Liberty Energy (LBRT) Competitors

Patterson-UTI Energy presently has a consensus target price of $13.25, suggesting a potential upside of 3.11%. Liberty Energy has a consensus target price of $30.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.97%. Given Liberty Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Liberty Energy is more favorable than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Liberty Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Liberty Energy has a net margin of 2.92% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -1.92%. Liberty Energy's return on equity of 1.14% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 7 more articles in the media than Liberty Energy. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 12 mentions for Liberty Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Liberty Energy's score of 0.39 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -173.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Liberty Energy pays out 48.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Liberty Energy has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Liberty Energy pays out 48.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Halliburton pays out 35.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Liberty Energy has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Halliburton has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Halliburton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Liberty Energy currently has a consensus target price of $30.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.97%. Halliburton has a consensus target price of $43.10, suggesting a potential upside of 20.12%. Given Liberty Energy's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Liberty Energy is more favorable than Halliburton.

98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Halliburton shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Halliburton has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Liberty Energy's net margin of 2.92%. Halliburton's return on equity of 18.71% beat Liberty Energy's return on equity.

In the previous week, Halliburton had 3 more articles in the media than Liberty Energy. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Halliburton and 12 mentions for Liberty Energy. Halliburton's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Liberty Energy's score of 0.39 indicating that Halliburton is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than Liberty Energy. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

96.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.4% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Liberty Energy had 8 more articles in the media than Helmerich & Payne. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Liberty Energy and 4 mentions for Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Liberty Energy's score of 0.39 indicating that Helmerich & Payne is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Helmerich & Payne currently has a consensus target price of $43.10, indicating a potential downside of 2.41%. Liberty Energy has a consensus target price of $30.00, indicating a potential upside of 42.97%. Given Liberty Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Liberty Energy is more favorable than Helmerich & Payne.

Liberty Energy has a net margin of 2.92% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of -3.43%. Liberty Energy's return on equity of 1.14% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity.

Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Helmerich & Payne pays out -70.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Liberty Energy pays out 48.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Liberty Energy has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Helmerich & Payne is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Liberty Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Liberty Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Matador Resources. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Liberty Energy and 11 mentions for Matador Resources. Matador Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Liberty Energy's score of 0.39 indicating that Matador Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matador Resources has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Matador Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 19.85% compared to Liberty Energy's net margin of 2.92%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 13.18% beat Liberty Energy's return on equity.

Matador Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Liberty Energy. Matador Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Liberty Energy pays out 48.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Liberty Energy has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Matador Resources has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Matador Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Liberty Energy presently has a consensus price target of $30.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.97%. Matador Resources has a consensus price target of $65.93, suggesting a potential upside of 7.92%. Given Liberty Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Liberty Energy is more favorable than Matador Resources.