California Resources (CRC) Competitors

Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. California Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Devon Energy pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. California Resources pays out -31.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Devon Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and California Resources has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. California Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than California Resources. California Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Devon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 41 more articles in the media than California Resources. MarketBeat recorded 46 mentions for Devon Energy and 5 mentions for California Resources. California Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Devon Energy's score of 1.18 indicating that California Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Devon Energy has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, California Resources has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Devon Energy presently has a consensus price target of $58.44, indicating a potential upside of 36.41%. California Resources has a consensus price target of $73.50, indicating a potential upside of 30.60%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than California Resources.

69.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of California Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of California Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 13.71% compared to California Resources' net margin of -16.10%. Devon Energy's return on equity of 15.22% beat California Resources' return on equity.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 24.40% compared to California Resources' net margin of -16.10%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 16.28% beat California Resources' return on equity.

California Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Magnolia Oil & Gas. California Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of California Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of California Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. California Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. California Resources pays out -31.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and California Resources has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. California Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Magnolia Oil & Gas currently has a consensus price target of $31.42, suggesting a potential upside of 16.04%. California Resources has a consensus price target of $73.50, suggesting a potential upside of 30.60%. Given California Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe California Resources is more favorable than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

In the previous week, Magnolia Oil & Gas had 1 more articles in the media than California Resources. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas and 5 mentions for California Resources. California Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 1.10 indicating that California Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, California Resources has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

California Resources has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matador Resources has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

California Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. California Resources pays out -31.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. California Resources has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Matador Resources has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Matador Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

California Resources currently has a consensus price target of $73.50, suggesting a potential upside of 30.60%. Matador Resources has a consensus price target of $65.08, suggesting a potential upside of 27.25%. Given California Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe California Resources is more favorable than Matador Resources.

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 17 more articles in the media than California Resources. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Matador Resources and 5 mentions for California Resources. Matador Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat California Resources' score of 1.20 indicating that Matador Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Matador Resources has higher revenue and earnings than California Resources. California Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matador Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 14.41% compared to California Resources' net margin of -16.10%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 11.20% beat California Resources' return on equity.

97.8% of California Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of California Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

California Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Murphy Oil pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. California Resources pays out -31.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Murphy Oil pays out 237.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. California Resources has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Murphy Oil has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Murphy Oil is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

97.8% of California Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.3% of Murphy Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of California Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Murphy Oil shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

California Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Murphy Oil. California Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Murphy Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

California Resources currently has a consensus target price of $73.50, indicating a potential upside of 30.60%. Murphy Oil has a consensus target price of $37.75, indicating a potential upside of 5.07%. Given California Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe California Resources is more favorable than Murphy Oil.

Murphy Oil has a net margin of 3.02% compared to California Resources' net margin of -16.10%. California Resources' return on equity of 10.12% beat Murphy Oil's return on equity.

In the previous week, California Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Murphy Oil. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for California Resources and 2 mentions for Murphy Oil. California Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Murphy Oil's score of 0.65 indicating that California Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

California Resources has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Murphy Oil has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.