Tidewater (TDW) Competitors

In the previous week, Borr Drilling had 1 more articles in the media than Tidewater. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Borr Drilling and 5 mentions for Tidewater. Borr Drilling's average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat Tidewater's score of 0.13 indicating that Borr Drilling is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Tidewater has higher revenue and earnings than Borr Drilling. Borr Drilling is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tidewater, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Tidewater has a net margin of 18.34% compared to Borr Drilling's net margin of -23.98%. Tidewater's return on equity of 5.36% beat Borr Drilling's return on equity.

95.1% of Tidewater shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.1% of Borr Drilling shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Tidewater shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.9% of Borr Drilling shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Tidewater has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Borr Drilling has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Tidewater currently has a consensus target price of $98.25, suggesting a potential upside of 16.57%. Borr Drilling has a consensus target price of $5.27, suggesting a potential upside of 26.75%. Given Borr Drilling's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Borr Drilling is more favorable than Tidewater.

In the previous week, Tidewater and Tidewater both had 5 articles in the media. Tidewater's average media sentiment score of 0.13 beat TechnipFMC's score of 0.00 indicating that Tidewater is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Tidewater currently has a consensus target price of $98.25, indicating a potential upside of 16.57%. TechnipFMC has a consensus target price of $72.08, indicating a potential upside of 2.40%. Given Tidewater's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Tidewater is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

TechnipFMC has higher revenue and earnings than Tidewater. Tidewater is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

95.1% of Tidewater shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Tidewater shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Tidewater has a net margin of 18.34% compared to TechnipFMC's net margin of 11.28%. TechnipFMC's return on equity of 36.54% beat Tidewater's return on equity.

Tidewater has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Tidewater pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. TechnipFMC pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Tidewater pays out 20.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TechnipFMC pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TechnipFMC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Tidewater has a net margin of 18.34% compared to Noble's net margin of 4.88%. Tidewater's return on equity of 5.36% beat Noble's return on equity.

Noble pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Tidewater pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Noble pays out 215.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Tidewater pays out 20.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Noble has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Tidewater has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

68.1% of Noble shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.1% of Tidewater shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Noble shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Tidewater shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Tidewater has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Noble. Tidewater is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Noble, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Noble had 1 more articles in the media than Tidewater. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Noble and 5 mentions for Tidewater. Noble's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Tidewater's score of 0.13 indicating that Noble is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Noble presently has a consensus price target of $45.29, indicating a potential upside of 6.35%. Tidewater has a consensus price target of $98.25, indicating a potential upside of 16.57%. Given Tidewater's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Tidewater is more favorable than Noble.

In the previous week, NOV had 12 more articles in the media than Tidewater. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for NOV and 5 mentions for Tidewater. NOV's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Tidewater's score of 0.13 indicating that NOV is being referred to more favorably in the media.

NOV has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tidewater has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

93.3% of NOV shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.1% of Tidewater shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of NOV shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Tidewater shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

NOV pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Tidewater pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. NOV pays out 138.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Tidewater pays out 20.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NOV has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. NOV is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

NOV presently has a consensus price target of $21.23, suggesting a potential upside of 8.68%. Tidewater has a consensus price target of $98.25, suggesting a potential upside of 16.57%. Given Tidewater's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Tidewater is more favorable than NOV.

Tidewater has a net margin of 18.34% compared to NOV's net margin of 1.10%. Tidewater's return on equity of 5.36% beat NOV's return on equity.

Tidewater has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NOV. Tidewater is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NOV, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.