Does the media prefer FANG or BKR?

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 25 more articles in the media than Baker Hughes. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 13 mentions for Baker Hughes. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Baker Hughes' score of 0.71 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Diamondback Energy 11 Very Positive mention(s) 6 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Baker Hughes 5 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher earnings & valuation, FTI or BKR?

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than TechnipFMC. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TechnipFMC $9.93B 2.84 $963.90M $2.88 24.99 Baker Hughes $27.73B 2.05 $2.59B $3.10 18.47

Is FTI or BKR more profitable?

TechnipFMC has a net margin of 11.28% compared to Baker Hughes' net margin of 11.17%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 36.54% beat Baker Hughes' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets TechnipFMC 11.28% 36.54% 12.02% Baker Hughes 11.17% 13.85% 5.80%

Does the media prefer FTI or BKR?

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 3 more articles in the media than TechnipFMC. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Baker Hughes and 10 mentions for TechnipFMC. TechnipFMC's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Baker Hughes' score of 0.71 indicating that TechnipFMC is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TechnipFMC 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Baker Hughes 5 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, BKR or HAL?

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than Halliburton. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baker Hughes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Baker Hughes $27.73B 2.05 $2.59B $3.10 18.47 Halliburton $22.18B 1.26 $1.28B $1.91 17.62

Does the media prefer BKR or HAL?

In the previous week, Halliburton had 9 more articles in the media than Baker Hughes. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Halliburton and 13 mentions for Baker Hughes. Baker Hughes' average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Halliburton's score of 0.70 indicating that Baker Hughes is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Baker Hughes 5 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Halliburton 10 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 10 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to BKR or MTDR?

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 1 more articles in the media than Matador Resources. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Baker Hughes and 12 mentions for Matador Resources. Baker Hughes' average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Matador Resources' score of 0.68 indicating that Baker Hughes is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Baker Hughes 5 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Matador Resources 3 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, NOV or BKR?

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than NOV. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NOV, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio NOV $8.74B 0.82 $145M $0.26 77.26 Baker Hughes $27.73B 2.05 $2.59B $3.10 18.47

Is NOV or BKR more profitable?

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 11.17% compared to NOV's net margin of 1.10%. Baker Hughes' return on equity of 13.85% beat NOV's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets NOV 1.10% 3.44% 1.94% Baker Hughes 11.17% 13.85% 5.80%

Does the media prefer NOV or BKR?

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 4 more articles in the media than NOV. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Baker Hughes and 9 mentions for NOV. NOV's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Baker Hughes' score of 0.71 indicating that NOV is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment NOV 5 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Baker Hughes 5 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Baker Hughes (BKR) Competitors

$57.25 +0.69 (+1.22%)

Closing price 09/18/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$57.44 +0.19 (+0.32%)

As of 09/18/2026 07:46 PM Eastern

Compare

BKR vs. FANG, FTI, HAL, MTDR, and NOV

Should you buy Baker Hughes stock or one of its competitors? Baker Hughes's main competitors and comparable companies include Diamondback Energy (FANG), TechnipFMC (FTI), Halliburton (HAL), Matador Resources (MTDR), and NOV (NOV). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Baker Hughes compare to Diamondback Energy?

Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) and Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and media sentiment.

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Baker Hughes pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Baker Hughes has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Diamondback Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Diamondback Energy	$15.03B	3.59	$1.66B	$5.13	37.51
Baker Hughes	$27.73B	2.05	$2.59B	$3.10	18.47

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Diamondback Energy presently has a consensus target price of $226.33, indicating a potential upside of 17.62%. Baker Hughes has a consensus target price of $71.81, indicating a potential upside of 25.43%. Given Baker Hughes' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Baker Hughes is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Diamondback Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	4 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.96
Baker Hughes	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 25 more articles in the media than Baker Hughes. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 13 mentions for Baker Hughes. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Baker Hughes' score of 0.71 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Diamondback Energy	11 Very Positive mention(s)	6 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Baker Hughes	5 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 11.17% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 8.58%. Baker Hughes' return on equity of 13.85% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Diamondback Energy	8.58%	10.10%	6.16%
Baker Hughes	11.17%	13.85%	5.80%

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats Baker Hughes on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baker Hughes compare to TechnipFMC?

TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) and Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and media sentiment.

TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

TechnipFMC has a net margin of 11.28% compared to Baker Hughes' net margin of 11.17%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 36.54% beat Baker Hughes' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TechnipFMC	11.28%	36.54%	12.02%
Baker Hughes	11.17%	13.85%	5.80%

96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. TechnipFMC pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Baker Hughes pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TechnipFMC has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Baker Hughes has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Baker Hughes is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than TechnipFMC. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TechnipFMC	$9.93B	2.84	$963.90M	$2.88	24.99
Baker Hughes	$27.73B	2.05	$2.59B	$3.10	18.47

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 3 more articles in the media than TechnipFMC. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Baker Hughes and 10 mentions for TechnipFMC. TechnipFMC's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Baker Hughes' score of 0.71 indicating that TechnipFMC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TechnipFMC	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Baker Hughes	5 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

TechnipFMC presently has a consensus target price of $70.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.73%. Baker Hughes has a consensus target price of $71.81, suggesting a potential upside of 25.43%. Given Baker Hughes' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Baker Hughes is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TechnipFMC	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
Baker Hughes	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90

Summary

Baker Hughes beats TechnipFMC on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baker Hughes compare to Halliburton?

Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) and Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 11.17% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 7.16%. Halliburton's return on equity of 18.71% beat Baker Hughes' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Baker Hughes	11.17%	13.85%	5.80%
Halliburton	7.16%	18.71%	7.89%

Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Baker Hughes pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Halliburton pays out 35.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Baker Hughes has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Halliburton has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Halliburton had 9 more articles in the media than Baker Hughes. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Halliburton and 13 mentions for Baker Hughes. Baker Hughes' average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Halliburton's score of 0.70 indicating that Baker Hughes is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Baker Hughes	5 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Halliburton	10 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	10 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than Halliburton. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baker Hughes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Baker Hughes	$27.73B	2.05	$2.59B	$3.10	18.47
Halliburton	$22.18B	1.26	$1.28B	$1.91	17.62

92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Halliburton shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Baker Hughes currently has a consensus target price of $71.81, suggesting a potential upside of 25.43%. Halliburton has a consensus target price of $43.24, suggesting a potential upside of 28.50%. Given Halliburton's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Baker Hughes.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Baker Hughes	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90
Halliburton	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.68

Summary

Baker Hughes beats Halliburton on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baker Hughes compare to Matador Resources?

Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) and Matador Resources (NYSE:MTDR) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Baker Hughes pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Baker Hughes has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Matador Resources has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Matador Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than Matador Resources. Matador Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baker Hughes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Baker Hughes	$27.73B	2.05	$2.59B	$3.10	18.47
Matador Resources	$3.70B	1.90	$759.22M	$5.83	9.75

Baker Hughes presently has a consensus target price of $71.81, suggesting a potential upside of 25.43%. Matador Resources has a consensus target price of $66.80, suggesting a potential upside of 17.54%. Given Baker Hughes' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Baker Hughes is more favorable than Matador Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Baker Hughes	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90
Matador Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 1 more articles in the media than Matador Resources. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Baker Hughes and 12 mentions for Matador Resources. Baker Hughes' average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Matador Resources' score of 0.68 indicating that Baker Hughes is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Baker Hughes	5 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Matador Resources	3 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matador Resources has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 19.85% compared to Baker Hughes' net margin of 11.17%. Baker Hughes' return on equity of 13.85% beat Matador Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Baker Hughes	11.17%	13.85%	5.80%
Matador Resources	19.85%	13.18%	6.46%

Summary

Baker Hughes beats Matador Resources on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baker Hughes compare to NOV?

NOV (NYSE:NOV) and Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 11.17% compared to NOV's net margin of 1.10%. Baker Hughes' return on equity of 13.85% beat NOV's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NOV	1.10%	3.44%	1.94%
Baker Hughes	11.17%	13.85%	5.80%

NOV presently has a consensus target price of $21.31, suggesting a potential upside of 6.07%. Baker Hughes has a consensus target price of $71.81, suggesting a potential upside of 25.43%. Given Baker Hughes' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Baker Hughes is more favorable than NOV.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NOV	2 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.19
Baker Hughes	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90

93.3% of NOV shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of NOV shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

NOV pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. NOV pays out 138.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Baker Hughes pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NOV has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Baker Hughes has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

NOV has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than NOV. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NOV, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NOV	$8.74B	0.82	$145M	$0.26	77.26
Baker Hughes	$27.73B	2.05	$2.59B	$3.10	18.47

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 4 more articles in the media than NOV. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Baker Hughes and 9 mentions for NOV. NOV's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Baker Hughes' score of 0.71 indicating that NOV is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
NOV	5 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Baker Hughes	5 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Baker Hughes beats NOV on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Baker Hughes News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BKR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

BKR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Baker Hughes	Energy Equipment & Services Industry	Energy Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$56.83B	$3.60B	$10.07B	$12.95B
Dividend Yield	1.61%	13.39%	10.56%	12.80%
P/E Ratio	18.47	43.88	21.10	25.40
Price / Sales	2.05	31.63	518.13	87.39
Price / Cash	15.00	20.83	36.25	51.42
Price / Book	2.98	2.13	4.19	6.33
Net Income	$2.59B	$67.81M	$4.35B	$358.33M
7 Day Performance	-3.06%	-2.11%	3.64%	1.12%
1 Month Performance	-8.81%	-1.98%	1.15%	-2.39%
1 Year Performance	20.93%	42.43%	37.82%	5.35%

Baker Hughes Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
BKR Baker Hughes	4.8037 of 5 stars	$57.25 +1.2%	$71.81 +25.4%	+20.9%	$56.83B	$27.73B	18.47	56,000	Analyst Upgrade High Trading Volume
FANG Diamondback Energy	3.6939 of 5 stars	$204.97 -0.2%	$224.05 +9.3%	+37.8%	$57.40B	$15.03B	39.96	1,762	Trending News Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
FTI TechnipFMC	4.0184 of 5 stars	$76.37 +1.0%	$69.64 -8.8%	+82.7%	$29.94B	$9.93B	26.52	25,407	Positive News Analyst Forecast
HAL Halliburton	4.9046 of 5 stars	$35.88 -0.5%	$43.10 +20.1%	+49.3%	$29.86B	$22.18B	18.78	46,000	Positive News Analyst Upgrade Options Volume
MTDR Matador Resources	4.8943 of 5 stars	$61.09 -0.9%	$65.93 +7.9%	+25.4%	$7.56B	$3.84B	10.48	483	Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:BKR) was last updated on 9/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Baker Hughes (BKR) Competitors

BKR vs. FANG, FTI, HAL, MTDR, and NOV

How does Baker Hughes compare to Diamondback Energy?

Summary

How does Baker Hughes compare to TechnipFMC?

Summary

How does Baker Hughes compare to Halliburton?

Summary

How does Baker Hughes compare to Matador Resources?

Summary

How does Baker Hughes compare to NOV?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BKR vs. The Competition

Baker Hughes Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Baker Hughes (BKR) Competitors

BKR vs. FANG, FTI, HAL, MTDR, and NOV

How does Baker Hughes compare to Diamondback Energy?

Is FANG or BKR a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, FANG or BKR?

Which has more volatility and risk, FANG or BKR?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in FANG or BKR?

Do analysts recommend FANG or BKR?

Does the media prefer FANG or BKR?

Is FANG or BKR more profitable?

Summary

How does Baker Hughes compare to TechnipFMC?

Which has more risk & volatility, FTI or BKR?

Is FTI or BKR more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in FTI or BKR?

Is FTI or BKR a better dividend stock?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, FTI or BKR?

Does the media prefer FTI or BKR?

Do analysts rate FTI or BKR?

Summary

How does Baker Hughes compare to Halliburton?

Is BKR or HAL more profitable?

Is BKR or HAL a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer BKR or HAL?

Which has more volatility and risk, BKR or HAL?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, BKR or HAL?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in BKR or HAL?

Do analysts prefer BKR or HAL?

Summary

How does Baker Hughes compare to Matador Resources?

Is BKR or MTDR a better dividend stock?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, BKR or MTDR?

Do analysts rate BKR or MTDR?

Does the media refer more to BKR or MTDR?

Which has more volatility and risk, BKR or MTDR?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in BKR or MTDR?

Is BKR or MTDR more profitable?

Summary

How does Baker Hughes compare to NOV?

Is NOV or BKR more profitable?

Do analysts rate NOV or BKR?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in NOV or BKR?

Is NOV or BKR a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, NOV or BKR?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, NOV or BKR?

Does the media prefer NOV or BKR?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BKR vs. The Competition

Baker Hughes Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools