Go Pro

Baker Hughes (BKR) Competitors

Baker Hughes logo
$53.82 -1.68 (-3.03%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$53.62 -0.20 (-0.37%)
As of 07:58 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BKR vs. FANG, FTI, HAL, MTDR, and NOV

Should you buy Baker Hughes stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Baker Hughes with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Baker Hughes include Diamondback Energy (FANG), TechnipFMC (FTI), Halliburton (HAL), Matador Resources (MTDR), and NOV (NOV). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Baker Hughes compare to Diamondback Energy?

Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) and Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, risk and profitability.

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baker Hughes$27.73B1.93$2.59B$3.1317.19
Diamondback Energy$15.03B3.22$1.66B$0.86199.95

Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.42, meaning that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Baker Hughes currently has a consensus target price of $69.14, suggesting a potential upside of 28.46%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus target price of $220.68, suggesting a potential upside of 28.33%. Given Baker Hughes' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Baker Hughes is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baker Hughes
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82
Diamondback Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
5 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.04

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 6 more articles in the media than Diamondback Energy. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Baker Hughes and 18 mentions for Diamondback Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Baker Hughes' score of 0.95 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Baker Hughes
13 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Diamondback Energy
14 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Baker Hughes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 511.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Baker Hughes has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Diamondback Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 11.17% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 1.87%. Baker Hughes' return on equity of 14.17% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baker Hughes11.17% 14.17% 6.24%
Diamondback Energy 1.87%7.76%4.67%

Summary

Baker Hughes beats Diamondback Energy on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baker Hughes compare to TechnipFMC?

TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) and Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than TechnipFMC. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TechnipFMC$9.93B2.61$963.90M$2.6224.82
Baker Hughes$27.73B1.93$2.59B$3.1317.19

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 11.17% compared to TechnipFMC's net margin of 10.62%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 34.06% beat Baker Hughes' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TechnipFMC10.62% 34.06% 11.30%
Baker Hughes 11.17%14.17%6.24%

TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

TechnipFMC presently has a consensus target price of $70.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.63%. Baker Hughes has a consensus target price of $69.14, indicating a potential upside of 28.46%. Given Baker Hughes' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Baker Hughes is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TechnipFMC
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.76
Baker Hughes
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82

TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. TechnipFMC pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Baker Hughes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TechnipFMC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Baker Hughes has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Baker Hughes is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 20 more articles in the media than TechnipFMC. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Baker Hughes and 4 mentions for TechnipFMC. Baker Hughes' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat TechnipFMC's score of 0.75 indicating that Baker Hughes is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TechnipFMC
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Baker Hughes
13 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Baker Hughes beats TechnipFMC on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baker Hughes compare to Halliburton?

Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) and Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and dividends.

Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Baker Hughes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Halliburton pays out 37.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Baker Hughes has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Halliburton has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than Halliburton. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baker Hughes$27.73B1.93$2.59B$3.1317.19
Halliburton$22.18B1.24$1.28B$1.8218.13

Baker Hughes presently has a consensus price target of $69.14, suggesting a potential upside of 28.46%. Halliburton has a consensus price target of $43.27, suggesting a potential upside of 31.14%. Given Halliburton's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Baker Hughes.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baker Hughes
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82
Halliburton
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 11.17% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 6.95%. Halliburton's return on equity of 19.04% beat Baker Hughes' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baker Hughes11.17% 14.17% 6.24%
Halliburton 6.95%19.04%7.96%

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 10 more articles in the media than Halliburton. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Baker Hughes and 14 mentions for Halliburton. Baker Hughes' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Halliburton's score of 0.88 indicating that Baker Hughes is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Baker Hughes
13 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Halliburton
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Halliburton shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Baker Hughes beats Halliburton on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baker Hughes compare to Matador Resources?

Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) and Matador Resources (NYSE:MTDR) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matador Resources has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Baker Hughes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Baker Hughes has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Matador Resources has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Baker Hughes presently has a consensus price target of $69.14, suggesting a potential upside of 28.46%. Matador Resources has a consensus price target of $64.38, suggesting a potential upside of 31.37%. Given Matador Resources' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Matador Resources is more favorable than Baker Hughes.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baker Hughes
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82
Matador Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.69

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than Matador Resources. Matador Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baker Hughes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baker Hughes$27.73B1.93$2.59B$3.1317.19
Matador Resources$3.70B1.65$759.22M$3.8912.60

Matador Resources has a net margin of 14.41% compared to Baker Hughes' net margin of 11.17%. Baker Hughes' return on equity of 14.17% beat Matador Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baker Hughes11.17% 14.17% 6.24%
Matador Resources 14.41%11.20%5.62%

92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Matador Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 14 more articles in the media than Matador Resources. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Baker Hughes and 10 mentions for Matador Resources. Baker Hughes' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Matador Resources' score of 0.81 indicating that Baker Hughes is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Baker Hughes
13 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Matador Resources
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Baker Hughes beats Matador Resources on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baker Hughes compare to NOV?

Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) and NOV (NYSE:NOV) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 11.17% compared to NOV's net margin of 1.05%. Baker Hughes' return on equity of 14.17% beat NOV's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baker Hughes11.17% 14.17% 6.24%
NOV 1.05%3.34%1.90%

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 14 more articles in the media than NOV. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Baker Hughes and 10 mentions for NOV. Baker Hughes' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat NOV's score of 0.74 indicating that Baker Hughes is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Baker Hughes
13 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
NOV
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of NOV shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of NOV shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Baker Hughes currently has a consensus target price of $69.14, indicating a potential upside of 28.46%. NOV has a consensus target price of $20.57, indicating a potential upside of 13.61%. Given Baker Hughes' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Baker Hughes is more favorable than NOV.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baker Hughes
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82
NOV
2 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.24

Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NOV has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. NOV pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Baker Hughes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NOV pays out 150.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Baker Hughes has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and NOV has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than NOV. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NOV, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baker Hughes$27.73B1.93$2.59B$3.1317.19
NOV$8.74B0.74$145M$0.2475.45

Summary

Baker Hughes beats NOV on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Baker Hughes News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BKR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BKR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BKR vs. The Competition

MetricBaker HughesOIL IndustryEnergy SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$55.06B$8.45B$9.74B$12.59B
Dividend Yield1.66%2.55%10.64%6.75%
P/E Ratio17.1922.1718.4125.26
Price / Sales1.931.70736.7699.96
Price / Cash14.5411.8838.2359.26
Price / Book2.802.894.116.62
Net Income$2.59B$373.98M$4.24B$336.83M
7 Day Performance-4.55%3.26%-0.31%2.52%
1 Month Performance-14.53%-3.15%-8.04%0.44%
1 Year Performance39.11%57.45%30.36%29.40%

Baker Hughes Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BKR
Baker Hughes
4.9171 of 5 stars
$53.82
-3.0%
$69.14
+28.5%
+44.8%$55.06B$27.73B17.1956,000
FANG
Diamondback Energy
4.7299 of 5 stars
$179.91
-1.4%
$221.37
+23.0%
+27.9%$50.61B$15.03B209.201,762
FTI
TechnipFMC
3.5873 of 5 stars
$64.44
-3.9%
$70.00
+8.6%
+92.4%$25.69B$9.93B24.6025,407
HAL
Halliburton
4.9487 of 5 stars
$34.09
-1.7%
$43.27
+27.0%
+66.6%$28.58B$22.18B18.7346,000
MTDR
Matador Resources
4.9572 of 5 stars
$49.88
-0.6%
$65.08
+30.5%
+4.4%$6.20B$3.70B12.82290

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:BKR) was last updated on 7/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners