Northern Oil and Gas (NOG) Competitors

Chord Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Northern Oil and Gas. Chord Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Northern Oil and Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Northern Oil and Gas has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chord Energy has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

98.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Chord Energy has a net margin of -1.25% compared to Northern Oil and Gas' net margin of -33.17%. Northern Oil and Gas' return on equity of 18.43% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

Northern Oil and Gas currently has a consensus price target of $31.88, suggesting a potential upside of 77.86%. Chord Energy has a consensus price target of $157.08, suggesting a potential upside of 38.61%. Given Northern Oil and Gas' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Northern Oil and Gas is more favorable than Chord Energy.

In the previous week, Northern Oil and Gas had 1 more articles in the media than Chord Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Northern Oil and Gas and 2 mentions for Chord Energy. Chord Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Northern Oil and Gas' score of -0.44 indicating that Chord Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Northern Oil and Gas pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Northern Oil and Gas pays out -28.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chord Energy pays out -460.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Northern Oil and Gas has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Chord Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Northern Oil and Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 19 more articles in the media than Northern Oil and Gas. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 3 mentions for Northern Oil and Gas. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Northern Oil and Gas' score of -0.44 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Diamondback Energy currently has a consensus target price of $220.68, indicating a potential upside of 28.27%. Northern Oil and Gas has a consensus target price of $31.88, indicating a potential upside of 77.86%. Given Northern Oil and Gas' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Northern Oil and Gas is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Northern Oil and Gas. Northern Oil and Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Northern Oil and Gas has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Northern Oil and Gas pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. Diamondback Energy pays out 511.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Northern Oil and Gas pays out -28.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Northern Oil and Gas has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Northern Oil and Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 1.87% compared to Northern Oil and Gas' net margin of -33.17%. Northern Oil and Gas' return on equity of 18.43% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Northern Oil and Gas pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. Devon Energy pays out 35.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Northern Oil and Gas pays out -28.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Devon Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Northern Oil and Gas has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Northern Oil and Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

69.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Devon Energy has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Northern Oil and Gas has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Devon Energy currently has a consensus target price of $59.38, indicating a potential upside of 46.85%. Northern Oil and Gas has a consensus target price of $31.88, indicating a potential upside of 77.86%. Given Northern Oil and Gas' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Northern Oil and Gas is more favorable than Devon Energy.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 13.71% compared to Northern Oil and Gas' net margin of -33.17%. Northern Oil and Gas' return on equity of 18.43% beat Devon Energy's return on equity.

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 29 more articles in the media than Northern Oil and Gas. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Devon Energy and 3 mentions for Northern Oil and Gas. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Northern Oil and Gas' score of -0.44 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Northern Oil and Gas. Northern Oil and Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Devon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Magnolia Oil & Gas had 2 more articles in the media than Northern Oil and Gas. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas and 3 mentions for Northern Oil and Gas. Magnolia Oil & Gas' average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Northern Oil and Gas' score of -0.44 indicating that Magnolia Oil & Gas is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 24.40% compared to Northern Oil and Gas' net margin of -33.17%. Northern Oil and Gas' return on equity of 18.43% beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Northern Oil and Gas. Northern Oil and Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Northern Oil and Gas pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Northern Oil and Gas pays out -28.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Northern Oil and Gas has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Northern Oil and Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Magnolia Oil & Gas currently has a consensus price target of $31.33, indicating a potential upside of 24.63%. Northern Oil and Gas has a consensus price target of $31.88, indicating a potential upside of 77.86%. Given Northern Oil and Gas' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Northern Oil and Gas is more favorable than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Northern Oil and Gas has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.