Is CHRD or SM more profitable?

SM Energy has a net margin of 18.20% compared to Chord Energy's net margin of 13.42%. SM Energy's return on equity of 17.93% beat Chord Energy's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Chord Energy 13.42% 10.18% 6.24% SM Energy 18.20% 17.93% 7.70%

Does the media favor CHRD or SM?

In the previous week, Chord Energy had 4 more articles in the media than SM Energy. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Chord Energy and 10 mentions for SM Energy. Chord Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat SM Energy's score of 0.98 indicating that Chord Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Chord Energy 6 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive SM Energy 5 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer SM or FANG?

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 13 more articles in the media than SM Energy. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 10 mentions for SM Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat SM Energy's score of 0.98 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment SM Energy 5 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Diamondback Energy 13 Very Positive mention(s) 6 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, SM or AROC?

SM Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Archrock. SM Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archrock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio SM Energy $3.15B 2.87 $648M $5.08 7.50 Archrock $1.49B 3.85 $322.29M $1.86 17.60

Is SM or AROC more profitable?

Archrock has a net margin of 21.84% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 18.20%. Archrock's return on equity of 22.22% beat SM Energy's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets SM Energy 18.20% 17.93% 7.70% Archrock 21.84% 22.22% 7.56%

Does the media favor SM or AROC?

In the previous week, SM Energy had 8 more articles in the media than Archrock. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for SM Energy and 2 mentions for Archrock. SM Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Archrock's score of 0.61 indicating that SM Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment SM Energy 5 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Archrock 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer SM or HESM?

In the previous week, SM Energy had 5 more articles in the media than Hess Midstream Partners. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for SM Energy and 5 mentions for Hess Midstream Partners. Hess Midstream Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat SM Energy's score of 0.98 indicating that Hess Midstream Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment SM Energy 5 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hess Midstream Partners 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to SM or MPC?

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 18 more articles in the media than SM Energy. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 10 mentions for SM Energy. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat SM Energy's score of 0.98 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment SM Energy 5 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Marathon Petroleum 19 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

SM Energy (SM) Competitors

$38.11 -0.07 (-0.17%)

Closing price 09/11/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$38.20 +0.08 (+0.21%)

As of 09/11/2026 07:57 PM Eastern

Compare

SM vs. CHRD, FANG, AROC, HESM, and MPC

Should you buy SM Energy stock or one of its competitors? SM Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include Chord Energy (CHRD), Diamondback Energy (FANG), Archrock (AROC), Hess Midstream Partners (HESM), and Marathon Petroleum (MPC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does SM Energy compare to Chord Energy?

Chord Energy (NASDAQ:CHRD) and SM Energy (NYSE:SM) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

In the previous week, Chord Energy had 4 more articles in the media than SM Energy. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Chord Energy and 10 mentions for SM Energy. Chord Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat SM Energy's score of 0.98 indicating that Chord Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Chord Energy	6 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
SM Energy	5 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. SM Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Chord Energy pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SM Energy pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chord Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and SM Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

SM Energy has a net margin of 18.20% compared to Chord Energy's net margin of 13.42%. SM Energy's return on equity of 17.93% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chord Energy	13.42%	10.18%	6.24%
SM Energy	18.20%	17.93%	7.70%

97.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.6% of SM Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of SM Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

SM Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Chord Energy. SM Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chord Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chord Energy	$4.88B	1.70	$44.46M	$14.92	10.19
SM Energy	$3.15B	2.87	$648M	$5.08	7.50

Chord Energy has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SM Energy has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Chord Energy presently has a consensus price target of $155.50, indicating a potential upside of 2.30%. SM Energy has a consensus price target of $38.19, indicating a potential upside of 0.19%. Given Chord Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Chord Energy is more favorable than SM Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chord Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76
SM Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71

Summary

Chord Energy beats SM Energy on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SM Energy compare to Diamondback Energy?

SM Energy (NYSE:SM) and Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

SM Energy has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

SM Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. SM Energy pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SM Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. SM Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

94.6% of SM Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of SM Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

SM Energy has a net margin of 18.20% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 8.58%. SM Energy's return on equity of 17.93% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SM Energy	18.20%	17.93%	7.70%
Diamondback Energy	8.58%	10.10%	6.16%

SM Energy presently has a consensus price target of $38.19, indicating a potential upside of 0.19%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $224.05, indicating a potential upside of 9.31%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than SM Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SM Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
Diamondback Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	4 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.96

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than SM Energy. SM Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SM Energy	$3.15B	2.87	$648M	$5.08	7.50
Diamondback Energy	$15.03B	3.82	$1.66B	$5.13	39.96

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 13 more articles in the media than SM Energy. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 10 mentions for SM Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat SM Energy's score of 0.98 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
SM Energy	5 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Diamondback Energy	13 Very Positive mention(s)	6 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats SM Energy on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SM Energy compare to Archrock?

SM Energy (NYSE:SM) and Archrock (NYSE:AROC) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and profitability.

Archrock has a net margin of 21.84% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 18.20%. Archrock's return on equity of 22.22% beat SM Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SM Energy	18.20%	17.93%	7.70%
Archrock	21.84%	22.22%	7.56%

SM Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Archrock. SM Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archrock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SM Energy	$3.15B	2.87	$648M	$5.08	7.50
Archrock	$1.49B	3.85	$322.29M	$1.86	17.60

SM Energy has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Archrock has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

SM Energy presently has a consensus price target of $38.19, suggesting a potential upside of 0.19%. Archrock has a consensus price target of $42.29, suggesting a potential upside of 29.15%. Given Archrock's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Archrock is more favorable than SM Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SM Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
Archrock	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

94.6% of SM Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Archrock shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of SM Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Archrock shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

SM Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Archrock pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. SM Energy pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Archrock pays out 49.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. SM Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Archrock has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

In the previous week, SM Energy had 8 more articles in the media than Archrock. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for SM Energy and 2 mentions for Archrock. SM Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Archrock's score of 0.61 indicating that SM Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
SM Energy	5 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Archrock	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

SM Energy and Archrock tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SM Energy compare to Hess Midstream Partners?

SM Energy (NYSE:SM) and Hess Midstream Partners (NYSE:HESM) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation and profitability.

SM Energy has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hess Midstream Partners has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

SM Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Hess Midstream Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.9%. SM Energy pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hess Midstream Partners pays out 109.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SM Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Hess Midstream Partners has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Hess Midstream Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Hess Midstream Partners has a net margin of 23.23% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 18.20%. Hess Midstream Partners' return on equity of 92.18% beat SM Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SM Energy	18.20%	17.93%	7.70%
Hess Midstream Partners	23.23%	92.18%	8.62%

SM Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Hess Midstream Partners. SM Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hess Midstream Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SM Energy	$3.15B	2.87	$648M	$5.08	7.50
Hess Midstream Partners	$1.62B	5.09	$352.90M	$2.90	13.80

SM Energy presently has a consensus price target of $38.19, suggesting a potential upside of 0.19%. Hess Midstream Partners has a consensus price target of $36.60, suggesting a potential downside of 8.56%. Given SM Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe SM Energy is more favorable than Hess Midstream Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SM Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
Hess Midstream Partners	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.86

94.6% of SM Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.0% of Hess Midstream Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of SM Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, SM Energy had 5 more articles in the media than Hess Midstream Partners. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for SM Energy and 5 mentions for Hess Midstream Partners. Hess Midstream Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat SM Energy's score of 0.98 indicating that Hess Midstream Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
SM Energy	5 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hess Midstream Partners	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

SM Energy beats Hess Midstream Partners on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SM Energy compare to Marathon Petroleum?

SM Energy (NYSE:SM) and Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than SM Energy. SM Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SM Energy	$3.15B	2.87	$648M	$5.08	7.50
Marathon Petroleum	$135.22B	0.86	$4.05B	$29.09	13.62

94.6% of SM Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of SM Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

SM Energy has a net margin of 18.20% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 5.48%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 31.96% beat SM Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SM Energy	18.20%	17.93%	7.70%
Marathon Petroleum	5.48%	31.96%	8.88%

SM Energy presently has a consensus price target of $38.19, indicating a potential upside of 0.19%. Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $330.50, indicating a potential downside of 16.59%. Given SM Energy's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe SM Energy is more favorable than Marathon Petroleum.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SM Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
Marathon Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82

