Cactus (WHD) Competitors

In the previous week, Halliburton had 25 more articles in the media than Cactus. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Halliburton and 5 mentions for Cactus. Halliburton's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Cactus' score of 0.66 indicating that Halliburton is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Cactus has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Halliburton has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Cactus' net margin of 6.17%. Halliburton's return on equity of 19.04% beat Cactus' return on equity.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than Cactus. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

85.1% of Cactus shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.9% of Cactus shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Halliburton shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Cactus pays out 52.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Halliburton pays out 37.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cactus has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Halliburton has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Halliburton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Cactus currently has a consensus price target of $62.60, indicating a potential upside of 5.34%. Halliburton has a consensus price target of $43.05, indicating a potential upside of 5.62%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Cactus.

In the previous week, Cactus had 4 more articles in the media than Helmerich & Payne. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Cactus and 1 mentions for Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Cactus' score of 0.66 indicating that Helmerich & Payne is being referred to more favorably in the media.

96.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of Cactus shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.4% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Cactus shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cactus has a net margin of 6.17% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of -9.38%. Cactus' return on equity of 15.43% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity.

Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Helmerich & Payne pays out -26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cactus pays out 52.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cactus has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Helmerich & Payne is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Cactus has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Helmerich & Payne currently has a consensus target price of $39.70, indicating a potential upside of 2.67%. Cactus has a consensus target price of $62.60, indicating a potential upside of 5.34%. Given Cactus' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cactus is more favorable than Helmerich & Payne.

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cactus has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cactus had 2 more articles in the media than Magnolia Oil & Gas. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Cactus and 3 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas. Magnolia Oil & Gas' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Cactus' score of 0.66 indicating that Magnolia Oil & Gas is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has higher revenue and earnings than Cactus. Magnolia Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 24.40% compared to Cactus' net margin of 6.17%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 16.28% beat Cactus' return on equity.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cactus has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

Magnolia Oil & Gas currently has a consensus target price of $31.42, suggesting a potential upside of 11.74%. Cactus has a consensus target price of $62.60, suggesting a potential upside of 5.34%. Given Magnolia Oil & Gas' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Magnolia Oil & Gas is more favorable than Cactus.

94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of Cactus shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Cactus shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cactus pays out 52.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Cactus has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Magnolia Oil & Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Matador Resources currently has a consensus target price of $65.08, indicating a potential upside of 15.16%. Cactus has a consensus target price of $62.60, indicating a potential upside of 5.34%. Given Matador Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Matador Resources is more favorable than Cactus.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 14.41% compared to Cactus' net margin of 6.17%. Cactus' return on equity of 15.43% beat Matador Resources' return on equity.

Matador Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Cactus. Matador Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cactus pays out 52.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matador Resources has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Cactus has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Matador Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

92.0% of Matador Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of Cactus shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Cactus shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Matador Resources has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cactus has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 16 more articles in the media than Cactus. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Matador Resources and 5 mentions for Cactus. Matador Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Cactus' score of 0.66 indicating that Matador Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.