Transocean (RIG) Competitors

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than Transocean. Transocean is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Transocean pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.6%. Halliburton pays out 35.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Transocean pays out -31.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Halliburton has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Transocean is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Halliburton has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Transocean's net margin of -40.24%. Halliburton's return on equity of 18.71% beat Transocean's return on equity.

Halliburton has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Transocean has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

85.2% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.7% of Transocean shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Halliburton shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.7% of Transocean shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Halliburton had 8 more articles in the media than Transocean. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Halliburton and 3 mentions for Transocean. Transocean's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Halliburton's score of 0.60 indicating that Transocean is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Halliburton presently has a consensus target price of $43.24, indicating a potential upside of 37.24%. Transocean has a consensus target price of $6.68, indicating a potential upside of 28.58%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Transocean.

Helmerich & Payne has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Transocean. Helmerich & Payne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Transocean, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Transocean presently has a consensus price target of $6.68, indicating a potential upside of 28.58%. Helmerich & Payne has a consensus price target of $43.10, indicating a potential upside of 17.72%. Given Transocean's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Transocean is more favorable than Helmerich & Payne.

Transocean pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.6%. Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Transocean pays out -31.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out -70.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Helmerich & Payne has a net margin of -3.43% compared to Transocean's net margin of -40.24%. Transocean's return on equity of 2.60% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity.

In the previous week, Transocean had 2 more articles in the media than Helmerich & Payne. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Transocean and 1 mentions for Helmerich & Payne. Transocean's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Helmerich & Payne's score of 1.21 indicating that Transocean is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Transocean has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

67.7% of Transocean shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by institutional investors. 9.7% of Transocean shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Transocean currently has a consensus target price of $6.68, suggesting a potential upside of 28.58%. Nabors Industries has a consensus target price of $102.57, suggesting a potential upside of 32.51%. Given Nabors Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Nabors Industries is more favorable than Transocean.

67.7% of Transocean shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.9% of Nabors Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.7% of Transocean shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of Nabors Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Transocean has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nabors Industries has a beta of 1, indicating that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

Nabors Industries has a net margin of 7.64% compared to Transocean's net margin of -40.24%. Transocean's return on equity of 2.60% beat Nabors Industries' return on equity.

In the previous week, Transocean had 2 more articles in the media than Nabors Industries. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Transocean and 1 mentions for Nabors Industries. Transocean's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Nabors Industries' score of 0.95 indicating that Transocean is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Nabors Industries has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Transocean. Transocean is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nabors Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Noble and Noble both had 3 articles in the media. Noble's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Transocean's score of 1.37 indicating that Noble is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Noble has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Transocean has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Noble has a net margin of 4.88% compared to Transocean's net margin of -40.24%. Transocean's return on equity of 2.60% beat Noble's return on equity.

Noble has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Transocean. Transocean is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Noble, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

68.1% of Noble shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.7% of Transocean shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Noble shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.7% of Transocean shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Noble pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Transocean pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.6%. Noble pays out 215.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Transocean pays out -31.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Transocean is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Noble currently has a consensus price target of $44.71, suggesting a potential upside of 6.79%. Transocean has a consensus price target of $6.68, suggesting a potential upside of 28.58%. Given Transocean's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Transocean is more favorable than Noble.