Cactus (WHD) Competitors

Cactus has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 7 more articles in the media than Cactus. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 12 mentions for Cactus. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Cactus' score of 0.75 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Cactus has a net margin of 6.01% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -1.92%. Cactus' return on equity of 16.66% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

85.1% of Cactus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 12.9% of Cactus shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cactus currently has a consensus price target of $66.80, suggesting a potential downside of 4.17%. Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $13.25, suggesting a potential upside of 3.11%. Given Patterson-UTI Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more favorable than Cactus.

Cactus has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Cactus pays out 51.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -173.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cactus has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Halliburton had 3 more articles in the media than Cactus. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Halliburton and 12 mentions for Cactus. Halliburton's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Cactus' score of 0.75 indicating that Halliburton is being referred to more favorably in the media.

85.2% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of Cactus shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Halliburton shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Cactus shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Halliburton has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Cactus' net margin of 6.01%. Halliburton's return on equity of 18.71% beat Cactus' return on equity.

Halliburton currently has a consensus target price of $43.10, indicating a potential upside of 20.12%. Cactus has a consensus target price of $66.80, indicating a potential downside of 4.17%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Cactus.

Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Halliburton pays out 35.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cactus pays out 51.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Halliburton has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Cactus has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Halliburton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Halliburton has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cactus has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than Cactus. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Cactus had 8 more articles in the media than Helmerich & Payne. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Cactus and 4 mentions for Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Cactus' score of 0.75 indicating that Helmerich & Payne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Cactus currently has a consensus price target of $66.80, suggesting a potential downside of 4.17%. Helmerich & Payne has a consensus price target of $43.10, suggesting a potential downside of 2.41%. Given Helmerich & Payne's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Helmerich & Payne is more favorable than Cactus.

Cactus has a net margin of 6.01% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of -3.43%. Cactus' return on equity of 16.66% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity.

Cactus has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

85.1% of Cactus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by institutional investors. 12.9% of Cactus shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cactus has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Cactus pays out 51.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out -70.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cactus has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Helmerich & Payne is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Cactus had 3 more articles in the media than Magnolia Oil & Gas. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Cactus and 9 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas. Cactus' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.48 indicating that Cactus is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cactus has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cactus pays out 51.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Cactus has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Magnolia Oil & Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 28.77% compared to Cactus' net margin of 6.01%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 21.04% beat Cactus' return on equity.

94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of Cactus shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Cactus shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Magnolia Oil & Gas currently has a consensus target price of $31.71, suggesting a potential upside of 14.35%. Cactus has a consensus target price of $66.80, suggesting a potential downside of 4.17%. Given Magnolia Oil & Gas' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Magnolia Oil & Gas is more favorable than Cactus.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has higher revenue and earnings than Cactus. Magnolia Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.