Plains GP Competitors

Enbridge (NYSE:ENB) and Plains GP (NYSE:PAGP) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Enbridge and Plains GP's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Enbridge and Plains GP, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Enbridge currently has a consensus target price of $52.40, suggesting a potential upside of 31.46%. Plains GP has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.40%. Given Enbridge's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Enbridge is more favorable than Plains GP.

Dividends

Enbridge pays an annual dividend of $2.61 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Enbridge pays out 130.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Plains GP pays out 36.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enbridge has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Plains GP is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Enbridge and Plains GP's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Enbridge has higher revenue and earnings than Plains GP. Plains GP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enbridge, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

51.1% of Enbridge shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.5% of Plains GP shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Enbridge shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.5% of Plains GP shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Enbridge has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its share price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Plains GP has a beta of 2.24, meaning that its share price is 124% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Enbridge beats Plains GP on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Mplx (NYSE:MPLX) and Plains GP (NYSE:PAGP) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Mplx and Plains GP's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Mplx and Plains GP, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Mplx currently has a consensus target price of $25.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 10.61%. Plains GP has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.40%. Given Plains GP's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Plains GP is more favorable than Mplx.

Dividends

Mplx pays an annual dividend of $2.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.7%. Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Mplx pays out 118.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Plains GP pays out 36.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Mplx has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Mplx is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Mplx and Plains GP's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Mplx has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Plains GP. Plains GP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mplx, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

29.0% of Mplx shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.5% of Plains GP shares are held by institutional investors. 12.5% of Plains GP shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Mplx has a beta of 2.01, meaning that its share price is 101% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Plains GP has a beta of 2.24, meaning that its share price is 124% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Mplx beats Plains GP on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Magellan Midstream Partners (NYSE:MMP) and Plains GP (NYSE:PAGP) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Magellan Midstream Partners and Plains GP's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Magellan Midstream Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Plains GP. Plains GP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magellan Midstream Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Magellan Midstream Partners pays an annual dividend of $4.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.7%. Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Magellan Midstream Partners pays out 86.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Plains GP pays out 36.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magellan Midstream Partners has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Magellan Midstream Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Risk and Volatility

Magellan Midstream Partners has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Plains GP has a beta of 2.24, meaning that its share price is 124% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

62.0% of Magellan Midstream Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.5% of Plains GP shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Magellan Midstream Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.5% of Plains GP shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Magellan Midstream Partners and Plains GP's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Magellan Midstream Partners and Plains GP, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Magellan Midstream Partners currently has a consensus target price of $48.7059, suggesting a potential upside of 2.78%. Plains GP has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.40%. Given Plains GP's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Plains GP is more favorable than Magellan Midstream Partners.

Summary

Magellan Midstream Partners beats Plains GP on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Phillips 66 Partners (NYSE:PSXP) and Plains GP (NYSE:PAGP) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Phillips 66 Partners and Plains GP's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Phillips 66 Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Plains GP. Plains GP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips 66 Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Phillips 66 Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.7%. Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Phillips 66 Partners pays out 81.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Plains GP pays out 36.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Phillips 66 Partners has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Phillips 66 Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Risk and Volatility

Phillips 66 Partners has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Plains GP has a beta of 2.24, suggesting that its share price is 124% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

22.2% of Phillips 66 Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.5% of Plains GP shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.5% of Plains GP shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Phillips 66 Partners and Plains GP's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Phillips 66 Partners and Plains GP, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Phillips 66 Partners currently has a consensus price target of $34.00, suggesting a potential downside of 5.32%. Plains GP has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.40%. Given Plains GP's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Plains GP is more favorable than Phillips 66 Partners.

Summary

Phillips 66 Partners beats Plains GP on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Plains All American Pipeline (NYSE:PAA) and Plains GP (NYSE:PAGP) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Plains All American Pipeline and Plains GP's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Plains All American Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plains GP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Plains All American Pipeline pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Plains All American Pipeline pays out 28.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Plains GP pays out 36.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Plains All American Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Risk and Volatility

Plains All American Pipeline has a beta of 2.22, suggesting that its share price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Plains GP has a beta of 2.24, suggesting that its share price is 124% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

45.6% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.5% of Plains GP shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.5% of Plains GP shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Plains All American Pipeline and Plains GP's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Plains All American Pipeline and Plains GP, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Plains All American Pipeline currently has a consensus price target of $23.50, suggesting a potential upside of 137.85%. Plains GP has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.40%. Given Plains All American Pipeline's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Plains All American Pipeline is more favorable than Plains GP.

Summary

Plains All American Pipeline beats Plains GP on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Shell Midstream Partners (NYSE:SHLX) and Plains GP (NYSE:PAGP) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Shell Midstream Partners and Plains GP's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Shell Midstream Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Plains GP. Plains GP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shell Midstream Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Shell Midstream Partners pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.3%. Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Shell Midstream Partners pays out 110.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Plains GP pays out 36.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Shell Midstream Partners has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Shell Midstream Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Risk and Volatility

Shell Midstream Partners has a beta of 1.74, suggesting that its share price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Plains GP has a beta of 2.24, suggesting that its share price is 124% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

27.5% of Shell Midstream Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.5% of Plains GP shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.5% of Plains GP shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Shell Midstream Partners and Plains GP's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Shell Midstream Partners and Plains GP, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Shell Midstream Partners currently has a consensus price target of $12.60, suggesting a potential downside of 15.94%. Plains GP has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.40%. Given Plains GP's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Plains GP is more favorable than Shell Midstream Partners.

Summary

Plains GP beats Shell Midstream Partners on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.