Global Partners (GLP) Competitors

Global Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. Evolution Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.4%. Global Partners pays out 63.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Evolution Petroleum pays out 600.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Partners has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

38.1% of Global Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.1% of Evolution Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 41.5% of Global Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.5% of Evolution Petroleum shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Global Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Evolution Petroleum. Global Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Evolution Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Global Partners had 1 more articles in the media than Evolution Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Global Partners and 1 mentions for Evolution Petroleum. Evolution Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Global Partners' score of 0.23 indicating that Evolution Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Global Partners has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.44, suggesting that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Global Partners has a net margin of 0.91% compared to Evolution Petroleum's net margin of -2.81%. Global Partners' return on equity of 30.87% beat Evolution Petroleum's return on equity.

Global Partners currently has a consensus target price of $46.00, suggesting a potential downside of 1.95%. Evolution Petroleum has a consensus target price of $4.76, suggesting a potential upside of 33.03%. Given Evolution Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Evolution Petroleum is more favorable than Global Partners.

In the previous week, Plains GP had 2 more articles in the media than Global Partners. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Plains GP and 2 mentions for Global Partners. Plains GP's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Global Partners' score of 0.23 indicating that Plains GP is being referred to more favorably in the media.

88.3% of Plains GP shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.1% of Global Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.9% of Plains GP shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 41.5% of Global Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.4%. Global Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. Plains GP pays out 59.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Partners pays out 63.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Global Partners has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Global Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Global Partners has a net margin of 0.91% compared to Plains GP's net margin of 0.21%. Global Partners' return on equity of 30.87% beat Plains GP's return on equity.

Plains GP has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Partners has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Plains GP currently has a consensus price target of $24.91, suggesting a potential downside of 4.42%. Global Partners has a consensus price target of $46.00, suggesting a potential downside of 1.95%. Given Global Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Global Partners is more favorable than Plains GP.

Plains GP has higher revenue and earnings than Global Partners. Plains GP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Global Partners and Global Partners both had 2 articles in the media. International Seaways' average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Global Partners' score of 0.23 indicating that International Seaways is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

International Seaways has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Global Partners. International Seaways is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

38.1% of Global Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.3% of International Seaways shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.5% of Global Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of International Seaways shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Global Partners presently has a consensus price target of $46.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.95%. International Seaways has a consensus price target of $102.25, indicating a potential downside of 11.58%. Given Global Partners' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Global Partners is more favorable than International Seaways.

Global Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. International Seaways pays an annual dividend of $20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 17.5%. Global Partners pays out 63.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. International Seaways pays out 129.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Partners has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

International Seaways has a net margin of 61.98% compared to Global Partners' net margin of 0.91%. International Seaways' return on equity of 31.75% beat Global Partners' return on equity.

Global Partners has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Seaways has a beta of -0.14, suggesting that its share price is 114% less volatile than the broader market.

Golar LNG currently has a consensus target price of $64.25, suggesting a potential upside of 30.56%. Global Partners has a consensus target price of $46.00, suggesting a potential downside of 1.95%. Given Golar LNG's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Golar LNG is more favorable than Global Partners.

Golar LNG has a beta of 0.13, suggesting that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Partners has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Golar LNG and Golar LNG both had 2 articles in the media. Golar LNG's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Global Partners' score of 0.23 indicating that Golar LNG is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Golar LNG pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Global Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. Golar LNG pays out 62.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Partners pays out 63.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Golar LNG has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Global Partners has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Global Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

92.2% of Golar LNG shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.1% of Global Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Golar LNG shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.5% of Global Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Golar LNG has a net margin of 31.27% compared to Global Partners' net margin of 0.91%. Global Partners' return on equity of 30.87% beat Golar LNG's return on equity.

Global Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Golar LNG. Global Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golar LNG, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.