Diamondback Energy (FANG) Competitors

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Viper Energy. Diamondback Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Viper Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Viper Energy has a beta of 0.4, meaning that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Viper Energy presently has a consensus price target of $57.07, indicating a potential upside of 34.69%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $222.30, indicating a potential upside of 11.73%. Given Viper Energy's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Viper Energy is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 14 more articles in the media than Viper Energy. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 20 mentions for Viper Energy. Viper Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Diamondback Energy's score of 0.92 indicating that Viper Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Viper Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Viper Energy pays out 1,169.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years.

87.7% of Viper Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Viper Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 8.58% compared to Viper Energy's net margin of 2.89%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 10.10% beat Viper Energy's return on equity.

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 8.58%. ConocoPhillips' return on equity of 14.72% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.11, suggesting that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the broader market.

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. ConocoPhillips pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. ConocoPhillips is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Diamondback Energy presently has a consensus price target of $222.30, suggesting a potential upside of 11.73%. ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $137.04, suggesting a potential upside of 11.52%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than ConocoPhillips.

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 24 more articles in the media than Diamondback Energy. MarketBeat recorded 58 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 34 mentions for Diamondback Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 0.91 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. ConocoPhillips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 16.67% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 8.58%. Devon Energy's return on equity of 14.93% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Devon Energy pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Devon Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Devon Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 15 more articles in the media than Diamondback Energy. MarketBeat recorded 49 mentions for Devon Energy and 34 mentions for Diamondback Energy. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Diamondback Energy's score of 0.92 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Devon Energy has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. Devon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of Devon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Diamondback Energy presently has a consensus price target of $222.30, indicating a potential upside of 11.73%. Devon Energy has a consensus price target of $59.72, indicating a potential upside of 31.72%. Given Devon Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 8 more articles in the media than EOG Resources. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 26 mentions for EOG Resources. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat EOG Resources' score of 0.92 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

EOG Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. EOG Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. EOG Resources pays an annual dividend of $4.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. EOG Resources pays out 31.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years and EOG Resources has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. EOG Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Diamondback Energy presently has a consensus price target of $222.30, indicating a potential upside of 11.73%. EOG Resources has a consensus price target of $156.32, indicating a potential upside of 10.05%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than EOG Resources.

EOG Resources has a net margin of 25.44% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 8.58%. EOG Resources' return on equity of 23.44% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.9% of EOG Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of EOG Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EOG Resources has a beta of 0.25, suggesting that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.