Liberty Energy (LBRT) Competitors

Halliburton has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Liberty Energy's net margin of 3.71%. Halliburton's return on equity of 19.04% beat Liberty Energy's return on equity.

Halliburton presently has a consensus price target of $42.05, suggesting a potential upside of 1.98%. Liberty Energy has a consensus price target of $30.42, suggesting a potential downside of 8.73%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Liberty Energy.

85.2% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Halliburton shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Halliburton has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than Liberty Energy. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Halliburton had 17 more articles in the media than Liberty Energy. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Halliburton and 11 mentions for Liberty Energy. Halliburton's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Liberty Energy's score of 1.11 indicating that Halliburton is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Halliburton pays out 37.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Liberty Energy pays out 39.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Halliburton has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Liberty Energy has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Halliburton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Liberty Energy has a net margin of 3.71% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of -9.38%. Liberty Energy's return on equity of 1.41% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity.

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Helmerich & Payne presently has a consensus price target of $39.50, suggesting a potential upside of 0.42%. Liberty Energy has a consensus price target of $30.42, suggesting a potential downside of 8.73%. Given Helmerich & Payne's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Helmerich & Payne is more favorable than Liberty Energy.

Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Helmerich & Payne pays out -26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Liberty Energy pays out 39.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Liberty Energy has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Helmerich & Payne is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

96.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Liberty Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Helmerich & Payne had 8 more articles in the media than Liberty Energy. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Helmerich & Payne and 11 mentions for Liberty Energy. Liberty Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Helmerich & Payne's score of 0.70 indicating that Liberty Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 24.40% compared to Liberty Energy's net margin of 3.71%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 16.28% beat Liberty Energy's return on equity.

Magnolia Oil & Gas presently has a consensus price target of $31.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.63%. Liberty Energy has a consensus price target of $30.42, suggesting a potential downside of 8.73%. Given Magnolia Oil & Gas' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Magnolia Oil & Gas is more favorable than Liberty Energy.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Liberty Energy. Magnolia Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Liberty Energy had 6 more articles in the media than Magnolia Oil & Gas. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Liberty Energy and 5 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas. Liberty Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.62 indicating that Liberty Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Liberty Energy pays out 39.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Liberty Energy has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Magnolia Oil & Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 14.41% compared to Liberty Energy's net margin of 3.71%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 11.20% beat Liberty Energy's return on equity.

Liberty Energy currently has a consensus price target of $30.42, indicating a potential downside of 8.73%. Matador Resources has a consensus price target of $63.46, indicating a potential upside of 9.58%. Given Matador Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Matador Resources is more favorable than Liberty Energy.

Matador Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Liberty Energy. Matador Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matador Resources has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Liberty Energy. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Matador Resources and 11 mentions for Liberty Energy. Liberty Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Matador Resources' score of 0.60 indicating that Liberty Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Liberty Energy pays out 39.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Liberty Energy has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Matador Resources has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Matador Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.