Global Partners (GLP) Competitors

Evolution Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.6%. Global Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Evolution Petroleum pays out 600.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Partners pays out 63.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Partners has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

Global Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Evolution Petroleum. Global Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Evolution Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Global Partners has a net margin of 0.91% compared to Evolution Petroleum's net margin of -4.36%. Global Partners' return on equity of 30.87% beat Evolution Petroleum's return on equity.

60.1% of Evolution Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.1% of Global Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 10.5% of Evolution Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.5% of Global Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.25, suggesting that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Partners has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Evolution Petroleum had 4 more articles in the media than Global Partners. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Evolution Petroleum and 6 mentions for Global Partners. Global Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Evolution Petroleum's score of 0.34 indicating that Global Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Evolution Petroleum presently has a consensus price target of $4.77, indicating a potential upside of 35.03%. Global Partners has a consensus price target of $46.00, indicating a potential downside of 8.51%. Given Evolution Petroleum's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Evolution Petroleum is more favorable than Global Partners.

Ultrapar Participacoes has a net margin of 2.28% compared to Global Partners' net margin of 0.91%. Global Partners' return on equity of 30.87% beat Ultrapar Participacoes' return on equity.

Ultrapar Participacoes presently has a consensus target price of $6.32, suggesting a potential downside of 6.09%. Global Partners has a consensus target price of $46.00, suggesting a potential downside of 8.51%. Given Ultrapar Participacoes' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ultrapar Participacoes is more favorable than Global Partners.

In the previous week, Global Partners had 3 more articles in the media than Ultrapar Participacoes. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Global Partners and 3 mentions for Ultrapar Participacoes. Ultrapar Participacoes' average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Global Partners' score of 1.20 indicating that Ultrapar Participacoes is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Ultrapar Participacoes pays an annual dividend of $0.21 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Global Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Ultrapar Participacoes pays out 34.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Partners pays out 63.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Global Partners has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Global Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Ultrapar Participacoes has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Partners has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Ultrapar Participacoes has higher revenue and earnings than Global Partners. Global Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ultrapar Participacoes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

3.6% of Ultrapar Participacoes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.1% of Global Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Ultrapar Participacoes shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 41.5% of Global Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Global Partners has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golar LNG has a beta of 0.05, meaning that its share price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

Global Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Golar LNG pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Global Partners pays out 63.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Golar LNG pays out 62.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Global Partners has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Golar LNG has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Global Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Global Partners currently has a consensus price target of $46.00, suggesting a potential downside of 8.51%. Golar LNG has a consensus price target of $59.30, suggesting a potential upside of 14.04%. Given Golar LNG's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Golar LNG is more favorable than Global Partners.

Global Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Golar LNG. Global Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golar LNG, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Golar LNG has a net margin of 31.27% compared to Global Partners' net margin of 0.91%. Global Partners' return on equity of 30.87% beat Golar LNG's return on equity.

In the previous week, Global Partners had 2 more articles in the media than Golar LNG. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Global Partners and 4 mentions for Golar LNG. Global Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Golar LNG's score of 0.63 indicating that Global Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

38.1% of Global Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of Golar LNG shares are held by institutional investors. 41.5% of Global Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Golar LNG shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Global Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Global Partners pays out 63.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Plains GP pays out 59.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Global Partners has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Plains GP is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Global Partners has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plains GP has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Global Partners presently has a consensus price target of $46.00, indicating a potential downside of 8.51%. Plains GP has a consensus price target of $23.55, indicating a potential downside of 12.27%. Given Global Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Global Partners is more favorable than Plains GP.

Plains GP has higher revenue and earnings than Global Partners. Plains GP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

38.1% of Global Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.3% of Plains GP shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.5% of Global Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Plains GP shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Global Partners had 4 more articles in the media than Plains GP. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Global Partners and 2 mentions for Plains GP. Global Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Plains GP's score of 0.00 indicating that Global Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Global Partners has a net margin of 0.91% compared to Plains GP's net margin of 0.21%. Global Partners' return on equity of 30.87% beat Plains GP's return on equity.