RPC Competitors

Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) and RPC (NYSE:RES) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

73.2% of Schlumberger shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.7% of RPC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Schlumberger shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 73.6% of RPC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Schlumberger and RPC's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

RPC has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Schlumberger. RPC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schlumberger, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Schlumberger has a beta of 2.28, suggesting that its stock price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RPC has a beta of 2.13, suggesting that its stock price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Schlumberger and RPC, as reported by MarketBeat.

Schlumberger presently has a consensus price target of $22.1591, indicating a potential downside of 6.66%. RPC has a consensus price target of $3.1313, indicating a potential downside of 17.81%. Given Schlumberger's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Schlumberger is more favorable than RPC.

Profitability

This table compares Schlumberger and RPC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Schlumberger beats RPC on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) and RPC (NYSE:RES) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

75.4% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.7% of RPC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Halliburton shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 73.6% of RPC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Halliburton and RPC's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

RPC has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Halliburton. RPC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Halliburton has a beta of 2.81, indicating that its share price is 181% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RPC has a beta of 2.13, indicating that its share price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Halliburton and RPC, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Halliburton currently has a consensus target price of $16.0095, suggesting a potential downside of 14.07%. RPC has a consensus target price of $3.1313, suggesting a potential downside of 17.81%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Halliburton is more favorable than RPC.

Profitability

This table compares Halliburton and RPC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Halliburton beats RPC on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

National Oilwell Varco (NYSE:NOV) and RPC (NYSE:RES) are both business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for National Oilwell Varco and RPC, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

National Oilwell Varco currently has a consensus target price of $15.2263, suggesting a potential upside of 19.89%. RPC has a consensus target price of $3.1313, suggesting a potential downside of 17.81%. Given National Oilwell Varco's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe National Oilwell Varco is more favorable than RPC.

Profitability

This table compares National Oilwell Varco and RPC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

National Oilwell Varco has a beta of 2.22, indicating that its share price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RPC has a beta of 2.13, indicating that its share price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares National Oilwell Varco and RPC's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

RPC has lower revenue, but higher earnings than National Oilwell Varco. RPC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than National Oilwell Varco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

94.5% of National Oilwell Varco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.7% of RPC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of National Oilwell Varco shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 73.6% of RPC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

National Oilwell Varco beats RPC on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

RPC (NYSE:RES) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for RPC and TechnipFMC, as reported by MarketBeat.

RPC currently has a consensus target price of $3.1313, suggesting a potential downside of 17.81%. TechnipFMC has a consensus target price of $10.0171, suggesting a potential downside of 5.05%. Given TechnipFMC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than RPC.

Profitability

This table compares RPC and TechnipFMC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

RPC has a beta of 2.13, indicating that its share price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, indicating that its share price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares RPC and TechnipFMC's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

RPC has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TechnipFMC. RPC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

25.7% of RPC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. 73.6% of RPC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

TechnipFMC beats RPC on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

RPC (NYSE:RES) and Dril-Quip (NYSE:DRQ) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for RPC and Dril-Quip, as reported by MarketBeat.

RPC currently has a consensus target price of $3.1313, suggesting a potential downside of 17.81%. Dril-Quip has a consensus target price of $31.4286, suggesting a potential downside of 2.34%. Given Dril-Quip's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Dril-Quip is more favorable than RPC.

Profitability

This table compares RPC and Dril-Quip's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

RPC has a beta of 2.13, indicating that its share price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dril-Quip has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its share price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares RPC and Dril-Quip's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Dril-Quip has lower revenue, but higher earnings than RPC. RPC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dril-Quip, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

25.7% of RPC shares are held by institutional investors. 73.6% of RPC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Dril-Quip shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Dril-Quip beats RPC on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

RPC (NYSE:RES) and Oceaneering International (NYSE:OII) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for RPC and Oceaneering International, as reported by MarketBeat.

RPC currently has a consensus target price of $3.1313, suggesting a potential downside of 17.81%. Oceaneering International has a consensus target price of $6.8286, suggesting a potential downside of 29.75%. Given RPC's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe RPC is more favorable than Oceaneering International.

Profitability

This table compares RPC and Oceaneering International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

RPC has a beta of 2.13, indicating that its share price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Oceaneering International has a beta of 3.6, indicating that its share price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares RPC and Oceaneering International's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

RPC has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Oceaneering International. RPC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oceaneering International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

25.7% of RPC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.4% of Oceaneering International shares are held by institutional investors. 73.6% of RPC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Oceaneering International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Oceaneering International beats RPC on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.