Cactus (WHD) Competitors

In the previous week, Halliburton had 12 more articles in the media than Cactus. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Halliburton and 6 mentions for Cactus. Cactus' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Halliburton's score of 1.11 indicating that Cactus is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Cactus has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Cactus presently has a consensus price target of $63.40, suggesting a potential upside of 19.58%. Halliburton has a consensus price target of $43.27, suggesting a potential upside of 23.25%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Cactus.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than Cactus. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Halliburton has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Cactus' net margin of 6.17%. Halliburton's return on equity of 19.04% beat Cactus' return on equity.

Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Cactus pays out 52.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Halliburton pays out 37.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cactus has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Halliburton has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Halliburton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

85.1% of Cactus shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.9% of Cactus shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Halliburton shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

85.1% of Cactus shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.9% of Cactus shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Helmerich & Payne had 6 more articles in the media than Cactus. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Helmerich & Payne and 6 mentions for Cactus. Helmerich & Payne's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Cactus' score of 1.12 indicating that Helmerich & Payne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Cactus has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cactus has a net margin of 6.17% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of -9.38%. Cactus' return on equity of 15.43% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity.

Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Cactus pays out 52.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out -26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cactus has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Helmerich & Payne is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Cactus has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Cactus currently has a consensus target price of $63.40, suggesting a potential upside of 19.58%. Helmerich & Payne has a consensus target price of $40.60, suggesting a potential upside of 13.92%. Given Cactus' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Cactus is more favorable than Helmerich & Payne.

Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Cactus pays out 52.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cactus has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Magnolia Oil & Gas has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Magnolia Oil & Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Cactus presently has a consensus price target of $63.40, suggesting a potential upside of 19.58%. Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $31.33, suggesting a potential upside of 16.74%. Given Cactus' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Cactus is more favorable than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 24.40% compared to Cactus' net margin of 6.17%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 16.28% beat Cactus' return on equity.

85.1% of Cactus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. 12.9% of Cactus shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has higher revenue and earnings than Cactus. Magnolia Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Magnolia Oil & Gas had 5 more articles in the media than Cactus. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas and 6 mentions for Cactus. Cactus' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.49 indicating that Cactus is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Cactus has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Matador Resources has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cactus has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

92.0% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of Cactus shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Cactus shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 14.41% compared to Cactus' net margin of 6.17%. Cactus' return on equity of 15.43% beat Matador Resources' return on equity.

Matador Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Cactus. Matador Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Matador Resources and Matador Resources both had 6 articles in the media. Matador Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Cactus' score of 1.12 indicating that Matador Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cactus pays out 52.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matador Resources has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Cactus has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Matador Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Matador Resources presently has a consensus price target of $65.08, indicating a potential upside of 29.02%. Cactus has a consensus price target of $63.40, indicating a potential upside of 19.58%. Given Matador Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Matador Resources is more favorable than Cactus.