Ryerson (RYZ) Competitors

Central Garden & Pet has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its share price is 38% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ryerson has a beta of 1.65, meaning that its share price is 65% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Central Garden & Pet has a net margin of 5.04% compared to Ryerson's net margin of -1.23%. Central Garden & Pet's return on equity of 10.99% beat Ryerson's return on equity.

Central Garden & Pet has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ryerson. Ryerson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Central Garden & Pet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Central Garden & Pet had 2 more articles in the media than Ryerson. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Central Garden & Pet and 0 mentions for Ryerson. Central Garden & Pet's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Ryerson's score of 0.00 indicating that Central Garden & Pet is being referred to more favorably in the media.

16.1% of Central Garden & Pet shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.8% of Ryerson shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.2% of Central Garden & Pet shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Ryerson shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Central Garden & Pet presently has a consensus price target of $50.00, suggesting a potential upside of 38.54%. Given Central Garden & Pet's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Central Garden & Pet is more favorable than Ryerson.

94.8% of Ryerson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.1% of Global Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.6% of Ryerson shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 41.5% of Global Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Global Partners has a consensus target price of $46.00, suggesting a potential downside of 5.36%. Given Global Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Global Partners is more favorable than Ryerson.

Global Partners has a net margin of 0.53% compared to Ryerson's net margin of -1.23%. Global Partners' return on equity of 15.99% beat Ryerson's return on equity.

Global Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Ryerson. Ryerson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ryerson pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Global Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Ryerson pays out -42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Partners pays out 144.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Partners has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Global Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Global Partners had 6 more articles in the media than Ryerson. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Global Partners and 0 mentions for Ryerson. Global Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Ryerson's score of 0.00 indicating that Global Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Ryerson has a beta of 1.65, meaning that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Global Partners has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, World Kinect had 9 more articles in the media than Ryerson. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for World Kinect and 0 mentions for Ryerson. World Kinect's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Ryerson's score of 0.00 indicating that World Kinect is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Ryerson has higher earnings, but lower revenue than World Kinect. Ryerson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than World Kinect, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

94.8% of Ryerson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.1% of World Kinect shares are held by institutional investors. 6.6% of Ryerson shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of World Kinect shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

World Kinect has a consensus price target of $29.50, suggesting a potential upside of 6.68%. Given World Kinect's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe World Kinect is more favorable than Ryerson.

Ryerson has a beta of 1.65, suggesting that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, World Kinect has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Ryerson has a net margin of -1.23% compared to World Kinect's net margin of -1.53%. World Kinect's return on equity of 8.27% beat Ryerson's return on equity.

Ryerson pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. World Kinect pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Ryerson pays out -42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. World Kinect pays out -7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. World Kinect has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. World Kinect is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Global Industrial has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ryerson has a beta of 1.65, meaning that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the S&P 500.

31.2% of Global Industrial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.8% of Ryerson shares are held by institutional investors. 65.3% of Global Industrial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Ryerson shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Global Industrial has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ryerson. Ryerson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Industrial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Global Industrial had 5 more articles in the media than Ryerson. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Global Industrial and 0 mentions for Ryerson. Global Industrial's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Ryerson's score of 0.00 indicating that Global Industrial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Global Industrial pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Ryerson pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Global Industrial pays out 60.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ryerson pays out -42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Global Industrial has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years. Global Industrial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Global Industrial has a net margin of 5.23% compared to Ryerson's net margin of -1.23%. Global Industrial's return on equity of 23.56% beat Ryerson's return on equity.