Sunoco (SUN) Competitors

Sunoco pays an annual dividend of $4.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Enbridge pays an annual dividend of $2.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Sunoco pays out 88.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enbridge pays out 147.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sunoco has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Enbridge has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Enbridge has a net margin of 7.20% compared to Sunoco's net margin of 2.88%. Sunoco's return on equity of 18.78% beat Enbridge's return on equity.

24.3% of Sunoco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.6% of Enbridge shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Enbridge shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Enbridge has higher revenue and earnings than Sunoco. Sunoco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enbridge, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Enbridge had 15 more articles in the media than Sunoco. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Enbridge and 0 mentions for Sunoco. Sunoco's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Enbridge's score of 0.11 indicating that Sunoco is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Sunoco presently has a consensus target price of $79.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.25%. Enbridge has a consensus target price of $65.88, indicating a potential upside of 39.12%. Given Enbridge's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Enbridge is more favorable than Sunoco.

Sunoco has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enbridge has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

24.3% of Sunoco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Sunoco. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sunoco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 13 more articles in the media than Sunoco. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Energy Transfer and 0 mentions for Sunoco. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Sunoco's score of 0.63 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Sunoco pays an annual dividend of $4.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. Sunoco pays out 88.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer pays out 92.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sunoco has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Energy Transfer has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Energy Transfer is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Sunoco has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Sunoco currently has a consensus price target of $79.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.25%. Energy Transfer has a consensus price target of $24.60, indicating a potential upside of 21.48%. Given Energy Transfer's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Sunoco.

Energy Transfer has a net margin of 4.87% compared to Sunoco's net margin of 2.88%. Sunoco's return on equity of 18.78% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Sunoco has higher revenue and earnings than Global Partners. Global Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sunoco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Sunoco has a net margin of 2.88% compared to Global Partners' net margin of 0.91%. Global Partners' return on equity of 30.87% beat Sunoco's return on equity.

Global Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.4%. Sunoco pays an annual dividend of $4.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Global Partners pays out 63.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sunoco pays out 88.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Partners has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Sunoco has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Global Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

38.1% of Global Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.3% of Sunoco shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.5% of Global Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Global Partners had 5 more articles in the media than Sunoco. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Global Partners and 0 mentions for Sunoco. Sunoco's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Global Partners' score of 0.24 indicating that Sunoco is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Global Partners presently has a consensus target price of $46.00, suggesting a potential downside of 5.06%. Sunoco has a consensus target price of $79.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.25%. Given Sunoco's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sunoco is more favorable than Global Partners.

Global Partners has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sunoco has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than Sunoco. Sunoco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Sunoco pays an annual dividend of $4.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Marathon Petroleum pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sunoco pays out 88.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Marathon Petroleum has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Sunoco has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Marathon Petroleum presently has a consensus price target of $417.88, indicating a potential downside of 13.74%. Sunoco has a consensus price target of $79.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.25%. Given Sunoco's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sunoco is more favorable than Marathon Petroleum.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sunoco has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.3% of Sunoco shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 5.48% compared to Sunoco's net margin of 2.88%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 31.96% beat Sunoco's return on equity.

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 32 more articles in the media than Sunoco. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 0 mentions for Sunoco. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Sunoco's score of 0.63 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the media.