NYSE:WHD

Cactus Competitors

$36.04
-1.44 (-3.84 %)
(As of 07/30/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$35.80
$37.09
50-Day Range
$34.25
$43.74
52-Week Range
$16.11
$44.20
Volume270,912 shs
Average Volume314,641 shs
Market Capitalization$2.72 billion
P/E Ratio63.23
Dividend Yield0.96%
Beta2.41

Cactus (NYSE:WHD) Vs. NOV, FTI, WFRD, DNOW, DRQ, and SOI

Should you be buying WHD stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "oil & gas field machinery" are considered alternatives and competitors to Cactus, including NOV (NOV), TechnipFMC (FTI), Weatherford International (WFRD), NOW (DNOW), Dril-Quip (DRQ), and Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure (SOI).

NOV (NYSE:NOV) and Cactus (NYSE:WHD) are both mid-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares NOV and Cactus' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
NOV-10.10%-5.46%-2.93%
Cactus9.77%4.49%2.97%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for NOV and Cactus, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
NOV141002.60
Cactus04502.56

NOV presently has a consensus price target of $16.60, indicating a potential upside of 20.20%. Cactus has a consensus price target of $31.7778, indicating a potential downside of 11.83%. Given NOV's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe NOV is more favorable than Cactus.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

91.2% of NOV shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.1% of Cactus shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of NOV shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 21.3% of Cactus shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares NOV and Cactus' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NOV$6.09 billion0.89$-2,542,000,000.00($0.36)-38.36
Cactus$348.57 million7.81$34.45 million$0.7349.37

Cactus has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NOV. NOV is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

NOV has a beta of 2.3, meaning that its share price is 130% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cactus has a beta of 2.41, meaning that its share price is 141% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Cactus beats NOV on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) and Cactus (NYSE:WHD) are both mid-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for TechnipFMC and Cactus, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
TechnipFMC110702.33
Cactus04502.56

TechnipFMC currently has a consensus target price of $10.3364, indicating a potential upside of 43.16%. Cactus has a consensus target price of $31.7778, indicating a potential downside of 11.83%. Given TechnipFMC's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than Cactus.

Risk & Volatility

TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.26, suggesting that its share price is 126% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cactus has a beta of 2.41, suggesting that its share price is 141% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

76.6% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.1% of Cactus shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.3% of Cactus shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares TechnipFMC and Cactus' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TechnipFMC1.57%1.40%0.36%
Cactus9.77%4.49%2.97%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares TechnipFMC and Cactus' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TechnipFMC$13.05 billion0.25$-3,287,600,000.00$0.2036.10
Cactus$348.57 million7.81$34.45 million$0.7349.37

Cactus has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TechnipFMC. TechnipFMC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Cactus beats TechnipFMC on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cactus (NYSE:WHD) and Weatherford International (NASDAQ:WFRD) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Cactus and Weatherford International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Cactus04502.56
Weatherford International00103.00

Cactus currently has a consensus price target of $31.7778, indicating a potential downside of 11.83%. Given Weatherford International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Weatherford International is more favorable than Cactus.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

73.1% of Cactus shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Weatherford International shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.3% of Cactus shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Cactus and Weatherford International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Cactus9.77%4.49%2.97%
Weatherford InternationalN/AN/AN/A

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Cactus and Weatherford International's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cactus$348.57 million7.81$34.45 million$0.7349.37
Weatherford InternationalN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Cactus has higher revenue and earnings than Weatherford International.

Summary

Cactus beats Weatherford International on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cactus (NYSE:WHD) and NOW (NYSE:DNOW) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Risk & Volatility

Cactus has a beta of 2.41, meaning that its share price is 141% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NOW has a beta of 2.09, meaning that its share price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Cactus and NOW's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cactus$348.57 million7.81$34.45 million$0.7349.37
NOW$1.62 billion0.67$-427,000,000.00($0.65)-15.18

Cactus has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NOW. NOW is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Cactus and NOW's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Cactus9.77%4.49%2.97%
NOW-7.70%-9.48%-6.57%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

73.1% of Cactus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.0% of NOW shares are held by institutional investors. 21.3% of Cactus shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of NOW shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Cactus and NOW, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Cactus04502.56
NOW11302.40

Cactus presently has a consensus price target of $31.7778, indicating a potential downside of 11.83%. NOW has a consensus price target of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.32%. Given NOW's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe NOW is more favorable than Cactus.

Summary

Cactus beats NOW on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dril-Quip (NYSE:DRQ) and Cactus (NYSE:WHD) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Dril-Quip and Cactus' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Dril-Quip-14.78%-2.29%-2.05%
Cactus9.77%4.49%2.97%

Volatility and Risk

Dril-Quip has a beta of 1.51, indicating that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cactus has a beta of 2.41, indicating that its stock price is 141% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Dril-Quip and Cactus, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Dril-Quip14001.80
Cactus04502.56

Dril-Quip currently has a consensus target price of $28.41, indicating a potential downside of 0.59%. Cactus has a consensus target price of $31.7778, indicating a potential downside of 11.83%. Given Dril-Quip's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Dril-Quip is more favorable than Cactus.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

73.1% of Cactus shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Dril-Quip shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 21.3% of Cactus shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Dril-Quip and Cactus' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dril-Quip$364.97 million2.77$-30,770,000.00$0.25114.32
Cactus$348.57 million7.81$34.45 million$0.7349.37

Cactus has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Dril-Quip. Cactus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dril-Quip, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Cactus beats Dril-Quip on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure (NYSE:SOI) and Cactus (NYSE:WHD) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

52.6% of Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.1% of Cactus shares are held by institutional investors. 30.6% of Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.3% of Cactus shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure has a beta of 2.06, meaning that its stock price is 106% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cactus has a beta of 2.41, meaning that its stock price is 141% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure and Cactus' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure-6.47%-2.83%-2.16%
Cactus9.77%4.49%2.97%

Dividends

Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of $0.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure pays out -280.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cactus pays out 49.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Cactus has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure and Cactus, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure02102.33
Cactus04502.56

Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure currently has a consensus target price of $10.65, indicating a potential upside of 22.41%. Cactus has a consensus target price of $31.7778, indicating a potential downside of 11.83%. Given Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure is more favorable than Cactus.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure and Cactus' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure$102.98 million3.86$-29,340,000.00($0.15)-58.00
Cactus$348.57 million7.81$34.45 million$0.7349.37

Cactus has higher revenue and earnings than Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure. Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Cactus beats Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.


Cactus Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
NOV logo
NOV
NOV
2.0$13.81-4.1%$5.40 billion$6.09 billion-9.79Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
Gap Up
TechnipFMC logo
FTI
TechnipFMC
2.1$7.22-2.8%$3.25 billion$13.05 billion21.24Analyst Revision
News Coverage
WFRD
Weatherford International
0.1$17.44-2.0%$1.22 billionN/A0.00Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Gap Up
NOW logo
DNOW
NOW
1.3$9.87-1.0%$1.09 billion$1.62 billion-10.28Upcoming Earnings
Dril-Quip logo
DRQ
Dril-Quip
1.3$28.58-4.4%$1.01 billion$364.97 million-19.99Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Gap Up
Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure logo
SOI
Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure
2.3$8.70-0.2%$397.50 million$102.98 million-33.46Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
Oil States International logo
OIS
Oil States International
1.8$5.66-7.4%$346.85 million$638.08 million-4.92News Coverage
Gap Up
High Trading Volume
High Trading Volume
Newpark Resources logo
NR
Newpark Resources
1.4$3.23-2.2%$293.80 million$492.63 million-3.99Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Forum Energy Technologies logo
FET
Forum Energy Technologies
1.5$21.72-0.5%$121.63 million$512.50 million-1.36Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Profire Energy logo
PFIE
Profire Energy
1.4$1.07-3.8%$51.14 million$21.46 million-21.30Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Positive News
Gap Up
This page was last updated on 8/1/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more about MarketBeat.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research.