Liberty Energy (LBRT) Competitors

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than Liberty Energy. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Halliburton shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Halliburton has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Liberty Energy's net margin of 3.71%. Halliburton's return on equity of 19.04% beat Liberty Energy's return on equity.

In the previous week, Halliburton had 15 more articles in the media than Liberty Energy. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Halliburton and 10 mentions for Liberty Energy. Halliburton's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Liberty Energy's score of 0.68 indicating that Halliburton is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Liberty Energy pays out 39.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Halliburton pays out 37.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Liberty Energy has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Halliburton has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Halliburton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Liberty Energy currently has a consensus price target of $30.50, indicating a potential downside of 2.04%. Halliburton has a consensus price target of $43.27, indicating a potential upside of 5.31%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Liberty Energy.

98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Liberty Energy currently has a consensus target price of $30.50, indicating a potential downside of 2.04%. Helmerich & Payne has a consensus target price of $40.60, indicating a potential upside of 5.49%. Given Helmerich & Payne's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Helmerich & Payne is more favorable than Liberty Energy.

Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Liberty Energy pays out 39.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out -26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Liberty Energy has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Helmerich & Payne is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Liberty Energy has a net margin of 3.71% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of -9.38%. Liberty Energy's return on equity of 1.41% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity.

In the previous week, Liberty Energy had 9 more articles in the media than Helmerich & Payne. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Liberty Energy and 1 mentions for Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Liberty Energy's score of 0.68 indicating that Helmerich & Payne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Liberty Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Liberty Energy presently has a consensus price target of $30.50, indicating a potential downside of 2.04%. Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $31.42, indicating a potential upside of 12.15%. Given Magnolia Oil & Gas' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Magnolia Oil & Gas is more favorable than Liberty Energy.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Liberty Energy. Magnolia Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Liberty Energy pays out 39.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Liberty Energy has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Magnolia Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Magnolia Oil & Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 24.40% compared to Liberty Energy's net margin of 3.71%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 16.28% beat Liberty Energy's return on equity.

In the previous week, Liberty Energy had 6 more articles in the media than Magnolia Oil & Gas. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Liberty Energy and 4 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas. Liberty Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.67 indicating that Liberty Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Matador Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Liberty Energy. Matador Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Matador Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matador Resources has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Liberty Energy pays out 39.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Liberty Energy has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Matador Resources has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Matador Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 11 more articles in the media than Liberty Energy. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Matador Resources and 10 mentions for Liberty Energy. Matador Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Liberty Energy's score of 0.68 indicating that Matador Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Liberty Energy presently has a consensus target price of $30.50, indicating a potential downside of 2.04%. Matador Resources has a consensus target price of $65.08, indicating a potential upside of 14.93%. Given Matador Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Matador Resources is more favorable than Liberty Energy.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 14.41% compared to Liberty Energy's net margin of 3.71%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 11.20% beat Liberty Energy's return on equity.