Liberty Energy (LBRT) Competitors

Halliburton presently has a consensus target price of $43.27, suggesting a potential upside of 23.25%. Liberty Energy has a consensus target price of $32.18, suggesting a potential upside of 18.80%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Liberty Energy.

Halliburton has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Halliburton had 12 more articles in the media than Liberty Energy. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Halliburton and 6 mentions for Liberty Energy. Liberty Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat Halliburton's score of 1.11 indicating that Liberty Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Halliburton pays out 37.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Liberty Energy pays out 39.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Halliburton has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Liberty Energy has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Halliburton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than Liberty Energy. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

85.2% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Halliburton shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Halliburton has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Liberty Energy's net margin of 3.71%. Halliburton's return on equity of 19.04% beat Liberty Energy's return on equity.

Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Liberty Energy pays out 39.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out -26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Liberty Energy has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Helmerich & Payne is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Liberty Energy has a net margin of 3.71% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of -9.38%. Liberty Energy's return on equity of 1.41% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity.

Liberty Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Liberty Energy presently has a consensus price target of $32.18, indicating a potential upside of 18.80%. Helmerich & Payne has a consensus price target of $40.60, indicating a potential upside of 13.92%. Given Liberty Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Liberty Energy is more favorable than Helmerich & Payne.

In the previous week, Helmerich & Payne had 6 more articles in the media than Liberty Energy. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Helmerich & Payne and 6 mentions for Liberty Energy. Liberty Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat Helmerich & Payne's score of 1.36 indicating that Liberty Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 24.40% compared to Liberty Energy's net margin of 3.71%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 16.28% beat Liberty Energy's return on equity.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Liberty Energy. Magnolia Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Magnolia Oil & Gas had 5 more articles in the media than Liberty Energy. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas and 6 mentions for Liberty Energy. Liberty Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.97 indicating that Liberty Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Liberty Energy pays out 39.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Liberty Energy has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Magnolia Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Magnolia Oil & Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Liberty Energy currently has a consensus target price of $32.18, suggesting a potential upside of 18.80%. Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus target price of $31.33, suggesting a potential upside of 16.74%. Given Liberty Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Liberty Energy is more favorable than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 14.41% compared to Liberty Energy's net margin of 3.71%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 11.20% beat Liberty Energy's return on equity.

Matador Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Liberty Energy. Matador Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Liberty Energy presently has a consensus price target of $32.18, indicating a potential upside of 18.80%. Matador Resources has a consensus price target of $65.08, indicating a potential upside of 29.02%. Given Matador Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Matador Resources is more favorable than Liberty Energy.

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Liberty Energy. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Matador Resources and 6 mentions for Liberty Energy. Liberty Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat Matador Resources' score of 1.39 indicating that Liberty Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matador Resources has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Liberty Energy pays out 39.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Liberty Energy has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Matador Resources has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Matador Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.