Hess Midstream Competitors

Hess Midstream (NYSE:HESM) and Callon Petroleum (NYSE:CPE) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

63.2% of Hess Midstream shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.7% of Callon Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Callon Petroleum shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Hess Midstream and Callon Petroleum, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Hess Midstream presently has a consensus target price of $23.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.88%. Callon Petroleum has a consensus target price of $15.1607, indicating a potential downside of 56.94%. Given Hess Midstream's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Hess Midstream is more favorable than Callon Petroleum.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Hess Midstream and Callon Petroleum's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Hess Midstream has higher revenue and earnings than Callon Petroleum. Callon Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hess Midstream, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Hess Midstream and Callon Petroleum's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Hess Midstream has a beta of 2.33, suggesting that its stock price is 133% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Callon Petroleum has a beta of 3.4, suggesting that its stock price is 240% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Hess Midstream beats Callon Petroleum on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Enerplus (NYSE:ERF) and Hess Midstream (NYSE:HESM) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Volatility & Risk

Enerplus has a beta of 3.18, suggesting that its share price is 218% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hess Midstream has a beta of 2.33, suggesting that its share price is 133% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Enerplus pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Hess Midstream pays an annual dividend of $1.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.9%. Enerplus pays out 8.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hess Midstream pays out 149.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enerplus has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Hess Midstream has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Hess Midstream is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Enerplus and Hess Midstream's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Enerplus and Hess Midstream's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Hess Midstream has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Enerplus. Enerplus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hess Midstream, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

51.0% of Enerplus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.2% of Hess Midstream shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Enerplus and Hess Midstream, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Enerplus presently has a consensus target price of $7.9722, suggesting a potential upside of 45.74%. Hess Midstream has a consensus target price of $23.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.88%. Given Enerplus' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Enerplus is more favorable than Hess Midstream.

Summary

Hess Midstream beats Enerplus on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hess Midstream (NYSE:HESM) and Comstock Resources (NYSE:CRK) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Hess Midstream and Comstock Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

Hess Midstream presently has a consensus target price of $23.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.88%. Comstock Resources has a consensus target price of $6.76, suggesting a potential upside of 29.01%. Given Comstock Resources' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Comstock Resources is more favorable than Hess Midstream.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

63.2% of Hess Midstream shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.0% of Comstock Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Comstock Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Hess Midstream and Comstock Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Hess Midstream has a beta of 2.33, indicating that its stock price is 133% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Comstock Resources has a beta of 1.62, indicating that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Hess Midstream and Comstock Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Comstock Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hess Midstream. Comstock Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hess Midstream, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Hess Midstream (NYSE:HESM) and Centennial Resource Development (NASDAQ:CDEV) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Hess Midstream and Centennial Resource Development, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Hess Midstream presently has a consensus price target of $23.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.88%. Centennial Resource Development has a consensus price target of $1.4357, suggesting a potential downside of 66.14%. Given Hess Midstream's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hess Midstream is more favorable than Centennial Resource Development.

Profitability

This table compares Hess Midstream and Centennial Resource Development's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Hess Midstream and Centennial Resource Development's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Hess Midstream has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Centennial Resource Development. Hess Midstream is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centennial Resource Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

63.2% of Hess Midstream shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.7% of Centennial Resource Development shares are held by institutional investors. 31.9% of Centennial Resource Development shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

Hess Midstream has a beta of 2.33, suggesting that its stock price is 133% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Centennial Resource Development has a beta of 6.82, suggesting that its stock price is 582% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Hess Midstream beats Centennial Resource Development on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kosmos Energy (NYSE:KOS) and Hess Midstream (NYSE:HESM) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Kosmos Energy and Hess Midstream, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Kosmos Energy presently has a consensus target price of $2.6150, suggesting a potential downside of 5.94%. Hess Midstream has a consensus target price of $23.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.88%. Given Hess Midstream's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hess Midstream is more favorable than Kosmos Energy.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

80.4% of Kosmos Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.2% of Hess Midstream shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Kosmos Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Kosmos Energy has a beta of 3.77, suggesting that its stock price is 277% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hess Midstream has a beta of 2.33, suggesting that its stock price is 133% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Kosmos Energy and Hess Midstream's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Kosmos Energy and Hess Midstream's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Hess Midstream has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Kosmos Energy. Kosmos Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hess Midstream, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Hess Midstream beats Kosmos Energy on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Vermilion Energy (NYSE:VET) and Hess Midstream (NYSE:HESM) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Volatility and Risk

Vermilion Energy has a beta of 3, meaning that its stock price is 200% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hess Midstream has a beta of 2.33, meaning that its stock price is 133% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

13.6% of Vermilion Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.2% of Hess Midstream shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Vermilion Energy and Hess Midstream, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Vermilion Energy presently has a consensus price target of $9.2778, suggesting a potential upside of 33.49%. Hess Midstream has a consensus price target of $23.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.88%. Given Vermilion Energy's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Vermilion Energy is more favorable than Hess Midstream.

Profitability

This table compares Vermilion Energy and Hess Midstream's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Vermilion Energy and Hess Midstream's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Hess Midstream has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vermilion Energy. Hess Midstream is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vermilion Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Hess Midstream beats Vermilion Energy on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.