Does the media favor CHRD or SM?

In the previous week, SM Energy had 7 more articles in the media than Chord Energy. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for SM Energy and 5 mentions for Chord Energy. SM Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Chord Energy's score of 1.08 indicating that SM Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Chord Energy 2 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive SM Energy 9 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer SM or FANG?

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 43 more articles in the media than SM Energy. MarketBeat recorded 55 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 12 mentions for SM Energy. SM Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Diamondback Energy's score of 1.08 indicating that SM Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment SM Energy 9 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Diamondback Energy 36 Very Positive mention(s) 6 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, AROC or SM?

SM Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Archrock. SM Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archrock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Archrock $1.49B 3.74 $322.29M $1.86 17.09 SM Energy $3.15B 2.82 $648M $5.08 7.35

Is AROC or SM more profitable?

Archrock has a net margin of 21.84% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 18.20%. Archrock's return on equity of 22.22% beat SM Energy's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Archrock 21.84% 22.22% 7.56% SM Energy 18.20% 17.93% 7.70%

Does the media favor AROC or SM?

In the previous week, SM Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Archrock. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for SM Energy and 8 mentions for Archrock. SM Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Archrock's score of 1.29 indicating that SM Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Archrock 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive SM Energy 9 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer HESM or SM?

In the previous week, SM Energy had 7 more articles in the media than Hess Midstream Partners. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for SM Energy and 5 mentions for Hess Midstream Partners. SM Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Hess Midstream Partners' score of 0.76 indicating that SM Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hess Midstream Partners 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive SM Energy 9 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to SM or MPC?

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 53 more articles in the media than SM Energy. MarketBeat recorded 65 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 12 mentions for SM Energy. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat SM Energy's score of 1.32 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment SM Energy 9 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Marathon Petroleum 60 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

SM Energy (SM) Competitors

$37.34 -0.30 (-0.80%)

As of 08/21/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

Compare

SM vs. CHRD, FANG, AROC, HESM, and MPC

Should you buy SM Energy stock or one of its competitors? SM Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include Chord Energy (CHRD), Diamondback Energy (FANG), Archrock (AROC), Hess Midstream Partners (HESM), and Marathon Petroleum (MPC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does SM Energy compare to Chord Energy?

Chord Energy (NASDAQ:CHRD) and SM Energy (NYSE:SM) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability and risk.

Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. SM Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Chord Energy pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SM Energy pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chord Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and SM Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

97.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.6% of SM Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of SM Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

SM Energy has a net margin of 18.20% compared to Chord Energy's net margin of 13.42%. SM Energy's return on equity of 17.93% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chord Energy	13.42%	10.18%	6.24%
SM Energy	18.20%	17.93%	7.70%

Chord Energy presently has a consensus target price of $152.54, indicating a potential upside of 3.17%. SM Energy has a consensus target price of $37.93, indicating a potential upside of 1.59%. Given Chord Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Chord Energy is more favorable than SM Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chord Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.69
SM Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

SM Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Chord Energy. SM Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chord Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chord Energy	$6.32B	1.28	$44.46M	$14.92	9.91
SM Energy	$3.15B	2.82	$648M	$5.08	7.35

Chord Energy has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SM Energy has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, SM Energy had 7 more articles in the media than Chord Energy. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for SM Energy and 5 mentions for Chord Energy. SM Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Chord Energy's score of 1.08 indicating that SM Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Chord Energy	2 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
SM Energy	9 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

SM Energy beats Chord Energy on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SM Energy compare to Diamondback Energy?

SM Energy (NYSE:SM) and Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

SM Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. SM Energy pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SM Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. SM Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

SM Energy has a net margin of 18.20% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 8.58%. SM Energy's return on equity of 17.93% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SM Energy	18.20%	17.93%	7.70%
Diamondback Energy	8.58%	10.10%	6.16%

SM Energy has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

SM Energy currently has a consensus price target of $37.93, indicating a potential upside of 1.59%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $222.21, indicating a potential upside of 5.45%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than SM Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SM Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Diamondback Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	4 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.96

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 43 more articles in the media than SM Energy. MarketBeat recorded 55 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 12 mentions for SM Energy. SM Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Diamondback Energy's score of 1.08 indicating that SM Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
SM Energy	9 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Diamondback Energy	36 Very Positive mention(s)	6 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

94.6% of SM Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of SM Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than SM Energy. SM Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SM Energy	$3.15B	2.82	$648M	$5.08	7.35
Diamondback Energy	$16.98B	3.47	$1.66B	$5.13	41.08

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats SM Energy on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SM Energy compare to Archrock?

Archrock (NYSE:AROC) and SM Energy (NYSE:SM) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Archrock currently has a consensus target price of $42.29, suggesting a potential upside of 33.06%. SM Energy has a consensus target price of $37.93, suggesting a potential upside of 1.59%. Given Archrock's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Archrock is more favorable than SM Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Archrock	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90
SM Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

In the previous week, SM Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Archrock. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for SM Energy and 8 mentions for Archrock. SM Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Archrock's score of 1.29 indicating that SM Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Archrock	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
SM Energy	9 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

95.5% of Archrock shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.6% of SM Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Archrock shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of SM Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Archrock has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SM Energy has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

SM Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Archrock. SM Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archrock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Archrock	$1.49B	3.74	$322.29M	$1.86	17.09
SM Energy	$3.15B	2.82	$648M	$5.08	7.35

Archrock pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. SM Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Archrock pays out 49.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SM Energy pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Archrock has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and SM Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Archrock has a net margin of 21.84% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 18.20%. Archrock's return on equity of 22.22% beat SM Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Archrock	21.84%	22.22%	7.56%
SM Energy	18.20%	17.93%	7.70%

Summary

Archrock and SM Energy tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SM Energy compare to Hess Midstream Partners?

Hess Midstream Partners (NYSE:HESM) and SM Energy (NYSE:SM) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Hess Midstream Partners has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SM Energy has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Hess Midstream Partners has a net margin of 23.23% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 18.20%. Hess Midstream Partners' return on equity of 92.18% beat SM Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hess Midstream Partners	23.23%	92.18%	8.62%
SM Energy	18.20%	17.93%	7.70%

99.0% of Hess Midstream Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.6% of SM Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of SM Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hess Midstream Partners presently has a consensus price target of $37.67, suggesting a potential downside of 3.74%. SM Energy has a consensus price target of $37.93, suggesting a potential upside of 1.59%. Given SM Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SM Energy is more favorable than Hess Midstream Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hess Midstream Partners	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88
SM Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Hess Midstream Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.1%. SM Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Hess Midstream Partners pays out 109.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SM Energy pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hess Midstream Partners has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and SM Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Hess Midstream Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

SM Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Hess Midstream Partners. SM Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hess Midstream Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hess Midstream Partners	$1.62B	4.98	$352.90M	$2.90	13.49
SM Energy	$3.15B	2.82	$648M	$5.08	7.35

In the previous week, SM Energy had 7 more articles in the media than Hess Midstream Partners. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for SM Energy and 5 mentions for Hess Midstream Partners. SM Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Hess Midstream Partners' score of 0.76 indicating that SM Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hess Midstream Partners	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
SM Energy	9 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

SM Energy beats Hess Midstream Partners on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SM Energy compare to Marathon Petroleum?

SM Energy (NYSE:SM) and Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

SM Energy has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than SM Energy. SM Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SM Energy	$3.15B	2.82	$648M	$5.08	7.35
Marathon Petroleum	$153.58B	0.69	$4.05B	$29.09	12.45

SM Energy currently has a consensus price target of $37.93, indicating a potential upside of 1.59%. Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $312.50, indicating a potential downside of 13.72%. Given SM Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe SM Energy is more favorable than Marathon Petroleum.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SM Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Marathon Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

SM Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. SM Energy pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. SM Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Marathon Petroleum has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. SM Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

94.6% of SM Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of SM Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

SM Energy has a net margin of 18.20% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 5.48%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 31.96% beat SM Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SM Energy	18.20%	17.93%	7.70%
Marathon Petroleum	5.48%	31.96%	8.88%

