Baker Hughes (BKR) Competitors

Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) and Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Is BKR or FANG a better dividend stock?

Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Baker Hughes pays out 31.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Baker Hughes has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Diamondback Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Is BKR or FANG more profitable?

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 30.84% compared to Baker Hughes' net margin of 10.51%. Baker Hughes' return on equity of 14.70% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Baker Hughes	10.51%	14.70%	6.47%
Diamondback Energy	30.84%	11.22%	6.53%

Do analysts recommend BKR or FANG?

Baker Hughes presently has a consensus price target of $48.50, suggesting a potential upside of 19.16%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $193.35, suggesting a potential upside of 33.96%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than Baker Hughes.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Baker Hughes	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90
Diamondback Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.05

Does the media prefer BKR or FANG?

In the previous week, Baker Hughes and Baker Hughes both had 24 articles in the media. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Baker Hughes' score of 0.91 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Baker Hughes	17 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Diamondback Energy	19 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Do insiders & institutionals believe in BKR or FANG?

92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Baker Hughes shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Which has more volatility and risk, BKR or FANG?

Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Which has higher earnings and valuation, BKR or FANG?

Diamondback Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Baker Hughes. Diamondback Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baker Hughes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Baker Hughes	$27.83B	1.45	$2.98B	$2.93	13.89
Diamondback Energy	$11.07B	3.81	$3.34B	$16.35	8.83

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats Baker Hughes on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.