Geospace Technologies (GEOS) Competitors

Gulf Island Fabrication has higher revenue and earnings than Geospace Technologies. Geospace Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gulf Island Fabrication, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Gulf Island Fabrication has a net margin of 5.46% compared to Geospace Technologies' net margin of -28.10%. Gulf Island Fabrication's return on equity of 11.60% beat Geospace Technologies' return on equity.

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.2, indicating that its share price is 80% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gulf Island Fabrication has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its share price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Geospace Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gulf Island Fabrication'saverage media sentiment score.

57.2% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.4% of Gulf Island Fabrication shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 20.1% of Gulf Island Fabrication shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dawson Geophysical has a beta of -0.13, suggesting that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.2, suggesting that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Dawson Geophysical had 2 more articles in the media than Geospace Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Dawson Geophysical and 0 mentions for Geospace Technologies. Dawson Geophysical's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Geospace Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Dawson Geophysical is being referred to more favorably in the media.

7.9% of Dawson Geophysical shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.2% of Geospace Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Dawson Geophysical shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Geospace Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dawson Geophysical has a net margin of -2.57% compared to Geospace Technologies' net margin of -28.10%. Dawson Geophysical's return on equity of -11.82% beat Geospace Technologies' return on equity.

Dawson Geophysical has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Geospace Technologies. Dawson Geophysical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Geospace Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.2, meaning that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SLB has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, SLB had 32 more articles in the media than Geospace Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for SLB and 0 mentions for Geospace Technologies. SLB's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Geospace Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that SLB is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

57.2% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.0% of SLB shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of SLB shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

SLB has a consensus price target of $58.95, suggesting a potential upside of 5.25%. Given SLB's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe SLB is more favorable than Geospace Technologies.

SLB has a net margin of 9.26% compared to Geospace Technologies' net margin of -28.10%. SLB's return on equity of 15.54% beat Geospace Technologies' return on equity.

SLB has higher revenue and earnings than Geospace Technologies. Geospace Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SLB, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Halliburton has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its share price is 27% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.2, meaning that its share price is 80% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Halliburton had 31 more articles in the media than Geospace Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for Halliburton and 0 mentions for Geospace Technologies. Halliburton's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Geospace Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Halliburton is being referred to more favorably in the media.

85.2% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.2% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Halliburton shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Halliburton has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Geospace Technologies' net margin of -28.10%. Halliburton's return on equity of 19.04% beat Geospace Technologies' return on equity.

Halliburton presently has a consensus price target of $41.09, suggesting a potential downside of 1.53%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Geospace Technologies.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than Geospace Technologies. Geospace Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.