Does the media prefer USAC or GLP?

In the previous week, Global Partners had 3 more articles in the media than USA Compression Partners. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Global Partners and 2 mentions for USA Compression Partners. Global Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat USA Compression Partners' score of 0.50 indicating that Global Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment USA Compression Partners 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Global Partners 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to GLP or EPM?

In the previous week, Global Partners had 3 more articles in the media than Evolution Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Global Partners and 2 mentions for Evolution Petroleum. Global Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Evolution Petroleum's score of -0.33 indicating that Global Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Global Partners 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Evolution Petroleum 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor GLP or REZI?

In the previous week, Resideo Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than Global Partners. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Resideo Technologies and 5 mentions for Global Partners. Resideo Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Global Partners' score of 0.57 indicating that Resideo Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Global Partners 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Resideo Technologies 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer GLP or PTLE?

Global Partners currently has a consensus target price of $46.00, suggesting a potential downside of 7.11%. Given Global Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Global Partners is more favorable than PTL. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Global Partners 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 PTL 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has better valuation & earnings, GLP or PTLE?

Global Partners has higher revenue and earnings than PTL. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Global Partners $18.56B 0.09 $79.22M $3.60 13.76 PTL $71.65M 73.60 -$1.18M N/A N/A

Is GLP or PTLE more profitable?

Global Partners has a net margin of 0.77% compared to PTL's net margin of 0.00%. Global Partners' return on equity of 24.23% beat PTL's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Global Partners 0.77% 24.23% 3.82% PTL N/A N/A N/A

Does the media favor GLP or PTLE?

In the previous week, Global Partners had 4 more articles in the media than PTL. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Global Partners and 1 mentions for PTL. Global Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat PTL's score of 0.00 indicating that Global Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Global Partners 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive PTL 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to SITE or GLP?

In the previous week, SiteOne Landscape Supply had 31 more articles in the media than Global Partners. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for SiteOne Landscape Supply and 5 mentions for Global Partners. Global Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat SiteOne Landscape Supply's score of -0.20 indicating that Global Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment SiteOne Landscape Supply 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 13 Neutral mention(s) 9 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Global Partners 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Global Partners (GLP) Competitors

$49.52 +0.55 (+1.12%)

Closing price 07/31/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$49.48 -0.03 (-0.07%)

As of 07/31/2026 07:34 PM Eastern

Compare

GLP vs. USAC, EPM, REZI, PTLE, and SITE

Should you buy Global Partners stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Global Partners with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Global Partners include USA Compression Partners (USAC), Evolution Petroleum (EPM), Resideo Technologies (REZI), PTL (PTLE), and SiteOne Landscape Supply (SITE).

How does Global Partners compare to USA Compression Partners?

USA Compression Partners (NYSE:USAC) and Global Partners (NYSE:GLP) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

USA Compression Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Global Partners. Global Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than USA Compression Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
USA Compression Partners	$998.10M	3.80	$111.32M	$0.97	26.99
Global Partners	$18.56B	0.09	$79.22M	$3.60	13.76

USA Compression Partners has a beta of 0.22, indicating that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Partners has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

USA Compression Partners presently has a consensus target price of $29.25, indicating a potential upside of 11.73%. Global Partners has a consensus target price of $46.00, indicating a potential downside of 7.11%. Given USA Compression Partners' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe USA Compression Partners is more favorable than Global Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
USA Compression Partners	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17
Global Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

In the previous week, Global Partners had 3 more articles in the media than USA Compression Partners. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Global Partners and 2 mentions for USA Compression Partners. Global Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat USA Compression Partners' score of 0.50 indicating that Global Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
USA Compression Partners	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Global Partners	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

47.8% of USA Compression Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.1% of Global Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 41.5% of Global Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

USA Compression Partners has a net margin of 11.91% compared to Global Partners' net margin of 0.77%. Global Partners' return on equity of 24.23% beat USA Compression Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
USA Compression Partners	11.91%	-807.33%	4.66%
Global Partners	0.77%	24.23%	3.82%

USA Compression Partners pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.0%. Global Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. USA Compression Partners pays out 216.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Partners pays out 85.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Partners has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

Summary

Global Partners beats USA Compression Partners on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Partners compare to Evolution Petroleum?

Global Partners (NYSE:GLP) and Evolution Petroleum (NYSEAMERICAN:EPM) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and media sentiment.

Global Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Evolution Petroleum. Global Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Evolution Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Global Partners	$18.56B	0.09	$79.22M	$3.60	13.76
Evolution Petroleum	$85.84M	1.54	$1.47M	$0.08	46.01

Global Partners has a net margin of 0.77% compared to Evolution Petroleum's net margin of -4.36%. Global Partners' return on equity of 24.23% beat Evolution Petroleum's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Global Partners	0.77%	24.23%	3.82%
Evolution Petroleum	-4.36%	-2.75%	-1.10%

Global Partners currently has a consensus target price of $46.00, suggesting a potential downside of 7.11%. Evolution Petroleum has a consensus target price of $4.77, suggesting a potential upside of 29.53%. Given Evolution Petroleum's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Evolution Petroleum is more favorable than Global Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Global Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Evolution Petroleum	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

38.1% of Global Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.1% of Evolution Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 41.5% of Global Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.5% of Evolution Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Global Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Evolution Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. Global Partners pays out 85.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Evolution Petroleum pays out 600.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Partners has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

Global Partners has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.25, suggesting that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Global Partners had 3 more articles in the media than Evolution Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Global Partners and 2 mentions for Evolution Petroleum. Global Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Evolution Petroleum's score of -0.33 indicating that Global Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Global Partners	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Evolution Petroleum	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Global Partners beats Evolution Petroleum on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Partners compare to Resideo Technologies?

Global Partners (NYSE:GLP) and Resideo Technologies (NYSE:REZI) are related companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

38.1% of Global Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.7% of Resideo Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.5% of Global Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Resideo Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Resideo Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than Global Partners. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Resideo Technologies and 5 mentions for Global Partners. Resideo Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Global Partners' score of 0.57 indicating that Resideo Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Global Partners	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Resideo Technologies	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Global Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Resideo Technologies. Resideo Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Global Partners	$18.56B	0.09	$79.22M	$3.60	13.76
Resideo Technologies	$7.47B	0.69	-$527M	-$3.84	N/A

Global Partners presently has a consensus price target of $46.00, suggesting a potential downside of 7.11%. Resideo Technologies has a consensus price target of $46.50, suggesting a potential upside of 35.70%. Given Resideo Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Resideo Technologies is more favorable than Global Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Global Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Resideo Technologies	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Global Partners has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Resideo Technologies has a beta of 1.63, indicating that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Global Partners has a net margin of 0.77% compared to Resideo Technologies' net margin of -6.71%. Global Partners' return on equity of 24.23% beat Resideo Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Global Partners	0.77%	24.23%	3.82%
Resideo Technologies	-6.71%	16.70%	4.66%

Summary

Global Partners and Resideo Technologies tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Partners compare to PTL?

Global Partners (NYSE:GLP) and PTL (NASDAQ:PTLE) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

Global Partners has a net margin of 0.77% compared to PTL's net margin of 0.00%. Global Partners' return on equity of 24.23% beat PTL's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Global Partners	0.77%	24.23%	3.82%
PTL	N/A	N/A	N/A

Global Partners has higher revenue and earnings than PTL.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Global Partners	$18.56B	0.09	$79.22M	$3.60	13.76
PTL	$71.65M	73.60	-$1.18M	N/A	N/A

Global Partners has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PTL has a beta of -0.07, suggesting that its stock price is 107% less volatile than the broader market.

Global Partners currently has a consensus target price of $46.00, suggesting a potential downside of 7.11%. Given Global Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Global Partners is more favorable than PTL.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Global Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
PTL	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

38.1% of Global Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.5% of Global Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Global Partners had 4 more articles in the media than PTL. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Global Partners and 1 mentions for PTL. Global Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat PTL's score of 0.00 indicating that Global Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Global Partners	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
PTL	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Global Partners beats PTL on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Partners compare to SiteOne Landscape Supply?

SiteOne Landscape Supply (NYSE:SITE) and Global Partners (NYSE:GLP) are related companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends and earnings.

SiteOne Landscape Supply has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Global Partners. Global Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SiteOne Landscape Supply, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SiteOne Landscape Supply	$4.70B	0.88	$155.40M	$3.65	25.92
Global Partners	$18.56B	0.09	$79.22M	$3.60	13.76

In the previous week, SiteOne Landscape Supply had 31 more articles in the media than Global Partners. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for SiteOne Landscape Supply and 5 mentions for Global Partners. Global Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat SiteOne Landscape Supply's score of -0.20 indicating that Global Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
SiteOne Landscape Supply	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	13 Neutral mention(s)	9 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Global Partners	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

38.1% of Global Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of SiteOne Landscape Supply shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.5% of Global Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

SiteOne Landscape Supply has a net margin of 3.41% compared to Global Partners' net margin of 0.77%. Global Partners' return on equity of 24.23% beat SiteOne Landscape Supply's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SiteOne Landscape Supply	3.41%	9.76%	4.83%
Global Partners	0.77%	24.23%	3.82%

SiteOne Landscape Supply currently has a consensus price target of $135.27, suggesting a potential upside of 42.97%. Global Partners has a consensus price target of $46.00, suggesting a potential downside of 7.11%. Given SiteOne Landscape Supply's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe SiteOne Landscape Supply is more favorable than Global Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SiteOne Landscape Supply	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.36
Global Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

SiteOne Landscape Supply has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Partners has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

SiteOne Landscape Supply beats Global Partners on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Global Partners News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GLP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GLP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Global Partners	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry	Energy Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$1.68B	$11.36B	$9.90B	$23.69B
Dividend Yield	6.19%	11.32%	11.58%	4.22%
P/E Ratio	13.76	19.65	19.40	30.98
Price / Sales	0.09	448.08	367.57	19.22
Price / Cash	6.69	39.42	35.94	18.73
Price / Book	2.79	4.39	3.98	4.76
Net Income	$79.22M	$5.28B	$4.35B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	2.01%	-0.40%	-0.73%	0.35%
1 Month Performance	4.46%	5.09%	4.37%	-0.55%
1 Year Performance	-4.53%	34.51%	35.91%	19.21%

Global Partners Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GLP Global Partners	2.1417 of 5 stars	$49.52 +1.1%	$46.00 -7.1%	-4.5%	$1.68B	$18.56B	13.76	4,700	News Coverage Upcoming Earnings Dividend Increase Gap Down
USAC USA Compression Partners	2.79 of 5 stars	$25.66 -2.7%	$29.25 +14.0%	+13.0%	$3.82B	$998.10M	26.45	730	Upcoming Earnings High Trading Volume
EPM Evolution Petroleum	2.1757 of 5 stars	$3.61 -5.7%	$4.77 +32.0%	-20.9%	$137.39M	$85.84M	N/A	8
REZI Resideo Technologies	3.8133 of 5 stars	$35.21 +1.9%	$46.50 +32.1%	+34.7%	$5.23B	$7.61B	N/A	14,800	Positive News Upcoming Earnings
PTLE PTL	0.1361 of 5 stars	$10.15 -0.3%	N/A	-35.1%	$5.12B	$71.65M	N/A	N/A	News Coverage Short Interest Increase Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:GLP) was last updated on 8/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Global Partners (GLP) Competitors

GLP vs. USAC, EPM, REZI, PTLE, and SITE

How does Global Partners compare to USA Compression Partners?

Summary

How does Global Partners compare to Evolution Petroleum?

Summary

How does Global Partners compare to Resideo Technologies?

Summary

How does Global Partners compare to PTL?

Summary

How does Global Partners compare to SiteOne Landscape Supply?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GLP vs. The Competition

Global Partners Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Global Partners (GLP) Competitors

GLP vs. USAC, EPM, REZI, PTLE, and SITE

How does Global Partners compare to USA Compression Partners?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, USAC or GLP?

Which has more risk and volatility, USAC or GLP?

Do analysts recommend USAC or GLP?

Does the media prefer USAC or GLP?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of USAC or GLP?

Is USAC or GLP more profitable?

Is USAC or GLP a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Global Partners compare to Evolution Petroleum?

Which has better valuation & earnings, GLP or EPM?

Is GLP or EPM more profitable?

Do analysts rate GLP or EPM?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in GLP or EPM?

Is GLP or EPM a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, GLP or EPM?

Does the media refer more to GLP or EPM?

Summary

How does Global Partners compare to Resideo Technologies?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of GLP or REZI?

Does the media favor GLP or REZI?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, GLP or REZI?

Do analysts rate GLP or REZI?

Which has more risk and volatility, GLP or REZI?

Is GLP or REZI more profitable?

Summary

How does Global Partners compare to PTL?

Is GLP or PTLE more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, GLP or PTLE?

Which has more risk and volatility, GLP or PTLE?

Do analysts prefer GLP or PTLE?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in GLP or PTLE?

Does the media favor GLP or PTLE?

Summary

How does Global Partners compare to SiteOne Landscape Supply?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, SITE or GLP?

Does the media refer more to SITE or GLP?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of SITE or GLP?

Is SITE or GLP more profitable?

Do analysts rate SITE or GLP?

Which has more volatility & risk, SITE or GLP?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GLP vs. The Competition

Global Partners Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools