Free Trial

Diamondback Energy (FANG) Competitors

Diamondback Energy logo
$191.61 -2.53 (-1.30%)
As of 02:53 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FANG vs. CHRD, VNOM, COP, DVN, and EOG

Should you buy Diamondback Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Diamondback Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Diamondback Energy include Chord Energy (CHRD), Viper Energy (VNOM), ConocoPhillips (COP), Devon Energy (DVN), and EOG Resources (EOG). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Diamondback Energy compare to Chord Energy?

Chord Energy (NASDAQ:CHRD) and Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 1.87% compared to Chord Energy's net margin of -1.25%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 7.76% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chord Energy-1.25% 7.06% 4.39%
Diamondback Energy 1.87%7.76%4.67%

Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Chord Energy pays out -460.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 511.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chord Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Chord Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 12 more articles in the media than Chord Energy. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 9 mentions for Chord Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Chord Energy's score of 1.25 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chord Energy
4 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Diamondback Energy
16 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Chord Energy has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Chord Energy presently has a consensus target price of $157.54, suggesting a potential upside of 20.48%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus target price of $223.26, suggesting a potential upside of 16.52%. Given Chord Energy's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Chord Energy is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chord Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Diamondback Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
5 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.04

97.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Chord Energy. Chord Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chord Energy$4.88B1.51$44.46M-$1.13N/A
Diamondback Energy$15.03B3.59$1.66B$0.86222.80

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats Chord Energy on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Diamondback Energy compare to Viper Energy?

Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) and Viper Energy (NASDAQ:VNOM) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Viper Energy. Viper Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diamondback Energy$15.03B3.59$1.66B$0.86222.80
Viper Energy$1.40B11.63-$68M-$0.32N/A

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 1.87% compared to Viper Energy's net margin of -2.77%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 7.76% beat Viper Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Diamondback Energy1.87% 7.76% 4.67%
Viper Energy -2.77%2.64%2.21%

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 5 more articles in the media than Viper Energy. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 16 mentions for Viper Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Viper Energy's score of 0.83 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Diamondback Energy
16 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Viper Energy
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Viper Energy has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Viper Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Diamondback Energy pays out 511.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Viper Energy pays out -475.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Viper Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Diamondback Energy presently has a consensus price target of $223.26, indicating a potential upside of 16.52%. Viper Energy has a consensus price target of $57.86, indicating a potential upside of 27.99%. Given Viper Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Viper Energy is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Diamondback Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
5 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.04
Viper Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.06

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.7% of Viper Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Viper Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats Viper Energy on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Diamondback Energy compare to ConocoPhillips?

ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) and Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. ConocoPhillips pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 511.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. ConocoPhillips is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.14, indicating that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. ConocoPhillips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ConocoPhillips$61.55B2.25$7.99B$5.8919.34
Diamondback Energy$15.03B3.59$1.66B$0.86222.80

82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 14 more articles in the media than Diamondback Energy. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 21 mentions for Diamondback Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 1.21 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ConocoPhillips
25 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Diamondback Energy
16 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 12.10% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 1.87%. ConocoPhillips' return on equity of 11.39% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ConocoPhillips12.10% 11.39% 6.03%
Diamondback Energy 1.87%7.76%4.67%

ConocoPhillips currently has a consensus target price of $134.60, suggesting a potential upside of 18.19%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus target price of $223.26, suggesting a potential upside of 16.52%. Given ConocoPhillips' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ConocoPhillips
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Diamondback Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
5 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.04

Summary

ConocoPhillips beats Diamondback Energy on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Diamondback Energy compare to Devon Energy?

Devon Energy (NYSE:DVN) and Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

Devon Energy has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

69.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Devon Energy currently has a consensus target price of $57.85, indicating a potential upside of 31.97%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus target price of $223.26, indicating a potential upside of 16.52%. Given Devon Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Devon Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
22 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.90
Diamondback Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
5 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.04

Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Devon Energy pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 511.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Devon Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Diamondback Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Devon Energy and Devon Energy both had 21 articles in the media. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Devon Energy's score of 0.80 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Devon Energy
14 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Diamondback Energy
16 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Devon Energy has a net margin of 13.71% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 1.87%. Devon Energy's return on equity of 15.22% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Devon Energy13.71% 15.22% 7.39%
Diamondback Energy 1.87%7.76%4.67%

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. Devon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Devon Energy$17.19B1.58$2.64B$3.5912.21
Diamondback Energy$15.03B3.59$1.66B$0.86222.80

Summary

Devon Energy beats Diamondback Energy on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Diamondback Energy compare to EOG Resources?

EOG Resources (NYSE:EOG) and Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

89.9% of EOG Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of EOG Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, EOG Resources had 5 more articles in the media than Diamondback Energy. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for EOG Resources and 21 mentions for Diamondback Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat EOG Resources' score of 1.34 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
EOG Resources
21 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Diamondback Energy
16 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

EOG Resources pays an annual dividend of $4.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. EOG Resources pays out 40.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 511.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. EOG Resources has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. EOG Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

EOG Resources has a net margin of 23.01% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 1.87%. EOG Resources' return on equity of 19.25% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EOG Resources23.01% 19.25% 11.37%
Diamondback Energy 1.87%7.76%4.67%

EOG Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. EOG Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EOG Resources$22.63B3.13$4.98B$10.1613.09
Diamondback Energy$15.03B3.59$1.66B$0.86222.80

EOG Resources has a beta of 0.27, meaning that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

EOG Resources currently has a consensus price target of $156.39, indicating a potential upside of 17.56%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $223.26, indicating a potential upside of 16.52%. Given EOG Resources' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe EOG Resources is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
EOG Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
16 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Diamondback Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
5 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.04

Summary

EOG Resources beats Diamondback Energy on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Diamondback Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FANG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FANG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FANG vs. The Competition

MetricDiamondback EnergyOIL IndustryEnergy SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$53.95B$8.11B$10.09B$12.58B
Dividend Yield2.28%4.59%10.31%5.26%
P/E Ratio223.0011.3120.4726.31
Price / Sales3.596.49826.30114.16
Price / Cash6.206.5238.5956.90
Price / Book1.262.044.657.34
Net Income$1.66B$585.47M$4.23B$336.95M
7 Day Performance-4.53%-6.15%-2.22%3.65%
1 Month Performance-6.68%-8.57%-1.69%7.39%
1 Year Performance39.04%25.52%49.08%37.74%

Diamondback Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FANG
Diamondback Energy
3.7512 of 5 stars
$191.61
-1.3%
$223.26
+16.5%
+42.5%$53.95B$15.03B223.001,762
CHRD
Chord Energy
3.8199 of 5 stars
$143.98
flat
$156.69
+8.8%
+48.7%$8.11B$5.33BN/A530
VNOM
Viper Energy
3.6251 of 5 stars
$46.89
flat
$57.00
+21.6%
+11.6%$16.83B$1.66BN/A711
COP
ConocoPhillips
4.3653 of 5 stars
$120.48
+0.0%
$133.28
+10.6%
+35.9%$146.78B$61.55B20.459,900
DVN
Devon Energy
4.9184 of 5 stars
$47.29
+0.1%
$57.30
+21.2%
+42.8%$29.38B$17.19B13.172,200

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FANG) was last updated on 5/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners