TechnipFMC Competitors

TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) and Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, meaning that its stock price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schlumberger has a beta of 2.28, meaning that its stock price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares TechnipFMC and Schlumberger's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.2% of Schlumberger shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Schlumberger shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares TechnipFMC and Schlumberger's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

TechnipFMC has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schlumberger. TechnipFMC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schlumberger, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for TechnipFMC and Schlumberger, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

TechnipFMC currently has a consensus target price of $10.3393, indicating a potential upside of 38.60%. Schlumberger has a consensus target price of $24.68, indicating a potential downside of 9.73%. Given TechnipFMC's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than Schlumberger.

Summary

Schlumberger beats TechnipFMC on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Halliburton has a beta of 2.81, meaning that its share price is 181% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, meaning that its share price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

75.4% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Halliburton shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Halliburton and TechnipFMC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Halliburton and TechnipFMC, as reported by MarketBeat.

Halliburton presently has a consensus price target of $18.1778, suggesting a potential downside of 16.08%. TechnipFMC has a consensus price target of $10.3393, suggesting a potential upside of 38.60%. Given TechnipFMC's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than Halliburton.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Halliburton and TechnipFMC's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than TechnipFMC. TechnipFMC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Halliburton beats TechnipFMC on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

NOV (NYSE:NOV) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both mid-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Risk and Volatility

NOV has a beta of 2.22, indicating that its share price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, indicating that its share price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares NOV and TechnipFMC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

94.5% of NOV shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of NOV shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares NOV and TechnipFMC's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

TechnipFMC has higher revenue and earnings than NOV. NOV is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for NOV and TechnipFMC, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

NOV currently has a consensus target price of $13.8071, suggesting a potential downside of 0.02%. TechnipFMC has a consensus target price of $10.3393, suggesting a potential upside of 38.60%. Given TechnipFMC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than NOV.

Summary

TechnipFMC beats NOV on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) and RPC (NYSE:RES) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for TechnipFMC and RPC, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

TechnipFMC presently has a consensus price target of $10.3393, suggesting a potential upside of 38.60%. RPC has a consensus price target of $3.4583, suggesting a potential downside of 37.46%. Given TechnipFMC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than RPC.

Volatility & Risk

TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, suggesting that its share price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RPC has a beta of 2.13, suggesting that its share price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.7% of RPC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 73.6% of RPC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares TechnipFMC and RPC's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

RPC has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TechnipFMC. RPC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares TechnipFMC and RPC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

TechnipFMC beats RPC on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dril-Quip (NYSE:DRQ) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Dril-Quip and TechnipFMC's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Dril-Quip has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TechnipFMC. TechnipFMC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dril-Quip, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Dril-Quip has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its share price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, suggesting that its share price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Dril-Quip and TechnipFMC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Dril-Quip shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Dril-Quip and TechnipFMC, as provided by MarketBeat.

Dril-Quip presently has a consensus price target of $28.60, suggesting a potential downside of 7.59%. TechnipFMC has a consensus price target of $10.3393, suggesting a potential upside of 38.60%. Given TechnipFMC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than Dril-Quip.

Summary

TechnipFMC beats Dril-Quip on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Oceaneering International (NYSE:OII) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Risk & Volatility

Oceaneering International has a beta of 3.6, indicating that its stock price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, indicating that its stock price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

83.4% of Oceaneering International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Oceaneering International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Oceaneering International and TechnipFMC's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Oceaneering International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TechnipFMC. Oceaneering International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Oceaneering International and TechnipFMC, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Oceaneering International currently has a consensus target price of $11.2571, suggesting a potential downside of 0.47%. TechnipFMC has a consensus target price of $10.3393, suggesting a potential upside of 38.60%. Given TechnipFMC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than Oceaneering International.

Profitability

This table compares Oceaneering International and TechnipFMC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

TechnipFMC beats Oceaneering International on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.