Go Pro

SM Energy (SM) Competitors

SM Energy logo
$32.42 +0.80 (+2.51%)
Closing price 07/31/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$32.92 +0.49 (+1.51%)
As of 07/31/2026 07:59 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SM vs. CHRD, FANG, AROC, HESM, and MPC

Should you buy SM Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares SM Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with SM Energy include Chord Energy (CHRD), Diamondback Energy (FANG), Archrock (AROC), Hess Midstream Partners (HESM), and Marathon Petroleum (MPC). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does SM Energy compare to Chord Energy?

SM Energy (NYSE:SM) and Chord Energy (NASDAQ:CHRD) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, SM Energy had 16 more articles in the media than Chord Energy. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for SM Energy and 8 mentions for Chord Energy. Chord Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat SM Energy's score of 1.24 indicating that Chord Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
SM Energy
19 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Chord Energy
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

94.6% of SM Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of SM Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

SM Energy currently has a consensus price target of $36.53, indicating a potential upside of 12.67%. Chord Energy has a consensus price target of $152.38, indicating a potential upside of 8.55%. Given SM Energy's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe SM Energy is more favorable than Chord Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
SM Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Chord Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.69

SM Energy has a net margin of 3.45% compared to Chord Energy's net margin of -1.25%. SM Energy's return on equity of 13.93% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SM Energy3.45% 13.93% 6.29%
Chord Energy -1.25%7.06%4.39%

SM Energy has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chord Energy has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

SM Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chord Energy. Chord Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SM Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SM Energy$3.15B2.46$648M$2.3813.62
Chord Energy$4.88B1.62$44.46M-$1.13N/A

SM Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. SM Energy pays out 37.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chord Energy pays out -460.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. SM Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Chord Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Chord Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

SM Energy beats Chord Energy on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SM Energy compare to Diamondback Energy?

Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) and SM Energy (NYSE:SM) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 4 more articles in the media than SM Energy. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 24 mentions for SM Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat SM Energy's score of 1.24 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Diamondback Energy
21 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
SM Energy
19 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Diamondback Energy currently has a consensus price target of $218.63, indicating a potential upside of 7.73%. SM Energy has a consensus price target of $36.53, indicating a potential upside of 12.67%. Given SM Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe SM Energy is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Diamondback Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
SM Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. SM Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Diamondback Energy pays out 511.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SM Energy pays out 37.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and SM Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. SM Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

SM Energy has a net margin of 3.45% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 1.87%. SM Energy's return on equity of 13.93% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Diamondback Energy1.87% 7.76% 4.67%
SM Energy 3.45%13.93%6.29%

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SM Energy has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than SM Energy. SM Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diamondback Energy$15.03B3.80$1.66B$0.86235.99
SM Energy$3.15B2.46$648M$2.3813.62

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.6% of SM Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of SM Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats SM Energy on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SM Energy compare to Archrock?

SM Energy (NYSE:SM) and Archrock (NYSE:AROC) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

In the previous week, SM Energy had 14 more articles in the media than Archrock. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for SM Energy and 10 mentions for Archrock. Archrock's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat SM Energy's score of 1.24 indicating that Archrock is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
SM Energy
19 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Archrock
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

SM Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Archrock. SM Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archrock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SM Energy$3.15B2.46$648M$2.3813.62
Archrock$1.49B4.20$322.29M$1.8419.42

SM Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Archrock pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. SM Energy pays out 37.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Archrock pays out 47.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. SM Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Archrock has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. SM Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

SM Energy presently has a consensus target price of $36.53, suggesting a potential upside of 12.67%. Archrock has a consensus target price of $41.71, suggesting a potential upside of 16.76%. Given Archrock's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Archrock is more favorable than SM Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
SM Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Archrock
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

94.6% of SM Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Archrock shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of SM Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Archrock shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

SM Energy has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Archrock has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Archrock has a net margin of 21.45% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 3.45%. Archrock's return on equity of 22.89% beat SM Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SM Energy3.45% 13.93% 6.29%
Archrock 21.45%22.89%7.61%

Summary

Archrock beats SM Energy on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SM Energy compare to Hess Midstream Partners?

