California Resources (CRC) Competitors

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 8.58% compared to California Resources' net margin of -3.79%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 10.10% beat California Resources' return on equity.

In the previous week, California Resources had 10 more articles in the media than Diamondback Energy. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for California Resources and 18 mentions for Diamondback Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat California Resources' score of 0.29 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

97.8% of California Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of California Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

California Resources has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

California Resources presently has a consensus price target of $72.55, indicating a potential upside of 36.09%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $222.30, indicating a potential upside of 9.79%. Given California Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe California Resources is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

California Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. California Resources pays out -119.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. California Resources has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. California Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than California Resources. California Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. California Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Devon Energy pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. California Resources pays out -119.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Devon Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and California Resources has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. California Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 25 more articles in the media than California Resources. MarketBeat recorded 53 mentions for Devon Energy and 28 mentions for California Resources. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat California Resources' score of 0.29 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Devon Energy currently has a consensus price target of $59.60, indicating a potential upside of 30.06%. California Resources has a consensus price target of $72.55, indicating a potential upside of 36.09%. Given California Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe California Resources is more favorable than Devon Energy.

Devon Energy has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, California Resources has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

69.7% of Devon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of California Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of California Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 16.67% compared to California Resources' net margin of -3.79%. Devon Energy's return on equity of 14.93% beat California Resources' return on equity.

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than California Resources. California Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Devon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

California Resources currently has a consensus target price of $72.55, indicating a potential upside of 36.09%. Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus target price of $31.58, indicating a potential upside of 20.34%. Given California Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe California Resources is more favorable than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

California Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Magnolia Oil & Gas. California Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, California Resources had 13 more articles in the media than Magnolia Oil & Gas. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for California Resources and 15 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas. Magnolia Oil & Gas' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat California Resources' score of 0.29 indicating that Magnolia Oil & Gas is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

97.8% of California Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of California Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

California Resources has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 28.77% compared to California Resources' net margin of -3.79%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 21.04% beat California Resources' return on equity.

California Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. California Resources pays out -119.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. California Resources has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Magnolia Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. California Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

97.8% of California Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of California Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

California Resources currently has a consensus price target of $72.55, indicating a potential upside of 36.09%. Matador Resources has a consensus price target of $66.07, indicating a potential upside of 23.25%. Given California Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe California Resources is more favorable than Matador Resources.

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 10 more articles in the media than California Resources. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Matador Resources and 28 mentions for California Resources. Matador Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat California Resources' score of 0.29 indicating that Matador Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

California Resources has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matador Resources has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

California Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. California Resources pays out -119.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. California Resources has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Matador Resources has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. California Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 19.85% compared to California Resources' net margin of -3.79%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 13.18% beat California Resources' return on equity.

Matador Resources has higher revenue and earnings than California Resources. California Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matador Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.