Log in
NASDAQ:FANG

Diamondback Energy Competitors

$27.71
-0.74 (-2.60 %)
(As of 10/21/2020 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$27.51
Now: $27.71
$28.44
50-Day Range
$28.04
MA: $31.44
$38.48
52-Week Range
$14.55
Now: $27.71
$96.92
Volume3.02 million shs
Average Volume3.37 million shs
Market Capitalization$4.37 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield5.27%
Beta2.25

Competitors

Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) Vs. COP, EOG, PXD, CXO, COG, and CLR

Should you be buying FANG stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "oil & gas exploration & production" are considered alternatives and competitors to Diamondback Energy, including ConocoPhillips (COP), EOG Resources (EOG), Pioneer Natural Resources (PXD), Concho Resources (CXO), Cabot Oil & Gas (COG), and Continental Resources (CLR).

Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) and ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Diamondback Energy and ConocoPhillips' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Diamondback Energy-81.81%5.66%3.52%
ConocoPhillips8.49%3.72%1.84%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

92.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.0% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Diamondback Energy pays out 21.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ConocoPhillips pays out 47.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and ConocoPhillips has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. ConocoPhillips is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Risk & Volatility

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 2.25, suggesting that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.68, suggesting that its share price is 68% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Diamondback Energy and ConocoPhillips, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Diamondback Energy052202.81
ConocoPhillips041912.88

Diamondback Energy presently has a consensus target price of $59.3889, suggesting a potential upside of 114.32%. ConocoPhillips has a consensus target price of $53.8261, suggesting a potential upside of 75.67%. Given Diamondback Energy's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than ConocoPhillips.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Diamondback Energy and ConocoPhillips' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diamondback Energy$3.96 billion1.10$240 million$6.934.00
ConocoPhillips$36.67 billion0.90$7.19 billion$3.598.53

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. Diamondback Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) and EOG Resources (NYSE:EOG) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Diamondback Energy and EOG Resources' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diamondback Energy$3.96 billion1.10$240 million$6.934.00
EOG Resources$17.38 billion1.18$2.73 billion$4.987.05

EOG Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. Diamondback Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EOG Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Diamondback Energy and EOG Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Diamondback Energy052202.81
EOG Resources0121302.52

Diamondback Energy presently has a consensus target price of $59.3889, suggesting a potential upside of 114.32%. EOG Resources has a consensus target price of $63.5652, suggesting a potential upside of 80.99%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than EOG Resources.

Profitability

This table compares Diamondback Energy and EOG Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Diamondback Energy-81.81%5.66%3.52%
EOG Resources2.44%7.70%4.44%

Dividends

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. EOG Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Diamondback Energy pays out 21.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. EOG Resources pays out 30.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and EOG Resources has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Diamondback Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Risk & Volatility

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 2.25, suggesting that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EOG Resources has a beta of 2, suggesting that its share price is 100% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

92.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.7% of EOG Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of EOG Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats EOG Resources on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Pioneer Natural Resources (NYSE:PXD) and Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Pioneer Natural Resources and Diamondback Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pioneer Natural Resources$9.30 billion1.38$756 million$8.189.59
Diamondback Energy$3.96 billion1.10$240 million$6.934.00

Pioneer Natural Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. Diamondback Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pioneer Natural Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Pioneer Natural Resources and Diamondback Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Pioneer Natural Resources041812.87
Diamondback Energy052202.81

Pioneer Natural Resources presently has a consensus target price of $126.8571, suggesting a potential upside of 61.73%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus target price of $59.3889, suggesting a potential upside of 114.32%. Given Diamondback Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than Pioneer Natural Resources.

Profitability

This table compares Pioneer Natural Resources and Diamondback Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Pioneer Natural Resources5.26%7.20%4.66%
Diamondback Energy-81.81%5.66%3.52%

Dividends

Pioneer Natural Resources pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Pioneer Natural Resources pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 21.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Pioneer Natural Resources has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Diamondback Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Volatility & Risk

Pioneer Natural Resources has a beta of 1.84, indicating that its share price is 84% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 2.25, indicating that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

90.1% of Pioneer Natural Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Pioneer Natural Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Pioneer Natural Resources beats Diamondback Energy on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Concho Resources (NYSE:CXO) and Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) are both mid-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Concho Resources and Diamondback Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Concho Resources$4.59 billion1.90$-705,000,000.00$3.0514.52
Diamondback Energy$3.96 billion1.10$240 million$6.934.00

Diamondback Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Concho Resources. Diamondback Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Concho Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Concho Resources and Diamondback Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Concho Resources041902.83
Diamondback Energy052202.81

Concho Resources presently has a consensus target price of $75.8696, suggesting a potential upside of 71.34%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus target price of $59.3889, suggesting a potential upside of 114.32%. Given Diamondback Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than Concho Resources.

