Oceaneering International (OII) Competitors

Oceaneering International has a net margin of 12.19% compared to Enbridge's net margin of 7.20%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 18.40% beat Enbridge's return on equity.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enbridge has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Enbridge has higher revenue and earnings than Oceaneering International. Oceaneering International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enbridge, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Enbridge had 29 more articles in the media than Oceaneering International. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Enbridge and 3 mentions for Oceaneering International. Enbridge's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Oceaneering International's score of 0.42 indicating that Enbridge is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

93.9% of Oceaneering International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.6% of Enbridge shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Oceaneering International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Enbridge shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Oceaneering International pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Enbridge pays an annual dividend of $2.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Oceaneering International pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enbridge pays out 147.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enbridge has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Enbridge is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Oceaneering International currently has a consensus target price of $45.00, indicating a potential downside of 2.95%. Enbridge has a consensus target price of $71.17, indicating a potential upside of 46.19%. Given Enbridge's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Enbridge is more favorable than Oceaneering International.

Oceaneering International has a net margin of 12.19% compared to TechnipFMC's net margin of 11.28%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 36.54% beat Oceaneering International's return on equity.

TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Oceaneering International pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. TechnipFMC pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Oceaneering International pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TechnipFMC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, TechnipFMC had 8 more articles in the media than Oceaneering International. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for TechnipFMC and 3 mentions for Oceaneering International. TechnipFMC's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Oceaneering International's score of 0.42 indicating that TechnipFMC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

TechnipFMC currently has a consensus price target of $70.00, indicating a potential downside of 2.73%. Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $45.00, indicating a potential downside of 2.95%. Given TechnipFMC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than Oceaneering International.

TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

TechnipFMC has higher revenue and earnings than Oceaneering International. Oceaneering International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Oceaneering International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Oceaneering International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Halliburton had 19 more articles in the media than Oceaneering International. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Halliburton and 3 mentions for Oceaneering International. Halliburton's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Oceaneering International's score of 0.42 indicating that Halliburton is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Oceaneering International has a net margin of 12.19% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 7.16%. Halliburton's return on equity of 18.71% beat Oceaneering International's return on equity.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than Oceaneering International. Oceaneering International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

93.9% of Oceaneering International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Oceaneering International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Halliburton shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Oceaneering International pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Oceaneering International pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Halliburton pays out 35.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Halliburton has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Halliburton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Oceaneering International currently has a consensus target price of $45.00, indicating a potential downside of 2.95%. Halliburton has a consensus target price of $43.24, indicating a potential upside of 28.50%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Oceaneering International.

Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Liberty Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Oceaneering International. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Liberty Energy and 3 mentions for Oceaneering International. Oceaneering International's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Liberty Energy's score of 0.14 indicating that Oceaneering International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Oceaneering International shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Oceaneering International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Liberty Energy presently has a consensus target price of $29.55, indicating a potential upside of 52.65%. Oceaneering International has a consensus target price of $45.00, indicating a potential downside of 2.95%. Given Liberty Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Liberty Energy is more favorable than Oceaneering International.

Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Oceaneering International pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Liberty Energy pays out 48.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Oceaneering International pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Liberty Energy has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Liberty Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Oceaneering International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Liberty Energy. Oceaneering International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Oceaneering International has a net margin of 12.19% compared to Liberty Energy's net margin of 2.92%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 18.40% beat Liberty Energy's return on equity.