Free Trial

Plains GP (PAGP) Competitors

Plains GP logo
$24.63 +0.28 (+1.15%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$24.44 -0.18 (-0.75%)
As of 07:28 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PAGP vs. FANG, PAA, DVN, EPD, and ET

Should you buy Plains GP stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Plains GP with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Plains GP include Diamondback Energy (FANG), Plains All American Pipeline (PAA), Devon Energy (DVN), Enterprise Products Partners (EPD), and Energy Transfer (ET).

How does Plains GP compare to Diamondback Energy?

Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) and Plains GP (NYSE:PAGP) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

Diamondback Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Plains GP. Plains GP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diamondback Energy$15.03B3.68$1.66B$0.86228.55
Plains GP$45.26B0.11$103M$0.9725.39

Diamondback Energy currently has a consensus price target of $223.63, suggesting a potential upside of 13.78%. Plains GP has a consensus price target of $23.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.62%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than Plains GP.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Diamondback Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.96
Plains GP
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.36

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Diamondback Energy pays out 511.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Plains GP pays out 172.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Plains GP is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 1.87% compared to Plains GP's net margin of 0.21%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 7.76% beat Plains GP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Diamondback Energy1.87% 7.76% 4.67%
Plains GP 0.21%0.70%0.36%

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 50 more articles in the media than Plains GP. MarketBeat recorded 50 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 0 mentions for Plains GP. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Plains GP's score of 0.00 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Diamondback Energy Positive
Plains GP Neutral

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.42, meaning that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plains GP has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.3% of Plains GP shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Plains GP shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats Plains GP on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Plains GP compare to Plains All American Pipeline?

Plains GP (NYSE:PAGP) and Plains All American Pipeline (NASDAQ:PAA) are both pipelines, except natural gas industry companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Plains All American Pipeline had 4 more articles in the media than Plains GP. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Plains All American Pipeline and 0 mentions for Plains GP. Plains All American Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 1.63 beat Plains GP's score of 0.00 indicating that Plains All American Pipeline is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Plains GP Neutral
Plains All American Pipeline Very Positive

88.3% of Plains GP shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of Plains GP shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Plains All American Pipeline has a net margin of 2.53% compared to Plains GP's net margin of 0.21%. Plains All American Pipeline's return on equity of 12.17% beat Plains GP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Plains GP0.21% 0.70% 0.36%
Plains All American Pipeline 2.53%12.17%4.54%

Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Plains All American Pipeline pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. Plains GP pays out 172.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Plains All American Pipeline pays out 127.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Plains All American Pipeline has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Plains All American Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Plains All American Pipeline has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Plains GP. Plains All American Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plains GP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Plains GP$45.26B0.11$103M$0.9725.39
Plains All American Pipeline$44.26B0.36$1.44B$1.3117.35

Plains GP currently has a consensus price target of $23.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.62%. Plains All American Pipeline has a consensus price target of $22.93, indicating a potential upside of 0.87%. Given Plains All American Pipeline's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Plains All American Pipeline is more favorable than Plains GP.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Plains GP
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.36
Plains All American Pipeline
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

Plains GP has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plains All American Pipeline has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Plains All American Pipeline beats Plains GP on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Plains GP compare to Devon Energy?

Plains GP (NYSE:PAGP) and Devon Energy (NYSE:DVN) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Plains GP has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Devon Energy has a beta of 0.37, suggesting that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 13.71% compared to Plains GP's net margin of 0.21%. Devon Energy's return on equity of 15.22% beat Plains GP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Plains GP0.21% 0.70% 0.36%
Devon Energy 13.71%15.22%7.39%

Devon Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Plains GP. Devon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plains GP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Plains GP$45.26B0.11$103M$0.9725.39
Devon Energy$17.19B1.68$2.64B$3.5912.98

Plains GP currently has a consensus price target of $23.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.62%. Devon Energy has a consensus price target of $58.67, suggesting a potential upside of 25.94%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than Plains GP.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Plains GP
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.36
Devon Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
24 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.90

88.3% of Plains GP shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of Devon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of Plains GP shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Plains GP pays out 172.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Devon Energy pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Devon Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 54 more articles in the media than Plains GP. MarketBeat recorded 54 mentions for Devon Energy and 0 mentions for Plains GP. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Plains GP's score of 0.00 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Plains GP Neutral
Devon Energy Positive

Summary

Devon Energy beats Plains GP on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Plains GP compare to Enterprise Products Partners?

Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE:EPD) and Plains GP (NYSE:PAGP) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Enterprise Products Partners had 16 more articles in the media than Plains GP. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Enterprise Products Partners and 0 mentions for Plains GP. Enterprise Products Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Plains GP's score of 0.00 indicating that Enterprise Products Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Enterprise Products Partners Positive
Plains GP Neutral

26.1% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.3% of Plains GP shares are held by institutional investors. 32.6% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Plains GP shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Enterprise Products Partners pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Enterprise Products Partners pays out 81.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Plains GP pays out 172.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enterprise Products Partners has raised its dividend for 28 consecutive years.

Enterprise Products Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Plains GP. Enterprise Products Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plains GP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Enterprise Products Partners$52.60B1.56$5.81B$2.7014.05
Plains GP$45.26B0.11$103M$0.9725.39

Enterprise Products Partners has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plains GP has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Enterprise Products Partners currently has a consensus target price of $39.67, indicating a potential upside of 4.55%. Plains GP has a consensus target price of $23.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.62%. Given Enterprise Products Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Enterprise Products Partners is more favorable than Plains GP.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Enterprise Products Partners
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.47
Plains GP
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.36

Enterprise Products Partners has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Plains GP's net margin of 0.21%. Enterprise Products Partners' return on equity of 19.53% beat Plains GP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Enterprise Products Partners11.45% 19.53% 7.53%
Plains GP 0.21%0.70%0.36%

Summary

Enterprise Products Partners beats Plains GP on 16 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Plains GP compare to Energy Transfer?

Plains GP (NYSE:PAGP) and Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, risk and dividends.

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Plains GP. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plains GP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Plains GP$45.26B0.11$103M$0.9725.39
Energy Transfer$85.54B0.77$4.18B$1.2015.86

Energy Transfer has a net margin of 4.66% compared to Plains GP's net margin of 0.21%. Energy Transfer's return on equity of 9.77% beat Plains GP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Plains GP0.21% 0.70% 0.36%
Energy Transfer 4.66%9.77%3.17%

Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. Plains GP pays out 172.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Energy Transfer is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

88.3% of Plains GP shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.9% of Plains GP shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Plains GP has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 17 more articles in the media than Plains GP. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Energy Transfer and 0 mentions for Plains GP. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Plains GP's score of 0.00 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Plains GP Neutral
Energy Transfer Positive

Plains GP currently has a consensus price target of $23.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.62%. Energy Transfer has a consensus price target of $23.45, indicating a potential upside of 23.21%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Plains GP.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Plains GP
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.36
Energy Transfer
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.07

Summary

Energy Transfer beats Plains GP on 16 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Plains GP News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PAGP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PAGP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PAGP vs. The Competition

MetricPlains GPPipelines, except natural gas IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$4.87B$10.36B$10.10B$23.11B
Dividend Yield6.83%7.13%10.42%4.08%
P/E Ratio46.4730.5319.5627.39
Price / Sales0.110.24778.2120.96
Price / Cash3.435.1637.1924.21
Price / Book0.320.894.254.59
Net Income$103M$769M$4.23B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-0.81%-0.80%-2.82%-0.60%
1 Month Performance6.21%5.43%-1.19%-1.14%
1 Year Performance31.57%31.57%40.78%18.94%

Plains GP Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PAGP
Plains GP
1.8346 of 5 stars
$24.63
+1.1%
$23.00
-6.6%
+31.1%$4.87B$45.26B46.474,100
FANG
Diamondback Energy
3.6471 of 5 stars
$199.03
+3.9%
$223.26
+12.2%
+36.7%$53.87B$15.03B231.431,762
PAA
Plains All American Pipeline
3.3173 of 5 stars
$22.93
+2.2%
$22.54
-1.7%
N/A$15.83B$44.26B17.503,900
DVN
Devon Energy
4.8443 of 5 stars
$46.28
+4.0%
$57.96
+25.2%
+34.7%$27.65B$17.19B12.892,200
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners
4.8193 of 5 stars
$37.22
+1.2%
$39.67
+6.6%
+17.6%$79.53B$52.60B13.788,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:PAGP) was last updated on 6/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners