Ryerson (RYZ) Competitors

Ryerson has a beta of 1.65, meaning that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Central Garden & Pet has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the S&P 500.

94.8% of Ryerson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.1% of Central Garden & Pet shares are held by institutional investors. 6.6% of Ryerson shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of Central Garden & Pet shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Central Garden & Pet had 2 more articles in the media than Ryerson. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Central Garden & Pet and 0 mentions for Ryerson. Central Garden & Pet's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Ryerson's score of 0.00 indicating that Central Garden & Pet is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Central Garden & Pet has a consensus target price of $50.00, suggesting a potential upside of 38.54%. Given Central Garden & Pet's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Central Garden & Pet is more favorable than Ryerson.

Central Garden & Pet has a net margin of 5.04% compared to Ryerson's net margin of -1.23%. Central Garden & Pet's return on equity of 10.99% beat Ryerson's return on equity.

Central Garden & Pet has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ryerson. Ryerson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Central Garden & Pet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Global Partners had 6 more articles in the media than Ryerson. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Global Partners and 0 mentions for Ryerson. Global Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Ryerson's score of 0.00 indicating that Global Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Global Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Ryerson. Ryerson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Global Partners has a net margin of 0.53% compared to Ryerson's net margin of -1.23%. Global Partners' return on equity of 15.99% beat Ryerson's return on equity.

Ryerson pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Global Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Ryerson pays out -42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Partners pays out 144.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Partners has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Global Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Global Partners has a consensus target price of $46.00, suggesting a potential downside of 5.36%. Given Global Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Global Partners is more favorable than Ryerson.

Ryerson has a beta of 1.65, meaning that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Global Partners has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500.

94.8% of Ryerson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.1% of Global Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 6.6% of Ryerson shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 41.5% of Global Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

97.1% of World Kinect shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.8% of Ryerson shares are held by institutional investors. 3.2% of World Kinect shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Ryerson shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

World Kinect presently has a consensus target price of $29.50, suggesting a potential upside of 6.68%. Given World Kinect's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe World Kinect is more favorable than Ryerson.

World Kinect has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ryerson has a beta of 1.65, indicating that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the S&P 500.

World Kinect pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Ryerson pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. World Kinect pays out -7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ryerson pays out -42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. World Kinect has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years. World Kinect is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Ryerson has lower revenue, but higher earnings than World Kinect. Ryerson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than World Kinect, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, World Kinect had 9 more articles in the media than Ryerson. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for World Kinect and 0 mentions for Ryerson. World Kinect's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Ryerson's score of 0.00 indicating that World Kinect is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Ryerson has a net margin of -1.23% compared to World Kinect's net margin of -1.53%. World Kinect's return on equity of 8.27% beat Ryerson's return on equity.

94.8% of Ryerson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.2% of Global Industrial shares are held by institutional investors. 6.6% of Ryerson shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 65.3% of Global Industrial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ryerson has a beta of 1.65, suggesting that its share price is 65% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Global Industrial has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Ryerson pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Global Industrial pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Ryerson pays out -42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Industrial pays out 60.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Global Industrial has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years. Global Industrial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Global Industrial has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ryerson. Ryerson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Industrial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Global Industrial had 5 more articles in the media than Ryerson. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Global Industrial and 0 mentions for Ryerson. Global Industrial's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Ryerson's score of 0.00 indicating that Global Industrial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Global Industrial has a net margin of 5.23% compared to Ryerson's net margin of -1.23%. Global Industrial's return on equity of 23.56% beat Ryerson's return on equity.