Diamondback Energy (FANG) Competitors

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 1.87% compared to Viper Energy's net margin of -2.77%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 7.76% beat Viper Energy's return on equity.

Viper Energy has a beta of 0.4, indicating that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Viper Energy currently has a consensus target price of $57.57, suggesting a potential upside of 32.47%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus target price of $218.68, suggesting a potential upside of 9.47%. Given Viper Energy's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Viper Energy is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Viper Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Viper Energy pays out -475.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 511.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Viper Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

87.7% of Viper Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Viper Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Viper Energy. Viper Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 11 more articles in the media than Viper Energy. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 17 mentions for Viper Energy. Viper Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Diamondback Energy's score of 1.31 indicating that Viper Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 17 more articles in the media than Diamondback Energy. MarketBeat recorded 45 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 28 mentions for Diamondback Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 1.07 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. ConocoPhillips pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 511.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. ConocoPhillips is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.42, meaning that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 12.10% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 1.87%. ConocoPhillips' return on equity of 11.39% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

ConocoPhillips currently has a consensus target price of $134.16, suggesting a potential upside of 12.80%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus target price of $218.68, suggesting a potential upside of 9.47%. Given ConocoPhillips' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. ConocoPhillips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.42, meaning that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Devon Energy has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 3 more articles in the media than Devon Energy. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 25 mentions for Devon Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Devon Energy's score of 1.23 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Diamondback Energy presently has a consensus target price of $218.68, suggesting a potential upside of 9.47%. Devon Energy has a consensus target price of $59.56, suggesting a potential upside of 34.67%. Given Devon Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Diamondback Energy pays out 511.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Devon Energy pays out 35.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Devon Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Devon Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. Devon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 13.71% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 1.87%. Devon Energy's return on equity of 15.22% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

EOG Resources pays an annual dividend of $4.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. EOG Resources pays out 40.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 511.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. EOG Resources has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. EOG Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

EOG Resources has a beta of 0.25, indicating that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

EOG Resources has a net margin of 23.01% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 1.87%. EOG Resources' return on equity of 19.25% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

EOG Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. EOG Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

89.9% of EOG Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of EOG Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, EOG Resources had 11 more articles in the media than Diamondback Energy. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for EOG Resources and 28 mentions for Diamondback Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat EOG Resources' score of 1.01 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

EOG Resources currently has a consensus target price of $155.32, suggesting a potential upside of 6.70%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus target price of $218.68, suggesting a potential upside of 9.47%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than EOG Resources.