NASDAQ:GEOS

Geospace Technologies Competitors

$7.80
+0.10 (+1.30 %)
(As of 05/6/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$7.68
$8.09
50-Day Range
$7.40
$10.86
52-Week Range
$5.02
$12.40
Volume11,926 shs
Average Volume42,557 shs
Market Capitalization$105.99 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.14

Competitors

Geospace Technologies (NASDAQ:GEOS) Vs. SLB, HAL, NOV, FTI, OII, and DRQ

Should you be buying GEOS stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "oil & gas equipment & services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Geospace Technologies, including Schlumberger (SLB), Halliburton (HAL), NOV (NOV), TechnipFMC (FTI), Oceaneering International (OII), and Dril-Quip (DRQ).

Geospace Technologies (NASDAQ:GEOS) and Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

59.5% of Geospace Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.2% of Schlumberger shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of Geospace Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Schlumberger shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Geospace Technologies and Schlumberger, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Geospace Technologies0000N/A
Schlumberger161402.62

Schlumberger has a consensus target price of $27.2421, suggesting a potential downside of 11.35%. Given Schlumberger's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Schlumberger is more favorable than Geospace Technologies.

Risk & Volatility

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 2.14, meaning that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schlumberger has a beta of 2.28, meaning that its stock price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Geospace Technologies and Schlumberger's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Geospace Technologies-20.08%-11.48%-9.95%
Schlumberger-40.15%7.34%2.46%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Geospace Technologies and Schlumberger's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Geospace Technologies$87.83 million1.21$-19,240,000.00N/AN/A
Schlumberger$32.92 billion1.31$-10,137,000,000.00$1.4720.90

Geospace Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schlumberger.

Summary

Schlumberger beats Geospace Technologies on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Geospace Technologies (NASDAQ:GEOS) and Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Geospace Technologies and Halliburton's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Geospace Technologies$87.83 million1.21$-19,240,000.00N/AN/A
Halliburton$22.41 billion0.88$-1,131,000,000.00$1.2417.88

Geospace Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Halliburton.

Profitability

This table compares Geospace Technologies and Halliburton's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Geospace Technologies-20.08%-11.48%-9.95%
Halliburton-26.60%11.10%3.08%

Risk & Volatility

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 2.14, meaning that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 2.81, meaning that its stock price is 181% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Geospace Technologies and Halliburton, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Geospace Technologies0000N/A
Halliburton371222.54

Halliburton has a consensus target price of $19.4278, suggesting a potential downside of 12.37%. Given Halliburton's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Geospace Technologies.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

59.5% of Geospace Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.4% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of Geospace Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Halliburton shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Halliburton beats Geospace Technologies on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

NOV (NYSE:NOV) and Geospace Technologies (NASDAQ:GEOS) are both business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares NOV and Geospace Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
NOV-36.63%1.13%0.62%
Geospace Technologies-20.08%-11.48%-9.95%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for NOV and Geospace Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
NOV35802.31
Geospace Technologies0000N/A

NOV presently has a consensus price target of $14.5615, indicating a potential downside of 12.49%. Given NOV's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe NOV is more favorable than Geospace Technologies.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

94.5% of NOV shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.5% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of NOV shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares NOV and Geospace Technologies' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NOV$8.48 billion0.77$-6,095,000,000.00($0.72)-23.11
Geospace Technologies$87.83 million1.21$-19,240,000.00N/AN/A

Geospace Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NOV.

Volatility & Risk

NOV has a beta of 2.22, indicating that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Geospace Technologies has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

NOV beats Geospace Technologies on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Geospace Technologies (NASDAQ:GEOS) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Geospace Technologies and TechnipFMC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Geospace Technologies-20.08%-11.48%-9.95%
TechnipFMC-42.41%1.56%0.38%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Geospace Technologies and TechnipFMC, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Geospace Technologies0000N/A
TechnipFMC111702.32

TechnipFMC has a consensus price target of $10.1773, indicating a potential upside of 24.42%. Given TechnipFMC's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than Geospace Technologies.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

59.5% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Geospace Technologies and TechnipFMC's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Geospace Technologies$87.83 million1.21$-19,240,000.00N/AN/A
TechnipFMC$13.41 billion0.27$-2,415,200,000.00$0.7411.05

Geospace Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TechnipFMC.