SM Energy (NYSE:SM) and Hess Midstream Partners (NYSE:HESM) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and profitability.

94.6% of SM Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.0% of Hess Midstream Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of SM Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

SM Energy presently has a consensus price target of $36.53, indicating a potential upside of 12.67%. Hess Midstream Partners has a consensus price target of $38.86, indicating a potential downside of 5.08%. Given SM Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe SM Energy is more favorable than Hess Midstream Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
SM Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Hess Midstream Partners
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.89

Hess Midstream Partners has a net margin of 22.64% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 3.45%. Hess Midstream Partners' return on equity of 84.47% beat SM Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SM Energy3.45% 13.93% 6.29%
Hess Midstream Partners 22.64%84.47%8.40%

SM Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Hess Midstream Partners. SM Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hess Midstream Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SM Energy$3.15B2.46$648M$2.3813.62
Hess Midstream Partners$1.62B5.21$352.90M$2.8914.16

SM Energy has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hess Midstream Partners has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

SM Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Hess Midstream Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.6%. SM Energy pays out 37.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hess Midstream Partners pays out 108.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SM Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Hess Midstream Partners has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Hess Midstream Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, SM Energy had 12 more articles in the media than Hess Midstream Partners. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for SM Energy and 12 mentions for Hess Midstream Partners. Hess Midstream Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat SM Energy's score of 1.24 indicating that Hess Midstream Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
SM Energy
19 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hess Midstream Partners
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Hess Midstream Partners beats SM Energy on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SM Energy compare to Marathon Petroleum?

Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) and SM Energy (NYSE:SM) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and valuation.

Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. SM Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Marathon Petroleum pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SM Energy pays out 37.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marathon Petroleum has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and SM Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. SM Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SM Energy has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

SM Energy has a net margin of 3.45% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 3.36%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 16.22% beat SM Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Marathon Petroleum3.36% 16.22% 4.60%
SM Energy 3.45%13.93%6.29%

Marathon Petroleum currently has a consensus price target of $298.69, indicating a potential downside of 5.55%. SM Energy has a consensus price target of $36.53, indicating a potential upside of 12.67%. Given SM Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe SM Energy is more favorable than Marathon Petroleum.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Marathon Petroleum
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.61
SM Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 18 more articles in the media than SM Energy. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 24 mentions for SM Energy. SM Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Marathon Petroleum's score of 1.14 indicating that SM Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Marathon Petroleum
29 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
SM Energy
19 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than SM Energy. SM Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marathon Petroleum$135.22B0.68$4.05B$15.3220.64
SM Energy$3.15B2.46$648M$2.3813.62

76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.6% of SM Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of SM Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

SM Energy beats Marathon Petroleum on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get SM Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SM vs. The Competition

MetricSM EnergyOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$7.80B$11.36B$9.90B$23.68B
Dividend Yield2.71%11.32%11.58%4.22%
P/E Ratio13.6219.6519.4031.00
Price / Sales2.46448.07367.5619.07
Price / Cash2.0339.6736.1631.30
Price / Book0.774.403.984.62
Net Income$648M$5.28B$4.35B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-2.30%-0.40%-0.73%0.35%
1 Month Performance21.20%5.09%4.37%-0.55%
1 Year Performance21.76%34.51%35.91%19.21%

SM Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SM
SM Energy
4.475 of 5 stars
$32.43
+2.5%
$36.53
+12.7%
+21.8%$7.80B$3.15B13.621,241
CHRD
Chord Energy
2.7366 of 5 stars
$131.80
-4.7%
$152.38
+15.6%
+32.6%$7.79B$4.88BN/A530
FANG
Diamondback Energy
3.5288 of 5 stars
$195.80
-4.3%
$218.68
+11.7%
+38.9%$57.58B$15.03B227.681,762
AROC
Archrock
4.7367 of 5 stars
$35.63
-1.4%
$41.71
+17.1%
+59.2%$6.33B$1.52B19.371,350
HESM
Hess Midstream Partners
2.8647 of 5 stars
$39.74
-2.2%
$38.86
-2.2%
-3.7%$8.38B$1.62B13.75200

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:SM) was last updated on 8/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners