Does the media prefer GLP or USAC?

In the previous week, USA Compression Partners had 12 more articles in the media than Global Partners. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for USA Compression Partners and 4 mentions for Global Partners. Global Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat USA Compression Partners' score of -0.62 indicating that Global Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Global Partners 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral USA Compression Partners 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Negative

Which has better valuation and earnings, INGM or GLP?

Ingram Micro has higher revenue and earnings than Global Partners. Global Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ingram Micro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ingram Micro $52.56B 0.13 $327.88M $1.51 19.21 Global Partners $18.56B 0.09 $79.22M $3.60 13.53

Does the media prefer INGM or GLP?

In the previous week, Ingram Micro had 4 more articles in the media than Global Partners. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Ingram Micro and 4 mentions for Global Partners. Ingram Micro's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Global Partners' score of 0.33 indicating that Ingram Micro is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ingram Micro 2 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Global Partners 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor SITE or GLP?

In the previous week, Global Partners had 1 more articles in the media than SiteOne Landscape Supply. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Global Partners and 3 mentions for SiteOne Landscape Supply. SiteOne Landscape Supply's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Global Partners' score of 0.33 indicating that SiteOne Landscape Supply is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment SiteOne Landscape Supply 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Global Partners 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer REZI or GLP?

In the previous week, Resideo Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Global Partners. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Resideo Technologies and 4 mentions for Global Partners. Global Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Resideo Technologies' score of 0.03 indicating that Global Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Resideo Technologies 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Global Partners 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Global Partners (GLP) Competitors

$48.72 +0.39 (+0.81%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$48.68 -0.04 (-0.08%)

As of 04:10 PM Eastern

Compare

GLP vs. USAC, EPM, INGM, SITE, and REZI

Should you buy Global Partners stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Global Partners with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Global Partners include USA Compression Partners (USAC), Evolution Petroleum (EPM), Ingram Micro (INGM), SiteOne Landscape Supply (SITE), and Resideo Technologies (REZI).

How does Global Partners compare to USA Compression Partners?

Global Partners (NYSE:GLP) and USA Compression Partners (NYSE:USAC) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Global Partners presently has a consensus price target of $46.00, suggesting a potential downside of 5.58%. USA Compression Partners has a consensus price target of $29.25, suggesting a potential upside of 8.66%. Given USA Compression Partners' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe USA Compression Partners is more favorable than Global Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Global Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
USA Compression Partners	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17

Global Partners has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, USA Compression Partners has a beta of 0.21, indicating that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, USA Compression Partners had 12 more articles in the media than Global Partners. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for USA Compression Partners and 4 mentions for Global Partners. Global Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat USA Compression Partners' score of -0.62 indicating that Global Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Global Partners	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
USA Compression Partners	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative

Global Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. USA Compression Partners pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. Global Partners pays out 85.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. USA Compression Partners pays out 216.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Partners has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

38.1% of Global Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.8% of USA Compression Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.5% of Global Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

USA Compression Partners has a net margin of 11.91% compared to Global Partners' net margin of 0.77%. Global Partners' return on equity of 24.23% beat USA Compression Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Global Partners	0.77%	24.23%	3.82%
USA Compression Partners	11.91%	-807.33%	4.66%

USA Compression Partners has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Global Partners. Global Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than USA Compression Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Global Partners	$18.56B	0.09	$79.22M	$3.60	13.53
USA Compression Partners	$998.10M	3.91	$111.32M	$0.97	27.75

Summary

Global Partners and USA Compression Partners tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Partners compare to Evolution Petroleum?

Evolution Petroleum (NYSEAMERICAN:EPM) and Global Partners (NYSE:GLP) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Global Partners has a net margin of 0.77% compared to Evolution Petroleum's net margin of -4.36%. Global Partners' return on equity of 24.23% beat Evolution Petroleum's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Evolution Petroleum	-4.36%	-2.75%	-1.10%
Global Partners	0.77%	24.23%	3.82%

In the previous week, Global Partners had 4 more articles in the media than Evolution Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Global Partners and 0 mentions for Evolution Petroleum. Global Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Evolution Petroleum's score of 0.00 indicating that Global Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Evolution Petroleum	Neutral
Global Partners	Neutral

Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.23, indicating that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Partners has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Global Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Evolution Petroleum. Global Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Evolution Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Evolution Petroleum	$85.84M	1.60	$1.47M	$0.08	47.88
Global Partners	$18.56B	0.09	$79.22M	$3.60	13.53

Evolution Petroleum presently has a consensus price target of $4.93, indicating a potential upside of 28.81%. Global Partners has a consensus price target of $46.00, indicating a potential downside of 5.58%. Given Evolution Petroleum's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Evolution Petroleum is more favorable than Global Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Evolution Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Global Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

60.1% of Evolution Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.1% of Global Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 10.5% of Evolution Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.5% of Global Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Evolution Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.5%. Global Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Evolution Petroleum pays out 600.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Partners pays out 85.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Partners has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

Summary

Global Partners beats Evolution Petroleum on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Partners compare to Ingram Micro?

Ingram Micro (NYSE:INGM) and Global Partners (NYSE:GLP) are both wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Ingram Micro pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Global Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Ingram Micro pays out 22.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Partners pays out 85.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Partners has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Global Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Ingram Micro has higher revenue and earnings than Global Partners. Global Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ingram Micro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ingram Micro	$52.56B	0.13	$327.88M	$1.51	19.21
Global Partners	$18.56B	0.09	$79.22M	$3.60	13.53

Global Partners has a net margin of 0.77% compared to Ingram Micro's net margin of 0.66%. Global Partners' return on equity of 24.23% beat Ingram Micro's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ingram Micro	0.66%	17.19%	3.53%
Global Partners	0.77%	24.23%	3.82%

Ingram Micro presently has a consensus target price of $30.29, indicating a potential upside of 4.39%. Global Partners has a consensus target price of $46.00, indicating a potential downside of 5.58%. Given Ingram Micro's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Ingram Micro is more favorable than Global Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ingram Micro	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Global Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

38.1% of Global Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Ingram Micro shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.5% of Global Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ingram Micro had 4 more articles in the media than Global Partners. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Ingram Micro and 4 mentions for Global Partners. Ingram Micro's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Global Partners' score of 0.33 indicating that Ingram Micro is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ingram Micro	2 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Global Partners	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Ingram Micro has a beta of 1.78, suggesting that its share price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Partners has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ingram Micro and Global Partners tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Partners compare to SiteOne Landscape Supply?

SiteOne Landscape Supply (NYSE:SITE) and Global Partners (NYSE:GLP) are both wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

SiteOne Landscape Supply has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Global Partners. Global Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SiteOne Landscape Supply, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SiteOne Landscape Supply	$4.70B	0.99	$155.40M	$3.37	31.22
Global Partners	$18.56B	0.09	$79.22M	$3.60	13.53

SiteOne Landscape Supply currently has a consensus target price of $158.36, suggesting a potential upside of 50.54%. Global Partners has a consensus target price of $46.00, suggesting a potential downside of 5.58%. Given SiteOne Landscape Supply's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe SiteOne Landscape Supply is more favorable than Global Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SiteOne Landscape Supply	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.38
Global Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

SiteOne Landscape Supply has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Partners has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

38.1% of Global Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of SiteOne Landscape Supply shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.5% of Global Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Global Partners had 1 more articles in the media than SiteOne Landscape Supply. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Global Partners and 3 mentions for SiteOne Landscape Supply. SiteOne Landscape Supply's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Global Partners' score of 0.33 indicating that SiteOne Landscape Supply is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
SiteOne Landscape Supply	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Global Partners	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

SiteOne Landscape Supply has a net margin of 3.24% compared to Global Partners' net margin of 0.77%. Global Partners' return on equity of 24.23% beat SiteOne Landscape Supply's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SiteOne Landscape Supply	3.24%	9.22%	4.59%
Global Partners	0.77%	24.23%	3.82%

Summary

SiteOne Landscape Supply beats Global Partners on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Partners compare to Resideo Technologies?

Resideo Technologies (NYSE:REZI) and Global Partners (NYSE:GLP) are both wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Resideo Technologies has a beta of 1.64, meaning that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Partners has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Global Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Resideo Technologies. Resideo Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Resideo Technologies	$7.47B	0.72	-$527M	-$3.84	N/A
Global Partners	$18.56B	0.09	$79.22M	$3.60	13.53

Global Partners has a net margin of 0.77% compared to Resideo Technologies' net margin of -6.71%. Global Partners' return on equity of 24.23% beat Resideo Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Resideo Technologies	-6.71%	16.70%	4.66%
Global Partners	0.77%	24.23%	3.82%

91.7% of Resideo Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.1% of Global Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Resideo Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.5% of Global Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Resideo Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $46.50, suggesting a potential upside of 31.12%. Global Partners has a consensus target price of $46.00, suggesting a potential downside of 5.58%. Given Resideo Technologies' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Resideo Technologies is more favorable than Global Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Resideo Technologies	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Global Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

In the previous week, Resideo Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Global Partners. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Resideo Technologies and 4 mentions for Global Partners. Global Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Resideo Technologies' score of 0.03 indicating that Global Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Resideo Technologies	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Global Partners	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Global Partners beats Resideo Technologies on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Global Partners News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GLP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GLP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Global Partners	Oil Refining & Marketing MLP Industry	Energy Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$1.64B	$12.49B	$9.90B	$23.40B
Dividend Yield	6.33%	6.25%	10.71%	4.03%
P/E Ratio	13.53	16.54	19.05	31.08
Price / Sales	0.09	1.45	603.39	154.80
Price / Cash	6.54	9.11	36.83	18.64
Price / Book	2.74	6.96	4.13	4.77
Net Income	$79.22M	$398.95M	$4.24B	$1.06B
7 Day Performance	2.79%	3.78%	2.03%	-0.56%
1 Month Performance	2.70%	1.49%	-4.52%	-0.11%
1 Year Performance	-6.33%	45.22%	28.40%	16.64%

Global Partners Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GLP Global Partners	2.9491 of 5 stars	$48.72 +0.8%	$46.00 -5.6%	-8.0%	$1.64B	$18.56B	13.53	4,700	Short Interest Decrease
USAC USA Compression Partners	3.3547 of 5 stars	$25.53 -3.1%	$29.25 +14.6%	+7.4%	$3.82B	$998.10M	26.32	730
EPM Evolution Petroleum	2.3947 of 5 stars	$3.52 -3.6%	$4.93 +40.2%	-24.7%	$130.93M	$85.84M	N/A	8
INGM Ingram Micro	4.3041 of 5 stars	$26.19 +2.1%	$30.29 +15.6%	+40.0%	$5.94B	$52.56B	8.44	22,200
SITE SiteOne Landscape Supply	4.3067 of 5 stars	$110.69 -1.5%	$159.70 +44.3%	-17.1%	$4.98B	$4.70B	32.85	8,650	Positive News Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:GLP) was last updated on 7/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Global Partners (GLP) Competitors

GLP vs. USAC, EPM, INGM, SITE, and REZI

How does Global Partners compare to USA Compression Partners?

Summary

How does Global Partners compare to Evolution Petroleum?

Summary

How does Global Partners compare to Ingram Micro?

Summary

How does Global Partners compare to SiteOne Landscape Supply?

Summary

How does Global Partners compare to Resideo Technologies?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GLP vs. The Competition

Global Partners Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Global Partners (GLP) Competitors

GLP vs. USAC, EPM, INGM, SITE, and REZI

How does Global Partners compare to USA Compression Partners?

Do analysts prefer GLP or USAC?

Which has more volatility & risk, GLP or USAC?

Does the media prefer GLP or USAC?

Is GLP or USAC a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in GLP or USAC?

Is GLP or USAC more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, GLP or USAC?

Summary

How does Global Partners compare to Evolution Petroleum?

Is EPM or GLP more profitable?

Does the media prefer EPM or GLP?

Which has more volatility and risk, EPM or GLP?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, EPM or GLP?

Do analysts prefer EPM or GLP?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in EPM or GLP?

Is EPM or GLP a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Global Partners compare to Ingram Micro?

Is INGM or GLP a better dividend stock?

Which has better valuation and earnings, INGM or GLP?

Is INGM or GLP more profitable?

Do analysts prefer INGM or GLP?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in INGM or GLP?

Does the media prefer INGM or GLP?

Which has more risk & volatility, INGM or GLP?

Summary

How does Global Partners compare to SiteOne Landscape Supply?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, SITE or GLP?

Do analysts rate SITE or GLP?

Which has more volatility & risk, SITE or GLP?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of SITE or GLP?

Does the media favor SITE or GLP?

Is SITE or GLP more profitable?

Summary

How does Global Partners compare to Resideo Technologies?

Which has more risk & volatility, REZI or GLP?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, REZI or GLP?

Is REZI or GLP more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in REZI or GLP?

Do analysts rate REZI or GLP?

Does the media prefer REZI or GLP?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GLP vs. The Competition

Global Partners Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools