Sunoco (SUN) Competitors

Enbridge has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sunoco has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Enbridge had 14 more articles in the media than Sunoco. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Enbridge and 3 mentions for Sunoco. Enbridge's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Sunoco's score of -0.15 indicating that Enbridge is being referred to more favorably in the media.

54.6% of Enbridge shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.3% of Sunoco shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Enbridge shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Enbridge has higher revenue and earnings than Sunoco. Sunoco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enbridge, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Enbridge pays an annual dividend of $2.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Sunoco pays an annual dividend of $3.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. Enbridge pays out 133.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sunoco pays out 101.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enbridge has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Sunoco has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Sunoco is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Enbridge has a net margin of 9.83% compared to Sunoco's net margin of 3.07%. Sunoco's return on equity of 17.52% beat Enbridge's return on equity.

Enbridge currently has a consensus target price of $66.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.73%. Sunoco has a consensus target price of $74.13, suggesting a potential upside of 13.56%. Given Enbridge's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Enbridge is more favorable than Sunoco.

Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sunoco has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. Sunoco pays an annual dividend of $3.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sunoco pays out 101.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Sunoco has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Energy Transfer is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Energy Transfer currently has a consensus price target of $23.45, suggesting a potential upside of 23.05%. Sunoco has a consensus price target of $74.13, suggesting a potential upside of 13.56%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Sunoco.

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 10 more articles in the media than Sunoco. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Energy Transfer and 3 mentions for Sunoco. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Sunoco's score of -0.15 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Sunoco. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sunoco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Energy Transfer has a net margin of 4.66% compared to Sunoco's net margin of 3.07%. Sunoco's return on equity of 17.52% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.3% of Sunoco shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

24.3% of Sunoco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.1% of Global Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.5% of Global Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Sunoco has a beta of 0.43, indicating that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Partners has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Sunoco presently has a consensus price target of $74.13, indicating a potential upside of 13.56%. Global Partners has a consensus price target of $46.00, indicating a potential downside of 3.04%. Given Sunoco's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Sunoco is more favorable than Global Partners.

In the previous week, Global Partners had 2 more articles in the media than Sunoco. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Global Partners and 3 mentions for Sunoco. Global Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Sunoco's score of -0.15 indicating that Global Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Sunoco has a net margin of 3.07% compared to Global Partners' net margin of 0.77%. Global Partners' return on equity of 24.23% beat Sunoco's return on equity.

Sunoco has higher revenue and earnings than Global Partners. Global Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sunoco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Sunoco pays an annual dividend of $3.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. Global Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Sunoco pays out 101.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Partners pays out 85.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sunoco has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Global Partners has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Global Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 42 more articles in the media than Sunoco. MarketBeat recorded 45 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 3 mentions for Sunoco. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Sunoco's score of -0.15 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Sunoco pays an annual dividend of $3.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. Marathon Petroleum pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sunoco pays out 101.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Marathon Petroleum has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Sunoco has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than Sunoco. Sunoco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.3% of Sunoco shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 3.36% compared to Sunoco's net margin of 3.07%. Sunoco's return on equity of 17.52% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sunoco has a beta of 0.43, indicating that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Marathon Petroleum presently has a consensus target price of $272.94, indicating a potential upside of 3.74%. Sunoco has a consensus target price of $74.13, indicating a potential upside of 13.56%. Given Sunoco's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sunoco is more favorable than Marathon Petroleum.