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 53 more articles in the media than SM Energy. MarketBeat recorded 65 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 12 mentions for SM Energy. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat SM Energy's score of 1.32 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
SM Energy	9 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Marathon Petroleum	60 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Summary

SM Energy and Marathon Petroleum tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get SM Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SM vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	SM Energy	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry	Energy Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$8.95B	$11.51B	$10.05B	$24.12B
Dividend Yield	2.34%	11.46%	11.68%	3.71%
P/E Ratio	7.35	17.12	20.56	30.15
Price / Sales	2.82	467.09	383.45	17.54
Price / Cash	2.34	39.83	36.19	32.42
Price / Book	1.14	3.21	3.03	6.77
Net Income	$648M	$5.27B	$4.33B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	10.78%	2.72%	1.91%	-0.66%
1 Month Performance	12.48%	4.80%	4.27%	2.44%
1 Year Performance	34.73%	37.69%	39.09%	14.85%

SM Energy Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SM SM Energy	4.0557 of 5 stars	$37.34 -0.8%	$37.93 +1.6%	+44.5%	$8.95B	$3.15B	7.35	1,241	Positive News Analyst Upgrade
CHRD Chord Energy	3.353 of 5 stars	$138.52 +5.5%	$152.08 +9.8%	+45.0%	$7.18B	$4.88B	9.28	530	Positive News
FANG Diamondback Energy	3.4952 of 5 stars	$198.97 +5.8%	$222.30 +11.7%	+52.7%	$52.66B	$15.03B	38.79	1,762	News Coverage Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
AROC Archrock	4.7898 of 5 stars	$33.06 -0.1%	$41.29 +24.9%	+27.6%	$5.80B	$1.49B	17.77	1,350	Positive News
HESM Hess Midstream Partners	2.4533 of 5 stars	$40.61 +2.0%	$38.86 -4.3%	-5.2%	$8.21B	$1.62B	14.00	200	News Coverage

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:SM) was last updated on 8/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

SM Energy (SM) Competitors

SM vs. CHRD, FANG, AROC, HESM, and MPC

How does SM Energy compare to Chord Energy?

Summary

How does SM Energy compare to Diamondback Energy?

Summary

How does SM Energy compare to Archrock?

Summary

How does SM Energy compare to Hess Midstream Partners?

Summary

How does SM Energy compare to Marathon Petroleum?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SM vs. The Competition

SM Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

SM Energy (SM) Competitors

SM vs. CHRD, FANG, AROC, HESM, and MPC

How does SM Energy compare to Chord Energy?

Is CHRD or SM a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in CHRD or SM?

Is CHRD or SM more profitable?

Do analysts prefer CHRD or SM?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CHRD or SM?

Which has more risk and volatility, CHRD or SM?

Does the media favor CHRD or SM?

Summary

How does SM Energy compare to Diamondback Energy?

Is SM or FANG a better dividend stock?

Is SM or FANG more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, SM or FANG?

Do analysts recommend SM or FANG?

Does the media prefer SM or FANG?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in SM or FANG?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, SM or FANG?

Summary

How does SM Energy compare to Archrock?

Do analysts recommend AROC or SM?

Does the media favor AROC or SM?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of AROC or SM?

Which has more risk and volatility, AROC or SM?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, AROC or SM?

Is AROC or SM a better dividend stock?

Is AROC or SM more profitable?

Summary

How does SM Energy compare to Hess Midstream Partners?

Which has more volatility & risk, HESM or SM?

Is HESM or SM more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in HESM or SM?

Do analysts rate HESM or SM?

Is HESM or SM a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, HESM or SM?

Does the media prefer HESM or SM?

Summary

How does SM Energy compare to Marathon Petroleum?

Which has more volatility & risk, SM or MPC?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, SM or MPC?

Do analysts prefer SM or MPC?

Is SM or MPC a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in SM or MPC?

Is SM or MPC more profitable?

Does the media refer more to SM or MPC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SM vs. The Competition

SM Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools