California Resources (CRC) Competitors

Devon Energy has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, California Resources has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 15.37% compared to California Resources' net margin of 9.89%. Devon Energy's return on equity of 16.28% beat California Resources' return on equity.

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 43 more articles in the media than California Resources. MarketBeat recorded 53 mentions for Devon Energy and 10 mentions for California Resources. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat California Resources' score of 0.42 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than California Resources. Devon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than California Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. California Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Devon Energy pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. California Resources pays out 39.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Devon Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and California Resources has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

69.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of California Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of California Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Devon Energy presently has a consensus price target of $55.59, indicating a potential upside of 14.49%. California Resources has a consensus price target of $71.20, indicating a potential upside of 6.97%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than California Resources.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 24.79% compared to California Resources' net margin of 9.89%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 16.67% beat California Resources' return on equity.

In the previous week, Magnolia Oil & Gas had 11 more articles in the media than California Resources. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas and 10 mentions for California Resources. Magnolia Oil & Gas' average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat California Resources' score of 0.42 indicating that Magnolia Oil & Gas is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

California Resources has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the S&P 500.

California Resources currently has a consensus price target of $71.20, indicating a potential upside of 6.97%. Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $31.08, indicating a potential upside of 4.68%. Given California Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe California Resources is more favorable than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

California Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Magnolia Oil & Gas. California Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

97.8% of California Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of California Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

California Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. California Resources pays out 39.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. California Resources has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Magnolia Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 20.54% compared to California Resources' net margin of 9.89%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 12.36% beat California Resources' return on equity.

In the previous week, California Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Matador Resources. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for California Resources and 8 mentions for Matador Resources. Matador Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat California Resources' score of 0.42 indicating that Matador Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Matador Resources has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its share price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, California Resources has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Matador Resources currently has a consensus price target of $62.62, indicating a potential upside of 4.33%. California Resources has a consensus price target of $71.20, indicating a potential upside of 6.97%. Given California Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe California Resources is more favorable than Matador Resources.

Matador Resources has higher revenue and earnings than California Resources. Matador Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than California Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

92.0% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of California Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 5.8% of Matador Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of California Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. California Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Matador Resources pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. California Resources pays out 39.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matador Resources has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and California Resources has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Matador Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Murphy Oil has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, California Resources has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Murphy Oil had 12 more articles in the media than California Resources. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Murphy Oil and 10 mentions for California Resources. Murphy Oil's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat California Resources' score of 0.42 indicating that Murphy Oil is being referred to more favorably in the media.

California Resources has a net margin of 9.89% compared to Murphy Oil's net margin of 3.83%. California Resources' return on equity of 10.23% beat Murphy Oil's return on equity.

California Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Murphy Oil. California Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Murphy Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Murphy Oil pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. California Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Murphy Oil pays out 194.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. California Resources pays out 39.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Murphy Oil has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and California Resources has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Murphy Oil is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Murphy Oil presently has a consensus price target of $33.27, indicating a potential downside of 16.75%. California Resources has a consensus price target of $71.20, indicating a potential upside of 6.97%. Given California Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe California Resources is more favorable than Murphy Oil.

78.3% of Murphy Oil shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of California Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 5.8% of Murphy Oil shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of California Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.