Do analysts prefer WPP or GIB?

CGI Group has a consensus price target of $83.67, suggesting a potential upside of 23.41%. Given CGI Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CGI Group is more favorable than WPP. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score WPP 2 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 CGI Group 1 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.14

Which has higher valuation and earnings, WPP or GIB?

CGI Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than WPP. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio WPP $17.87B 0.23 -$283.52M N/A N/A CGI Group $11.38B 1.26 $1.19B $5.54 12.24

Is WPP or GIB more profitable?

CGI Group has a net margin of 10.26% compared to WPP's net margin of 0.00%. CGI Group's return on equity of 18.72% beat WPP's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets WPP N/A N/A N/A CGI Group 10.26% 18.72% 9.84%

Does the media refer more to WPP or GIB?

In the previous week, WPP had 3 more articles in the media than CGI Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for WPP and 2 mentions for CGI Group. WPP's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat CGI Group's score of 0.62 indicating that WPP is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment WPP 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive CGI Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer GFL or WPP?

GFL Environmental presently has a consensus price target of $54.78, indicating a potential upside of 39.84%. Given GFL Environmental's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe GFL Environmental is more favorable than WPP. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score GFL Environmental 2 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 12 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.63 WPP 2 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has better earnings & valuation, GFL or WPP?

GFL Environmental has higher earnings, but lower revenue than WPP. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio GFL Environmental $4.73B 2.97 $2.74B $0.32 122.41 WPP $17.87B 0.23 -$283.52M N/A N/A

Does the media favor GFL or WPP?

In the previous week, WPP had 3 more articles in the media than GFL Environmental. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for WPP and 2 mentions for GFL Environmental. WPP's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat GFL Environmental's score of 0.51 indicating that WPP is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment GFL Environmental 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive WPP 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend WPP or ICLR?

Icon has a consensus price target of $173.19, indicating a potential upside of 4.27%. Given Icon's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Icon is more favorable than WPP. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score WPP 2 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Icon 3 Sell rating(s) 6 Hold rating(s) 9 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, WPP or ICLR?

Icon has lower revenue, but higher earnings than WPP. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio WPP $17.87B 0.23 -$283.52M N/A N/A Icon $8.25B 1.54 $229.34M $5.62 29.56

Is WPP or ICLR more profitable?

Icon has a net margin of 5.35% compared to WPP's net margin of 0.00%. Icon's return on equity of 8.73% beat WPP's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets WPP N/A N/A N/A Icon 5.35% 8.73% 4.96%

Does the media refer more to WPP or ICLR?

In the previous week, Icon had 2 more articles in the media than WPP. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Icon and 5 mentions for WPP. WPP's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Icon's score of 0.49 indicating that WPP is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment WPP 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Icon 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer WPP or ALLE?

Allegion has a consensus price target of $160.89, indicating a potential upside of 17.77%. Given Allegion's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Allegion is more favorable than WPP. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score WPP 2 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Allegion 0 Sell rating(s) 9 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Which has better valuation & earnings, WPP or ALLE?

Allegion has lower revenue, but higher earnings than WPP. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio WPP $17.87B 0.23 -$283.52M N/A N/A Allegion $4.07B 2.89 $643.80M $7.32 18.66

Is WPP or ALLE more profitable?

Allegion has a net margin of 15.24% compared to WPP's net margin of 0.00%. Allegion's return on equity of 35.41% beat WPP's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets WPP N/A N/A N/A Allegion 15.24% 35.41% 13.53%

Does the media prefer WPP or ALLE?

In the previous week, Allegion had 5 more articles in the media than WPP. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Allegion and 5 mentions for WPP. Allegion's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat WPP's score of 0.68 indicating that Allegion is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment WPP 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Allegion 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer WPP or QXO?

QXO has a consensus target price of $30.57, indicating a potential upside of 120.75%. Given QXO's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe QXO is more favorable than WPP. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score WPP 2 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 QXO 2 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 15 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.76

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, WPP or QXO?

QXO has lower revenue, but higher earnings than WPP. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio WPP $17.87B 0.23 -$283.52M N/A N/A QXO $6.84B 1.47 -$279.40M -$0.91 N/A

Is WPP or QXO more profitable?

WPP has a net margin of 0.00% compared to QXO's net margin of -6.02%. QXO's return on equity of 1.91% beat WPP's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets WPP N/A N/A N/A QXO -6.02% 1.91% 1.02%

Does the media refer more to WPP or QXO?

In the previous week, QXO had 12 more articles in the media than WPP. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for QXO and 5 mentions for WPP. WPP's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat QXO's score of 0.44 indicating that WPP is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment WPP 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive QXO 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

WPP (WPP) Competitors

$18.88 +0.39 (+2.08%)

Closing price 07/13/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$18.77 -0.11 (-0.58%)

As of 07/13/2026 08:00 PM Eastern

Compare

WPP vs. GIB, GFL, ICLR, ALLE, and QXO

Should you buy WPP stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares WPP with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with WPP include CGI Group (GIB), GFL Environmental (GFL), Icon (ICLR), Allegion (ALLE), and QXO (QXO). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does WPP compare to CGI Group?

WPP (NYSE:WPP) and CGI Group (NYSE:GIB) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

CGI Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than WPP.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
WPP	$17.87B	0.23	-$283.52M	N/A	N/A
CGI Group	$11.38B	1.26	$1.19B	$5.54	12.24

WPP has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CGI Group has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

CGI Group has a consensus price target of $83.67, suggesting a potential upside of 23.41%. Given CGI Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CGI Group is more favorable than WPP.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
WPP	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
CGI Group	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.14

CGI Group has a net margin of 10.26% compared to WPP's net margin of 0.00%. CGI Group's return on equity of 18.72% beat WPP's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
WPP	N/A	N/A	N/A
CGI Group	10.26%	18.72%	9.84%

WPP pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. CGI Group pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. CGI Group pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, WPP had 3 more articles in the media than CGI Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for WPP and 2 mentions for CGI Group. WPP's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat CGI Group's score of 0.62 indicating that WPP is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
WPP	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
CGI Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

4.3% of WPP shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.7% of CGI Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of WPP shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of CGI Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CGI Group beats WPP on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WPP compare to GFL Environmental?

GFL Environmental (NYSE:GFL) and WPP (NYSE:WPP) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation, earnings and dividends.

In the previous week, WPP had 3 more articles in the media than GFL Environmental. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for WPP and 2 mentions for GFL Environmental. WPP's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat GFL Environmental's score of 0.51 indicating that WPP is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
GFL Environmental	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
WPP	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WPP has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

GFL Environmental pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. WPP pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. GFL Environmental pays out 21.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GFL Environmental has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

GFL Environmental presently has a consensus price target of $54.78, indicating a potential upside of 39.84%. Given GFL Environmental's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe GFL Environmental is more favorable than WPP.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
GFL Environmental	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
WPP	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

GFL Environmental has a net margin of 3.09% compared to WPP's net margin of 0.00%. GFL Environmental's return on equity of 4.53% beat WPP's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
GFL Environmental	3.09%	4.53%	1.78%
WPP	N/A	N/A	N/A

GFL Environmental has higher earnings, but lower revenue than WPP.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
GFL Environmental	$4.73B	2.97	$2.74B	$0.32	122.41
WPP	$17.87B	0.23	-$283.52M	N/A	N/A

64.7% of GFL Environmental shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of WPP shares are held by institutional investors. 8.7% of GFL Environmental shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of WPP shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

GFL Environmental beats WPP on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WPP compare to Icon?

WPP (NYSE:WPP) and Icon (NASDAQ:ICLR) are both business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Icon had 2 more articles in the media than WPP. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Icon and 5 mentions for WPP. WPP's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Icon's score of 0.49 indicating that WPP is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
WPP	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Icon	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

4.3% of WPP shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.6% of Icon shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of WPP shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.0% of Icon shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

WPP has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Icon has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Icon has a consensus price target of $173.19, indicating a potential upside of 4.27%. Given Icon's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Icon is more favorable than WPP.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
WPP	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Icon	3 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Icon has lower revenue, but higher earnings than WPP.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
WPP	$17.87B	0.23	-$283.52M	N/A	N/A
Icon	$8.25B	1.54	$229.34M	$5.62	29.56

Icon has a net margin of 5.35% compared to WPP's net margin of 0.00%. Icon's return on equity of 8.73% beat WPP's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
WPP	N/A	N/A	N/A
Icon	5.35%	8.73%	4.96%

Summary

Icon beats WPP on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WPP compare to Allegion?

WPP (NYSE:WPP) and Allegion (NYSE:ALLE) are both business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

WPP has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Allegion has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

Allegion has lower revenue, but higher earnings than WPP.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
WPP	$17.87B	0.23	-$283.52M	N/A	N/A
Allegion	$4.07B	2.89	$643.80M	$7.32	18.66

WPP pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Allegion pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Allegion pays out 30.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Allegion has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Allegion had 5 more articles in the media than WPP. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Allegion and 5 mentions for WPP. Allegion's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat WPP's score of 0.68 indicating that Allegion is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
WPP	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Allegion	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Allegion has a net margin of 15.24% compared to WPP's net margin of 0.00%. Allegion's return on equity of 35.41% beat WPP's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
WPP	N/A	N/A	N/A
Allegion	15.24%	35.41%	13.53%

4.3% of WPP shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of Allegion shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of WPP shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Allegion shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Allegion has a consensus price target of $160.89, indicating a potential upside of 17.77%. Given Allegion's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Allegion is more favorable than WPP.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
WPP	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Allegion	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Summary

Allegion beats WPP on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WPP compare to QXO?

WPP (NYSE:WPP) and QXO (NYSE:QXO) are both business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

QXO has lower revenue, but higher earnings than WPP.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
WPP	$17.87B	0.23	-$283.52M	N/A	N/A
QXO	$6.84B	1.47	-$279.40M	-$0.91	N/A

QXO has a consensus target price of $30.57, indicating a potential upside of 120.75%. Given QXO's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe QXO is more favorable than WPP.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
WPP	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
QXO	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76

WPP has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, QXO has a beta of 2.23, suggesting that its share price is 123% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, QXO had 12 more articles in the media than WPP. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for QXO and 5 mentions for WPP. WPP's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat QXO's score of 0.44 indicating that WPP is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
WPP	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
QXO	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

4.3% of WPP shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.7% of QXO shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of WPP shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 41.0% of QXO shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

WPP has a net margin of 0.00% compared to QXO's net margin of -6.02%. QXO's return on equity of 1.91% beat WPP's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
WPP	N/A	N/A	N/A
QXO	-6.02%	1.91%	1.02%

Summary

QXO beats WPP on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get WPP News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WPP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

WPP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	WPP	ADVERTISING/MKTG SVCS Industry	Business Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$3.99B	$2.17B	$6.90B	$23.46B
Dividend Yield	5.20%	3.83%	3.12%	4.02%
P/E Ratio	N/A	30.61	28.64	31.08
Price / Sales	0.23	84.03	344.87	19.77
Price / Cash	2.65	13.14	23.21	18.64
Price / Book	1.11	16.29	5.70	4.77
Net Income	-$283.52M	$17.67M	$203.89M	$1.06B
7 Day Performance	6.02%	-6.35%	-1.60%	-0.23%
1 Month Performance	-1.15%	-7.20%	-2.23%	-0.11%
1 Year Performance	-31.95%	202.45%	13.25%	16.46%

WPP Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
WPP WPP	2.0965 of 5 stars	$18.88 +2.1%	N/A	-32.6%	$3.99B	$17.87B	N/A	98,655
GIB CGI Group	3.9664 of 5 stars	$66.47 0.0%	$83.67 +25.9%	-32.6%	$14.06B	$11.38B	12.00	94,000
GFL GFL Environmental	4.5355 of 5 stars	$40.50 +8.1%	$54.78 +35.3%	-17.2%	$13.44B	$4.73B	55.12	14,850	High Trading Volume
ICLR Icon	3.0451 of 5 stars	$170.94 -1.2%	$173.19 +1.3%	+10.4%	$13.25B	$8.25B	30.42	40,100
ALLE Allegion	4.7403 of 5 stars	$140.29 -0.2%	$160.89 +14.7%	-8.2%	$12.08B	$4.07B	19.17	13,300	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:WPP) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

WPP (WPP) Competitors