SM Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. SM Energy pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. SM Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Marathon Petroleum has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. SM Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

SM Energy has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 18 more articles in the media than SM Energy. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 10 mentions for SM Energy. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat SM Energy's score of 0.98 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
SM Energy	5 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Marathon Petroleum	19 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Marathon Petroleum beats SM Energy on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get SM Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SM vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	SM Energy	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry	Energy Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$9.08B	$11.68B	$10.19B	$23.19B
Dividend Yield	2.30%	10.07%	10.54%	3.56%
P/E Ratio	7.50	18.72	21.80	28.69
Price / Sales	2.87	626.59	511.16	99.85
Price / Cash	2.38	40.05	36.34	33.82
Price / Book	0.91	4.55	4.12	4.74
Net Income	$648M	$5.28B	$4.33B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	4.39%	1.05%	0.92%	-1.99%
1 Month Performance	17.53%	5.71%	4.62%	-2.68%
1 Year Performance	42.56%	37.83%	38.88%	10.45%

SM Energy Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SM SM Energy	4.5291 of 5 stars	$38.11 -0.2%	$38.19 +0.2%	+40.2%	$9.08B	$3.15B	7.50	1,241	Analyst Forecast Insider Trade
CHRD Chord Energy	2.9863 of 5 stars	$147.11 +0.8%	$152.54 +3.7%	+45.0%	$7.99B	$4.88B	9.86	530	News Coverage Positive News Analyst Upgrade
FANG Diamondback Energy	2.9586 of 5 stars	$200.48 +1.4%	$222.21 +10.8%	+48.1%	$55.35B	$15.03B	39.08	1,762	Positive News Analyst Forecast High Trading Volume
AROC Archrock	4.8238 of 5 stars	$31.41 +0.5%	$42.29 +34.6%	+32.1%	$5.48B	$1.49B	16.89	1,350
HESM Hess Midstream Partners	2.4977 of 5 stars	$40.23 +1.7%	$37.67 -6.4%	+0.7%	$8.16B	$1.62B	13.87	200	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:SM) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

SM Energy (SM) Competitors

SM vs. CHRD, FANG, AROC, HESM, and MPC

How does SM Energy compare to Chord Energy?

Summary

How does SM Energy compare to Diamondback Energy?

Summary

How does SM Energy compare to Archrock?

Summary

How does SM Energy compare to Hess Midstream Partners?

Summary

How does SM Energy compare to Marathon Petroleum?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SM vs. The Competition

SM Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

SM Energy (SM) Competitors

SM vs. CHRD, FANG, AROC, HESM, and MPC

How does SM Energy compare to Chord Energy?

Does the media favor CHRD or SM?

Is CHRD or SM a better dividend stock?

Is CHRD or SM more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CHRD or SM?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CHRD or SM?

Which has more risk & volatility, CHRD or SM?

Do analysts prefer CHRD or SM?

Summary

How does SM Energy compare to Diamondback Energy?

Which has more volatility & risk, SM or FANG?

Is SM or FANG a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in SM or FANG?

Is SM or FANG more profitable?

Do analysts recommend SM or FANG?

Which has better earnings & valuation, SM or FANG?

Does the media prefer SM or FANG?

Summary

How does SM Energy compare to Archrock?

Is SM or AROC more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, SM or AROC?

Which has more volatility & risk, SM or AROC?

Do analysts prefer SM or AROC?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in SM or AROC?

Is SM or AROC a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor SM or AROC?

Summary

How does SM Energy compare to Hess Midstream Partners?

Which has more risk and volatility, SM or HESM?

Is SM or HESM a better dividend stock?

Is SM or HESM more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, SM or HESM?

Do analysts prefer SM or HESM?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in SM or HESM?

Does the media prefer SM or HESM?

Summary

How does SM Energy compare to Marathon Petroleum?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, SM or MPC?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in SM or MPC?

Is SM or MPC more profitable?

Do analysts recommend SM or MPC?

Is SM or MPC a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, SM or MPC?

Does the media refer more to SM or MPC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SM vs. The Competition

SM Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools