%1.36%
1 Month Performance1.21%-6.03%1.22%0.70%
1 Year Performance-61.54%-14.58%2.41%25.30%

Fiverr International Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FVRR
Fiverr International
3.8706 of 5 stars
$11.13
0.0%
$19.30
+73.5%
-61.5%$400.14M$429.22M14.26790
UPWK
Upwork
3.188 of 5 stars
$7.84
-2.6%
$15.50
+97.7%
-38.9%$994.32M$787.78M9.68850
FIVN
Five9
4.8888 of 5 stars
$18.82
-3.0%
$25.93
+37.8%
-20.3%$1.48B$1.15B28.522,910
NEO
NeoGenomics
1.385 of 5 stars
$11.20
+0.6%
$13.86
+23.7%
+97.4%$1.45B$727.33MN/A2,500
DXC
DXC Technology
4.3778 of 5 stars
$8.29
-3.7%
$12.75
+53.9%
-41.5%$1.41B$12.64B138.08115,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:FVRR) was last updated on 6/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners