Which has preferable valuation & earnings, BKR or FTI?

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than TechnipFMC. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Baker Hughes $27.73B 2.06 $2.59B $3.13 18.42 TechnipFMC $9.93B 2.93 $963.90M $2.62 27.87

Is BKR or FTI more profitable?

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 11.17% compared to TechnipFMC's net margin of 10.62%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 34.06% beat Baker Hughes' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Baker Hughes 11.17% 14.17% 6.24% TechnipFMC 10.62% 34.06% 11.30%

Does the media refer more to BKR or FTI?

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 18 more articles in the media than TechnipFMC. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Baker Hughes and 8 mentions for TechnipFMC. Baker Hughes' average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat TechnipFMC's score of 0.56 indicating that Baker Hughes is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Baker Hughes 12 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive TechnipFMC 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor PTEN or FTI?

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy and Patterson-UTI Energy both had 8 articles in the media. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat TechnipFMC's score of 0.56 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Patterson-UTI Energy 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive TechnipFMC 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to FTI or WFRD?

In the previous week, Weatherford International had 5 more articles in the media than TechnipFMC. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Weatherford International and 8 mentions for TechnipFMC. TechnipFMC's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Weatherford International's score of 0.40 indicating that TechnipFMC is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TechnipFMC 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Weatherford International 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings & valuation, HAL or FTI?

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than TechnipFMC. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Halliburton $22.18B 1.33 $1.28B $1.82 19.35 TechnipFMC $9.93B 2.93 $963.90M $2.62 27.87

Is HAL or FTI more profitable?

TechnipFMC has a net margin of 10.62% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 6.95%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 34.06% beat Halliburton's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Halliburton 6.95% 19.04% 7.96% TechnipFMC 10.62% 34.06% 11.30%

Does the media prefer HAL or FTI?

In the previous week, Halliburton had 25 more articles in the media than TechnipFMC. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Halliburton and 8 mentions for TechnipFMC. Halliburton's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat TechnipFMC's score of 0.56 indicating that Halliburton is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Halliburton 17 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive TechnipFMC 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, MGY or FTI?

TechnipFMC has higher revenue and earnings than Magnolia Oil & Gas. Magnolia Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Magnolia Oil & Gas $1.31B 3.77 $325.25M $1.72 15.54 TechnipFMC $9.93B 2.93 $963.90M $2.62 27.87

Does the media favor MGY or FTI?

In the previous week, Magnolia Oil & Gas had 1 more articles in the media than TechnipFMC. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas and 8 mentions for TechnipFMC. Magnolia Oil & Gas' average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat TechnipFMC's score of 0.56 indicating that Magnolia Oil & Gas is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Magnolia Oil & Gas 3 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive TechnipFMC 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

TechnipFMC (FTI) Competitors

$73.01 +1.16 (+1.62%)

Closing price 07/13/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$73.06 +0.04 (+0.06%)

As of 07/13/2026 07:34 PM Eastern

Compare

FTI vs. BKR, PTEN, WFRD, HAL, and MGY

Should you buy TechnipFMC stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares TechnipFMC with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with TechnipFMC include Baker Hughes (BKR), Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN), Weatherford International (WFRD), Halliburton (HAL), and Magnolia Oil & Gas (MGY). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does TechnipFMC compare to Baker Hughes?

Baker Hughes (NASDAQ:BKR) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 11.17% compared to TechnipFMC's net margin of 10.62%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 34.06% beat Baker Hughes' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Baker Hughes	11.17%	14.17%	6.24%
TechnipFMC	10.62%	34.06%	11.30%

Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

92.1% of Baker Hughes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Baker Hughes had 18 more articles in the media than TechnipFMC. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Baker Hughes and 8 mentions for TechnipFMC. Baker Hughes' average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat TechnipFMC's score of 0.56 indicating that Baker Hughes is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Baker Hughes	12 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
TechnipFMC	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Baker Hughes currently has a consensus price target of $70.14, suggesting a potential upside of 21.64%. TechnipFMC has a consensus price target of $69.64, suggesting a potential downside of 4.62%. Given Baker Hughes' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Baker Hughes is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Baker Hughes	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82
TechnipFMC	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than TechnipFMC. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Baker Hughes	$27.73B	2.06	$2.59B	$3.13	18.42
TechnipFMC	$9.93B	2.93	$963.90M	$2.62	27.87

Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Baker Hughes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TechnipFMC pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Baker Hughes has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and TechnipFMC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Baker Hughes is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Baker Hughes beats TechnipFMC on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TechnipFMC compare to Patterson-UTI Energy?

Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Patterson-UTI Energy presently has a consensus target price of $12.15, suggesting a potential upside of 25.52%. TechnipFMC has a consensus target price of $69.64, suggesting a potential downside of 4.62%. Given Patterson-UTI Energy's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Patterson-UTI Energy	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
TechnipFMC	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

TechnipFMC has a net margin of 10.62% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -2.56%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 34.06% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Patterson-UTI Energy	-2.56%	-2.32%	-1.37%
TechnipFMC	10.62%	34.06%	11.30%

Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -129.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TechnipFMC pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TechnipFMC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TechnipFMC has higher revenue and earnings than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Patterson-UTI Energy	$4.83B	0.76	-$93.64M	-$0.31	N/A
TechnipFMC	$9.93B	2.93	$963.90M	$2.62	27.87

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy and Patterson-UTI Energy both had 8 articles in the media. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat TechnipFMC's score of 0.56 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Patterson-UTI Energy	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
TechnipFMC	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

TechnipFMC beats Patterson-UTI Energy on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TechnipFMC compare to Weatherford International?

TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) and Weatherford International (NASDAQ:WFRD) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

TechnipFMC presently has a consensus target price of $69.64, suggesting a potential downside of 4.62%. Weatherford International has a consensus target price of $114.00, suggesting a potential upside of 40.57%. Given Weatherford International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Weatherford International is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TechnipFMC	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81
Weatherford International	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82

In the previous week, Weatherford International had 5 more articles in the media than TechnipFMC. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Weatherford International and 8 mentions for TechnipFMC. TechnipFMC's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Weatherford International's score of 0.40 indicating that TechnipFMC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TechnipFMC	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Weatherford International	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Weatherford International pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. TechnipFMC pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Weatherford International pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TechnipFMC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Weatherford International has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.2% of Weatherford International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Weatherford International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TechnipFMC has higher revenue and earnings than Weatherford International. Weatherford International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TechnipFMC	$9.93B	2.93	$963.90M	$2.62	27.87
Weatherford International	$4.92B	1.19	$431M	$6.39	12.69

TechnipFMC has a net margin of 10.62% compared to Weatherford International's net margin of 9.49%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 34.06% beat Weatherford International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TechnipFMC	10.62%	34.06%	11.30%
Weatherford International	9.49%	28.31%	8.95%

Summary

TechnipFMC beats Weatherford International on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TechnipFMC compare to Halliburton?

Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and profitability.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than TechnipFMC. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Halliburton	$22.18B	1.33	$1.28B	$1.82	19.35
TechnipFMC	$9.93B	2.93	$963.90M	$2.62	27.87

TechnipFMC has a net margin of 10.62% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 6.95%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 34.06% beat Halliburton's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Halliburton	6.95%	19.04%	7.96%
TechnipFMC	10.62%	34.06%	11.30%

Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Halliburton pays out 37.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TechnipFMC pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Halliburton has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and TechnipFMC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Halliburton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

85.2% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Halliburton shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Halliburton had 25 more articles in the media than TechnipFMC. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Halliburton and 8 mentions for TechnipFMC. Halliburton's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat TechnipFMC's score of 0.56 indicating that Halliburton is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Halliburton	17 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
TechnipFMC	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Halliburton has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Halliburton currently has a consensus price target of $43.18, indicating a potential upside of 22.59%. TechnipFMC has a consensus price target of $69.64, indicating a potential downside of 4.62%. Given Halliburton's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Halliburton is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Halliburton	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.68
TechnipFMC	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

Summary

TechnipFMC beats Halliburton on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TechnipFMC compare to Magnolia Oil & Gas?

Magnolia Oil & Gas (NYSE:MGY) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 24.40% compared to TechnipFMC's net margin of 10.62%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 34.06% beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Magnolia Oil & Gas	24.40%	16.28%	11.26%
TechnipFMC	10.62%	34.06%	11.30%

94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Magnolia Oil & Gas currently has a consensus price target of $31.08, indicating a potential upside of 16.27%. TechnipFMC has a consensus price target of $69.64, indicating a potential downside of 4.62%. Given Magnolia Oil & Gas' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Magnolia Oil & Gas is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Magnolia Oil & Gas	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.47
TechnipFMC	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TechnipFMC pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and TechnipFMC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Magnolia Oil & Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Magnolia Oil & Gas had 1 more articles in the media than TechnipFMC. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas and 8 mentions for TechnipFMC. Magnolia Oil & Gas' average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat TechnipFMC's score of 0.56 indicating that Magnolia Oil & Gas is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Magnolia Oil & Gas	3 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
TechnipFMC	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

TechnipFMC has higher revenue and earnings than Magnolia Oil & Gas. Magnolia Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Magnolia Oil & Gas	$1.31B	3.77	$325.25M	$1.72	15.54
TechnipFMC	$9.93B	2.93	$963.90M	$2.62	27.87

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

TechnipFMC beats Magnolia Oil & Gas on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TechnipFMC News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FTI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FTI vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	TechnipFMC	OIL Industry	Energy Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$28.65B	$8.67B	$9.78B	$23.46B
Dividend Yield	0.28%	2.56%	10.72%	4.02%
P/E Ratio	27.87	21.88	19.05	31.08
Price / Sales	2.93	1.71	624.86	19.77
Price / Cash	19.79	12.34	36.83	18.64
Price / Book	8.67	2.83	4.13	4.77
Net Income	$963.90M	$373.98M	$4.24B	$1.06B
7 Day Performance	6.99%	2.18%	1.60%	-0.23%
1 Month Performance	3.28%	-7.06%	-4.51%	-0.11%
1 Year Performance	112.83%	57.55%	28.48%	16.46%

TechnipFMC Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FTI TechnipFMC	3.6658 of 5 stars	$73.01 +1.6%	$69.64 -4.6%	+104.8%	$28.65B	$9.93B	27.87	25,407
BKR Baker Hughes	4.9663 of 5 stars	$53.25 +0.9%	$70.57 +32.5%	+41.7%	$52.36B	$27.73B	19.77	56,000	Analyst Upgrade High Trading Volume
PTEN Patterson-UTI Energy	3.9519 of 5 stars	$8.56 -1.2%	$12.35 +44.3%	+47.8%	$3.29B	$4.83B	N/A	7,900
WFRD Weatherford International	4.9313 of 5 stars	$83.90 +1.1%	$108.22 +29.0%	+39.5%	$5.97B	$4.92B	13.13	16,700	News Coverage Upcoming Earnings
HAL Halliburton	4.8837 of 5 stars	$32.97 +0.0%	$43.32 +31.4%	+52.7%	$27.53B	$22.18B	18.12	46,000	Trending News Upcoming Earnings

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:FTI) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

TechnipFMC (FTI) Competitors

FTI vs. BKR, PTEN, WFRD, HAL, and MGY

How does TechnipFMC compare to Baker Hughes?

Summary

How does TechnipFMC compare to Patterson-UTI Energy?

Summary

How does TechnipFMC compare to Weatherford International?

Summary

How does TechnipFMC compare to Halliburton?

Summary

How does TechnipFMC compare to Magnolia Oil & Gas?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FTI vs. The Competition

TechnipFMC Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

TechnipFMC (FTI) Competitors

FTI vs. BKR, PTEN, WFRD, HAL, and MGY

How does TechnipFMC compare to Baker Hughes?

Is BKR or FTI more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, BKR or FTI?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in BKR or FTI?

Does the media refer more to BKR or FTI?

Do analysts rate BKR or FTI?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, BKR or FTI?

Is BKR or FTI a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does TechnipFMC compare to Patterson-UTI Energy?

Which has more risk & volatility, PTEN or FTI?

Do analysts rate PTEN or FTI?

Is PTEN or FTI more profitable?

Is PTEN or FTI a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PTEN or FTI?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PTEN or FTI?

Does the media favor PTEN or FTI?

Summary

How does TechnipFMC compare to Weatherford International?

Do analysts recommend FTI or WFRD?

Does the media refer more to FTI or WFRD?

Is FTI or WFRD a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, FTI or WFRD?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of FTI or WFRD?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, FTI or WFRD?

Is FTI or WFRD more profitable?

Summary

How does TechnipFMC compare to Halliburton?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, HAL or FTI?

Is HAL or FTI more profitable?

Is HAL or FTI a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in HAL or FTI?

Does the media prefer HAL or FTI?

Which has more volatility and risk, HAL or FTI?

Do analysts rate HAL or FTI?

Summary

How does TechnipFMC compare to Magnolia Oil & Gas?

Is MGY or FTI more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MGY or FTI?

Do analysts prefer MGY or FTI?

Is MGY or FTI a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor MGY or FTI?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, MGY or FTI?

Which has more risk & volatility, MGY or FTI?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FTI vs. The Competition

TechnipFMC Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools