NYSE:FTI

TechnipFMC Competitors

$7.46
+0.20 (+2.75 %)
(As of 04/14/2021 04:08 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$7.35
Now: $7.46
$7.66
50-Day Range
$7.14
MA: $8.13
$9.26
52-Week Range
$5.11
Now: $7.46
$13.04
Volume288,015 shs
Average Volume11.76 million shs
Market Capitalization$3.34 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.38

Competitors

TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) Vs. SLB, HAL, NOV, RES, DRQ, and OII

Should you be buying FTI stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "oil & gas equipment & services" are considered alternatives and competitors to TechnipFMC, including Schlumberger (SLB), Halliburton (HAL), NOV (NOV), RPC (RES), Dril-Quip (DRQ), and Oceaneering International (OII).

TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) and Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, meaning that its stock price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schlumberger has a beta of 2.28, meaning that its stock price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares TechnipFMC and Schlumberger's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TechnipFMC-42.41%1.56%0.38%
Schlumberger-40.15%7.34%2.46%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.2% of Schlumberger shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Schlumberger shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares TechnipFMC and Schlumberger's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TechnipFMC$13.41 billion0.25$-2,415,200,000.00$0.7410.08
Schlumberger$32.92 billion1.16$-10,137,000,000.00$1.4718.58

TechnipFMC has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schlumberger. TechnipFMC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schlumberger, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for TechnipFMC and Schlumberger, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
TechnipFMC112902.36
Schlumberger261302.52

TechnipFMC currently has a consensus target price of $10.3393, indicating a potential upside of 38.60%. Schlumberger has a consensus target price of $24.68, indicating a potential downside of 9.73%. Given TechnipFMC's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than Schlumberger.

Summary

Schlumberger beats TechnipFMC on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Halliburton has a beta of 2.81, meaning that its share price is 181% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, meaning that its share price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

75.4% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Halliburton shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Halliburton and TechnipFMC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Halliburton-26.60%11.10%3.08%
TechnipFMC-42.41%1.56%0.38%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Halliburton and TechnipFMC, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Halliburton381022.48
TechnipFMC112902.36

Halliburton presently has a consensus price target of $18.1778, suggesting a potential downside of 16.08%. TechnipFMC has a consensus price target of $10.3393, suggesting a potential upside of 38.60%. Given TechnipFMC's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than Halliburton.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Halliburton and TechnipFMC's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Halliburton$22.41 billion0.86$-1,131,000,000.00$1.2417.47
TechnipFMC$13.41 billion0.25$-2,415,200,000.00$0.7410.08

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than TechnipFMC. TechnipFMC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Halliburton beats TechnipFMC on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

NOV (NYSE:NOV) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both mid-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Risk and Volatility

NOV has a beta of 2.22, indicating that its share price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, indicating that its share price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares NOV and TechnipFMC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
NOV-36.63%1.13%0.62%
TechnipFMC-42.41%1.56%0.38%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

94.5% of NOV shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of NOV shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares NOV and TechnipFMC's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NOV$8.48 billion0.63$-6,095,000,000.00($0.72)-19.17
TechnipFMC$13.41 billion0.25$-2,415,200,000.00$0.7410.08

TechnipFMC has higher revenue and earnings than NOV. NOV is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for NOV and TechnipFMC, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
NOV27802.35
TechnipFMC112902.36

NOV currently has a consensus target price of $13.8071, suggesting a potential downside of 0.02%. TechnipFMC has a consensus target price of $10.3393, suggesting a potential upside of 38.60%. Given TechnipFMC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than NOV.

Summary

TechnipFMC beats NOV on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) and RPC (NYSE:RES) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for TechnipFMC and RPC, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
TechnipFMC112902.36
RPC22101.80

TechnipFMC presently has a consensus price target of $10.3393, suggesting a potential upside of 38.60%. RPC has a consensus price target of $3.4583, suggesting a potential downside of 37.46%. Given TechnipFMC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than RPC.

Volatility & Risk

TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, suggesting that its share price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RPC has a beta of 2.13, suggesting that its share price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.7% of RPC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 73.6% of RPC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares TechnipFMC and RPC's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TechnipFMC$13.41 billion0.25$-2,415,200,000.00$0.7410.08
RPC$1.22 billion0.98$-87,110,000.00($0.12)-46.08

RPC has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TechnipFMC. RPC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares TechnipFMC and RPC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TechnipFMC-42.41%1.56%0.38%
RPC-32.86%-9.35%-7.44%

Summary

TechnipFMC beats RPC on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dril-Quip (NYSE:DRQ) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Dril-Quip and TechnipFMC's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dril-Quip$414.81 million2.64$1.72 million$0.08386.88
TechnipFMC$13.41 billion0.25$-2,415,200,000.00$0.7410.08

