NYSE:FET

Forum Energy Technologies Competitors

$24.70
+0.07 (+0.28 %)
(As of 06/14/2021 10:13 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$24.44
$24.87
50-Day Range
$17.61
$26.99
52-Week Range
$6.22
$28.50
Volume5 shs
Average Volume70,611 shs
Market Capitalization$138.32 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta4.27

Forum Energy Technologies (NYSE:FET) Vs. SLB, HAL, NOV, FTI, OII, and DRQ

Should you be buying FET stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "oil & gas equipment & services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Forum Energy Technologies, including Schlumberger (SLB), Halliburton (HAL), NOV (NOV), TechnipFMC (FTI), Oceaneering International (OII), and Dril-Quip (DRQ).

Forum Energy Technologies (NYSE:FET) and Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Forum Energy Technologies and Schlumberger, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Forum Energy Technologies01002.00
Schlumberger161402.62

Forum Energy Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $8.00, suggesting a potential downside of 67.52%. Schlumberger has a consensus target price of $28.1895, suggesting a potential downside of 19.20%. Given Schlumberger's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Schlumberger is more favorable than Forum Energy Technologies.

Volatility and Risk

Forum Energy Technologies has a beta of 4.27, suggesting that its share price is 327% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schlumberger has a beta of 2.39, suggesting that its share price is 139% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

42.7% of Forum Energy Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.2% of Schlumberger shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.7% of Forum Energy Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Schlumberger shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Forum Energy Technologies and Schlumberger's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Forum Energy Technologies-20.14%-27.85%-12.38%
Schlumberger-13.30%7.20%2.09%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Forum Energy Technologies and Schlumberger's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Forum Energy Technologies$512.50 million0.27$-96,890,000.00($20.91)-1.18
Schlumberger$23.60 billion2.05$-10,518,000,000.00$0.6850.82

Forum Energy Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schlumberger. Forum Energy Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schlumberger, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Schlumberger beats Forum Energy Technologies on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) and Forum Energy Technologies (NYSE:FET) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Halliburton and Forum Energy Technologies' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Halliburton$14.45 billion1.49$-2,945,000,000.00$0.6537.12
Forum Energy Technologies$512.50 million0.27$-96,890,000.00($20.91)-1.18

Forum Energy Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Halliburton. Forum Energy Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Halliburton and Forum Energy Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Halliburton281212.52
Forum Energy Technologies01002.00

Halliburton presently has a consensus target price of $20.40, indicating a potential downside of 15.88%. Forum Energy Technologies has a consensus target price of $8.00, indicating a potential downside of 67.52%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Forum Energy Technologies.

Profitability

This table compares Halliburton and Forum Energy Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Halliburton-13.67%9.26%2.29%
Forum Energy Technologies-20.14%-27.85%-12.38%

Volatility & Risk

Halliburton has a beta of 2.83, suggesting that its share price is 183% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Forum Energy Technologies has a beta of 4.27, suggesting that its share price is 327% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

76.5% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.7% of Forum Energy Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Halliburton shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.7% of Forum Energy Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Halliburton beats Forum Energy Technologies on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Forum Energy Technologies (NYSE:FET) and NOV (NYSE:NOV) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

42.7% of Forum Energy Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of NOV shares are held by institutional investors. 8.7% of Forum Energy Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of NOV shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Forum Energy Technologies has a beta of 4.27, meaning that its stock price is 327% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NOV has a beta of 2.3, meaning that its stock price is 130% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Forum Energy Technologies and NOV, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Forum Energy Technologies01002.00
NOV35802.31

Forum Energy Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $8.00, indicating a potential downside of 67.52%. NOV has a consensus target price of $15.10, indicating a potential downside of 10.81%. Given NOV's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe NOV is more favorable than Forum Energy Technologies.

Profitability

This table compares Forum Energy Technologies and NOV's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Forum Energy Technologies-20.14%-27.85%-12.38%
NOV-11.18%-5.60%-3.00%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Forum Energy Technologies and NOV's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Forum Energy Technologies$512.50 million0.27$-96,890,000.00($20.91)-1.18
NOV$6.09 billion1.10$-2,542,000,000.00($0.36)-47.69

Forum Energy Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NOV. NOV is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Forum Energy Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

NOV beats Forum Energy Technologies on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Forum Energy Technologies (NYSE:FET) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Risk & Volatility

Forum Energy Technologies has a beta of 4.27, suggesting that its share price is 327% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.25, suggesting that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Forum Energy Technologies and TechnipFMC, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Forum Energy Technologies01002.00
TechnipFMC111702.32

Forum Energy Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $8.00, suggesting a potential downside of 67.52%. TechnipFMC has a consensus target price of $10.17, suggesting a potential upside of 0.39%. Given TechnipFMC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than Forum Energy Technologies.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Forum Energy Technologies and TechnipFMC's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Forum Energy Technologies$512.50 million0.27$-96,890,000.00($20.91)-1.18
TechnipFMC$13.05 billion0.35$-3,287,600,000.00$0.2050.40

Forum Energy Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TechnipFMC. Forum Energy Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

42.7% of Forum Energy Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.9% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. 8.7% of Forum Energy Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of TechnipFMC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Forum Energy Technologies and TechnipFMC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Forum Energy Technologies-20.14%-27.85%-12.38%
TechnipFMC2.91%3.02%0.71%

Summary

TechnipFMC beats Forum Energy Technologies on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Oceaneering International (NYSE:OII) and Forum Energy Technologies (NYSE:FET) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

88.4% of Oceaneering International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.7% of Forum Energy Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Oceaneering International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.7% of Forum Energy Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Oceaneering International and Forum Energy Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Oceaneering International03202.40
Forum Energy Technologies01002.00

Oceaneering International presently has a consensus target price of $12.6857, suggesting a potential downside of 24.85%. Forum Energy Technologies has a consensus target price of $8.00, suggesting a potential downside of 67.52%. Given Oceaneering International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Oceaneering International is more favorable than Forum Energy Technologies.

Risk and Volatility

Oceaneering International has a beta of 3.55, indicating that its share price is 255% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Forum Energy Technologies has a beta of 4.27, indicating that its share price is 327% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Oceaneering International and Forum Energy Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Oceaneering International-8.01%-4.76%-1.33%
Forum Energy Technologies-20.14%-27.85%-12.38%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Oceaneering International and Forum Energy Technologies' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oceaneering International$1.83 billion0.92$-496,750,000.00($0.27)-62.59
Forum Energy Technologies$512.50 million0.27$-96,890,000.00($20.91)-1.18

Forum Energy Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Oceaneering International. Oceaneering International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Forum Energy Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Oceaneering International beats Forum Energy Technologies on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dril-Quip (NYSE:DRQ) and Forum Energy Technologies (NYSE:FET) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

42.7% of Forum Energy Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Dril-Quip shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.7% of Forum Energy Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Dril-Quip and Forum Energy Technologies' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dril-Quip$364.97 million3.76$-30,770,000.00$0.25154.92
Forum Energy Technologies$512.50 million0.27$-96,890,000.00($20.91)-1.18

Dril-Quip has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Forum Energy Technologies. Forum Energy Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dril-Quip, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Dril-Quip has a beta of 1.51, meaning that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Forum Energy Technologies has a beta of 4.27, meaning that its stock price is 327% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Dril-Quip and Forum Energy Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Dril-Quip13001.75
Forum Energy Technologies01002.00

Dril-Quip presently has a consensus price target of $27.6667, indicating a potential downside of 26.71%. Forum Energy Technologies has a consensus price target of $8.00, indicating a potential downside of 67.52%. Given Dril-Quip's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Dril-Quip is more favorable than Forum Energy Technologies.

Profitability

This table compares Dril-Quip and Forum Energy Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Dril-Quip-12.97%-1.68%-1.50%
Forum Energy Technologies-20.14%-27.85%-12.38%

Summary

Dril-Quip beats Forum Energy Technologies on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


Forum Energy Technologies Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Schlumberger logo
SLB
Schlumberger
1.9$34.56+1.0%$48.86 billion$23.60 billion-16.86
Halliburton logo
HAL
Halliburton
2.2$24.13+0.4%$21.38 billion$14.45 billion-12.00
NOV logo
NOV
NOV
1.2$17.17+1.4%$6.61 billion$6.09 billion-10.87
TechnipFMC logo
FTI
TechnipFMC
1.6$10.08+0.5%$4.57 billion$13.05 billion13.62Gap Up
Oceaneering International logo
OII
Oceaneering International
1.4$16.90+0.1%$1.68 billion$1.83 billion-12.16Gap Up
Dril-Quip logo
DRQ
Dril-Quip
0.7$38.73+2.5%$1.34 billion$364.97 million-30.02
RPC logo
RES
RPC
1.0$6.16+6.0%$1.23 billion$598.30 million-20.53
Helix Energy Solutions Group logo
HLX
Helix Energy Solutions Group
1.3$6.33+4.6%$910.37 million$733.55 million30.14Gap Up
Tidewater logo
TDW
Tidewater
1.1$14.37+1.3%$578.04 million$397.04 million-2.73
TETRA Technologies logo
TTI
TETRA Technologies
1.8$4.02+4.7%$474.70 million$377.71 million8.20
Oil States International logo
OIS
Oil States International
1.2$7.70+4.0%$452.87 million$638.08 million-5.88Gap Up
Newpark Resources logo
NR
Newpark Resources
1.1$3.82+1.3%$342.92 million$492.63 million-4.72
Matrix Service logo
MTRX
Matrix Service
1.0$10.96+2.8%$282.48 million$1.10 billion-10.96
Natural Gas Services Group logo
NGS
Natural Gas Services Group
0.9$11.44+1.7%$152.99 million$68.06 million-57.20
Geospace Technologies logo
GEOS
Geospace Technologies
0.7$8.90+0.7%$119.02 million$87.83 million-8.32Gap Up
Gulf Island Fabrication logo
GIFI
Gulf Island Fabrication
1.0$4.89+0.8%$75.26 million$250.96 million-1.44Gap Down
ION Geophysical logo
IO
ION Geophysical
1.2$2.25+0.4%$64.54 million$122.67 million-0.77
Dawson Geophysical logo
DWSN
Dawson Geophysical
0.7$2.70+1.1%$64.09 million$86.10 million-3.29Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Up
This page was last updated on 6/14/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more about MarketBeat.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.