Ituran Location and Control Competitors

Ituran Location and Control (NASDAQ:ITRN) and Kadant (NYSE:KAI) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Risk & Volatility

Ituran Location and Control has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kadant has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Ituran Location and Control pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Kadant pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Ituran Location and Control pays out 15.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kadant pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kadant has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Ituran Location and Control is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Ituran Location and Control and Kadant's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Ituran Location and Control and Kadant's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Kadant has higher revenue and earnings than Ituran Location and Control. Ituran Location and Control is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kadant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Ituran Location and Control and Kadant, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Ituran Location and Control presently has a consensus price target of $16.00, suggesting a potential downside of 26.20%. Kadant has a consensus price target of $117.00, suggesting a potential downside of 32.76%. Given Ituran Location and Control's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Ituran Location and Control is more favorable than Kadant.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

56.3% of Ituran Location and Control shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.6% of Kadant shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Kadant shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Kadant beats Ituran Location and Control on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ituran Location and Control (NASDAQ:ITRN) and Belden (NYSE:BDC) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Volatility & Risk

Ituran Location and Control has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Belden has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Ituran Location and Control pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Belden pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Ituran Location and Control pays out 15.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Belden pays out 4.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Belden has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Ituran Location and Control and Belden's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ituran Location and Control and Belden's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Ituran Location and Control has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Belden. Belden is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ituran Location and Control, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Ituran Location and Control and Belden, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Ituran Location and Control presently has a consensus price target of $16.00, suggesting a potential downside of 26.20%. Belden has a consensus price target of $44.0556, suggesting a potential downside of 0.35%. Given Belden's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Belden is more favorable than Ituran Location and Control.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

56.3% of Ituran Location and Control shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Belden shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Belden beats Ituran Location and Control on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ituran Location and Control (NASDAQ:ITRN) and O-I Glass (NYSE:OI) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Volatility & Risk

Ituran Location and Control has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its share price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, O-I Glass has a beta of 1.78, suggesting that its share price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Ituran Location and Control and O-I Glass' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ituran Location and Control and O-I Glass' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Ituran Location and Control has higher earnings, but lower revenue than O-I Glass. O-I Glass is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ituran Location and Control, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Ituran Location and Control and O-I Glass, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Ituran Location and Control presently has a consensus price target of $16.00, suggesting a potential downside of 26.20%. O-I Glass has a consensus price target of $10.8889, suggesting a potential downside of 6.77%. Given O-I Glass' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe O-I Glass is more favorable than Ituran Location and Control.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

56.3% of Ituran Location and Control shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.9% of O-I Glass shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of O-I Glass shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

O-I Glass beats Ituran Location and Control on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ituran Location and Control (NASDAQ:ITRN) and Constellium (NYSE:CSTM) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Volatility & Risk

Ituran Location and Control has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its share price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Constellium has a beta of 2.58, suggesting that its share price is 158% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Ituran Location and Control and Constellium's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ituran Location and Control and Constellium's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Constellium has higher revenue and earnings than Ituran Location and Control. Ituran Location and Control is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Constellium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Ituran Location and Control and Constellium, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Ituran Location and Control presently has a consensus price target of $16.00, suggesting a potential downside of 26.20%. Constellium has a consensus price target of $16.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 25.88%. Given Constellium's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Constellium is more favorable than Ituran Location and Control.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

56.3% of Ituran Location and Control shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.0% of Constellium shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Constellium beats Ituran Location and Control on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Alamo Group (NYSE:ALG) and Ituran Location and Control (NASDAQ:ITRN) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Alamo Group and Ituran Location and Control, as provided by MarketBeat.

Alamo Group presently has a consensus price target of $129.00, suggesting a potential downside of 15.48%. Ituran Location and Control has a consensus price target of $16.00, suggesting a potential downside of 26.20%. Given Alamo Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Alamo Group is more favorable than Ituran Location and Control.

Volatility and Risk

Alamo Group has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ituran Location and Control has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its share price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

91.2% of Alamo Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.3% of Ituran Location and Control shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Alamo Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Alamo Group and Ituran Location and Control's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Alamo Group has higher revenue and earnings than Ituran Location and Control. Ituran Location and Control is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alamo Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Alamo Group and Ituran Location and Control's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Alamo Group pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Ituran Location and Control pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Alamo Group pays out 9.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ituran Location and Control pays out 15.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Alamo Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Alamo Group beats Ituran Location and Control on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ituran Location and Control (NASDAQ:ITRN) and Kaiser Aluminum (NASDAQ:KALU) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

Dividends

Ituran Location and Control pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Kaiser Aluminum pays an annual dividend of $2.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Ituran Location and Control pays out 15.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Kaiser Aluminum is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ituran Location and Control and Kaiser Aluminum's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Kaiser Aluminum has higher revenue and earnings than Ituran Location and Control.

Volatility and Risk

Ituran Location and Control has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its share price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Ituran Location and Control and Kaiser Aluminum, as reported by MarketBeat.

Ituran Location and Control currently has a consensus target price of $16.00, suggesting a potential downside of 26.20%. Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus target price of $101.00, suggesting a potential downside of 11.48%. Given Kaiser Aluminum's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Kaiser Aluminum is more favorable than Ituran Location and Control.

Profitability

This table compares Ituran Location and Control and Kaiser Aluminum's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

56.3% of Ituran Location and Control shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.3% of Kaiser Aluminum shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Kaiser Aluminum shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Kaiser Aluminum beats Ituran Location and Control on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.