Go Pro

Precision Drilling (PDS) Competitors

Precision Drilling logo
$77.87 +0.14 (+0.18%)
Closing price 07/31/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$77.69 -0.18 (-0.23%)
As of 07/31/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PDS vs. FANG, PTEN, CNQ, CVE, and HAL

Should you buy Precision Drilling stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Precision Drilling with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Precision Drilling include Diamondback Energy (FANG), Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN), Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ), Cenovus Energy (CVE), and Halliburton (HAL). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Precision Drilling compare to Diamondback Energy?

Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) and Precision Drilling (NYSE:PDS) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.9% of Precision Drilling shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Precision Drilling shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Diamondback Energy currently has a consensus price target of $218.63, indicating a potential upside of 7.73%. Precision Drilling has a consensus price target of $122.33, indicating a potential upside of 57.10%. Given Precision Drilling's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Precision Drilling is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Diamondback Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Precision Drilling
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Precision Drilling. Precision Drilling is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diamondback Energy$15.03B3.80$1.66B$0.86235.99
Precision Drilling$1.32B0.76$1.32M-$2.09N/A

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 17 more articles in the media than Precision Drilling. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 10 mentions for Precision Drilling. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Precision Drilling's score of 0.41 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Diamondback Energy
19 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Precision Drilling
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 1.87% compared to Precision Drilling's net margin of -1.68%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 7.76% beat Precision Drilling's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Diamondback Energy1.87% 7.76% 4.67%
Precision Drilling -1.68%2.11%1.24%

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Precision Drilling has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats Precision Drilling on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Precision Drilling compare to Patterson-UTI Energy?

Precision Drilling (NYSE:PDS) and Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

Precision Drilling has a net margin of -1.68% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -1.92%. Precision Drilling's return on equity of 2.11% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Precision Drilling-1.68% 2.11% 1.24%
Patterson-UTI Energy -1.92%-1.68%-0.98%

Precision Drilling has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Precision Drilling has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Precision Drilling, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Precision Drilling$1.32B0.76$1.32M-$2.09N/A
Patterson-UTI Energy$4.83B0.82-$93.64M-$0.23N/A

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 21 more articles in the media than Precision Drilling. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 10 mentions for Precision Drilling. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Precision Drilling's score of 0.41 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Precision Drilling
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Patterson-UTI Energy
14 Very Positive mention(s)
9 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

48.9% of Precision Drilling shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Precision Drilling shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Precision Drilling currently has a consensus target price of $122.33, indicating a potential upside of 57.10%. Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus target price of $12.75, indicating a potential upside of 21.66%. Given Precision Drilling's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Precision Drilling is more favorable than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Precision Drilling
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Patterson-UTI Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Summary

Patterson-UTI Energy beats Precision Drilling on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Precision Drilling compare to Canadian Natural Resources?

Precision Drilling (NYSE:PDS) and Canadian Natural Resources (NYSE:CNQ) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, risk and valuation.

Canadian Natural Resources has a net margin of 22.04% compared to Precision Drilling's net margin of -1.68%. Canadian Natural Resources' return on equity of 17.49% beat Precision Drilling's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Precision Drilling-1.68% 2.11% 1.24%
Canadian Natural Resources 22.04%17.49%8.37%

Precision Drilling currently has a consensus target price of $122.33, indicating a potential upside of 57.10%. Canadian Natural Resources has a consensus target price of $57.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.57%. Given Precision Drilling's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Precision Drilling is more favorable than Canadian Natural Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Precision Drilling
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Canadian Natural Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73

48.9% of Precision Drilling shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.0% of Canadian Natural Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Precision Drilling shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.0% of Canadian Natural Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Canadian Natural Resources had 7 more articles in the media than Precision Drilling. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Canadian Natural Resources and 10 mentions for Precision Drilling. Canadian Natural Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Precision Drilling's score of 0.41 indicating that Canadian Natural Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Precision Drilling
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Canadian Natural Resources
14 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Canadian Natural Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Precision Drilling. Precision Drilling is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Canadian Natural Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Precision Drilling$1.32B0.76$1.32M-$2.09N/A
Canadian Natural Resources$31.61B3.12$7.74B$3.3514.23

Precision Drilling has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Canadian Natural Resources has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Canadian Natural Resources beats Precision Drilling on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Precision Drilling compare to Cenovus Energy?

Cenovus Energy (NYSE:CVE) and Precision Drilling (NYSE:PDS) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

51.2% of Cenovus Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.9% of Precision Drilling shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Precision Drilling shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Cenovus Energy had 20 more articles in the media than Precision Drilling. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Cenovus Energy and 10 mentions for Precision Drilling. Cenovus Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Precision Drilling's score of 0.41 indicating that Cenovus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cenovus Energy
21 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Precision Drilling
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Cenovus Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Precision Drilling. Precision Drilling is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cenovus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cenovus Energy$58.03B0.97$2.81B$2.6011.59
Precision Drilling$1.32B0.76$1.32M-$2.09N/A

Cenovus Energy presently has a consensus price target of $36.25, indicating a potential upside of 20.29%. Precision Drilling has a consensus price target of $122.33, indicating a potential upside of 57.10%. Given Precision Drilling's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Precision Drilling is more favorable than Cenovus Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cenovus Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87
Precision Drilling
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Cenovus Energy has a net margin of 12.37% compared to Precision Drilling's net margin of -1.68%. Cenovus Energy's return on equity of 21.08% beat Precision Drilling's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cenovus Energy12.37% 21.08% 10.80%
Precision Drilling -1.68%2.11%1.24%

Cenovus Energy has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Precision Drilling has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cenovus Energy beats Precision Drilling on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Precision Drilling compare to Halliburton?

Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) and Precision Drilling (NYSE:PDS) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Halliburton currently has a consensus target price of $43.10, indicating a potential upside of 33.76%. Precision Drilling has a consensus target price of $122.33, indicating a potential upside of 57.10%. Given Precision Drilling's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Precision Drilling is more favorable than Halliburton.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Halliburton
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.68
Precision Drilling
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than Precision Drilling. Precision Drilling is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Halliburton$22.37B1.20$1.28B$1.9116.87
Precision Drilling$1.32B0.76$1.32M-$2.09N/A

In the previous week, Halliburton had 34 more articles in the media than Precision Drilling. MarketBeat recorded 44 mentions for Halliburton and 10 mentions for Precision Drilling. Halliburton's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Precision Drilling's score of 0.41 indicating that Halliburton is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Halliburton
30 Very Positive mention(s)
8 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Precision Drilling
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

85.2% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.9% of Precision Drilling shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Halliburton shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Precision Drilling shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Halliburton has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Precision Drilling has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Halliburton has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Precision Drilling's net margin of -1.68%. Halliburton's return on equity of 18.71% beat Precision Drilling's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Halliburton7.16% 18.71% 7.89%
Precision Drilling -1.68%2.11%1.24%

Summary

Halliburton beats Precision Drilling on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Precision Drilling News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PDS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PDS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PDS vs. The Competition

MetricPrecision DrillingEnergy Equipment & Services IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.00B$3.52B$9.67B$23.66B
Dividend YieldN/A13.44%11.57%4.21%
P/E Ratio-37.2625.1917.0531.00
Price / Sales0.7631.58378.1281.85
Price / Cash3.6321.7835.9418.73
Price / Book0.892.123.974.76
Net Income$1.32M$68.04M$4.35B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-3.12%-0.25%0.86%-0.34%
1 Month Performance2.98%1.96%4.21%-0.53%
1 Year Performance43.80%45.20%35.98%19.19%

Precision Drilling Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PDS
Precision Drilling
4.0301 of 5 stars
$77.87
+0.2%
$122.33
+57.1%
+43.8%$1.00B$1.32BN/A5,245
FANG
Diamondback Energy
3.5142 of 5 stars
$199.27
+2.0%
$218.68
+9.7%
+38.9%$56.11B$15.03B231.951,762
PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy
4.1338 of 5 stars
$10.47
+3.6%
$12.15
+16.1%
+89.2%$3.98B$4.83BN/A7,900
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources
4.8005 of 5 stars
$44.65
+1.6%
$57.00
+27.7%
+53.8%$92.70B$31.61B13.3310,750
CVE
Cenovus Energy
4.1259 of 5 stars
$28.55
+1.0%
$35.25
+23.5%
+103.5%$53.17B$35.57B15.707,211

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:PDS) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners