Cactus (WHD) Competitors

Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Halliburton pays out 37.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cactus pays out 52.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Halliburton has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Cactus has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Halliburton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

85.2% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of Cactus shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Halliburton shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Cactus shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Halliburton had 31 more articles in the media than Cactus. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Halliburton and 2 mentions for Cactus. Cactus' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Halliburton's score of 0.72 indicating that Cactus is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Halliburton currently has a consensus target price of $43.18, indicating a potential upside of 22.59%. Cactus has a consensus target price of $63.40, indicating a potential upside of 18.40%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Cactus.

Halliburton has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Cactus' net margin of 6.17%. Halliburton's return on equity of 19.04% beat Cactus' return on equity.

Halliburton has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cactus has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than Cactus. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cactus has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cactus has a net margin of 6.17% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of -9.38%. Cactus' return on equity of 15.43% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity.

96.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of Cactus shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.4% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Cactus shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Helmerich & Payne pays out -26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cactus pays out 52.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cactus has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Helmerich & Payne is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Helmerich & Payne currently has a consensus price target of $40.10, indicating a potential upside of 18.03%. Cactus has a consensus price target of $63.40, indicating a potential upside of 18.40%. Given Cactus' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cactus is more favorable than Helmerich & Payne.

In the previous week, Helmerich & Payne had 2 more articles in the media than Cactus. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Helmerich & Payne and 2 mentions for Cactus. Cactus' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Helmerich & Payne's score of -0.41 indicating that Cactus is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cactus has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has higher revenue and earnings than Cactus. Magnolia Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cactus pays out 52.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Cactus has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Magnolia Oil & Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of Cactus shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Cactus shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cactus has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Magnolia Oil & Gas presently has a consensus target price of $31.08, suggesting a potential upside of 16.27%. Cactus has a consensus target price of $63.40, suggesting a potential upside of 18.40%. Given Cactus' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cactus is more favorable than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 24.40% compared to Cactus' net margin of 6.17%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 16.28% beat Cactus' return on equity.

In the previous week, Magnolia Oil & Gas had 7 more articles in the media than Cactus. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas and 2 mentions for Cactus. Cactus' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.77 indicating that Cactus is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 14 more articles in the media than Cactus. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Matador Resources and 2 mentions for Cactus. Cactus' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Matador Resources' score of -0.30 indicating that Cactus is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

92.0% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of Cactus shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Cactus shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Matador Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Cactus. Matador Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Matador Resources has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cactus has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Matador Resources presently has a consensus target price of $64.38, indicating a potential upside of 21.17%. Cactus has a consensus target price of $63.40, indicating a potential upside of 18.40%. Given Matador Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Matador Resources is more favorable than Cactus.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 14.41% compared to Cactus' net margin of 6.17%. Cactus' return on equity of 15.43% beat Matador Resources' return on equity.

Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cactus pays out 52.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matador Resources has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Cactus has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Matador Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.