Profitability

This table compares Concho Resources and Diamondback Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Concho Resources-256.19%5.27%3.59%
Diamondback Energy-81.81%5.66%3.52%

Dividends

Concho Resources pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Concho Resources pays out 26.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 21.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Concho Resources has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Diamondback Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Volatility & Risk

Concho Resources has a beta of 1.87, indicating that its share price is 87% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 2.25, indicating that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

90.6% of Concho Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Concho Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats Concho Resources on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cabot Oil & Gas (NYSE:COG) and Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) are both mid-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Cabot Oil & Gas and Diamondback Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cabot Oil & Gas$2.07 billion3.70$681.07 million$1.6211.84
Diamondback Energy$3.96 billion1.10$240 million$6.934.00

Cabot Oil & Gas has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Diamondback Energy. Diamondback Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cabot Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Cabot Oil & Gas and Diamondback Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Cabot Oil & Gas28802.33
Diamondback Energy052202.81

Cabot Oil & Gas presently has a consensus target price of $20.5882, suggesting a potential upside of 7.34%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus target price of $59.3889, suggesting a potential upside of 114.32%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than Cabot Oil & Gas.

Profitability

This table compares Cabot Oil & Gas and Diamondback Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Cabot Oil & Gas19.98%12.85%6.22%
Diamondback Energy-81.81%5.66%3.52%

Dividends

Cabot Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Cabot Oil & Gas pays out 24.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 21.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cabot Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Diamondback Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Volatility & Risk

Cabot Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.22, indicating that its share price is 78% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 2.25, indicating that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

93.2% of Cabot Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Cabot Oil & Gas shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Cabot Oil & Gas beats Diamondback Energy on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Continental Resources (NYSE:CLR) and Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) are both mid-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

16.7% of Continental Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 79.6% of Continental Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Continental Resources and Diamondback Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Continental Resources-2.17%1.75%0.77%
Diamondback Energy-81.81%5.66%3.52%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Continental Resources and Diamondback Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Continental Resources$4.63 billion1.03$775.64 million$2.255.82
Diamondback Energy$3.96 billion1.10$240 million$6.934.00

Continental Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. Diamondback Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Continental Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Continental Resources has a beta of 3.48, indicating that its share price is 248% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 2.25, indicating that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Continental Resources and Diamondback Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Continental Resources616301.88
Diamondback Energy052202.81

Continental Resources presently has a consensus target price of $17.0714, suggesting a potential upside of 30.42%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus target price of $59.3889, suggesting a potential upside of 114.32%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than Continental Resources.

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats Continental Resources on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Diamondback Energy Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
ConocoPhillips logo
COP
ConocoPhillips
2.6$30.64-6.3%$32.86 billion$36.67 billion15.09Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
Increase in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
EOG Resources logo
EOG
EOG Resources
2.8$35.12-3.3%$20.45 billion$17.38 billion57.57Analyst Downgrade
Increase in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
Heavy News Reporting
Pioneer Natural Resources logo
PXD
Pioneer Natural Resources
2.6$78.44-6.5%$12.89 billion$9.30 billion31.13Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
Analyst Revision
Heavy News Reporting
Concho Resources logo
CXO
Concho Resources
2.4$44.28-6.4%$8.71 billion$4.59 billion-0.90Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Downgrade
High Trading Volume
Analyst Revision
Heavy News Reporting
Cabot Oil & Gas logo
COG
Cabot Oil & Gas
1.8$19.18-0.5%$7.64 billion$2.07 billion23.98Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Revision
Continental Resources logo
CLR
Continental Resources
2.4$13.09-2.1%$4.78 billion$4.63 billion-62.33Increase in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
Noble Energy logo
NBL
Noble Energy
2.3$8.46-0.0%$4.06 billion$4.99 billion9.40
EQT logo
EQT
EQT
1.5$14.83-1.3%$3.79 billion$4.42 billion-1.93Analyst Revision
Apache logo
APA
Apache
1.7$9.10-5.6%$3.43 billion$6.41 billion-0.43Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Heavy News Reporting
Devon Energy logo
DVN
Devon Energy
2.6$8.63-3.9%$3.30 billion$6.22 billion-1.07Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Marathon Oil logo
MRO
Marathon Oil
1.8$4.10-1.2%$3.24 billion$5.19 billion-4.94Analyst Report
Cimarex Energy logo
XEC
Cimarex Energy
2.7$27.10-1.1%$2.61 billion$2.36 billion-1.32Analyst Upgrade
Unusual Options Activity
Analyst Revision
Heavy News Reporting
WPX Energy logo
WPX
WPX Energy
1.7$4.40-3.6%$2.56 billion$2.29 billion-2.78Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
Range Resources logo
RRC
Range Resources
1.1$8.66-0.3%$2.22 billion$2.83 billion-1.17Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
Heavy News Reporting
Southwestern Energy logo
SWN
Southwestern Energy
1.5$2.87-0.3%$1.74 billion$3.04 billion-0.68Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Heavy News Reporting
Whiting Petroleum logo
WLL
Whiting Petroleum
1.9$15.67-2.8%$1.54 billionN/A0.00
Comstock Resources logo
CRK
Comstock Resources
1.7$5.79-4.1%$1.35 billion$768.69 million144.75Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
Heavy News Reporting
PDC Energy logo
PDCE
PDC Energy
2.3$12.71-0.4%$1.27 billion$1.16 billion-1.75Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Matador Resources logo
MTDR
Matador Resources
2.8$8.39-2.1%$980.29 million$983.67 million-6.12Upcoming Earnings
Unusual Options Activity
Kosmos Energy logo
KOS
Kosmos Energy
1.6$1.14-0.0%$462.17 million$1.51 billion-1.15Analyst Revision
Bonanza Creek Energy logo
BCEI
Bonanza Creek Energy
1.7$19.54-2.1%$407.10 million$313.22 million5.54Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
W&T Offshore logo
WTI
W&T Offshore
1.5$1.64-1.2%$240.84 million$534.90 million1.61
Berry Petroleum logo
BRY
Berry Petroleum
1.4$2.99-2.7%$238.81 million$559.41 million-1.76Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
Heavy News Reporting
QEP Resources logo
QEP
QEP Resources
2.0$0.89-3.4%$215.28 million$1.21 billion1.35Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
Heavy News Reporting
Callon Petroleum logo
CPE
Callon Petroleum
2.0$4.66-1.5%$185.23 million$671.57 million-0.14Analyst Report
SM Energy logo
SM
SM Energy
1.4$1.48-2.7%$169.40 million$1.59 billion-0.30Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Laredo Petroleum logo
LPI
Laredo Petroleum
1.4$8.51-3.6%$102.09 million$837.28 million-0.12Analyst Report
SandRidge Energy logo
SD
SandRidge Energy
0.7$1.70-3.5%$60.89 million$266.85 million-0.09Increase in Short Interest
SilverBow Resources logo
SBOW
SilverBow Resources
1.8$4.82-0.4%$57.56 million$288.63 million-0.21Heavy News Reporting
VAALCO Energy logo
EGY
VAALCO Energy
0.8$0.98-1.0%$56.03 million$84.52 million-1.03
Oasis Petroleum logo
OAS
Oasis Petroleum
1.6$0.13-7.7%$41.89 million$2.32 billion0.50
Gulfport Energy logo
GPOR
Gulfport Energy
1.5$0.25-4.0%$40.19 million$1.35 billion-0.01Upcoming Earnings
High Trading Volume
Analyst Revision
Heavy News Reporting
PHX
Panhandle Oil and Gas
2.4$1.57-1.9%$25.77 million$66.04 million-0.34
Abraxas Petroleum logo
AXAS
Abraxas Petroleum
0.8$1.85-5.4%$15.55 million$129.15 million1.81Analyst Downgrade
Increase in Short Interest
Approach Resources logo
AREX
Approach Resources
0.9$0.01-0.0%$1.08 million$114.04 million-0.04
This page was last updated on 10/22/2020 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.