Go Pro

Plains GP (PAGP) Competitors

Plains GP logo
$28.47 +0.25 (+0.89%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

PAGP vs. CHRD, PAA, DVN, EPD, and ET

Should you buy Plains GP stock or one of its competitors? Plains GP's main competitors and comparable companies include Chord Energy (CHRD), Plains All American Pipeline (PAA), Devon Energy (DVN), Enterprise Products Partners (EPD), and Energy Transfer (ET). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil, gas & consumable fuels" industry.

How does Plains GP compare to Chord Energy?

Chord Energy (NASDAQ:CHRD) and Plains GP (NYSE:PAGP) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

Plains GP has higher revenue and earnings than Chord Energy. Chord Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plains GP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chord Energy$4.88B1.69$44.46M$14.9210.08
Plains GP$52.31B0.11$103M$2.7910.20

Chord Energy has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plains GP has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

97.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.3% of Plains GP shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Plains GP shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Chord Energy has a net margin of 13.42% compared to Plains GP's net margin of 0.21%. Chord Energy's return on equity of 10.18% beat Plains GP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chord Energy13.42% 10.18% 6.24%
Plains GP 0.21%0.70%0.36%

In the previous week, Plains GP had 2 more articles in the media than Chord Energy. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Plains GP and 6 mentions for Chord Energy. Chord Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Plains GP's score of 0.98 indicating that Chord Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chord Energy
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Plains GP
4 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Chord Energy currently has a consensus price target of $152.54, indicating a potential upside of 1.42%. Plains GP has a consensus price target of $23.55, indicating a potential downside of 17.30%. Given Chord Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Chord Energy is more favorable than Plains GP.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chord Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.69
Plains GP
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.31

Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Chord Energy pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Plains GP pays out 59.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chord Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Chord Energy beats Plains GP on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Plains GP compare to Plains All American Pipeline?

Plains All American Pipeline (NASDAQ:PAA) and Plains GP (NYSE:PAGP) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

Plains All American Pipeline currently has a consensus price target of $23.54, indicating a potential downside of 8.98%. Plains GP has a consensus price target of $23.55, indicating a potential downside of 17.30%. Given Plains All American Pipeline's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Plains All American Pipeline is more favorable than Plains GP.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Plains All American Pipeline
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.41
Plains GP
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.31

Plains All American Pipeline pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Plains All American Pipeline pays out 46.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Plains GP pays out 59.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Plains All American Pipeline has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Plains All American Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

41.8% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.3% of Plains GP shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Plains GP shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Plains All American Pipeline has a net margin of 5.29% compared to Plains GP's net margin of 0.21%. Plains All American Pipeline's return on equity of 12.13% beat Plains GP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Plains All American Pipeline5.29% 12.13% 4.59%
Plains GP 0.21%0.70%0.36%

In the previous week, Plains GP had 2 more articles in the media than Plains All American Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Plains GP and 6 mentions for Plains All American Pipeline. Plains GP's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Plains All American Pipeline's score of 0.58 indicating that Plains GP is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Plains All American Pipeline
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Plains GP
4 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Plains All American Pipeline has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Plains GP. Plains All American Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plains GP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Plains All American Pipeline$44.26B0.41$1.44B$3.617.16
Plains GP$52.31B0.11$103M$2.7910.20

Plains All American Pipeline has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plains GP has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Plains All American Pipeline beats Plains GP on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Plains GP compare to Devon Energy?

Devon Energy (NYSE:DVN) and Plains GP (NYSE:PAGP) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 16.67% compared to Plains GP's net margin of 0.21%. Devon Energy's return on equity of 14.93% beat Plains GP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Devon Energy16.67% 14.93% 7.91%
Plains GP 0.21%0.70%0.36%

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 25 more articles in the media than Plains GP. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Devon Energy and 8 mentions for Plains GP. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat Plains GP's score of 0.98 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Devon Energy
32 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Plains GP
4 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Devon Energy currently has a consensus price target of $59.23, indicating a potential upside of 20.71%. Plains GP has a consensus price target of $23.55, indicating a potential downside of 17.30%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than Plains GP.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Devon Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
22 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.90
Plains GP
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.31

Devon Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Plains GP. Plains GP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Devon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Devon Energy$17.19B3.14$2.64B$4.2111.66
Plains GP$52.31B0.11$103M$2.7910.20

Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Devon Energy pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Plains GP pays out 59.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Devon Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

69.7% of Devon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.3% of Plains GP shares are held by institutional investors. 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Plains GP shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Devon Energy has a beta of 0.37, indicating that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plains GP has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Devon Energy beats Plains GP on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Plains GP compare to Enterprise Products Partners?

Plains GP (NYSE:PAGP) and Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE:EPD) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Enterprise Products Partners pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Plains GP pays out 59.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enterprise Products Partners pays out 77.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enterprise Products Partners has raised its dividend for 28 consecutive years. Plains GP is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Plains GP presently has a consensus price target of $23.55, indicating a potential downside of 17.30%. Enterprise Products Partners has a consensus price target of $40.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.73%. Given Enterprise Products Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Enterprise Products Partners is more favorable than Plains GP.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Plains GP
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.31
Enterprise Products Partners
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Plains GP has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enterprise Products Partners has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Enterprise Products Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Plains GP. Plains GP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enterprise Products Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Plains GP$52.31B0.11$103M$2.7910.20
Enterprise Products Partners$52.60B1.61$5.81B$2.8813.65

Enterprise Products Partners has a net margin of 10.79% compared to Plains GP's net margin of 0.21%. Enterprise Products Partners' return on equity of 20.67% beat Plains GP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Plains GP0.21% 0.70% 0.36%
Enterprise Products Partners 10.79%20.67%7.93%

In the previous week, Enterprise Products Partners had 25 more articles in the media than Plains GP. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Enterprise Products Partners and 8 mentions for Plains GP. Enterprise Products Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Plains GP's score of 0.98 indicating that Enterprise Products Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Plains GP
4 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Enterprise Products Partners
24 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

88.3% of Plains GP shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.1% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of Plains GP shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 32.6% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Enterprise Products Partners beats Plains GP on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Plains GP compare to Energy Transfer?

Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) and Plains GP (NYSE:PAGP) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Energy Transfer has a net margin of 4.87% compared to Plains GP's net margin of 0.21%. Energy Transfer's return on equity of 11.55% beat Plains GP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Energy Transfer4.87% 11.55% 3.69%
Plains GP 0.21%0.70%0.36%

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 8 more articles in the media than Plains GP. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Energy Transfer and 8 mentions for Plains GP. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Plains GP's score of 0.98 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Energy Transfer
11 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Plains GP
4 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Plains GP. Plains GP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Transfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Energy Transfer$85.54B0.87$4.18B$1.4714.62
Plains GP$52.31B0.11$103M$2.7910.20

38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.3% of Plains GP shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Plains GP shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Energy Transfer presently has a consensus target price of $24.08, suggesting a potential upside of 12.07%. Plains GP has a consensus target price of $23.55, suggesting a potential downside of 17.30%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Plains GP.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Energy Transfer
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.93
Plains GP
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.31

Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plains GP has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Energy Transfer pays out 92.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Plains GP pays out 59.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Energy Transfer has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Energy Transfer is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Energy Transfer beats Plains GP on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Plains GP News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PAGP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PAGP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PAGP vs. The Competition

MetricPlains GPOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$5.63B$11.44B$10.01B$24.02B
Dividend Yield5.96%11.23%11.49%3.73%
P/E Ratio53.7218.5721.7129.40
Price / Sales0.11521.46427.2920.15
Price / Cash3.4339.8436.2032.44
Price / Book0.373.333.127.55
Net Income$103M$5.27B$4.33B$1.07B
7 Day Performance4.82%1.64%1.63%-1.95%
1 Month Performance8.13%6.17%5.80%0.58%
1 Year Performance47.51%35.95%37.52%11.90%

Plains GP Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PAGP
Plains GP
2.8645 of 5 stars
$28.47
+0.9%
$23.55
-17.3%
+46.2%$5.63B$52.31B53.724,100
CHRD
Chord Energy
3.4903 of 5 stars
$147.11
+0.8%
$152.54
+3.7%
+33.9%$7.99B$4.88B9.86530
PAA
Plains All American Pipeline
2.4206 of 5 stars
$25.65
+0.7%
$23.54
-8.2%
N/A$17.98B$44.26B7.113,900
DVN
Devon Energy
4.8 of 5 stars
$48.58
+2.6%
$59.23
+21.9%
+34.5%$52.09B$17.19B11.542,200
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners
3.6152 of 5 stars
$38.88
-0.4%
$40.00
+2.9%
+20.9%$84.26B$52.60B13.508,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:PAGP) was last updated on 9/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners