Chord Energy (CHRD) Competitors

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chord Energy has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Chord Energy. Chord Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Diamondback Energy currently has a consensus target price of $219.25, suggesting a potential upside of 9.53%. Chord Energy has a consensus target price of $156.69, suggesting a potential upside of 9.46%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than Chord Energy.

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Diamondback Energy pays out 511.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chord Energy pays out -460.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Chord Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Chord Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 1.87% compared to Chord Energy's net margin of -1.25%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 7.76% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 28 more articles in the media than Chord Energy. MarketBeat recorded 48 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 20 mentions for Chord Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Chord Energy's score of 0.94 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Chord Energy presently has a consensus target price of $156.69, indicating a potential upside of 9.46%. Devon Energy has a consensus target price of $57.30, indicating a potential upside of 21.20%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than Chord Energy.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 13.71% compared to Chord Energy's net margin of -1.25%. Devon Energy's return on equity of 15.22% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Chord Energy pays out -460.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chord Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Devon Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Chord Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Chord Energy has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Devon Energy has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

97.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of Devon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Devon Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Chord Energy. Chord Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Devon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 51 more articles in the media than Chord Energy. MarketBeat recorded 71 mentions for Devon Energy and 20 mentions for Chord Energy. Chord Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Devon Energy's score of 0.83 indicating that Chord Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chord Energy pays out -460.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Chord Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Chord Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 24.40% compared to Chord Energy's net margin of -1.25%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 16.28% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

Magnolia Oil & Gas currently has a consensus price target of $31.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.41%. Chord Energy has a consensus price target of $156.69, indicating a potential upside of 9.46%. Given Chord Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Chord Energy is more favorable than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chord Energy. Chord Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Chord Energy had 8 more articles in the media than Magnolia Oil & Gas. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Chord Energy and 12 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas. Chord Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.69 indicating that Chord Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chord Energy has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

92.0% of Matador Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Matador Resources has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chord Energy has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Matador Resources presently has a consensus target price of $65.23, indicating a potential upside of 15.39%. Chord Energy has a consensus target price of $156.69, indicating a potential upside of 9.46%. Given Matador Resources' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Matador Resources is more favorable than Chord Energy.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 14.41% compared to Chord Energy's net margin of -1.25%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 11.20% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chord Energy pays out -460.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matador Resources has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Chord Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Chord Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Matador Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chord Energy. Chord Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matador Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Chord Energy. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Matador Resources and 20 mentions for Chord Energy. Chord Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Matador Resources' score of 0.54 indicating that Chord Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.