Free Trial

TechnipFMC (FTI) Competitors

TechnipFMC logo
$67.94 -1.51 (-2.17%)
As of 03:44 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FTI vs. BKR, WFRD, COP, HAL, and MGY

Should you buy TechnipFMC stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares TechnipFMC with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with TechnipFMC include Baker Hughes (BKR), Weatherford International (WFRD), ConocoPhillips (COP), Halliburton (HAL), and Magnolia Oil & Gas (MGY). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does TechnipFMC compare to Baker Hughes?

Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 5 more articles in the media than TechnipFMC. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Baker Hughes and 15 mentions for TechnipFMC. TechnipFMC's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Baker Hughes' score of 0.92 indicating that TechnipFMC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Baker Hughes
13 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
TechnipFMC
8 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Baker Hughes presently has a consensus target price of $69.14, suggesting a potential upside of 7.44%. TechnipFMC has a consensus target price of $69.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.56%. Given Baker Hughes' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Baker Hughes is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baker Hughes
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.77
TechnipFMC
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than TechnipFMC. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baker Hughes$27.73B2.30$2.59B$3.1320.56
TechnipFMC$9.93B2.73$963.90M$2.6225.93

Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Baker Hughes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TechnipFMC pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Baker Hughes has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and TechnipFMC has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Baker Hughes is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 11.17% compared to TechnipFMC's net margin of 10.62%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 34.06% beat Baker Hughes' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baker Hughes11.17% 14.17% 6.24%
TechnipFMC 10.62%34.06%11.30%

Summary

Baker Hughes and TechnipFMC tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TechnipFMC compare to Weatherford International?

TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) and Weatherford International (NASDAQ:WFRD) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Weatherford International has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Weatherford International pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. TechnipFMC pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Weatherford International pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TechnipFMC has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

TechnipFMC currently has a consensus target price of $69.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.56%. Weatherford International has a consensus target price of $110.67, suggesting a potential upside of 6.15%. Given Weatherford International's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Weatherford International is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TechnipFMC
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82
Weatherford International
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.64

TechnipFMC has a net margin of 10.62% compared to Weatherford International's net margin of 9.49%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 34.06% beat Weatherford International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TechnipFMC10.62% 34.06% 11.30%
Weatherford International 9.49%28.31%8.95%

In the previous week, TechnipFMC had 5 more articles in the media than Weatherford International. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for TechnipFMC and 10 mentions for Weatherford International. TechnipFMC's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Weatherford International's score of 0.63 indicating that TechnipFMC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TechnipFMC
8 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Weatherford International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.2% of Weatherford International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Weatherford International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TechnipFMC has higher revenue and earnings than Weatherford International. Weatherford International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TechnipFMC$9.93B2.73$963.90M$2.6225.93
Weatherford International$4.88B1.54$431M$6.3916.32

Summary

TechnipFMC beats Weatherford International on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TechnipFMC compare to ConocoPhillips?

TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) and ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.11, suggesting that its share price is 89% less volatile than the broader market.

TechnipFMC currently has a consensus price target of $69.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.56%. ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $134.48, suggesting a potential upside of 12.86%. Given ConocoPhillips' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TechnipFMC
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82
ConocoPhillips
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than TechnipFMC. ConocoPhillips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TechnipFMC$9.93B2.73$963.90M$2.6225.93
ConocoPhillips$61.55B2.36$7.99B$5.8920.23

96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. TechnipFMC pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ConocoPhillips pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TechnipFMC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 23 more articles in the media than TechnipFMC. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 15 mentions for TechnipFMC. TechnipFMC's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 1.10 indicating that TechnipFMC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TechnipFMC
8 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ConocoPhillips
25 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 12.10% compared to TechnipFMC's net margin of 10.62%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 34.06% beat ConocoPhillips' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TechnipFMC10.62% 34.06% 11.30%
ConocoPhillips 12.10%11.39%6.03%

Summary

TechnipFMC beats ConocoPhillips on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TechnipFMC compare to Halliburton?

Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

85.2% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Halliburton shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Halliburton had 14 more articles in the media than TechnipFMC. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Halliburton and 15 mentions for TechnipFMC. TechnipFMC's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Halliburton's score of 1.07 indicating that TechnipFMC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Halliburton
19 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
TechnipFMC
8 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Halliburton pays out 37.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TechnipFMC pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Halliburton has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and TechnipFMC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Halliburton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

TechnipFMC has a net margin of 10.62% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 6.95%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 34.06% beat Halliburton's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Halliburton6.95% 19.04% 7.96%
TechnipFMC 10.62%34.06%11.30%

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than TechnipFMC. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Halliburton$22.18B1.54$1.28B$1.8222.49
TechnipFMC$9.93B2.73$963.90M$2.6225.93

Halliburton presently has a consensus price target of $43.27, suggesting a potential upside of 5.72%. TechnipFMC has a consensus price target of $69.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.56%. Given Halliburton's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Halliburton is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Halliburton
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
TechnipFMC
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82

Halliburton has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

TechnipFMC beats Halliburton on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TechnipFMC compare to Magnolia Oil & Gas?

Magnolia Oil & Gas (NYSE:MGY) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, TechnipFMC had 12 more articles in the media than Magnolia Oil & Gas. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for TechnipFMC and 3 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas. TechnipFMC's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.84 indicating that TechnipFMC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Magnolia Oil & Gas
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
TechnipFMC
8 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TechnipFMC pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and TechnipFMC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Magnolia Oil & Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

TechnipFMC has higher revenue and earnings than Magnolia Oil & Gas. Magnolia Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Magnolia Oil & Gas$1.31B3.96$325.25M$1.7216.35
TechnipFMC$9.93B2.73$963.90M$2.6225.93

94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 24.40% compared to TechnipFMC's net margin of 10.62%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 34.06% beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Magnolia Oil & Gas24.40% 16.28% 11.26%
TechnipFMC 10.62%34.06%11.30%

Magnolia Oil & Gas presently has a consensus target price of $31.42, indicating a potential upside of 11.74%. TechnipFMC has a consensus target price of $69.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.56%. Given Magnolia Oil & Gas' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Magnolia Oil & Gas is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Magnolia Oil & Gas
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.41
TechnipFMC
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82

Summary

TechnipFMC beats Magnolia Oil & Gas on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TechnipFMC News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FTI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FTI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FTI vs. The Competition

MetricTechnipFMCOIL IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$27.10B$9.62B$10.39B$23.12B
Dividend Yield0.29%2.50%10.45%4.09%
P/E Ratio25.9423.4520.5430.99
Price / Sales2.731.75807.7914.88
Price / Cash18.8511.4738.4624.78
Price / Book8.072.944.394.68
Net Income$963.90M$373.98M$4.23B$1.07B
7 Day Performance0.90%3.05%1.69%-0.53%
1 Month Performance-10.33%0.07%-0.14%0.36%
1 Year Performance113.16%76.94%51.15%25.76%

TechnipFMC Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FTI
TechnipFMC
4.0132 of 5 stars
$67.94
-2.2%
$69.00
+1.6%
+122.3%$27.10B$9.93B25.9425,407
BKR
Baker Hughes
4.6684 of 5 stars
$66.06
flat
$69.41
+5.1%
+72.9%$65.54B$27.73B21.1156,000
WFRD
Weatherford International
4.6053 of 5 stars
$108.79
flat
$110.33
+1.4%
+136.5%$7.82B$4.92B17.0316,700
COP
ConocoPhillips
4.0263 of 5 stars
$120.48
+0.0%
$133.28
+10.6%
+34.8%$146.76B$61.55B20.459,900
HAL
Halliburton
4.2197 of 5 stars
$41.50
+0.1%
$42.86
+3.3%
+100.7%$34.64B$22.18B22.8046,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:FTI) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners