TechnipFMC (FTI) Competitors

In the previous week, TechnipFMC had 2 more articles in the media than Weatherford International. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for TechnipFMC and 7 mentions for Weatherford International. Weatherford International's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat TechnipFMC's score of 1.41 indicating that Weatherford International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

97.2% of Weatherford International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Weatherford International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TechnipFMC has higher revenue and earnings than Weatherford International. Weatherford International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Weatherford International currently has a consensus target price of $114.25, indicating a potential upside of 28.59%. TechnipFMC has a consensus target price of $69.64, indicating a potential downside of 8.81%. Given Weatherford International's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Weatherford International is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

Weatherford International has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

TechnipFMC has a net margin of 11.28% compared to Weatherford International's net margin of 7.66%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 36.54% beat Weatherford International's return on equity.

Weatherford International pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Weatherford International pays out 21.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TechnipFMC pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TechnipFMC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than TechnipFMC. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Halliburton has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Halliburton presently has a consensus target price of $43.10, suggesting a potential upside of 20.12%. TechnipFMC has a consensus target price of $69.64, suggesting a potential downside of 8.81%. Given Halliburton's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Halliburton is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

85.2% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Halliburton shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Halliburton had 6 more articles in the media than TechnipFMC. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Halliburton and 9 mentions for TechnipFMC. TechnipFMC's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Halliburton's score of 1.20 indicating that TechnipFMC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

TechnipFMC has a net margin of 11.28% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 7.16%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 36.54% beat Halliburton's return on equity.

Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Halliburton pays out 35.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TechnipFMC pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Halliburton has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and TechnipFMC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Halliburton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Magnolia Oil & Gas currently has a consensus target price of $31.71, suggesting a potential upside of 14.35%. TechnipFMC has a consensus target price of $69.64, suggesting a potential downside of 8.81%. Given Magnolia Oil & Gas' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Magnolia Oil & Gas is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Magnolia Oil & Gas and Magnolia Oil & Gas both had 9 articles in the media. TechnipFMC's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.48 indicating that TechnipFMC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 28.77% compared to TechnipFMC's net margin of 11.28%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 36.54% beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity.

Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TechnipFMC pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and TechnipFMC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Magnolia Oil & Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

TechnipFMC has higher revenue and earnings than Magnolia Oil & Gas. Magnolia Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

TechnipFMC presently has a consensus target price of $69.64, suggesting a potential downside of 8.81%. Noble has a consensus target price of $44.71, suggesting a potential downside of 1.20%. Given Noble's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Noble is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Noble pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. TechnipFMC pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Noble pays out 215.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TechnipFMC has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, TechnipFMC had 6 more articles in the media than Noble. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for TechnipFMC and 3 mentions for Noble. TechnipFMC's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Noble's score of 1.36 indicating that TechnipFMC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.1% of Noble shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Noble shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TechnipFMC has higher revenue and earnings than Noble. TechnipFMC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Noble, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

TechnipFMC has a net margin of 11.28% compared to Noble's net margin of 4.88%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 36.54% beat Noble's return on equity.

TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Noble has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.