PagerDuty Competitors

PagerDuty (NYSE:PD) and PTC (NASDAQ:PTC) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares PagerDuty and PTC's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

PTC has higher revenue and earnings than PagerDuty. PagerDuty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PTC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

83.2% of PagerDuty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.0% of PTC shares are held by institutional investors. 12.6% of PagerDuty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.0% of PTC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for PagerDuty and PTC, as reported by MarketBeat.

PagerDuty currently has a consensus price target of $41.70, suggesting a potential downside of 12.93%. PTC has a consensus price target of $113.2667, suggesting a potential downside of 12.55%. Given PTC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe PTC is more favorable than PagerDuty.

Volatility & Risk

PagerDuty has a beta of 1.43, indicating that its share price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PTC has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares PagerDuty and PTC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

PTC beats PagerDuty on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

PagerDuty (NYSE:PD) and Appian (NASDAQ:APPN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares PagerDuty and Appian's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

PagerDuty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Appian. Appian is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PagerDuty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

83.2% of PagerDuty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.3% of Appian shares are held by institutional investors. 12.6% of PagerDuty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 46.8% of Appian shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for PagerDuty and Appian, as reported by MarketBeat.

PagerDuty currently has a consensus price target of $41.70, suggesting a potential downside of 12.93%. Appian has a consensus price target of $71.7778, suggesting a potential downside of 66.55%. Given PagerDuty's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe PagerDuty is more favorable than Appian.

Volatility & Risk

PagerDuty has a beta of 1.43, indicating that its share price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Appian has a beta of 2, indicating that its share price is 100% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares PagerDuty and Appian's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

PagerDuty beats Appian on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

PagerDuty (NYSE:PD) and Ceridian HCM (NYSE:CDAY) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares PagerDuty and Ceridian HCM's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Ceridian HCM has higher revenue and earnings than PagerDuty. PagerDuty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ceridian HCM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

83.2% of PagerDuty shares are held by institutional investors. 12.6% of PagerDuty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.6% of Ceridian HCM shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for PagerDuty and Ceridian HCM, as reported by MarketBeat.

PagerDuty currently has a consensus price target of $41.70, suggesting a potential downside of 12.93%. Ceridian HCM has a consensus price target of $89.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 7.95%. Given Ceridian HCM's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ceridian HCM is more favorable than PagerDuty.

Volatility & Risk

PagerDuty has a beta of 1.43, indicating that its share price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ceridian HCM has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares PagerDuty and Ceridian HCM's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Ceridian HCM beats PagerDuty on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

PagerDuty (NYSE:PD) and Elastic (NYSE:ESTC) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares PagerDuty and Elastic's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

PagerDuty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Elastic. Elastic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PagerDuty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

83.2% of PagerDuty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.5% of Elastic shares are held by institutional investors. 12.6% of PagerDuty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.2% of Elastic shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for PagerDuty and Elastic, as reported by MarketBeat.

PagerDuty currently has a consensus price target of $41.70, suggesting a potential downside of 12.93%. Elastic has a consensus price target of $154.7222, suggesting a potential downside of 1.70%. Given Elastic's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Elastic is more favorable than PagerDuty.

Volatility & Risk

PagerDuty has a beta of 1.43, indicating that its share price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Elastic has a beta of 1.16, indicating that its share price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares PagerDuty and Elastic's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

PagerDuty (NYSE:PD) and Nuance Communications (NASDAQ:NUAN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

83.2% of PagerDuty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Nuance Communications shares are held by institutional investors. 12.6% of PagerDuty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Nuance Communications shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for PagerDuty and Nuance Communications, as reported by MarketBeat.

PagerDuty currently has a consensus price target of $41.70, suggesting a potential downside of 12.93%. Nuance Communications has a consensus price target of $49.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.53%. Given Nuance Communications' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Nuance Communications is more favorable than PagerDuty.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares PagerDuty and Nuance Communications' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Nuance Communications has higher revenue and earnings than PagerDuty. PagerDuty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nuance Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares PagerDuty and Nuance Communications' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

PagerDuty has a beta of 1.43, indicating that its share price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nuance Communications has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Nuance Communications beats PagerDuty on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Avalara (NYSE:AVLR) and PagerDuty (NYSE:PD) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

88.6% of Avalara shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.2% of PagerDuty shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of Avalara shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.6% of PagerDuty shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Avalara and PagerDuty, as provided by MarketBeat.

Avalara presently has a consensus target price of $171.0667, suggesting a potential upside of 13.11%. PagerDuty has a consensus target price of $41.70, suggesting a potential downside of 12.93%. Given Avalara's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Avalara is more favorable than PagerDuty.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Avalara and PagerDuty's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Avalara has higher revenue and earnings than PagerDuty. Avalara is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PagerDuty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Avalara and PagerDuty's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Avalara has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PagerDuty has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its share price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Avalara beats PagerDuty on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.