Go Pro

Hess Midstream Partners (HESM) Competitors

Hess Midstream Partners logo
$40.67 +0.19 (+0.46%)
Closing price 07/24/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$40.65 -0.02 (-0.04%)
As of 07/24/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

HESM vs. PAA, AM, DTM, EPD, and ET

Should you buy Hess Midstream Partners stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Hess Midstream Partners with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Hess Midstream Partners include Plains All American Pipeline (PAA), Antero Midstream (AM), DT Midstream (DTM), Enterprise Products Partners (EPD), and Energy Transfer (ET).

How does Hess Midstream Partners compare to Plains All American Pipeline?

Hess Midstream Partners (NYSE:HESM) and Plains All American Pipeline (NASDAQ:PAA) are related companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Plains All American Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Hess Midstream Partners. Hess Midstream Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plains All American Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hess Midstream Partners$1.62B5.17$352.90M$2.8914.07
Plains All American Pipeline$44.26B0.39$1.44B$1.3118.78

Hess Midstream Partners has a net margin of 22.64% compared to Plains All American Pipeline's net margin of 2.53%. Hess Midstream Partners' return on equity of 84.47% beat Plains All American Pipeline's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hess Midstream Partners22.64% 84.47% 8.40%
Plains All American Pipeline 2.53%12.17%4.54%

In the previous week, Plains All American Pipeline had 1 more articles in the media than Hess Midstream Partners. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Plains All American Pipeline and 5 mentions for Hess Midstream Partners. Hess Midstream Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Plains All American Pipeline's score of 1.11 indicating that Hess Midstream Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hess Midstream Partners
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Plains All American Pipeline
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Hess Midstream Partners has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plains All American Pipeline has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Hess Midstream Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.7%. Plains All American Pipeline pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Hess Midstream Partners pays out 108.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Plains All American Pipeline pays out 127.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hess Midstream Partners has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Plains All American Pipeline has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Hess Midstream Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Hess Midstream Partners presently has a consensus target price of $38.86, suggesting a potential downside of 4.45%. Plains All American Pipeline has a consensus target price of $23.23, suggesting a potential downside of 5.57%. Given Hess Midstream Partners' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Hess Midstream Partners is more favorable than Plains All American Pipeline.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hess Midstream Partners
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.89
Plains All American Pipeline
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.35

99.0% of Hess Midstream Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Hess Midstream Partners beats Plains All American Pipeline on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hess Midstream Partners compare to Antero Midstream?

Hess Midstream Partners (NYSE:HESM) and Antero Midstream (NYSE:AM) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Hess Midstream Partners presently has a consensus target price of $38.86, indicating a potential downside of 4.45%. Antero Midstream has a consensus target price of $24.25, indicating a potential upside of 6.62%. Given Antero Midstream's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Antero Midstream is more favorable than Hess Midstream Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hess Midstream Partners
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.89
Antero Midstream
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17

Hess Midstream Partners has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Antero Midstream has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Hess Midstream Partners and Hess Midstream Partners both had 5 articles in the media. Antero Midstream's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Hess Midstream Partners' score of 1.13 indicating that Antero Midstream is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hess Midstream Partners
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Antero Midstream
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Antero Midstream has a net margin of 33.90% compared to Hess Midstream Partners' net margin of 22.64%. Hess Midstream Partners' return on equity of 84.47% beat Antero Midstream's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hess Midstream Partners22.64% 84.47% 8.40%
Antero Midstream 33.90%20.38%6.92%

Antero Midstream has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hess Midstream Partners. Hess Midstream Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antero Midstream, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hess Midstream Partners$1.62B5.17$352.90M$2.8914.07
Antero Midstream$1.19B9.09$413.16M$0.8626.45

Hess Midstream Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.7%. Antero Midstream pays an annual dividend of $0.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Hess Midstream Partners pays out 108.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Antero Midstream pays out 104.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hess Midstream Partners has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Hess Midstream Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

99.0% of Hess Midstream Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.0% of Antero Midstream shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Antero Midstream shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Antero Midstream beats Hess Midstream Partners on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hess Midstream Partners compare to DT Midstream?

DT Midstream (NYSE:DTM) and Hess Midstream Partners (NYSE:HESM) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, DT Midstream had 2 more articles in the media than Hess Midstream Partners. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for DT Midstream and 5 mentions for Hess Midstream Partners. DT Midstream's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Hess Midstream Partners' score of 1.13 indicating that DT Midstream is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
DT Midstream
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hess Midstream Partners
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

81.5% of DT Midstream shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.0% of Hess Midstream Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of DT Midstream shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

DT Midstream currently has a consensus target price of $155.69, suggesting a potential upside of 6.85%. Hess Midstream Partners has a consensus target price of $38.86, suggesting a potential downside of 4.45%. Given DT Midstream's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe DT Midstream is more favorable than Hess Midstream Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DT Midstream
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Hess Midstream Partners
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.89

DT Midstream has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hess Midstream Partners has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

DT Midstream has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hess Midstream Partners. Hess Midstream Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DT Midstream, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DT Midstream$1.28B11.65$441M$4.5232.24
Hess Midstream Partners$1.62B5.17$352.90M$2.8914.07

DT Midstream has a net margin of 36.28% compared to Hess Midstream Partners' net margin of 22.64%. Hess Midstream Partners' return on equity of 84.47% beat DT Midstream's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DT Midstream36.28% 9.53% 4.60%
Hess Midstream Partners 22.64%84.47%8.40%

DT Midstream pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Hess Midstream Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.7%. DT Midstream pays out 77.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hess Midstream Partners pays out 108.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. DT Midstream has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Hess Midstream Partners has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Hess Midstream Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

DT Midstream beats Hess Midstream Partners on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hess Midstream Partners compare to Enterprise Products Partners?

Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE:EPD) and Hess Midstream Partners (NYSE:HESM) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

Enterprise Products Partners currently has a consensus price target of $39.93, suggesting a potential upside of 3.16%. Hess Midstream Partners has a consensus price target of $38.86, suggesting a potential downside of 4.45%. Given Enterprise Products Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Enterprise Products Partners is more favorable than Hess Midstream Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Enterprise Products Partners
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44
Hess Midstream Partners
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.89

In the previous week, Enterprise Products Partners had 8 more articles in the media than Hess Midstream Partners. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Enterprise Products Partners and 5 mentions for Hess Midstream Partners. Hess Midstream Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Enterprise Products Partners' score of 0.81 indicating that Hess Midstream Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Enterprise Products Partners
7 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hess Midstream Partners
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Enterprise Products Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Hess Midstream Partners. Hess Midstream Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enterprise Products Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Enterprise Products Partners$51.57B1.62$5.81B$2.7014.34
Hess Midstream Partners$1.62B5.17$352.90M$2.8914.07

Hess Midstream Partners has a net margin of 22.64% compared to Enterprise Products Partners' net margin of 11.45%. Hess Midstream Partners' return on equity of 84.47% beat Enterprise Products Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Enterprise Products Partners11.45% 19.53% 7.53%
Hess Midstream Partners 22.64%84.47%8.40%

Enterprise Products Partners has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hess Midstream Partners has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

26.1% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.0% of Hess Midstream Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 32.6% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Enterprise Products Partners pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Hess Midstream Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.7%. Enterprise Products Partners pays out 83.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hess Midstream Partners pays out 108.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enterprise Products Partners has raised its dividend for 28 consecutive years and Hess Midstream Partners has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Summary

Enterprise Products Partners beats Hess Midstream Partners on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hess Midstream Partners compare to Energy Transfer?

Hess Midstream Partners (NYSE:HESM) and Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends and earnings.

99.0% of Hess Midstream Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hess Midstream Partners has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 25 more articles in the media than Hess Midstream Partners. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Energy Transfer and 5 mentions for Hess Midstream Partners. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Hess Midstream Partners' score of 1.13 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hess Midstream Partners
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Energy Transfer
24 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Hess Midstream Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.7%. Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Hess Midstream Partners pays out 108.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hess Midstream Partners has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Energy Transfer has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Hess Midstream Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Hess Midstream Partners presently has a consensus target price of $38.86, indicating a potential downside of 4.45%. Energy Transfer has a consensus target price of $23.50, indicating a potential upside of 15.34%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Hess Midstream Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hess Midstream Partners
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.89
Energy Transfer
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.13

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Hess Midstream Partners. Hess Midstream Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Transfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hess Midstream Partners$1.62B5.17$352.90M$2.8914.07
Energy Transfer$85.54B0.82$4.18B$1.2016.98

Hess Midstream Partners has a net margin of 22.64% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.66%. Hess Midstream Partners' return on equity of 84.47% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hess Midstream Partners22.64% 84.47% 8.40%
Energy Transfer 4.66%9.77%3.17%

Summary

Energy Transfer beats Hess Midstream Partners on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hess Midstream Partners News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HESM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HESM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HESM vs. The Competition

MetricHess Midstream PartnersE&P MLP IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$8.35B$3.34B$10.43B$23.46B
Dividend Yield7.70%8.94%11.37%4.21%
P/E Ratio14.0712.3819.7630.72
Price / Sales5.173.65388.7985.54
Price / Cash14.477.0036.9931.69
Price / Book19.276.044.144.73
Net Income$352.90M$150.80M$4.25B$1.07B
7 Day Performance0.85%2.58%1.47%-0.44%
1 Month Performance7.49%6.72%3.05%0.73%
1 Year Performance0.95%9.23%29.45%14.12%

Hess Midstream Partners Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HESM
Hess Midstream Partners
2.8025 of 5 stars
$40.67
+0.5%
$38.86
-4.5%
+3.1%$8.35B$1.62B14.07200
PAA
Plains All American Pipeline
3.1363 of 5 stars
$23.58
+0.1%
$22.93
-2.7%
N/A$16.63B$44.26B18.003,900
AM
Antero Midstream
3.4908 of 5 stars
$22.62
+0.7%
$24.25
+7.2%
+33.2%$10.74B$1.19B26.30590
DTM
DT Midstream
3.6371 of 5 stars
$148.44
+1.6%
$155.23
+4.6%
+44.6%$15.14B$1.24B32.84360
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners
4.3641 of 5 stars
$38.11
-0.5%
$40.13
+5.3%
+21.7%$82.39B$52.60B14.128,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:HESM) was last updated on 7/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners