Matador Resources (MTDR) Competitors

Diamondback Energy presently has a consensus price target of $219.53, suggesting a potential upside of 15.46%. Matador Resources has a consensus price target of $64.08, suggesting a potential upside of 20.85%. Given Matador Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Matador Resources is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Matador Resources. Matador Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 14.41% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 1.87%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 11.20% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matador Resources has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Diamondback Energy pays out 511.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Matador Resources has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Matador Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Diamondback Energy. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Matador Resources and 17 mentions for Diamondback Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Matador Resources' score of -0.16 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Matador Resources presently has a consensus price target of $64.08, indicating a potential upside of 20.85%. Devon Energy has a consensus price target of $59.32, indicating a potential upside of 37.84%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than Matador Resources.

92.0% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of Devon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Matador Resources has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Devon Energy has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Devon Energy. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Matador Resources and 16 mentions for Devon Energy. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Matador Resources' score of -0.16 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Matador Resources. Devon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matador Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 35.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matador Resources has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Devon Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Devon Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 14.41% compared to Devon Energy's net margin of 13.71%. Devon Energy's return on equity of 15.22% beat Matador Resources' return on equity.

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 9 more articles in the media than Liberty Energy. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Matador Resources and 9 mentions for Liberty Energy. Liberty Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Matador Resources' score of -0.16 indicating that Liberty Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Matador Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Liberty Energy. Matador Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Liberty Energy pays out 39.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Liberty Energy has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Matador Resources has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Matador Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matador Resources has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Matador Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 14.41% compared to Liberty Energy's net margin of 3.71%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 11.20% beat Liberty Energy's return on equity.

Liberty Energy currently has a consensus target price of $32.09, suggesting a potential upside of 37.04%. Matador Resources has a consensus target price of $64.08, suggesting a potential upside of 20.85%. Given Liberty Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Liberty Energy is more favorable than Matador Resources.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matador Resources has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 12 more articles in the media than Magnolia Oil & Gas. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Matador Resources and 6 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas. Magnolia Oil & Gas' average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Matador Resources' score of -0.16 indicating that Magnolia Oil & Gas is being referred to more favorably in the media.

94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Matador Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Magnolia Oil & Gas currently has a consensus price target of $31.08, indicating a potential upside of 15.65%. Matador Resources has a consensus price target of $64.08, indicating a potential upside of 20.85%. Given Matador Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Matador Resources is more favorable than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Matador Resources has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Matador Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Matador Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Magnolia Oil & Gas. Matador Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 24.40% compared to Matador Resources' net margin of 14.41%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 16.28% beat Matador Resources' return on equity.