Cenovus Energy (CVE) Competitors

$30.80 +0.65 (+2.15%)

Closing price 05/15/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$30.90 +0.10 (+0.31%)

As of 05/15/2026 07:58 PM Eastern

CVE vs. FANG, BTE, CNQ, DVN, and EOG

Should you buy Cenovus Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Cenovus Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Cenovus Energy include Diamondback Energy (FANG), Baytex Energy (BTE), Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ), Devon Energy (DVN), and EOG Resources (EOG). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Cenovus Energy compare to Diamondback Energy?

Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) and Cenovus Energy (NYSE:CVE) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

Cenovus Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. Cenovus Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Diamondback Energy	$15.03B	3.81	$1.66B	$0.86	236.70
Cenovus Energy	$35.57B	1.62	$2.81B	$1.82	16.92

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Cenovus Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Diamondback Energy pays out 511.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cenovus Energy pays out 32.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Cenovus Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Diamondback Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 21 more articles in the media than Cenovus Energy. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 4 mentions for Cenovus Energy. Cenovus Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Diamondback Energy's score of 0.94 indicating that Cenovus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Diamondback Energy	14 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cenovus Energy	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cenovus Energy has a beta of 0.37, meaning that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

Cenovus Energy has a net margin of 9.53% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 1.87%. Cenovus Energy's return on equity of 15.29% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Diamondback Energy	1.87%	7.76%	4.67%
Cenovus Energy	9.53%	15.29%	7.83%

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.2% of Cenovus Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Diamondback Energy presently has a consensus target price of $218.25, indicating a potential upside of 7.22%. Cenovus Energy has a consensus target price of $31.25, indicating a potential upside of 1.46%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than Cenovus Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Diamondback Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	5 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.04
Cenovus Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats Cenovus Energy on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cenovus Energy compare to Baytex Energy?

Baytex Energy (NYSE:BTE) and Cenovus Energy (NYSE:CVE) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Baytex Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Cenovus Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Baytex Energy pays out -10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cenovus Energy pays out 32.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cenovus Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Cenovus Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Cenovus Energy has a consensus target price of $31.25, indicating a potential upside of 1.46%. Given Cenovus Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cenovus Energy is more favorable than Baytex Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Baytex Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Cenovus Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Cenovus Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Baytex Energy. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Cenovus Energy and 3 mentions for Baytex Energy. Cenovus Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Baytex Energy's score of 0.93 indicating that Cenovus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Baytex Energy	0 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cenovus Energy	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cenovus Energy has a net margin of 9.53% compared to Baytex Energy's net margin of -24.25%. Cenovus Energy's return on equity of 15.29% beat Baytex Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Baytex Energy	-24.25%	-10.85%	-6.38%
Cenovus Energy	9.53%	15.29%	7.83%

Cenovus Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Baytex Energy. Baytex Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cenovus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Baytex Energy	$2.56B	1.48	-$432.12M	-$0.70	N/A
Cenovus Energy	$35.57B	1.62	$2.81B	$1.82	16.92

46.2% of Baytex Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.2% of Cenovus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Baytex Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Baytex Energy has a beta of 0.39, indicating that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cenovus Energy has a beta of 0.37, indicating that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cenovus Energy beats Baytex Energy on 17 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cenovus Energy compare to Canadian Natural Resources?

Cenovus Energy (NYSE:CVE) and Canadian Natural Resources (NYSE:CNQ) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Cenovus Energy presently has a consensus price target of $31.25, suggesting a potential upside of 1.46%. Canadian Natural Resources has a consensus price target of $57.00, suggesting a potential upside of 18.79%. Given Canadian Natural Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Canadian Natural Resources is more favorable than Cenovus Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cenovus Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Canadian Natural Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Cenovus Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Canadian Natural Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.83 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Cenovus Energy pays out 32.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Canadian Natural Resources pays out 54.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cenovus Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Canadian Natural Resources has raised its dividend for 24 consecutive years. Canadian Natural Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

