Cactus (WHD) Competitors

Cactus has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than Cactus. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Halliburton has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Cactus' net margin of 6.01%. Halliburton's return on equity of 18.71% beat Cactus' return on equity.

Cactus currently has a consensus target price of $65.20, suggesting a potential upside of 1.91%. Halliburton has a consensus target price of $43.10, suggesting a potential upside of 35.67%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Cactus.

85.1% of Cactus shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.9% of Cactus shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Halliburton shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Halliburton had 18 more articles in the media than Cactus. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Halliburton and 24 mentions for Cactus. Halliburton's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Cactus' score of 0.95 indicating that Halliburton is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Cactus pays out 47.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Halliburton pays out 35.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cactus has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Halliburton has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Halliburton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Cactus pays out 47.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out -26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cactus has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Helmerich & Payne is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Cactus has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cactus has a net margin of 6.01% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of -9.38%. Cactus' return on equity of 16.66% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity.

Cactus has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cactus had 19 more articles in the media than Helmerich & Payne. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Cactus and 5 mentions for Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Cactus' score of 0.95 indicating that Helmerich & Payne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

85.1% of Cactus shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.9% of Cactus shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cactus presently has a consensus target price of $65.20, suggesting a potential upside of 1.91%. Helmerich & Payne has a consensus target price of $39.80, suggesting a potential upside of 17.79%. Given Helmerich & Payne's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Helmerich & Payne is more favorable than Cactus.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 24.40% compared to Cactus' net margin of 6.01%. Cactus' return on equity of 16.66% beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has higher revenue and earnings than Cactus. Magnolia Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cactus has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Cactus pays out 47.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cactus has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Magnolia Oil & Gas has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Magnolia Oil & Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Magnolia Oil & Gas had 4 more articles in the media than Cactus. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas and 24 mentions for Cactus. Cactus' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.50 indicating that Cactus is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Cactus currently has a consensus price target of $65.20, suggesting a potential upside of 1.91%. Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $31.50, suggesting a potential upside of 25.52%. Given Magnolia Oil & Gas' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Magnolia Oil & Gas is more favorable than Cactus.

85.1% of Cactus shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.9% of Cactus shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cactus has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matador Resources has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Matador Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Cactus. Matador Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 14.41% compared to Cactus' net margin of 6.01%. Cactus' return on equity of 16.66% beat Matador Resources' return on equity.

In the previous week, Cactus had 10 more articles in the media than Matador Resources. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Cactus and 14 mentions for Matador Resources. Cactus' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Matador Resources' score of 0.76 indicating that Cactus is being referred to more favorably in the media.

85.1% of Cactus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 12.9% of Cactus shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cactus presently has a consensus price target of $65.20, indicating a potential upside of 1.91%. Matador Resources has a consensus price target of $66.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.04%. Given Matador Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Matador Resources is more favorable than Cactus.

Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Cactus pays out 47.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cactus has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Matador Resources has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Matador Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.