NYSE:OII

Oceaneering International Competitors

$15.02

+0.46 (+3.16 %)

(As of 05/14/2021 12:00 AM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$14.58

▼

$15.22

50-Day Range

$9.94

▼

$15.40

52-Week Range

$3.31

▼

$15.83

Volume787,565 shs

Average Volume1.19 million shs

Market Capitalization$1.50 billion

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend YieldN/A

Beta3.6

Oceaneering International (NYSE:OII) Vs. SLB, HAL, NOV, FTI, RES, and DRQ

Should you be buying OII stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "oil & gas equipment & services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Oceaneering International, including Schlumberger (SLB), Halliburton (HAL), NOV (NOV), TechnipFMC (FTI), RPC (RES), and Dril-Quip (DRQ).

Oceaneering International vs. Schlumberger Stock

Oceaneering International (NYSE:OII) and Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Oceaneering International and Schlumberger, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Oceaneering International	0	3	2	0	2.40
Schlumberger	1	6	15	0	2.64

Oceaneering International currently has a consensus price target of $12.6857, suggesting a potential downside of 15.54%. Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $27.78, suggesting a potential downside of 15.33%. Given Schlumberger's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Schlumberger is more favorable than Oceaneering International.

Volatility & Risk

Oceaneering International has a beta of 3.6, suggesting that its share price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schlumberger has a beta of 2.28, suggesting that its share price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Oceaneering International and Schlumberger's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Oceaneering International	$2.05 billion	0.73	$-348,440,000.00	($0.82)	-18.32
Schlumberger	$32.92 billion	1.39	$-10,137,000,000.00	$1.47	22.32

Oceaneering International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schlumberger. Oceaneering International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schlumberger, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

83.4% of Oceaneering International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.2% of Schlumberger shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Oceaneering International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Schlumberger shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Oceaneering International and Schlumberger's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Oceaneering International	-37.40%	-3.56%	-1.14%
Schlumberger	-40.15%	7.34%	2.46%

Summary

Schlumberger beats Oceaneering International on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Oceaneering International vs. Halliburton Stock

Oceaneering International (NYSE:OII) and Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Oceaneering International and Halliburton, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Oceaneering International	0	3	2	0	2.40
Halliburton	3	8	12	1	2.46

Oceaneering International currently has a consensus price target of $12.6857, suggesting a potential downside of 15.54%. Halliburton has a consensus price target of $19.7211, suggesting a potential downside of 14.48%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Oceaneering International.

Volatility & Risk

Oceaneering International has a beta of 3.6, suggesting that its share price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 2.81, suggesting that its share price is 181% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Oceaneering International and Halliburton's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Oceaneering International	$2.05 billion	0.73	$-348,440,000.00	($0.82)	-18.32
Halliburton	$22.41 billion	0.92	$-1,131,000,000.00	$1.24	18.60

Oceaneering International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Halliburton. Oceaneering International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

83.4% of Oceaneering International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.4% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Oceaneering International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Halliburton shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Oceaneering International and Halliburton's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Oceaneering International	-37.40%	-3.56%	-1.14%
Halliburton	-26.60%	11.10%	3.08%

Summary

Halliburton beats Oceaneering International on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Oceaneering International vs. NOV Stock

Oceaneering International (NYSE:OII) and NOV (NYSE:NOV) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Oceaneering International and NOV's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Oceaneering International	-37.40%	-3.56%	-1.14%
NOV	-36.63%	1.13%	0.62%

Volatility & Risk

Oceaneering International has a beta of 3.6, suggesting that its share price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NOV has a beta of 2.22, suggesting that its share price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

83.4% of Oceaneering International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.5% of NOV shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Oceaneering International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of NOV shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Oceaneering International and NOV's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Oceaneering International	$2.05 billion	0.73	$-348,440,000.00	($0.82)	-18.32
NOV	$8.48 billion	0.81	$-6,095,000,000.00	($0.72)	-24.32

Oceaneering International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NOV. NOV is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oceaneering International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Oceaneering International and NOV, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Oceaneering International	0	3	2	0	2.40
NOV	3	6	8	0	2.29

Oceaneering International currently has a consensus price target of $12.6857, suggesting a potential downside of 15.54%. NOV has a consensus price target of $14.8071, suggesting a potential downside of 15.44%. Given NOV's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe NOV is more favorable than Oceaneering International.

Summary

NOV beats Oceaneering International on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Oceaneering International vs. TechnipFMC Stock

Oceaneering International (NYSE:OII) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Oceaneering International has a beta of 3.6, suggesting that its stock price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, suggesting that its stock price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Oceaneering International and TechnipFMC's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Oceaneering International	$2.05 billion	0.73	$-348,440,000.00	($0.82)	-18.32
TechnipFMC	$13.41 billion	0.27	$-2,415,200,000.00	$0.74	11.09

Oceaneering International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TechnipFMC. Oceaneering International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Oceaneering International and TechnipFMC, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Oceaneering International	0	3	2	0	2.40
TechnipFMC	1	11	7	0	2.32

Oceaneering International currently has a consensus price target of $12.6857, suggesting a potential downside of 15.54%. TechnipFMC has a consensus price target of $10.1773, suggesting a potential upside of 23.96%. Given TechnipFMC's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than Oceaneering International.

Profitability

This table compares Oceaneering International and TechnipFMC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Oceaneering International	-37.40%	-3.56%	-1.14%
TechnipFMC	-42.41%	1.56%	0.38%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

83.4% of Oceaneering International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Oceaneering International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Oceaneering International vs. RPC Stock

Oceaneering International (NYSE:OII) and RPC (NYSE:RES) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Oceaneering International has a beta of 3.6, suggesting that its stock price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RPC has a beta of 2.13, suggesting that its stock price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Oceaneering International and RPC's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Oceaneering International	$2.05 billion	0.73	$-348,440,000.00	($0.82)	-18.32
RPC	$1.22 billion	1.03	$-87,110,000.00	($0.12)	-48.42

RPC has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Oceaneering International. RPC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oceaneering International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Oceaneering International and RPC, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Oceaneering International	0	3	2	0	2.40
RPC	2	2	0	0	1.50

Oceaneering International currently has a consensus price target of $12.6857, suggesting a potential downside of 15.54%. RPC has a consensus price target of $3.35, suggesting a potential downside of 42.34%. Given Oceaneering International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Oceaneering International is more favorable than RPC.

Profitability

This table compares Oceaneering International and RPC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Oceaneering International	-37.40%	-3.56%	-1.14%
RPC	-32.86%	-9.35%	-7.44%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

83.4% of Oceaneering International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.7% of RPC shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Oceaneering International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 73.6% of RPC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Oceaneering International beats RPC on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Oceaneering International vs. Dril-Quip Stock

Oceaneering International (NYSE:OII) and Dril-Quip (NYSE:DRQ) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Oceaneering International has a beta of 3.6, suggesting that its stock price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dril-Quip has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Oceaneering International and Dril-Quip's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Oceaneering International	$2.05 billion	0.73	$-348,440,000.00	($0.82)	-18.32
Dril-Quip	$414.81 million	2.93	$1.72 million	$0.08	429.00

Dril-Quip has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Oceaneering International. Oceaneering International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dril-Quip, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Oceaneering International and Dril-Quip, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Oceaneering International	0	3	2	0	2.40
Dril-Quip	1	4	0	0	1.80

Oceaneering International currently has a consensus price target of $12.6857, suggesting a potential downside of 15.54%. Dril-Quip has a consensus price target of $29.00, suggesting a potential downside of 15.50%. Given Dril-Quip's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Dril-Quip is more favorable than Oceaneering International.

Profitability

This table compares Oceaneering International and Dril-Quip's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Oceaneering International	-37.40%	-3.56%	-1.14%
Dril-Quip	-3.14%	0.99%	0.89%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

83.4% of Oceaneering International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Oceaneering International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Dril-Quip shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.