51.2% of Cenovus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.0% of Canadian Natural Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.0% of Canadian Natural Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Canadian Natural Resources had 4 more articles in the media than Cenovus Energy. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Canadian Natural Resources and 4 mentions for Cenovus Energy. Cenovus Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Canadian Natural Resources' score of 0.83 indicating that Cenovus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cenovus Energy	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Canadian Natural Resources	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cenovus Energy has a beta of 0.37, indicating that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Canadian Natural Resources has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Canadian Natural Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cenovus Energy. Canadian Natural Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cenovus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cenovus Energy	$35.57B	1.62	$2.81B	$1.82	16.92
Canadian Natural Resources	$31.61B	3.16	$7.74B	$3.35	14.32

Canadian Natural Resources has a net margin of 22.04% compared to Cenovus Energy's net margin of 9.53%. Canadian Natural Resources' return on equity of 17.49% beat Cenovus Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cenovus Energy	9.53%	15.29%	7.83%
Canadian Natural Resources	22.04%	17.49%	8.37%

Summary

Canadian Natural Resources beats Cenovus Energy on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cenovus Energy compare to Devon Energy?

Devon Energy (NYSE:DVN) and Cenovus Energy (NYSE:CVE) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Cenovus Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Devon Energy. Devon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cenovus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Devon Energy	$17.19B	1.79	$2.64B	$3.59	13.80
Cenovus Energy	$35.57B	1.62	$2.81B	$1.82	16.92

Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Cenovus Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Devon Energy pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cenovus Energy pays out 32.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Devon Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Cenovus Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Devon Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 13.71% compared to Cenovus Energy's net margin of 9.53%. Cenovus Energy's return on equity of 15.29% beat Devon Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Devon Energy	13.71%	15.22%	7.39%
Cenovus Energy	9.53%	15.29%	7.83%

Devon Energy has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cenovus Energy has a beta of 0.37, meaning that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

69.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.2% of Cenovus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Devon Energy currently has a consensus price target of $56.41, suggesting a potential upside of 13.85%. Cenovus Energy has a consensus price target of $31.25, suggesting a potential upside of 1.46%. Given Devon Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than Cenovus Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Devon Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	4 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.94
Cenovus Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 23 more articles in the media than Cenovus Energy. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Devon Energy and 4 mentions for Cenovus Energy. Cenovus Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Devon Energy's score of 0.83 indicating that Cenovus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Devon Energy	14 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cenovus Energy	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Devon Energy beats Cenovus Energy on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cenovus Energy compare to EOG Resources?

EOG Resources (NYSE:EOG) and Cenovus Energy (NYSE:CVE) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

89.9% of EOG Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.2% of Cenovus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of EOG Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, EOG Resources had 24 more articles in the media than Cenovus Energy. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for EOG Resources and 4 mentions for Cenovus Energy. EOG Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Cenovus Energy's score of 1.14 indicating that EOG Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
EOG Resources	17 Very Positive mention(s)	6 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cenovus Energy	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

EOG Resources currently has a consensus price target of $154.21, indicating a potential upside of 9.92%. Cenovus Energy has a consensus price target of $31.25, indicating a potential upside of 1.46%. Given EOG Resources' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe EOG Resources is more favorable than Cenovus Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
EOG Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	16 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55
Cenovus Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

EOG Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cenovus Energy. EOG Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cenovus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
EOG Resources	$23.50B	3.18	$4.98B	$10.16	13.81
Cenovus Energy	$35.57B	1.62	$2.81B	$1.82	16.92

EOG Resources pays an annual dividend of $4.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Cenovus Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. EOG Resources pays out 40.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cenovus Energy pays out 32.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. EOG Resources has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Cenovus Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. EOG Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

EOG Resources has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cenovus Energy has a beta of 0.37, indicating that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

EOG Resources has a net margin of 23.01% compared to Cenovus Energy's net margin of 9.53%. EOG Resources' return on equity of 19.25% beat Cenovus Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
EOG Resources	23.01%	19.25%	11.37%
Cenovus Energy	9.53%	15.29%	7.83%

Summary

EOG Resources beats Cenovus Energy on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cenovus Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CVE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CVE vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Cenovus Energy	OIL Industry	Energy Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$57.78B	$51.80B	$10.85B	$22.74B
Dividend Yield	1.90%	3.19%	10.20%	4.12%
P/E Ratio	16.92	24.87	21.66	29.73
Price / Sales	1.62	1.38	1,042.75	23.27
Price / Cash	8.89	11.03	38.02	24.79
Price / Book	2.43	3.66	4.40	4.60
Net Income	$2.81B	$2.38B	$4.25B	$1.06B
7 Day Performance	8.47%	5.56%	2.34%	-2.27%
1 Month Performance	25.74%	13.31%	6.31%	-1.66%
1 Year Performance	124.56%	82.95%	54.78%	21.94%

Cenovus Energy Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CVE Cenovus Energy	3.7697 of 5 stars	$30.80 +2.2%	$31.25 +1.5%	+124.6%	$57.78B	$35.57B	16.92	7,211	Positive News Analyst Forecast
FANG Diamondback Energy	3.1306 of 5 stars	$196.15 +3.9%	$218.25 +11.3%	+44.2%	$53.08B	$15.03B	228.08	1,762	Insider Trade Analyst Revision
BTE Baytex Energy	2.3941 of 5 stars	$4.81 -0.5%	N/A	+202.9%	$3.53B	$2.56B	N/A	231	Gap Up
CNQ Canadian Natural Resources	4.8758 of 5 stars	$45.16 +1.4%	$57.00 +26.2%	+56.4%	$92.89B	$31.61B	13.48	10,750	Short Interest Decrease
DVN Devon Energy	4.5288 of 5 stars	$46.71 +2.4%	$55.59 +19.0%	+49.0%	$28.34B	$17.19B	13.01	2,200	Positive News Analyst Forecast Insider Trade Analyst Revision

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:CVE) was last updated on 5/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Cenovus Energy (CVE) Competitors

CVE vs. FANG, BTE, CNQ, DVN, and EOG

How does Cenovus Energy compare to Diamondback Energy?

Summary

How does Cenovus Energy compare to Baytex Energy?

Summary

How does Cenovus Energy compare to Canadian Natural Resources?

Summary

How does Cenovus Energy compare to Devon Energy?

Summary

How does Cenovus Energy compare to EOG Resources?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CVE vs. The Competition

Cenovus Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Cenovus Energy (CVE) Competitors

CVE vs. FANG, BTE, CNQ, DVN, and EOG

How does Cenovus Energy compare to Diamondback Energy?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, FANG or CVE?

Is FANG or CVE a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer FANG or CVE?

Which has more risk & volatility, FANG or CVE?

Is FANG or CVE more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in FANG or CVE?

Do analysts recommend FANG or CVE?

Summary

How does Cenovus Energy compare to Baytex Energy?

Is BTE or CVE a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend BTE or CVE?

Does the media prefer BTE or CVE?

Is BTE or CVE more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, BTE or CVE?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in BTE or CVE?

Which has more risk & volatility, BTE or CVE?

Summary

How does Cenovus Energy compare to Canadian Natural Resources?

Do analysts rate CVE or CNQ?

Is CVE or CNQ a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in CVE or CNQ?

Does the media prefer CVE or CNQ?

Which has more risk and volatility, CVE or CNQ?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, CVE or CNQ?

Is CVE or CNQ more profitable?

Summary

How does Cenovus Energy compare to Devon Energy?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, DVN or CVE?

Is DVN or CVE a better dividend stock?

Is DVN or CVE more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, DVN or CVE?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in DVN or CVE?

Do analysts prefer DVN or CVE?

Does the media refer more to DVN or CVE?

Summary

How does Cenovus Energy compare to EOG Resources?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in EOG or CVE?

Does the media favor EOG or CVE?

Do analysts rate EOG or CVE?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, EOG or CVE?

Is EOG or CVE a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, EOG or CVE?

Is EOG or CVE more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CVE vs. The Competition

Cenovus Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools