Go Pro

TechnipFMC (FTI) Competitors

TechnipFMC logo
$68.83 -0.02 (-0.02%)
Closing price 10/2/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$68.81 -0.02 (-0.03%)
As of 10/2/2026 07:32 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FTI vs. BKR, WFRD, HAL, NE, and NOV

Should you buy TechnipFMC stock or one of its competitors? TechnipFMC's main competitors and comparable companies include Baker Hughes (BKR), Weatherford International (WFRD), Halliburton (HAL), Noble (NE), and NOV (NOV). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "energy equipment & services" industry.

How does TechnipFMC compare to Baker Hughes?

Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

TechnipFMC has a net margin of 11.28% compared to Baker Hughes' net margin of 11.17%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 36.54% beat Baker Hughes' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baker Hughes11.17% 13.85% 5.80%
TechnipFMC 11.28%36.54%12.02%

Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than TechnipFMC. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baker Hughes$27.73B2.01$2.59B$3.1018.06
TechnipFMC$9.93B2.72$963.90M$2.8823.90

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 12 more articles in the media than TechnipFMC. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Baker Hughes and 3 mentions for TechnipFMC. TechnipFMC's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Baker Hughes' score of 0.31 indicating that TechnipFMC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Baker Hughes
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
TechnipFMC
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Baker Hughes presently has a consensus target price of $71.41, suggesting a potential upside of 27.52%. TechnipFMC has a consensus target price of $72.08, suggesting a potential upside of 4.71%. Given Baker Hughes' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Baker Hughes is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baker Hughes
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.95
TechnipFMC
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87

Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Baker Hughes pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TechnipFMC pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Baker Hughes has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and TechnipFMC has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Baker Hughes is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Baker Hughes beats TechnipFMC on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TechnipFMC compare to Weatherford International?

TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) and Weatherford International (NASDAQ:WFRD) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.2% of Weatherford International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Weatherford International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Weatherford International has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

TechnipFMC presently has a consensus target price of $72.08, indicating a potential upside of 4.71%. Weatherford International has a consensus target price of $114.50, indicating a potential upside of 43.63%. Given Weatherford International's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Weatherford International is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TechnipFMC
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87
Weatherford International
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Weatherford International pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. TechnipFMC pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Weatherford International pays out 21.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TechnipFMC has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, TechnipFMC had 1 more articles in the media than Weatherford International. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for TechnipFMC and 2 mentions for Weatherford International. TechnipFMC's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Weatherford International's score of 0.62 indicating that TechnipFMC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TechnipFMC
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Weatherford International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

TechnipFMC has higher revenue and earnings than Weatherford International. Weatherford International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TechnipFMC$9.93B2.72$963.90M$2.8823.90
Weatherford International$4.92B1.16$431M$5.0715.72

TechnipFMC has a net margin of 11.28% compared to Weatherford International's net margin of 7.66%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 36.54% beat Weatherford International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TechnipFMC11.28% 36.54% 12.02%
Weatherford International 7.66%21.50%7.09%

Summary

TechnipFMC beats Weatherford International on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TechnipFMC compare to Halliburton?

TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) and Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

TechnipFMC presently has a consensus price target of $72.08, suggesting a potential upside of 4.71%. Halliburton has a consensus price target of $43.24, suggesting a potential upside of 35.84%. Given Halliburton's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Halliburton is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TechnipFMC
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87
Halliburton
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.68

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than TechnipFMC. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TechnipFMC$9.93B2.72$963.90M$2.8823.90
Halliburton$22.18B1.20$1.28B$1.9116.66

TechnipFMC has a net margin of 11.28% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 7.16%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 36.54% beat Halliburton's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TechnipFMC11.28% 36.54% 12.02%
Halliburton 7.16%18.71%7.89%

96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Halliburton shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. TechnipFMC pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Halliburton pays out 35.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TechnipFMC has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Halliburton has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Halliburton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Halliburton had 8 more articles in the media than TechnipFMC. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Halliburton and 3 mentions for TechnipFMC. TechnipFMC's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Halliburton's score of 0.50 indicating that TechnipFMC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TechnipFMC
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Halliburton
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

TechnipFMC beats Halliburton on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TechnipFMC compare to Noble?

Noble (NYSE:NE) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Noble has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Noble had 3 more articles in the media than TechnipFMC. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Noble and 3 mentions for TechnipFMC. Noble's average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat TechnipFMC's score of 0.84 indicating that Noble is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Noble
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
TechnipFMC
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Noble currently has a consensus price target of $44.71, suggesting a potential upside of 10.21%. TechnipFMC has a consensus price target of $72.08, suggesting a potential upside of 4.71%. Given Noble's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Noble is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Noble
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
TechnipFMC
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87

68.1% of Noble shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Noble shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Noble pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.9%. TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Noble pays out 215.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TechnipFMC pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TechnipFMC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

TechnipFMC has a net margin of 11.28% compared to Noble's net margin of 4.88%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 36.54% beat Noble's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Noble4.88% 1.93% 1.18%
TechnipFMC 11.28%36.54%12.02%

TechnipFMC has higher revenue and earnings than Noble. TechnipFMC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Noble, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Noble$3.29B1.97$216.72M$0.9343.63
TechnipFMC$9.93B2.72$963.90M$2.8823.90

Summary

TechnipFMC beats Noble on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TechnipFMC compare to NOV?

NOV (NYSE:NOV) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

NOV has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

93.3% of NOV shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of NOV shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

TechnipFMC has a net margin of 11.28% compared to NOV's net margin of 1.10%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 36.54% beat NOV's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NOV1.10% 3.44% 1.94%
TechnipFMC 11.28%36.54%12.02%

NOV pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. NOV pays out 138.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TechnipFMC pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NOV has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and TechnipFMC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

NOV presently has a consensus price target of $21.23, indicating a potential upside of 12.89%. TechnipFMC has a consensus price target of $72.08, indicating a potential upside of 4.71%. Given NOV's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe NOV is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NOV
2 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.19
TechnipFMC
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87

TechnipFMC has higher revenue and earnings than NOV. TechnipFMC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NOV, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NOV$8.64B0.78$145M$0.2672.33
TechnipFMC$9.93B2.72$963.90M$2.8823.90

In the previous week, NOV had 16 more articles in the media than TechnipFMC. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for NOV and 3 mentions for TechnipFMC. TechnipFMC's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat NOV's score of 0.53 indicating that TechnipFMC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NOV
8 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
TechnipFMC
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

TechnipFMC beats NOV on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TechnipFMC News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FTI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FTI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FTI vs. The Competition

MetricTechnipFMCEnergy Equipment & Services IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$27.00B$3.45B$9.82B$22.65B
Dividend Yield0.29%13.44%10.69%3.72%
P/E Ratio23.9042.0420.3027.75
Price / Sales2.7226.82509.2320.73
Price / Cash18.9620.2236.9338.88
Price / Book8.172.094.014.64
Net Income$963.90M$67.81M$4.35B$1.08B
7 Day Performance-3.06%-1.32%-1.12%-1.06%
1 Month Performance-13.86%-4.54%-3.44%-5.50%
1 Year Performance81.03%33.86%28.80%5.13%

TechnipFMC Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FTI
TechnipFMC
3.5719 of 5 stars
$68.83
0.0%
$72.08
+4.7%
+78.8%$27.00B$9.93B23.9025,407
BKR
Baker Hughes
4.9627 of 5 stars
$57.83
+1.0%
$71.81
+24.2%
+15.7%$56.83B$27.73B18.6556,000
WFRD
Weatherford International
4.8234 of 5 stars
$82.20
+0.2%
$114.25
+39.0%
+20.3%$5.87B$4.92B16.2116,700
HAL
Halliburton
4.8479 of 5 stars
$33.40
-0.7%
$43.24
+29.5%
+30.5%$28.03B$22.18B17.4946,000
NE
Noble
3.298 of 5 stars
$44.28
+0.0%
$44.71
+1.0%
+41.1%$7.07B$3.29B47.614,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:FTI) was last updated on 10/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners