Murphy Oil (MUR) Competitors

Murphy Oil has a net margin of 3.02% compared to Chord Energy's net margin of -1.25%. Chord Energy's return on equity of 7.06% beat Murphy Oil's return on equity.

Murphy Oil has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chord Energy has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Chord Energy had 3 more articles in the media than Murphy Oil. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Chord Energy and 0 mentions for Murphy Oil. Chord Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Murphy Oil's score of 0.00 indicating that Chord Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Murphy Oil has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chord Energy. Chord Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Murphy Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

78.3% of Murphy Oil shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 5.8% of Murphy Oil shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Murphy Oil currently has a consensus target price of $38.58, indicating a potential upside of 20.92%. Chord Energy has a consensus target price of $157.08, indicating a potential upside of 38.61%. Given Chord Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Chord Energy is more favorable than Murphy Oil.

Murphy Oil pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Murphy Oil pays out 237.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chord Energy pays out -460.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Murphy Oil has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Chord Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Chord Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Murphy Oil currently has a consensus target price of $38.58, indicating a potential upside of 20.92%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus target price of $220.68, indicating a potential upside of 28.27%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than Murphy Oil.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Murphy Oil. Murphy Oil is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Murphy Oil has a net margin of 3.02% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 1.87%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 7.76% beat Murphy Oil's return on equity.

Murphy Oil has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

78.3% of Murphy Oil shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 5.8% of Murphy Oil shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 25 more articles in the media than Murphy Oil. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 0 mentions for Murphy Oil. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Murphy Oil's score of 0.00 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Murphy Oil pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Murphy Oil pays out 237.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Diamondback Energy pays out 511.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Murphy Oil has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Murphy Oil is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 12.10% compared to Murphy Oil's net margin of 3.02%. ConocoPhillips' return on equity of 11.39% beat Murphy Oil's return on equity.

ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Murphy Oil pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. ConocoPhillips pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Murphy Oil pays out 237.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Murphy Oil has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Murphy Oil is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

ConocoPhillips presently has a consensus target price of $134.76, indicating a potential upside of 28.79%. Murphy Oil has a consensus target price of $38.58, indicating a potential upside of 20.92%. Given ConocoPhillips' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than Murphy Oil.

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 14 more articles in the media than Murphy Oil. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 0 mentions for Murphy Oil. ConocoPhillips' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Murphy Oil's score of 0.00 indicating that ConocoPhillips is being referred to more favorably in the media.

82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.3% of Murphy Oil shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Murphy Oil shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Murphy Oil has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Murphy Oil. ConocoPhillips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Murphy Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Murphy Oil pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Murphy Oil pays out 237.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Devon Energy pays out 35.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Murphy Oil has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Devon Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Murphy Oil is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 32 more articles in the media than Murphy Oil. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Devon Energy and 0 mentions for Murphy Oil. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Murphy Oil's score of 0.00 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Murphy Oil has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Devon Energy has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

78.3% of Murphy Oil shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of Devon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 5.8% of Murphy Oil shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Murphy Oil currently has a consensus target price of $38.58, suggesting a potential upside of 20.92%. Devon Energy has a consensus target price of $59.38, suggesting a potential upside of 46.85%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than Murphy Oil.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 13.71% compared to Murphy Oil's net margin of 3.02%. Devon Energy's return on equity of 15.22% beat Murphy Oil's return on equity.

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Murphy Oil. Devon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Murphy Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.