Geospace Technologies Competitors

Geospace Technologies (NASDAQ:GEOS) and Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

59.5% of Geospace Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.2% of Schlumberger shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of Geospace Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Schlumberger shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Geospace Technologies and Schlumberger, as provided by MarketBeat.

Schlumberger has a consensus target price of $27.2421, suggesting a potential downside of 11.35%. Given Schlumberger's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Schlumberger is more favorable than Geospace Technologies.

Risk & Volatility

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 2.14, meaning that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schlumberger has a beta of 2.28, meaning that its stock price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Geospace Technologies and Schlumberger's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Geospace Technologies and Schlumberger's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Geospace Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schlumberger.

Summary

Schlumberger beats Geospace Technologies on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Geospace Technologies (NASDAQ:GEOS) and Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Geospace Technologies and Halliburton's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Geospace Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Halliburton.

Profitability

This table compares Geospace Technologies and Halliburton's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 2.14, meaning that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 2.81, meaning that its stock price is 181% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Geospace Technologies and Halliburton, as provided by MarketBeat.

Halliburton has a consensus target price of $19.4278, suggesting a potential downside of 12.37%. Given Halliburton's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Geospace Technologies.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

59.5% of Geospace Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.4% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of Geospace Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Halliburton shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Halliburton beats Geospace Technologies on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

NOV (NYSE:NOV) and Geospace Technologies (NASDAQ:GEOS) are both business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares NOV and Geospace Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for NOV and Geospace Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

NOV presently has a consensus price target of $14.5615, indicating a potential downside of 12.49%. Given NOV's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe NOV is more favorable than Geospace Technologies.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

94.5% of NOV shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.5% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of NOV shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares NOV and Geospace Technologies' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Geospace Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NOV.

Volatility & Risk

NOV has a beta of 2.22, indicating that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Geospace Technologies has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

NOV beats Geospace Technologies on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Geospace Technologies (NASDAQ:GEOS) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Geospace Technologies and TechnipFMC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Geospace Technologies and TechnipFMC, as provided by MarketBeat.

TechnipFMC has a consensus price target of $10.1773, indicating a potential upside of 24.42%. Given TechnipFMC's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than Geospace Technologies.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

59.5% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Geospace Technologies and TechnipFMC's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Geospace Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TechnipFMC.

Risk and Volatility

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its share price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, indicating that its share price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

TechnipFMC beats Geospace Technologies on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Geospace Technologies (NASDAQ:GEOS) and Oceaneering International (NYSE:OII) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Geospace Technologies and Oceaneering International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Geospace Technologies and Oceaneering International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $11.7250, indicating a potential downside of 17.83%. Given Oceaneering International's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Oceaneering International is more favorable than Geospace Technologies.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

59.5% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.4% of Oceaneering International shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Oceaneering International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Geospace Technologies and Oceaneering International's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Geospace Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Oceaneering International.

Risk and Volatility

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its share price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Oceaneering International has a beta of 3.6, indicating that its share price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Oceaneering International beats Geospace Technologies on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Geospace Technologies (NASDAQ:GEOS) and Dril-Quip (NYSE:DRQ) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Geospace Technologies and Dril-Quip's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Dril-Quip has higher revenue and earnings than Geospace Technologies.

Risk and Volatility

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its share price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dril-Quip has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its share price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Geospace Technologies and Dril-Quip, as provided by MarketBeat.

Dril-Quip has a consensus price target of $28.60, indicating a potential downside of 18.91%. Given Dril-Quip's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Dril-Quip is more favorable than Geospace Technologies.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

59.5% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Dril-Quip shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Geospace Technologies and Dril-Quip's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Dril-Quip beats Geospace Technologies on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.