California Resources (CRC) Competitors

California Resources currently has a consensus price target of $74.10, suggesting a potential upside of 41.19%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $226.33, suggesting a potential upside of 21.25%. Given California Resources' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe California Resources is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

California Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. California Resources pays out -119.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. California Resources has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. California Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

97.8% of California Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of California Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than California Resources. California Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

California Resources has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 5 more articles in the media than California Resources. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 6 mentions for California Resources. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat California Resources' score of 0.47 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 8.58% compared to California Resources' net margin of -3.79%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 10.10% beat California Resources' return on equity.

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 10 more articles in the media than California Resources. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Devon Energy and 6 mentions for California Resources. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat California Resources' score of 0.47 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 16.67% compared to California Resources' net margin of -3.79%. Devon Energy's return on equity of 14.93% beat California Resources' return on equity.

California Resources presently has a consensus target price of $74.10, indicating a potential upside of 41.19%. Devon Energy has a consensus target price of $59.76, indicating a potential upside of 26.89%. Given California Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe California Resources is more favorable than Devon Energy.

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than California Resources. California Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Devon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

California Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. California Resources pays out -119.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. California Resources has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Devon Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. California Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

California Resources has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Devon Energy has a beta of 0.37, suggesting that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

97.8% of California Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of Devon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of California Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

California Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Magnolia Oil & Gas. California Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. California Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. California Resources pays out -119.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and California Resources has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. California Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, California Resources has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of California Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of California Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Magnolia Oil & Gas had 6 more articles in the media than California Resources. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas and 6 mentions for California Resources. California Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.42 indicating that California Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 28.77% compared to California Resources' net margin of -3.79%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 21.04% beat California Resources' return on equity.

Magnolia Oil & Gas currently has a consensus price target of $31.81, suggesting a potential upside of 31.96%. California Resources has a consensus price target of $74.10, suggesting a potential upside of 41.19%. Given California Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe California Resources is more favorable than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

92.0% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of California Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of California Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 19.85% compared to California Resources' net margin of -3.79%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 13.18% beat California Resources' return on equity.

Matador Resources has higher revenue and earnings than California Resources. California Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matador Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. California Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Matador Resources pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. California Resources pays out -119.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matador Resources has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and California Resources has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. California Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Matador Resources has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, California Resources has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Matador Resources and Matador Resources both had 6 articles in the media. California Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Matador Resources' score of 0.36 indicating that California Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Matador Resources currently has a consensus price target of $66.80, indicating a potential upside of 29.72%. California Resources has a consensus price target of $74.10, indicating a potential upside of 41.19%. Given California Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe California Resources is more favorable than Matador Resources.