Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) Competitors

Chevron has higher revenue and earnings than Enterprise Products Partners. Enterprise Products Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chevron, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Chevron has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enterprise Products Partners has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Enterprise Products Partners has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Chevron's net margin of 5.79%. Enterprise Products Partners' return on equity of 19.53% beat Chevron's return on equity.

Chevron pays an annual dividend of $7.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Enterprise Products Partners pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Chevron pays out 123.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enterprise Products Partners pays out 81.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chevron has raised its dividend for 38 consecutive years and Enterprise Products Partners has raised its dividend for 28 consecutive years. Enterprise Products Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

72.4% of Chevron shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.1% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Chevron shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 32.6% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Chevron had 78 more articles in the media than Enterprise Products Partners. MarketBeat recorded 100 mentions for Chevron and 22 mentions for Enterprise Products Partners. Chevron's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Enterprise Products Partners' score of 0.77 indicating that Chevron is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Chevron currently has a consensus price target of $205.70, suggesting a potential upside of 13.96%. Enterprise Products Partners has a consensus price target of $39.67, suggesting a potential upside of 8.57%. Given Chevron's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Chevron is more favorable than Enterprise Products Partners.

Enterprise Products Partners pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Enbridge pays an annual dividend of $2.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Enterprise Products Partners pays out 81.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enbridge pays out 133.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enterprise Products Partners has increased its dividend for 28 consecutive years and Enbridge has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Enterprise Products Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Enterprise Products Partners has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enbridge has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Enterprise Products Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Enbridge. Enterprise Products Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enbridge, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Enterprise Products Partners has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Enbridge's net margin of 9.83%. Enterprise Products Partners' return on equity of 19.53% beat Enbridge's return on equity.

26.1% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.6% of Enbridge shares are owned by institutional investors. 32.6% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Enbridge shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Enterprise Products Partners presently has a consensus target price of $39.67, suggesting a potential upside of 8.57%. Enbridge has a consensus target price of $66.50, suggesting a potential upside of 18.88%. Given Enbridge's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Enbridge is more favorable than Enterprise Products Partners.

In the previous week, Enterprise Products Partners had 6 more articles in the media than Enbridge. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Enterprise Products Partners and 16 mentions for Enbridge. Enbridge's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Enterprise Products Partners' score of 0.77 indicating that Enbridge is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

26.1% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. 32.6% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Enterprise Products Partners has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Enterprise Products Partners pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. Enterprise Products Partners pays out 81.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enterprise Products Partners has raised its dividend for 28 consecutive years and Energy Transfer has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Enterprise Products Partners had 10 more articles in the media than Energy Transfer. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Enterprise Products Partners and 12 mentions for Energy Transfer. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Enterprise Products Partners' score of 0.77 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Enterprise Products Partners currently has a consensus target price of $39.67, suggesting a potential upside of 8.57%. Energy Transfer has a consensus target price of $23.45, suggesting a potential upside of 24.19%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Enterprise Products Partners.

Enterprise Products Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Energy Transfer. Enterprise Products Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Transfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Enterprise Products Partners has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.66%. Enterprise Products Partners' return on equity of 19.53% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Enterprise Products Partners pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Kinder Morgan pays an annual dividend of $1.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Enterprise Products Partners pays out 81.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kinder Morgan pays out 79.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enterprise Products Partners has increased its dividend for 28 consecutive years and Kinder Morgan has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years. Enterprise Products Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 18.92% compared to Enterprise Products Partners' net margin of 11.45%. Enterprise Products Partners' return on equity of 19.53% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity.

Enterprise Products Partners presently has a consensus price target of $39.67, suggesting a potential upside of 8.57%. Kinder Morgan has a consensus price target of $34.53, suggesting a potential upside of 9.87%. Given Kinder Morgan's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kinder Morgan is more favorable than Enterprise Products Partners.

In the previous week, Kinder Morgan had 9 more articles in the media than Enterprise Products Partners. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for Kinder Morgan and 22 mentions for Enterprise Products Partners. Kinder Morgan's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Enterprise Products Partners' score of 0.77 indicating that Kinder Morgan is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

26.1% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of Kinder Morgan shares are held by institutional investors. 32.6% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Kinder Morgan shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Enterprise Products Partners has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Enterprise Products Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Kinder Morgan. Enterprise Products Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinder Morgan, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.