Go Pro

Geospace Technologies (GEOS) Competitors

Geospace Technologies logo
$5.60 +0.46 (+8.95%)
Closing price 08/14/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$5.66 +0.07 (+1.16%)
As of 08/14/2026 07:57 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GEOS vs. SMHI, SND, GIFI, OMSE, and TUSK

Should you buy Geospace Technologies stock or one of its competitors? Geospace Technologies's main competitors and comparable companies include SEACOR Marine (SMHI), Smart Sand (SND), Gulf Island Fabrication (GIFI), OMS Energy Technologies (OMSE), and Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas equipment & services" industry.

How does Geospace Technologies compare to SEACOR Marine?

SEACOR Marine (NYSE:SMHI) and Geospace Technologies (NASDAQ:GEOS) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

SEACOR Marine presently has a consensus target price of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.82%. Given SEACOR Marine's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe SEACOR Marine is more favorable than Geospace Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
SEACOR Marine
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Geospace Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

SEACOR Marine has a net margin of -8.62% compared to Geospace Technologies' net margin of -43.10%. SEACOR Marine's return on equity of -8.72% beat Geospace Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SEACOR Marine-8.62% -8.72% -3.46%
Geospace Technologies -43.10%-35.80%-28.30%

59.1% of SEACOR Marine shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.2% of Geospace Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 16.8% of SEACOR Marine shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Geospace Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

SEACOR Marine has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.19, suggesting that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

Geospace Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SEACOR Marine. SEACOR Marine is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Geospace Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SEACOR Marine$227.83M1.17-$27.84M-$0.71N/A
Geospace Technologies$110.80M0.65-$9.72M-$3.08N/A

In the previous week, SEACOR Marine had 8 more articles in the media than Geospace Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for SEACOR Marine and 3 mentions for Geospace Technologies. Geospace Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat SEACOR Marine's score of 0.21 indicating that Geospace Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
SEACOR Marine
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Geospace Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

SEACOR Marine beats Geospace Technologies on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Geospace Technologies compare to Smart Sand?

Smart Sand (NASDAQ:SND) and Geospace Technologies (NASDAQ:GEOS) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

35.2% of Smart Sand shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.2% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 33.5% of Smart Sand shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Smart Sand has higher revenue and earnings than Geospace Technologies. Geospace Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Smart Sand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Smart Sand$330.15M0.65$1.35M$0.2619.62
Geospace Technologies$110.80M0.65-$9.72M-$3.08N/A

In the previous week, Smart Sand had 4 more articles in the media than Geospace Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Smart Sand and 3 mentions for Geospace Technologies. Smart Sand's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Geospace Technologies' score of 0.47 indicating that Smart Sand is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Smart Sand
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Geospace Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Smart Sand has a beta of 0.3, suggesting that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.19, suggesting that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Smart Sand
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Geospace Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Smart Sand has a net margin of 2.71% compared to Geospace Technologies' net margin of -43.10%. Smart Sand's return on equity of 4.41% beat Geospace Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Smart Sand2.71% 4.41% 3.07%
Geospace Technologies -43.10%-35.80%-28.30%

Summary

Smart Sand beats Geospace Technologies on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Geospace Technologies compare to Gulf Island Fabrication?

Geospace Technologies (NASDAQ:GEOS) and Gulf Island Fabrication (NASDAQ:GIFI) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Geospace Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Gulf Island Fabrication
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Gulf Island Fabrication has a net margin of 5.46% compared to Geospace Technologies' net margin of -43.10%. Gulf Island Fabrication's return on equity of 11.60% beat Geospace Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Geospace Technologies-43.10% -35.80% -28.30%
Gulf Island Fabrication 5.46%11.60%7.92%

57.2% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.4% of Gulf Island Fabrication shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.1% of Gulf Island Fabrication shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Geospace Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Gulf Island Fabrication. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Geospace Technologies and 0 mentions for Gulf Island Fabrication. Geospace Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Gulf Island Fabrication's score of 0.00 indicating that Geospace Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Geospace Technologies Neutral
Gulf Island Fabrication Neutral

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.19, suggesting that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gulf Island Fabrication has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

Gulf Island Fabrication has higher revenue and earnings than Geospace Technologies. Geospace Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gulf Island Fabrication, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Geospace Technologies$110.80M0.65-$9.72M-$3.08N/A
Gulf Island Fabrication$166.77M1.15$14.74M$0.5521.82

Summary

Gulf Island Fabrication beats Geospace Technologies on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Geospace Technologies compare to OMS Energy Technologies?

OMS Energy Technologies (NASDAQ:OMSE) and Geospace Technologies (NASDAQ:GEOS) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

OMS Energy Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Geospace Technologies.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OMS Energy Technologies$155.91M1.23$32.21MN/AN/A
Geospace Technologies$110.80M0.65-$9.72M-$3.08N/A

OMS Energy Technologies has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Geospace Technologies' net margin of -43.10%. OMS Energy Technologies' return on equity of 0.00% beat Geospace Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OMS Energy TechnologiesN/A N/A N/A
Geospace Technologies -43.10%-35.80%-28.30%

57.2% of Geospace Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Geospace Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Geospace Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than OMS Energy Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Geospace Technologies and 1 mentions for OMS Energy Technologies. OMS Energy Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.90 beat Geospace Technologies' score of 0.47 indicating that OMS Energy Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
OMS Energy Technologies Very Positive
Geospace Technologies Neutral

OMS Energy Technologies has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.19, meaning that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
OMS Energy Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Geospace Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

OMS Energy Technologies beats Geospace Technologies on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Geospace Technologies compare to Mammoth Energy Services?

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and Geospace Technologies (NASDAQ:GEOS) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

Mammoth Energy Services has a net margin of 0.98% compared to Geospace Technologies' net margin of -43.10%. Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity of -8.10% beat Geospace Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services0.98% -8.10% -6.14%
Geospace Technologies -43.10%-35.80%-28.30%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mammoth Energy Services
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Geospace Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Geospace Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Mammoth Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Geospace Technologies and 2 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat Geospace Technologies' score of 0.47 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Mammoth Energy Services
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Geospace Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.2% of Geospace Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Geospace Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.19, meaning that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

Mammoth Energy Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Geospace Technologies. Geospace Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mammoth Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services$44.29M3.61$4.60M$0.02166.00
Geospace Technologies$110.80M0.65-$9.72M-$3.08N/A

Summary

Mammoth Energy Services beats Geospace Technologies on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Geospace Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GEOS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GEOS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GEOS vs. The Competition

MetricGeospace TechnologiesEnergy Equipment & Services IndustryEnergy SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$72.44M$3.69B$9.71B$13.07B
Dividend YieldN/A13.38%11.57%10.45%
P/E Ratio-1.8245.2620.2525.38
Price / Sales0.6531.67392.4779.38
Price / Cash286.0421.0236.0750.90
Price / Book0.762.282.956.25
Net Income-$9.72M$67.53M$4.32B$347.82M
7 Day Performance-4.27%5.88%3.64%1.08%
1 Month Performance-20.34%5.99%4.91%0.82%
1 Year Performance-65.54%58.98%39.36%20.99%

Geospace Technologies Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GEOS
Geospace Technologies
0.4906 of 5 stars
$5.60
+8.9%
N/A-64.2%$72.44M$110.80MN/A650
SMHI
SEACOR Marine
1.1443 of 5 stars
$9.73
+0.4%
$10.00
+2.8%
+57.2%$264.00M$227.83MN/A1,239
SND
Smart Sand
2.1127 of 5 stars
$4.66
+1.6%
N/A+172.7%$200.46M$330.15M8.48330
GIFI
Gulf Island Fabrication
N/A$12.00
flat
N/AN/A$191.99M$166.77M21.82960
OMSE
OMS Energy Technologies
2.0172 of 5 stars
$4.51
+0.3%
N/A-34.9%$191.53M$155.91MN/A632

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GEOS) was last updated on 8/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners