Log in
NYSE:SLB

Schlumberger Competitors

$22.10
-0.13 (-0.58 %)
(As of 11/25/2020 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$21.66
Now: $22.10
$22.31
50-Day Range
$14.18
MA: $16.71
$22.23
52-Week Range
$11.87
Now: $22.10
$41.14
Volume12.18 million shs
Average Volume16.17 million shs
Market Capitalization$30.76 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield2.25%
Beta2.12

Competitors

Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) Vs. HAL, NOV, FTI, DRQ, RES, and CKH

Should you be buying SLB stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "oil & gas equipment & services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Schlumberger, including Halliburton (HAL), National Oilwell Varco (NOV), TechnipFMC (FTI), Dril-Quip (DRQ), RPC (RES), and Seacor (CKH).

Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) and Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) are both large-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Schlumberger and Halliburton's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Schlumberger-40.15%7.34%2.46%
Halliburton-26.60%11.10%3.08%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Schlumberger and Halliburton, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Schlumberger381502.46
Halliburton217522.27

Schlumberger presently has a consensus target price of $22.2870, suggesting a potential upside of 0.85%. Halliburton has a consensus target price of $13.25, suggesting a potential downside of 25.81%. Given Schlumberger's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Schlumberger is more favorable than Halliburton.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Schlumberger and Halliburton's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schlumberger$32.92 billion0.93$-10,137,000,000.00$1.4715.03
Halliburton$22.41 billion0.70$-1,131,000,000.00$1.2414.40

Halliburton has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Schlumberger. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schlumberger, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Schlumberger has a beta of 2.12, indicating that its share price is 112% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 2.71, indicating that its share price is 171% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

72.5% of Schlumberger shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.5% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Schlumberger shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Halliburton shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Schlumberger pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Schlumberger pays out 34.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Halliburton pays out 14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Schlumberger has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Halliburton has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Schlumberger beats Halliburton on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

National Oilwell Varco (NYSE:NOV) and Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for National Oilwell Varco and Schlumberger, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
National Oilwell Varco211902.32
Schlumberger381502.46

National Oilwell Varco currently has a consensus price target of $14.7063, indicating a potential upside of 8.13%. Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $22.2870, indicating a potential upside of 0.85%. Given National Oilwell Varco's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe National Oilwell Varco is more favorable than Schlumberger.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares National Oilwell Varco and Schlumberger's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
National Oilwell Varco$8.48 billion0.62$-6,095,000,000.00($0.72)-18.89
Schlumberger$32.92 billion0.93$-10,137,000,000.00$1.4715.03

National Oilwell Varco has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schlumberger. National Oilwell Varco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schlumberger, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares National Oilwell Varco and Schlumberger's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
National Oilwell Varco-36.63%1.13%0.62%
Schlumberger-40.15%7.34%2.46%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

94.3% of National Oilwell Varco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.5% of Schlumberger shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of National Oilwell Varco shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Schlumberger shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

National Oilwell Varco has a beta of 1.97, suggesting that its share price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schlumberger has a beta of 2.12, suggesting that its share price is 112% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Schlumberger beats National Oilwell Varco on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) and Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

76.3% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.5% of Schlumberger shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Schlumberger shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.11, suggesting that its share price is 111% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schlumberger has a beta of 2.12, suggesting that its share price is 112% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares TechnipFMC and Schlumberger's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TechnipFMC-42.41%1.56%0.38%
Schlumberger-40.15%7.34%2.46%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for TechnipFMC and Schlumberger, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
TechnipFMC151302.63
Schlumberger381502.46

TechnipFMC currently has a consensus price target of $11.7560, suggesting a potential upside of 29.76%. Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $22.2870, suggesting a potential upside of 0.85%. Given TechnipFMC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than Schlumberger.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares TechnipFMC and Schlumberger's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TechnipFMC$13.41 billion0.30$-2,415,200,000.00$0.7412.24
Schlumberger$32.92 billion0.93$-10,137,000,000.00$1.4715.03

TechnipFMC has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schlumberger. TechnipFMC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schlumberger, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Schlumberger beats TechnipFMC on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dril-Quip (NYSE:DRQ) and Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Risk & Volatility

Dril-Quip has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schlumberger has a beta of 2.12, meaning that its stock price is 112% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Dril-Quip and Schlumberger's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dril-Quip$414.81 million2.62$1.72 million$0.08386.63
Schlumberger$32.92 billion0.93$-10,137,000,000.00$1.4715.03

Dril-Quip has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schlumberger. Schlumberger is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dril-Quip, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Dril-Quip and Schlumberger's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Dril-Quip-3.14%0.99%0.89%
Schlumberger-40.15%7.34%2.46%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

92.5% of Dril-Quip shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.5% of Schlumberger shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Dril-Quip shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Schlumberger shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Dril-Quip and Schlumberger, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Dril-Quip18102.00
Schlumberger381502.46

Dril-Quip presently has a consensus target price of $34.4444, suggesting a potential upside of 11.36%. Schlumberger has a consensus target price of $22.2870, suggesting a potential upside of 0.85%. Given Dril-Quip's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Dril-Quip is more favorable than Schlumberger.

Summary

Schlumberger beats Dril-Quip on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

RPC (NYSE:RES) and Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for RPC and Schlumberger, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
RPC33101.71
Schlumberger381502.46

RPC presently has a consensus price target of $3.15, suggesting a potential downside of 12.74%. Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $22.2870, suggesting a potential upside of 0.85%. Given Schlumberger's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Schlumberger is more favorable than RPC.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares RPC and Schlumberger's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RPC$1.22 billion0.64$-87,110,000.00($0.12)-30.08
Schlumberger$32.92 billion0.93$-10,137,000,000.00$1.4715.03

RPC has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schlumberger. RPC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schlumberger, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares RPC and Schlumberger's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
RPC-32.25%-8.40%-6.62%
Schlumberger-40.15%7.34%2.46%

Volatility & Risk

RPC has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its share price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schlumberger has a beta of 2.12, suggesting that its share price is 112% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

26.7% of RPC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.5% of Schlumberger shares are owned by institutional investors. 73.6% of RPC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Schlumberger shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Schlumberger beats RPC on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) and Seacor (NYSE:CKH) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Volatility & Risk

Schlumberger has a beta of 2.12, indicating that its share price is 112% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Seacor has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

72.5% of Schlumberger shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.0% of Seacor shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Schlumberger shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.8% of Seacor shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Schlumberger and Seacor, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Schlumberger381502.46
Seacor00103.00

Schlumberger currently has a consensus target price of $22.2870, indicating a potential upside of 0.85%. Seacor has a consensus target price of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 36.54%. Given Seacor's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Seacor is more favorable than Schlumberger.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Schlumberger and Seacor's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schlumberger$32.92 billion0.93$-10,137,000,000.00$1.4715.03
Seacor$799.97 million0.93$26.77 million$1.3826.54

Seacor has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Schlumberger. Schlumberger is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seacor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Schlumberger and Seacor's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Schlumberger-40.15%7.34%2.46%
Seacor1.45%1.30%0.70%


Schlumberger Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Halliburton logo
HAL
Halliburton
1.8$17.86-0.3%$15.79 billion$22.41 billion-3.59
National Oilwell Varco logo
NOV
National Oilwell Varco
1.4$13.60-2.9%$5.28 billion$8.48 billion-2.02
TechnipFMC logo
FTI
TechnipFMC
2.4$9.06-6.7%$4.06 billion$13.41 billion-0.72
Dril-Quip logo
DRQ
Dril-Quip
1.1$30.93-2.5%$1.09 billion$414.81 million-93.72
RPC logo
RES
RPC
1.1$3.61-1.1%$776.40 million$1.22 billion-2.73
Seacor logo
CKH
Seacor
1.8$36.62-2.5%$746.02 million$799.97 million70.42
Oceaneering International logo
OII
Oceaneering International
1.4$7.13-4.9%$708.05 million$2.05 billion-0.96Insider Selling
Helix Energy Solutions Group logo
HLX
Helix Energy Solutions Group
1.4$4.09-0.5%$614.16 million$751.91 million25.56
Era Group logo
ERA
Era Group
0.8$24.61-1.0%$529.73 million$226.06 million-98.44
Tidewater logo
TDW
Tidewater
0.9$10.52-5.2%$426.55 million$486.55 million-1.79
Oil States International logo
OIS
Oil States International
1.6$4.90-0.4%$299.05 million$1.02 billion-0.47
Matrix Service logo
MTRX
Matrix Service
2.1$10.50-0.3%$277.92 million$1.10 billion-6.60
Natural Gas Services Group logo
NGS
Natural Gas Services Group
1.4$11.69-0.1%$157.45 million$78.44 million-15.59
Newpark Resources logo
NR
Newpark Resources
2.1$1.71-2.3%$155.28 million$820.12 million-1.94
RigNet logo
RNET
RigNet
0.8$5.43-1.1%$111.64 million$242.93 million-3.39
Geospace Technologies logo
GEOS
Geospace Technologies
0.7$7.39-5.4%$101.03 million$95.81 million-14.49
TETRA Technologies logo
TTI
TETRA Technologies
1.5$0.80-0.0%$100.78 million$1.04 billion-0.67
Forum Energy Technologies logo
FET
Forum Energy Technologies
1.0$14.30-3.1%$79.74 million$956.50 million-2.69
Gulf Island Fabrication logo
GIFI
Gulf Island Fabrication
0.8$3.20-3.8%$49.04 million$303.31 million-1.05
Dawson Geophysical logo
DWSN
Dawson Geophysical
0.7$2.07-7.2%$48.60 million$145.77 million-4.31High Trading Volume
ION Geophysical logo
IO
ION Geophysical
1.0$2.00-2.0%$29.99 million$174.68 million-0.74
Superior Energy Services logo
SPN
Superior Energy Services
1.2$0.25-0.0%$3.71 million$1.43 billion-0.01
This page was last updated on 11/26/2020 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.