Dril-Quip has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TechnipFMC. TechnipFMC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dril-Quip, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Dril-Quip has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its share price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, suggesting that its share price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Dril-Quip and TechnipFMC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Dril-Quip-3.14%0.99%0.89%
TechnipFMC-42.41%1.56%0.38%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Dril-Quip shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Dril-Quip and TechnipFMC, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Dril-Quip16001.86
TechnipFMC112902.36

Dril-Quip presently has a consensus price target of $28.60, suggesting a potential downside of 7.59%. TechnipFMC has a consensus price target of $10.3393, suggesting a potential upside of 38.60%. Given TechnipFMC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than Dril-Quip.

Summary

TechnipFMC beats Dril-Quip on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Oceaneering International (NYSE:OII) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Risk & Volatility

Oceaneering International has a beta of 3.6, indicating that its stock price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, indicating that its stock price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

83.4% of Oceaneering International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Oceaneering International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Oceaneering International and TechnipFMC's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oceaneering International$2.05 billion0.55$-348,440,000.00($0.82)-13.79
TechnipFMC$13.41 billion0.25$-2,415,200,000.00$0.7410.08

Oceaneering International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TechnipFMC. Oceaneering International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Oceaneering International and TechnipFMC, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Oceaneering International04202.33
TechnipFMC112902.36

Oceaneering International currently has a consensus target price of $11.2571, suggesting a potential downside of 0.47%. TechnipFMC has a consensus target price of $10.3393, suggesting a potential upside of 38.60%. Given TechnipFMC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than Oceaneering International.

Profitability

This table compares Oceaneering International and TechnipFMC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Oceaneering International-37.40%-3.56%-1.14%
TechnipFMC-42.41%1.56%0.38%

Summary

TechnipFMC beats Oceaneering International on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


TechnipFMC Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Schlumberger logo
SLB
Schlumberger
2.3$27.31+4.7%$36.41 billion$32.92 billion-3.59Analyst Revision
Halliburton logo
HAL
Halliburton
2.2$21.66+4.5%$18.38 billion$22.41 billion-4.36Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
NOV logo
NOV
NOV
1.2$13.80+5.6%$5.06 billion$8.48 billion-2.05
RPC logo
RES
RPC
1.0$5.53+7.4%$1.10 billion$1.22 billion-5.17Gap Down
Dril-Quip logo
DRQ
Dril-Quip
0.6$30.95+4.5%$1.05 billion$414.81 million-93.79Gap Down
Oceaneering International logo
OII
Oceaneering International
1.0$11.31+7.3%$1.04 billion$2.05 billion-1.52Gap Down
Seacor logo
CKH
Seacor
1.4$41.41+0.2%$850.30 million$799.97 million79.64News Coverage
Helix Energy Solutions Group logo
HLX
Helix Energy Solutions Group
1.2$4.97+5.8%$705.35 million$751.91 million31.06Gap Down
Tidewater logo
TDW
Tidewater
0.9$12.40+6.9%$470.27 million$486.55 million-2.19Decrease in Short Interest
Matrix Service logo
MTRX
Matrix Service
1.1$13.60+1.8%$354.17 million$1.10 billion-8.55Gap Down
Oil States International logo
OIS
Oil States International
1.2$6.12+8.5%$343.20 million$1.02 billion-0.58Gap Down
TETRA Technologies logo
TTI
TETRA Technologies
1.2$2.70+5.2%$324.19 million$1.04 billion-2.31News Coverage
Newpark Resources logo
NR
Newpark Resources
1.1$3.47+5.8%$297.42 million$820.12 million-3.94Analyst Downgrade
RigNet logo
RNET
RigNet
0.8$8.66+0.1%$182.21 million$242.93 million-4.73
Natural Gas Services Group logo
NGS
Natural Gas Services Group
1.3$9.16+1.5%$122.73 million$78.44 million65.43
Geospace Technologies logo
GEOS
Geospace Technologies
0.7$8.40+2.1%$111.70 million$87.83 million-5.87News Coverage
Forum Energy Technologies logo
FET
Forum Energy Technologies
0.8$18.80+2.4%$102.76 million$956.50 million-1.38Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
Gulf Island Fabrication logo
GIFI
Gulf Island Fabrication
0.8$4.29+2.1%$65.17 million$303.31 million-1.41Increase in Short Interest
Gap Down
Dawson Geophysical logo
DWSN
Dawson Geophysical
0.7$2.51+2.0%$57.76 million$145.77 million-5.23News Coverage
ION Geophysical logo
IO
ION Geophysical
1.1$2.34+2.6%$43.10 million$174.68 million-0.86Increase in Short Interest
This page was last updated on 4/14/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.