Global Partners (GLP) Competitors

Global Partners has a net margin of 0.91% compared to Evolution Petroleum's net margin of -4.36%. Global Partners' return on equity of 30.87% beat Evolution Petroleum's return on equity.

Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.25, suggesting that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Partners has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

60.1% of Evolution Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.1% of Global Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.5% of Evolution Petroleum shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.5% of Global Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Evolution Petroleum and Evolution Petroleum both had 5 articles in the media. Global Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Evolution Petroleum's score of 0.25 indicating that Global Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Global Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Evolution Petroleum. Global Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Evolution Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Evolution Petroleum currently has a consensus target price of $4.77, suggesting a potential upside of 28.14%. Global Partners has a consensus target price of $46.00, suggesting a potential downside of 13.13%. Given Evolution Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Evolution Petroleum is more favorable than Global Partners.

Evolution Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.9%. Global Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Evolution Petroleum pays out 600.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Partners pays out 63.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Partners has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Global Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Plains GP pays out 59.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Partners pays out 63.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Global Partners has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Plains GP is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Plains GP has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Partners has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Global Partners has a net margin of 0.91% compared to Plains GP's net margin of 0.21%. Global Partners' return on equity of 30.87% beat Plains GP's return on equity.

Plains GP has higher revenue and earnings than Global Partners. Plains GP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Global Partners had 1 more articles in the media than Plains GP. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Global Partners and 4 mentions for Plains GP. Plains GP's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Global Partners' score of 1.05 indicating that Plains GP is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Plains GP currently has a consensus target price of $24.18, indicating a potential downside of 13.61%. Global Partners has a consensus target price of $46.00, indicating a potential downside of 13.13%. Given Global Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Global Partners is more favorable than Plains GP.

88.3% of Plains GP shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.1% of Global Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of Plains GP shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 41.5% of Global Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

38.1% of Global Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of Golar LNG shares are held by institutional investors. 41.5% of Global Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Golar LNG shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Golar LNG has a net margin of 31.27% compared to Global Partners' net margin of 0.91%. Global Partners' return on equity of 30.87% beat Golar LNG's return on equity.

Global Partners has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golar LNG has a beta of 0.05, indicating that its share price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

Global Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Golar LNG pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Global Partners pays out 63.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Golar LNG pays out 62.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Global Partners has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Golar LNG has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Global Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Global Partners presently has a consensus price target of $46.00, indicating a potential downside of 13.13%. Golar LNG has a consensus price target of $63.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.12%. Given Golar LNG's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Golar LNG is more favorable than Global Partners.

Global Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Golar LNG. Global Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golar LNG, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Global Partners had 2 more articles in the media than Golar LNG. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Global Partners and 3 mentions for Golar LNG. Global Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Golar LNG's score of 0.87 indicating that Global Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

International Seaways has a beta of -0.13, suggesting that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Partners has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

International Seaways has a net margin of 61.98% compared to Global Partners' net margin of 0.91%. International Seaways' return on equity of 31.75% beat Global Partners' return on equity.

International Seaways has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Global Partners. International Seaways is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

International Seaways presently has a consensus price target of $94.75, suggesting a potential downside of 8.53%. Global Partners has a consensus price target of $46.00, suggesting a potential downside of 13.13%. Given International Seaways' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe International Seaways is more favorable than Global Partners.

67.3% of International Seaways shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.1% of Global Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of International Seaways shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.5% of Global Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

International Seaways pays an annual dividend of $20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 19.5%. Global Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. International Seaways pays out 129.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Partners pays out 63.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Partners has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

In the previous week, International Seaways had 3 more articles in the media than Global Partners. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for International Seaways and 5 mentions for Global Partners. International Seaways' average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Global Partners' score of 1.05 indicating that International Seaways is being referred to more favorably in the media.