Free Trial

Baker Hughes (BKR) Competitors

Baker Hughes logo
$63.48 +0.46 (+0.73%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$63.60 +0.13 (+0.20%)
As of 06:00 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BKR vs. FANG, FTI, HAL, MTDR, and NOV

Should you buy Baker Hughes stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Baker Hughes with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Baker Hughes include Diamondback Energy (FANG), TechnipFMC (FTI), Halliburton (HAL), Matador Resources (MTDR), and NOV (NOV). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Baker Hughes compare to Diamondback Energy?

Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) and Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diamondback Energy$15.03B3.59$1.66B$0.86222.78
Baker Hughes$27.89B2.26$2.59B$3.1320.28

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 31 more articles in the media than Baker Hughes. MarketBeat recorded 47 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 16 mentions for Baker Hughes. Baker Hughes' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Diamondback Energy's score of 0.94 indicating that Baker Hughes is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Diamondback Energy
20 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Baker Hughes
12 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Diamondback Energy pays out 511.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Baker Hughes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Baker Hughes has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Diamondback Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Diamondback Energy presently has a consensus target price of $223.63, suggesting a potential upside of 16.72%. Baker Hughes has a consensus target price of $69.14, suggesting a potential upside of 8.91%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than Baker Hughes.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Diamondback Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.96
Baker Hughes
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.77

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 11.17% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 1.87%. Baker Hughes' return on equity of 14.17% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Diamondback Energy1.87% 7.76% 4.67%
Baker Hughes 11.17%14.17%6.24%

Summary

Baker Hughes beats Diamondback Energy on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baker Hughes compare to TechnipFMC?

Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 11.17% compared to TechnipFMC's net margin of 10.62%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 34.06% beat Baker Hughes' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baker Hughes11.17% 14.17% 6.24%
TechnipFMC 10.62%34.06%11.30%

Baker Hughes currently has a consensus price target of $69.14, suggesting a potential upside of 8.91%. TechnipFMC has a consensus price target of $69.71, suggesting a potential downside of 1.18%. Given Baker Hughes' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Baker Hughes is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baker Hughes
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.77
TechnipFMC
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82

92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than TechnipFMC. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baker Hughes$27.89B2.26$2.59B$3.1320.28
TechnipFMC$10.19B2.76$963.90M$2.6226.93

In the previous week, TechnipFMC had 2 more articles in the media than Baker Hughes. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for TechnipFMC and 16 mentions for Baker Hughes. TechnipFMC's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Baker Hughes' score of 1.02 indicating that TechnipFMC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Baker Hughes
12 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
TechnipFMC
16 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Baker Hughes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TechnipFMC pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Baker Hughes has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and TechnipFMC has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Baker Hughes is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

TechnipFMC beats Baker Hughes on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baker Hughes compare to Halliburton?

Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) and Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Halliburton had 15 more articles in the media than Baker Hughes. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for Halliburton and 16 mentions for Baker Hughes. Halliburton's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Baker Hughes' score of 1.02 indicating that Halliburton is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Halliburton
22 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Baker Hughes
12 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than Halliburton. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Halliburton$22.17B1.50$1.28B$1.8221.81
Baker Hughes$27.89B2.26$2.59B$3.1320.28

85.2% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Halliburton shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Halliburton currently has a consensus price target of $43.27, indicating a potential upside of 9.01%. Baker Hughes has a consensus price target of $69.14, indicating a potential upside of 8.91%. Given Halliburton's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Baker Hughes.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Halliburton
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Baker Hughes
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.77

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 11.17% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 6.95%. Halliburton's return on equity of 19.04% beat Baker Hughes' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Halliburton6.95% 19.04% 7.96%
Baker Hughes 11.17%14.17%6.24%

Halliburton has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Halliburton pays out 37.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Baker Hughes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Halliburton has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Baker Hughes has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Summary

Baker Hughes beats Halliburton on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baker Hughes compare to Matador Resources?

Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) and Matador Resources (NYSE:MTDR) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Matador Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than Matador Resources. Matador Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baker Hughes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baker Hughes$27.89B2.26$2.59B$3.1320.28
Matador Resources$3.70B1.80$759.22M$3.8913.78

Matador Resources has a net margin of 14.41% compared to Baker Hughes' net margin of 11.17%. Baker Hughes' return on equity of 14.17% beat Matador Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baker Hughes11.17% 14.17% 6.24%
Matador Resources 14.41%11.20%5.62%

Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matador Resources has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Baker Hughes currently has a consensus target price of $69.14, suggesting a potential upside of 8.91%. Matador Resources has a consensus target price of $65.08, suggesting a potential upside of 21.41%. Given Matador Resources' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Matador Resources is more favorable than Baker Hughes.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baker Hughes
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.77
Matador Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 21 more articles in the media than Baker Hughes. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Matador Resources and 16 mentions for Baker Hughes. Baker Hughes' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Matador Resources' score of 0.87 indicating that Baker Hughes is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Baker Hughes
12 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Matador Resources
13 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Baker Hughes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Baker Hughes has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Matador Resources has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Summary

Baker Hughes beats Matador Resources on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baker Hughes compare to NOV?

NOV (NYSE:NOV) and Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

NOV pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. NOV pays out 150.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Baker Hughes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NOV has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Baker Hughes has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

NOV has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

NOV presently has a consensus target price of $20.43, suggesting a potential downside of 3.16%. Baker Hughes has a consensus target price of $69.14, suggesting a potential upside of 8.91%. Given Baker Hughes' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Baker Hughes is more favorable than NOV.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NOV
2 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.24
Baker Hughes
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.77

93.3% of NOV shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of NOV shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 11.17% compared to NOV's net margin of 1.05%. Baker Hughes' return on equity of 14.17% beat NOV's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NOV1.05% 3.34% 1.90%
Baker Hughes 11.17%14.17%6.24%

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 7 more articles in the media than NOV. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Baker Hughes and 9 mentions for NOV. NOV's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Baker Hughes' score of 1.02 indicating that NOV is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NOV
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Baker Hughes
12 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than NOV. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NOV, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NOV$8.69B0.87$145M$0.2487.90
Baker Hughes$27.89B2.26$2.59B$3.1320.28

Summary

Baker Hughes beats NOV on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Baker Hughes News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BKR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BKR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BKR vs. The Competition

MetricBaker HughesOIL IndustryEnergy SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$62.98B$9.58B$10.10B$11.99B
Dividend Yield1.42%2.44%10.42%5.62%
P/E Ratio20.2824.6020.1324.13
Price / Sales2.261.73776.3384.94
Price / Cash16.6511.8637.1954.72
Price / Book3.302.984.276.82
Net Income$2.59B$373.98M$4.23B$337.52M
7 Day Performance-3.98%-3.46%-3.08%-0.96%
1 Month Performance-1.73%2.49%-2.14%1.68%
1 Year Performance62.64%62.85%39.78%26.88%

Baker Hughes Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BKR
Baker Hughes
4.4424 of 5 stars
$63.48
+0.7%
$69.14
+8.9%
+61.3%$62.98B$27.89B20.2856,000
FANG
Diamondback Energy
3.8843 of 5 stars
$192.62
-5.1%
$223.26
+15.9%
+35.0%$54.19B$15.03B223.981,762
FTI
TechnipFMC
4.0489 of 5 stars
$66.76
-3.3%
$69.71
+4.4%
+113.0%$26.64B$9.93B25.4825,407
HAL
Halliburton
4.4615 of 5 stars
$39.12
-5.1%
$43.27
+10.6%
+82.7%$32.73B$22.18B21.4946,000
MTDR
Matador Resources
4.8341 of 5 stars
$53.54
-4.0%
$65.08
+21.5%
+14.9%$6.65B$3.70B13.76290

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:BKR) was last updated on 6/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners