Northern Oil and Gas (NOG) Competitors

Northern Oil and Gas has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chord Energy has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Chord Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Northern Oil and Gas. Northern Oil and Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chord Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Northern Oil and Gas presently has a consensus price target of $30.63, indicating a potential upside of 18.61%. Chord Energy has a consensus price target of $153.46, indicating a potential upside of 3.69%. Given Northern Oil and Gas' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Northern Oil and Gas is more favorable than Chord Energy.

Northern Oil and Gas pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.0%. Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Northern Oil and Gas pays out -34.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chord Energy pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Northern Oil and Gas has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Chord Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Northern Oil and Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

98.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Chord Energy has a net margin of 13.42% compared to Northern Oil and Gas' net margin of -25.35%. Northern Oil and Gas' return on equity of 18.69% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

In the previous week, Northern Oil and Gas had 1 more articles in the media than Chord Energy. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Northern Oil and Gas and 9 mentions for Chord Energy. Northern Oil and Gas' average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Chord Energy's score of 1.02 indicating that Northern Oil and Gas is being referred to more favorably in the media.

98.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Northern Oil and Gas has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 8.58% compared to Northern Oil and Gas' net margin of -25.35%. Northern Oil and Gas' return on equity of 18.69% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Northern Oil and Gas. Northern Oil and Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 10 more articles in the media than Northern Oil and Gas. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 10 mentions for Northern Oil and Gas. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Northern Oil and Gas' score of 1.19 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Northern Oil and Gas presently has a consensus target price of $30.63, suggesting a potential upside of 18.61%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus target price of $222.21, suggesting a potential upside of 9.50%. Given Northern Oil and Gas' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Northern Oil and Gas is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Northern Oil and Gas pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.0%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Northern Oil and Gas pays out -34.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Northern Oil and Gas has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Northern Oil and Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Northern Oil and Gas pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.0%. Devon Energy pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Northern Oil and Gas pays out -34.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Devon Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Northern Oil and Gas has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Northern Oil and Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 19 more articles in the media than Northern Oil and Gas. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Devon Energy and 10 mentions for Northern Oil and Gas. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.64 beat Northern Oil and Gas' score of 1.19 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Northern Oil and Gas. Northern Oil and Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Devon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

69.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Devon Energy has a beta of 0.37, meaning that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Northern Oil and Gas has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Devon Energy presently has a consensus price target of $59.23, suggesting a potential upside of 21.56%. Northern Oil and Gas has a consensus price target of $30.63, suggesting a potential upside of 18.61%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than Northern Oil and Gas.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 16.67% compared to Northern Oil and Gas' net margin of -25.35%. Northern Oil and Gas' return on equity of 18.69% beat Devon Energy's return on equity.

98.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Northern Oil and Gas presently has a consensus price target of $30.63, suggesting a potential upside of 18.61%. Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $31.62, suggesting a potential upside of 16.28%. Given Northern Oil and Gas' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Northern Oil and Gas is more favorable than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Northern Oil and Gas. Northern Oil and Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Northern Oil and Gas pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.0%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Northern Oil and Gas pays out -34.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Northern Oil and Gas has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Magnolia Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Northern Oil and Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 28.77% compared to Northern Oil and Gas' net margin of -25.35%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 21.04% beat Northern Oil and Gas' return on equity.

In the previous week, Northern Oil and Gas had 4 more articles in the media than Magnolia Oil & Gas. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Northern Oil and Gas and 6 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas. Magnolia Oil & Gas' average media sentiment score of 1.48 beat Northern Oil and Gas' score of 1.19 indicating that Magnolia Oil & Gas is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Northern Oil and Gas has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.