TechnipFMC (FTI) Competitors

TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

TechnipFMC has higher revenue and earnings than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, TechnipFMC had 8 more articles in the media than Patterson-UTI Energy. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for TechnipFMC and 30 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy. TechnipFMC's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Patterson-UTI Energy's score of 0.84 indicating that TechnipFMC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

TechnipFMC currently has a consensus price target of $69.64, suggesting a potential upside of 0.53%. Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $12.85, suggesting a potential upside of 25.12%. Given Patterson-UTI Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

TechnipFMC has a net margin of 11.28% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -1.92%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 36.54% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. TechnipFMC pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -173.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TechnipFMC has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

TechnipFMC has higher revenue and earnings than Weatherford International. Weatherford International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

TechnipFMC presently has a consensus target price of $69.64, indicating a potential upside of 0.53%. Weatherford International has a consensus target price of $113.56, indicating a potential upside of 28.53%. Given Weatherford International's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Weatherford International is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

In the previous week, TechnipFMC had 26 more articles in the media than Weatherford International. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for TechnipFMC and 12 mentions for Weatherford International. TechnipFMC's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Weatherford International's score of 0.76 indicating that TechnipFMC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Weatherford International has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

TechnipFMC has a net margin of 11.28% compared to Weatherford International's net margin of 7.66%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 36.54% beat Weatherford International's return on equity.

TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Weatherford International pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. TechnipFMC pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Weatherford International pays out 21.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TechnipFMC has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.2% of Weatherford International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Weatherford International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

TechnipFMC has a net margin of 11.28% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 7.16%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 36.54% beat Halliburton's return on equity.

TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Halliburton shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. TechnipFMC pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Halliburton pays out 35.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TechnipFMC has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Halliburton has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Halliburton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Halliburton had 4 more articles in the media than TechnipFMC. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Halliburton and 38 mentions for TechnipFMC. Halliburton's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat TechnipFMC's score of 1.15 indicating that Halliburton is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

TechnipFMC currently has a consensus price target of $69.64, suggesting a potential upside of 0.53%. Halliburton has a consensus price target of $43.10, suggesting a potential upside of 35.10%. Given Halliburton's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Halliburton is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than TechnipFMC. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 24.40% compared to TechnipFMC's net margin of 11.28%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 36.54% beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity.

TechnipFMC presently has a consensus target price of $69.64, suggesting a potential upside of 0.53%. Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus target price of $31.50, suggesting a potential upside of 25.35%. Given Magnolia Oil & Gas' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Magnolia Oil & Gas is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

TechnipFMC has higher revenue and earnings than Magnolia Oil & Gas. Magnolia Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, TechnipFMC had 9 more articles in the media than Magnolia Oil & Gas. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for TechnipFMC and 29 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas. TechnipFMC's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.50 indicating that TechnipFMC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. TechnipFMC pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TechnipFMC has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Magnolia Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Magnolia Oil & Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.