Risk and Volatility

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its share price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, indicating that its share price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

TechnipFMC beats Geospace Technologies on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Geospace Technologies (NASDAQ:GEOS) and Oceaneering International (NYSE:OII) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Geospace Technologies and Oceaneering International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Geospace Technologies-20.08%-11.48%-9.95%
Oceaneering International-37.40%-3.56%-1.14%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Geospace Technologies and Oceaneering International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Geospace Technologies0000N/A
Oceaneering International04202.33

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $11.7250, indicating a potential downside of 17.83%. Given Oceaneering International's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Oceaneering International is more favorable than Geospace Technologies.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

59.5% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.4% of Oceaneering International shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Oceaneering International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Geospace Technologies and Oceaneering International's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Geospace Technologies$87.83 million1.21$-19,240,000.00N/AN/A
Oceaneering International$2.05 billion0.70$-348,440,000.00($0.82)-17.40

Geospace Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Oceaneering International.

Risk and Volatility

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its share price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Oceaneering International has a beta of 3.6, indicating that its share price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Oceaneering International beats Geospace Technologies on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Geospace Technologies (NASDAQ:GEOS) and Dril-Quip (NYSE:DRQ) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Geospace Technologies and Dril-Quip's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Geospace Technologies$87.83 million1.21$-19,240,000.00N/AN/A
Dril-Quip$414.81 million3.01$1.72 million$0.08440.88

Dril-Quip has higher revenue and earnings than Geospace Technologies.

Risk and Volatility

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its share price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dril-Quip has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its share price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Geospace Technologies and Dril-Quip, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Geospace Technologies0000N/A
Dril-Quip16001.86

Dril-Quip has a consensus price target of $28.60, indicating a potential downside of 18.91%. Given Dril-Quip's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Dril-Quip is more favorable than Geospace Technologies.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

59.5% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Dril-Quip shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Geospace Technologies and Dril-Quip's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Geospace Technologies-20.08%-11.48%-9.95%
Dril-Quip-3.14%0.99%0.89%

Summary

Dril-Quip beats Geospace Technologies on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.


Geospace Technologies Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Schlumberger logo
SLB
Schlumberger
2.1$30.73+1.3%$42.97 billion$32.92 billion-4.04
Halliburton logo
HAL
Halliburton
2.0$22.17+0.8%$19.73 billion$22.41 billion-4.46
NOV logo
NOV
NOV
1.2$16.64+1.4%$6.50 billion$8.48 billion-2.47Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
TechnipFMC logo
FTI
TechnipFMC
2.1$8.18+0.2%$3.67 billion$13.41 billion-0.65
Oceaneering International logo
OII
Oceaneering International
1.0$14.27+2.5%$1.42 billion$2.05 billion-1.92Analyst Upgrade
Dril-Quip logo
DRQ
Dril-Quip
0.5$35.27+2.6%$1.25 billion$414.81 million-106.88Analyst Upgrade
RPC logo
RES
RPC
1.0$5.55+2.9%$1.20 billion$1.22 billion-5.19Insider Selling
Seacor logo
CKH
Seacor
1.0$41.50+0.2%$850.71 million$799.97 million79.81
Helix Energy Solutions Group logo
HLX
Helix Energy Solutions Group
1.4$4.87+2.3%$734.03 million$751.91 million30.44Analyst Report
Tidewater logo
TDW
Tidewater
0.9$13.82+2.7%$562.92 million$486.55 million-2.44
TETRA Technologies logo
TTI
TETRA Technologies
1.0$3.35+3.3%$423.46 million$1.04 billion-2.86Earnings Announcement
High Trading Volume
Oil States International logo
OIS
Oil States International
1.2$6.33+0.6%$387.91 million$1.02 billion-0.60
Matrix Service logo
MTRX
Matrix Service
1.1$13.79+2.0%$365.57 million$1.10 billion-8.67Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
Newpark Resources logo
NR
Newpark Resources
1.1$3.36+6.5%$305.62 million$820.12 million-3.82Analyst Upgrade
RigNet logo
RNET
RigNet
0.8$9.60+0.0%$201.75 million$242.93 million-5.25Upcoming Earnings
Natural Gas Services Group logo
NGS
Natural Gas Services Group
1.3$9.13+1.9%$124.35 million$78.44 million65.21
Forum Energy Technologies logo
FET
Forum Energy Technologies
0.8$18.90+0.2%$105.84 million$956.50 million-1.39
Gulf Island Fabrication logo
GIFI
Gulf Island Fabrication
0.8$4.17+4.1%$64.71 million$303.31 million-1.37Upcoming Earnings
ION Geophysical logo
IO
ION Geophysical
1.1$2.11+3.3%$60.79 million$174.68 million-0.78Earnings Announcement
Gap Down
Dawson Geophysical logo
DWSN
Dawson Geophysical
0.7$2.38+0.4%$55.88 million$145.77 million-4.96Upcoming Earnings
Gap Up
This page was last updated on 5/7/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.