Does the media refer more to FANG or BKR?

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 1 more articles in the media than Diamondback Energy. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Baker Hughes and 11 mentions for Diamondback Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Baker Hughes' score of 0.38 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Diamondback Energy 5 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Baker Hughes 4 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better earnings and valuation, BKR or FTI?

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than TechnipFMC. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Baker Hughes $27.73B 2.03 $2.59B $3.10 18.29 TechnipFMC $9.93B 2.74 $963.90M $2.88 24.13

Is BKR or FTI more profitable?

TechnipFMC has a net margin of 11.28% compared to Baker Hughes' net margin of 11.17%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 36.54% beat Baker Hughes' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Baker Hughes 11.17% 13.85% 5.80% TechnipFMC 11.28% 36.54% 12.02%

Does the media prefer BKR or FTI?

In the previous week, TechnipFMC had 3 more articles in the media than Baker Hughes. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for TechnipFMC and 12 mentions for Baker Hughes. TechnipFMC's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Baker Hughes' score of 0.38 indicating that TechnipFMC is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Baker Hughes 4 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral TechnipFMC 3 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, BKR or HAL?

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than Halliburton. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baker Hughes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Baker Hughes $27.73B 2.03 $2.59B $3.10 18.29 Halliburton $22.18B 1.22 $1.28B $1.91 17.02

Does the media favor BKR or HAL?

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 1 more articles in the media than Halliburton. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Baker Hughes and 11 mentions for Halliburton. Baker Hughes' average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Halliburton's score of 0.27 indicating that Baker Hughes is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Baker Hughes 4 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Halliburton 4 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to MTDR or BKR?

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 5 more articles in the media than Matador Resources. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Baker Hughes and 7 mentions for Matador Resources. Matador Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Baker Hughes' score of 0.38 indicating that Matador Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Matador Resources 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Baker Hughes 4 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings & valuation, BKR or NOV?

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than NOV. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NOV, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Baker Hughes $27.73B 2.03 $2.59B $3.10 18.29 NOV $8.74B 0.77 $145M $0.26 72.90

Is BKR or NOV more profitable?

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 11.17% compared to NOV's net margin of 1.10%. Baker Hughes' return on equity of 13.85% beat NOV's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Baker Hughes 11.17% 13.85% 5.80% NOV 1.10% 3.44% 1.94%

Does the media favor BKR or NOV?

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 1 more articles in the media than NOV. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Baker Hughes and 11 mentions for NOV. NOV's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Baker Hughes' score of 0.38 indicating that NOV is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Baker Hughes 4 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral NOV 4 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Baker Hughes (BKR) Competitors

$56.70 +0.40 (+0.71%)

Closing price 10/9/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$56.49 -0.21 (-0.38%)

As of 10/9/2026 07:56 PM Eastern

Compare

BKR vs. FANG, FTI, HAL, MTDR, and NOV

Should you buy Baker Hughes stock or one of its competitors? Baker Hughes's main competitors and comparable companies include Diamondback Energy (FANG), TechnipFMC (FTI), Halliburton (HAL), Matador Resources (MTDR), and NOV (NOV). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Baker Hughes compare to Diamondback Energy?

Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) and Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 11.17% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 8.58%. Baker Hughes' return on equity of 13.85% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Diamondback Energy	8.58%	10.10%	6.16%
Baker Hughes	11.17%	13.85%	5.80%

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Diamondback Energy currently has a consensus target price of $231.84, indicating a potential upside of 20.67%. Baker Hughes has a consensus target price of $71.41, indicating a potential upside of 25.94%. Given Baker Hughes' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Baker Hughes is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Diamondback Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	4 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.96
Baker Hughes	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.95

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Baker Hughes pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Baker Hughes has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Diamondback Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Diamondback Energy	$16.98B	3.17	$1.66B	$5.13	37.45
Baker Hughes	$27.73B	2.03	$2.59B	$3.10	18.29

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 1 more articles in the media than Diamondback Energy. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Baker Hughes and 11 mentions for Diamondback Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Baker Hughes' score of 0.38 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Diamondback Energy	5 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Baker Hughes	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Diamondback Energy and Baker Hughes tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baker Hughes compare to TechnipFMC?

Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, TechnipFMC had 3 more articles in the media than Baker Hughes. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for TechnipFMC and 12 mentions for Baker Hughes. TechnipFMC's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Baker Hughes' score of 0.38 indicating that TechnipFMC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Baker Hughes	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
TechnipFMC	3 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

TechnipFMC has a net margin of 11.28% compared to Baker Hughes' net margin of 11.17%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 36.54% beat Baker Hughes' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Baker Hughes	11.17%	13.85%	5.80%
TechnipFMC	11.28%	36.54%	12.02%

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than TechnipFMC. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Baker Hughes	$27.73B	2.03	$2.59B	$3.10	18.29
TechnipFMC	$9.93B	2.74	$963.90M	$2.88	24.13

Baker Hughes presently has a consensus price target of $71.41, suggesting a potential upside of 25.94%. TechnipFMC has a consensus price target of $74.17, suggesting a potential upside of 6.72%. Given Baker Hughes' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Baker Hughes is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Baker Hughes	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.95
TechnipFMC	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.93

92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Baker Hughes pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TechnipFMC pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Baker Hughes has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and TechnipFMC has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Baker Hughes is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Baker Hughes and TechnipFMC tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baker Hughes compare to Halliburton?

Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) and Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 11.17% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 7.16%. Halliburton's return on equity of 18.71% beat Baker Hughes' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Baker Hughes	11.17%	13.85%	5.80%
Halliburton	7.16%	18.71%	7.89%

Baker Hughes currently has a consensus price target of $71.41, suggesting a potential upside of 25.94%. Halliburton has a consensus price target of $43.24, suggesting a potential upside of 32.99%. Given Halliburton's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Baker Hughes.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Baker Hughes	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.95
Halliburton	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.68

Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than Halliburton. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baker Hughes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Baker Hughes	$27.73B	2.03	$2.59B	$3.10	18.29
Halliburton	$22.18B	1.22	$1.28B	$1.91	17.02

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 1 more articles in the media than Halliburton. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Baker Hughes and 11 mentions for Halliburton. Baker Hughes' average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Halliburton's score of 0.27 indicating that Baker Hughes is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Baker Hughes	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Halliburton	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Halliburton shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Baker Hughes pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Halliburton pays out 35.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Baker Hughes has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Halliburton has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Summary

Baker Hughes beats Halliburton on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baker Hughes compare to Matador Resources?

Matador Resources (NYSE:MTDR) and Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than Matador Resources. Matador Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baker Hughes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Matador Resources	$3.70B	1.82	$759.22M	$5.83	9.31
Baker Hughes	$27.73B	2.03	$2.59B	$3.10	18.29

Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Matador Resources pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Baker Hughes pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matador Resources has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Baker Hughes has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Matador Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Matador Resources currently has a consensus price target of $66.80, suggesting a potential upside of 23.10%. Baker Hughes has a consensus price target of $71.41, suggesting a potential upside of 25.94%. Given Baker Hughes' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Baker Hughes is more favorable than Matador Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Matador Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82
Baker Hughes	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.95

Matador Resources has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 5 more articles in the media than Matador Resources. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Baker Hughes and 7 mentions for Matador Resources. Matador Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Baker Hughes' score of 0.38 indicating that Matador Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Matador Resources	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Baker Hughes	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

92.0% of Matador Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 19.85% compared to Baker Hughes' net margin of 11.17%. Baker Hughes' return on equity of 13.85% beat Matador Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Matador Resources	19.85%	13.18%	6.46%
Baker Hughes	11.17%	13.85%	5.80%

Summary

Baker Hughes beats Matador Resources on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baker Hughes compare to NOV?

Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) and NOV (NYSE:NOV) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and institutional ownership.

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than NOV. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NOV, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Baker Hughes	$27.73B	2.03	$2.59B	$3.10	18.29
NOV	$8.74B	0.77	$145M	$0.26	72.90

Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NOV has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of NOV shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of NOV shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 11.17% compared to NOV's net margin of 1.10%. Baker Hughes' return on equity of 13.85% beat NOV's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Baker Hughes	11.17%	13.85%	5.80%
NOV	1.10%	3.44%	1.94%

Baker Hughes currently has a consensus target price of $71.41, indicating a potential upside of 25.94%. NOV has a consensus target price of $21.23, indicating a potential upside of 12.01%. Given Baker Hughes' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Baker Hughes is more favorable than NOV.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Baker Hughes	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.95
NOV	2 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.19

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 1 more articles in the media than NOV. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Baker Hughes and 11 mentions for NOV. NOV's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Baker Hughes' score of 0.38 indicating that NOV is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Baker Hughes	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
NOV	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. NOV pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Baker Hughes pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NOV pays out 138.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Baker Hughes has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and NOV has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Baker Hughes beats NOV on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Baker Hughes News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BKR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

BKR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Baker Hughes	Energy Equipment & Services Industry	Energy Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$55.89B	$3.55B	$10.18B	$13.21B
Dividend Yield	1.63%	13.42%	10.66%	16.37%
P/E Ratio	18.29	43.58	20.54	26.16
Price / Sales	2.03	17.24	493.08	107.53
Price / Cash	14.75	20.66	37.29	53.09
Price / Book	2.95	2.13	4.09	6.33
Net Income	$2.59B	$72.25M	$4.35B	$382.15M
7 Day Performance	1.25%	1.23%	0.66%	-1.40%
1 Month Performance	-4.55%	-3.39%	-3.76%	-3.47%
1 Year Performance	25.89%	41.81%	33.81%	1.18%

Baker Hughes Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
BKR Baker Hughes	4.9206 of 5 stars	$56.70 +0.7%	$71.41 +25.9%	+18.4%	$55.89B	$27.73B	18.29	56,000
FANG Diamondback Energy	4.426 of 5 stars	$184.71 -0.4%	$226.33 +22.5%	+33.2%	$51.72B	$15.03B	36.01	1,762	Insider Trade
FTI TechnipFMC	3.7385 of 5 stars	$68.83 0.0%	$72.08 +4.7%	+88.3%	$26.99B	$9.93B	23.90	25,407
HAL Halliburton	4.8898 of 5 stars	$31.83 -0.2%	$43.24 +35.8%	+38.8%	$26.54B	$22.18B	16.66	46,000
MTDR Matador Resources	4.7903 of 5 stars	$53.58 +1.2%	$66.80 +24.7%	+21.5%	$6.62B	$3.84B	9.19	483	Analyst Upgrade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:BKR) was last updated on 10/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Baker Hughes (BKR) Competitors

BKR vs. FANG, FTI, HAL, MTDR, and NOV

How does Baker Hughes compare to Diamondback Energy?

Summary

How does Baker Hughes compare to TechnipFMC?

Summary

How does Baker Hughes compare to Halliburton?

Summary

How does Baker Hughes compare to Matador Resources?

Summary

How does Baker Hughes compare to NOV?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BKR vs. The Competition

Baker Hughes Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Baker Hughes (BKR) Competitors

BKR vs. FANG, FTI, HAL, MTDR, and NOV

How does Baker Hughes compare to Diamondback Energy?

Is FANG or BKR more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in FANG or BKR?

Which has more risk and volatility, FANG or BKR?

Do analysts rate FANG or BKR?

Is FANG or BKR a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, FANG or BKR?

Does the media refer more to FANG or BKR?

Summary

How does Baker Hughes compare to TechnipFMC?

Does the media prefer BKR or FTI?

Is BKR or FTI more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, BKR or FTI?

Do analysts prefer BKR or FTI?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in BKR or FTI?

Which has more volatility & risk, BKR or FTI?

Is BKR or FTI a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Baker Hughes compare to Halliburton?

Is BKR or HAL more profitable?

Do analysts rate BKR or HAL?

Which has more volatility & risk, BKR or HAL?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, BKR or HAL?

Does the media favor BKR or HAL?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of BKR or HAL?

Is BKR or HAL a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Baker Hughes compare to Matador Resources?

Which has better earnings and valuation, MTDR or BKR?

Is MTDR or BKR a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer MTDR or BKR?

Which has more risk and volatility, MTDR or BKR?

Does the media refer more to MTDR or BKR?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of MTDR or BKR?

Is MTDR or BKR more profitable?

Summary

How does Baker Hughes compare to NOV?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, BKR or NOV?

Which has more volatility & risk, BKR or NOV?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in BKR or NOV?

Is BKR or NOV more profitable?

Do analysts prefer BKR or NOV?

Does the media favor BKR or NOV?

Is BKR or NOV a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BKR vs. The Competition

Baker Hughes Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools