Chord Energy (CHRD) Competitors

Diamondback Energy currently has a consensus price target of $226.33, suggesting a potential upside of 17.62%. Chord Energy has a consensus price target of $165.92, suggesting a potential upside of 14.83%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than Chord Energy.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 24 more articles in the media than Chord Energy. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 14 mentions for Chord Energy. Chord Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Diamondback Energy's score of 0.74 indicating that Chord Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chord Energy has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Chord Energy. Chord Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Chord Energy has a net margin of 13.42% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 8.58%. Chord Energy's return on equity of 10.18% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chord Energy pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Chord Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Chord Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

97.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 7 more articles in the media than Chord Energy. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Devon Energy and 14 mentions for Chord Energy. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat Chord Energy's score of 0.85 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Chord Energy. Chord Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Devon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 16.67% compared to Chord Energy's net margin of 13.42%. Devon Energy's return on equity of 14.93% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Chord Energy pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chord Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Devon Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Chord Energy has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Devon Energy has a beta of 0.37, suggesting that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

Chord Energy presently has a consensus price target of $165.92, indicating a potential upside of 14.83%. Devon Energy has a consensus price target of $59.76, indicating a potential upside of 23.09%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than Chord Energy.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 28.77% compared to Chord Energy's net margin of 13.42%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 21.04% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

Magnolia Oil & Gas presently has a consensus target price of $31.71, suggesting a potential upside of 26.25%. Chord Energy has a consensus target price of $165.92, suggesting a potential upside of 14.83%. Given Magnolia Oil & Gas' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Magnolia Oil & Gas is more favorable than Chord Energy.

94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chord Energy has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chord Energy. Chord Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Chord Energy had 9 more articles in the media than Magnolia Oil & Gas. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Chord Energy and 5 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas. Magnolia Oil & Gas' average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Chord Energy's score of 0.85 indicating that Magnolia Oil & Gas is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chord Energy pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Chord Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Matador Resources pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chord Energy pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matador Resources has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Chord Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 19.85% compared to Chord Energy's net margin of 13.42%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 13.18% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

Matador Resources has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chord Energy has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Matador Resources presently has a consensus target price of $66.80, suggesting a potential upside of 17.54%. Chord Energy has a consensus target price of $165.92, suggesting a potential upside of 14.83%. Given Matador Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Matador Resources is more favorable than Chord Energy.

92.0% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Matador Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chord Energy. Chord Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matador Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Chord Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Matador Resources. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Chord Energy and 12 mentions for Matador Resources. Chord Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Matador Resources' score of 0.68 indicating that Chord Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.