Go Pro

Cactus (WHD) Competitors

Cactus logo
$63.48 +1.29 (+2.07%)
Closing price 10/2/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$63.85 +0.38 (+0.59%)
As of 10/2/2026 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

WHD vs. BKR, PTEN, HAL, HP, and MGY

Should you buy Cactus stock or one of its competitors? Cactus's main competitors and comparable companies include Baker Hughes (BKR), Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN), Halliburton (HAL), Helmerich & Payne (HP), and Magnolia Oil & Gas (MGY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Cactus compare to Baker Hughes?

Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) and Cactus (NYSE:WHD) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 12 more articles in the media than Cactus. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Baker Hughes and 3 mentions for Cactus. Baker Hughes' average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat Cactus' score of -0.13 indicating that Baker Hughes is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Baker Hughes
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Cactus
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than Cactus. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baker Hughes$27.73B2.01$2.59B$3.1018.06
Cactus$1.36B3.73$166.01M$1.1754.25

Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Baker Hughes pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cactus pays out 51.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Baker Hughes has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Cactus has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Baker Hughes is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Baker Hughes presently has a consensus price target of $71.41, indicating a potential upside of 27.52%. Cactus has a consensus price target of $66.40, indicating a potential upside of 4.61%. Given Baker Hughes' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Baker Hughes is more favorable than Cactus.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baker Hughes
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.95
Cactus
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 11.17% compared to Cactus' net margin of 6.01%. Cactus' return on equity of 16.66% beat Baker Hughes' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baker Hughes11.17% 13.85% 5.80%
Cactus 6.01%16.66%10.81%

92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of Cactus shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Cactus shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cactus has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its share price is 42% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Baker Hughes beats Cactus on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cactus compare to Patterson-UTI Energy?

Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) and Cactus (NYSE:WHD) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Cactus has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Patterson-UTI Energy$4.83B0.89-$93.64M-$0.23N/A
Cactus$1.36B3.73$166.01M$1.1754.25

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cactus has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the broader market.

Patterson-UTI Energy presently has a consensus target price of $13.14, suggesting a potential upside of 17.18%. Cactus has a consensus target price of $66.40, suggesting a potential upside of 4.61%. Given Patterson-UTI Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more favorable than Cactus.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Patterson-UTI Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Cactus
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Cactus has a net margin of 6.01% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -1.92%. Cactus' return on equity of 16.66% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Patterson-UTI Energy-1.92% -1.68% -0.98%
Cactus 6.01%16.66%10.81%

Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -173.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cactus pays out 51.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cactus has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Cactus. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 3 mentions for Cactus. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Cactus' score of -0.13 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Patterson-UTI Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cactus
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of Cactus shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Cactus shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Cactus beats Patterson-UTI Energy on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cactus compare to Halliburton?

Cactus (NYSE:WHD) and Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Cactus presently has a consensus target price of $66.40, indicating a potential upside of 4.61%. Halliburton has a consensus target price of $43.24, indicating a potential upside of 35.84%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Cactus.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cactus
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Halliburton
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.68

In the previous week, Halliburton had 8 more articles in the media than Cactus. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Halliburton and 3 mentions for Cactus. Halliburton's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Cactus' score of -0.13 indicating that Halliburton is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cactus
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Halliburton
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Halliburton has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Cactus' net margin of 6.01%. Halliburton's return on equity of 18.71% beat Cactus' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cactus6.01% 16.66% 10.81%
Halliburton 7.16%18.71%7.89%

Cactus has a beta of 1.42, indicating that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than Cactus. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cactus$1.36B3.73$166.01M$1.1754.25
Halliburton$22.18B1.20$1.28B$1.9116.66

Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Cactus pays out 51.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Halliburton pays out 35.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cactus has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Halliburton has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Halliburton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

85.1% of Cactus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. 12.9% of Cactus shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Halliburton shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Halliburton beats Cactus on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cactus compare to Helmerich & Payne?

Cactus (NYSE:WHD) and Helmerich & Payne (NYSE:HP) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Cactus had 2 more articles in the media than Helmerich & Payne. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Cactus and 1 mentions for Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Cactus' score of -0.13 indicating that Helmerich & Payne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cactus
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Helmerich & Payne
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

85.1% of Cactus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by institutional investors. 12.9% of Cactus shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Cactus pays out 51.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out -70.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cactus has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Helmerich & Payne is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Cactus has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its share price is 42% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Cactus has a net margin of 6.01% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of -3.43%. Cactus' return on equity of 16.66% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cactus6.01% 16.66% 10.81%
Helmerich & Payne -3.43%-2.35%-0.99%

Cactus presently has a consensus target price of $66.40, suggesting a potential upside of 4.61%. Helmerich & Payne has a consensus target price of $43.64, suggesting a potential upside of 13.27%. Given Helmerich & Payne's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Helmerich & Payne is more favorable than Cactus.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cactus
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Helmerich & Payne
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Cactus has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cactus$1.36B3.73$166.01M$1.1754.25
Helmerich & Payne$3.75B1.03-$163.70M-$1.41N/A

Summary

Cactus beats Helmerich & Payne on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cactus compare to Magnolia Oil & Gas?

Magnolia Oil & Gas (NYSE:MGY) and Cactus (NYSE:WHD) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment and dividends.

Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cactus pays out 51.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Cactus has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Magnolia Oil & Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cactus has a beta of 1.42, indicating that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the broader market.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 28.77% compared to Cactus' net margin of 6.01%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 21.04% beat Cactus' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Magnolia Oil & Gas28.77% 21.04% 14.46%
Cactus 6.01%16.66%10.81%

In the previous week, Magnolia Oil & Gas had 10 more articles in the media than Cactus. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas and 3 mentions for Cactus. Magnolia Oil & Gas' average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Cactus' score of -0.13 indicating that Magnolia Oil & Gas is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Magnolia Oil & Gas
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Cactus
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Magnolia Oil & Gas currently has a consensus target price of $31.88, suggesting a potential upside of 32.64%. Cactus has a consensus target price of $66.40, suggesting a potential upside of 4.61%. Given Magnolia Oil & Gas' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Magnolia Oil & Gas is more favorable than Cactus.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Magnolia Oil & Gas
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Cactus
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of Cactus shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Cactus shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has higher revenue and earnings than Cactus. Magnolia Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Magnolia Oil & Gas$1.48B3.85$325.25M$2.2810.54
Cactus$1.36B3.73$166.01M$1.1754.25

Summary

Magnolia Oil & Gas beats Cactus on 16 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cactus News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WHD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WHD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WHD vs. The Competition

MetricCactusEnergy Equipment & Services IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$4.99B$3.45B$9.82B$22.65B
Dividend Yield0.96%13.44%10.69%3.72%
P/E Ratio54.2542.0420.3027.75
Price / Sales3.7326.82509.2320.74
Price / Cash17.6920.2236.9338.88
Price / Book3.542.094.014.64
Net Income$166.01M$67.81M$4.35B$1.08B
7 Day Performance-1.37%-1.32%-1.12%-1.06%
1 Month Performance-11.53%-4.54%-3.44%-5.50%
1 Year Performance68.82%33.86%28.80%5.13%

Cactus Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WHD
Cactus
2.4446 of 5 stars
$63.48
+2.1%
$66.40
+4.6%
+66.2%$4.99B$1.36B54.251,500
BKR
Baker Hughes
4.96 of 5 stars
$57.29
-1.3%
$71.81
+25.3%
+15.7%$56.84B$27.73B18.4856,000
PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy
3.8031 of 5 stars
$11.18
+1.0%
$13.25
+18.5%
+109.9%$4.25B$4.83BN/A7,900
HAL
Halliburton
4.8479 of 5 stars
$32.73
-0.9%
$43.24
+32.1%
+30.5%$27.37B$22.18B17.1346,000
HP
Helmerich & Payne
2.9885 of 5 stars
$39.79
+0.6%
$43.10
+8.3%
+68.6%$3.95B$4.00BN/A6,200

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:WHD) was last updated on 10/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners