Liberty Energy (LBRT) Competitors

Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Liberty Energy pays out 48.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Halliburton pays out 35.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Liberty Energy has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Halliburton has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Halliburton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Halliburton shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Halliburton had 24 more articles in the media than Liberty Energy. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Halliburton and 18 mentions for Liberty Energy. Liberty Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Halliburton's score of 1.23 indicating that Liberty Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than Liberty Energy. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Liberty Energy presently has a consensus target price of $31.09, suggesting a potential upside of 65.08%. Halliburton has a consensus target price of $43.10, suggesting a potential upside of 35.80%. Given Liberty Energy's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Liberty Energy is more favorable than Halliburton.

Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Halliburton has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Liberty Energy's net margin of 2.92%. Halliburton's return on equity of 18.71% beat Liberty Energy's return on equity.

Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Liberty Energy pays out 48.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out -26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Liberty Energy has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Helmerich & Payne is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Liberty Energy has a net margin of 2.92% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of -9.38%. Liberty Energy's return on equity of 1.14% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity.

In the previous week, Liberty Energy had 13 more articles in the media than Helmerich & Payne. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Liberty Energy and 5 mentions for Helmerich & Payne. Liberty Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Helmerich & Payne's score of 1.04 indicating that Liberty Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Liberty Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Liberty Energy currently has a consensus price target of $31.09, indicating a potential upside of 65.08%. Helmerich & Payne has a consensus price target of $39.80, indicating a potential upside of 17.52%. Given Liberty Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Liberty Energy is more favorable than Helmerich & Payne.

98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 24.40% compared to Liberty Energy's net margin of 2.92%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 16.28% beat Liberty Energy's return on equity.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Liberty Energy. Magnolia Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Magnolia Oil & Gas presently has a consensus price target of $31.50, indicating a potential upside of 25.87%. Liberty Energy has a consensus price target of $31.09, indicating a potential upside of 65.08%. Given Liberty Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Liberty Energy is more favorable than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Magnolia Oil & Gas had 11 more articles in the media than Liberty Energy. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas and 18 mentions for Liberty Energy. Liberty Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.50 indicating that Liberty Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Liberty Energy pays out 48.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Liberty Energy has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Magnolia Oil & Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 14.41% compared to Liberty Energy's net margin of 2.92%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 11.20% beat Liberty Energy's return on equity.

Matador Resources presently has a consensus target price of $66.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.42%. Liberty Energy has a consensus target price of $31.09, suggesting a potential upside of 65.08%. Given Liberty Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Liberty Energy is more favorable than Matador Resources.

In the previous week, Liberty Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Matador Resources. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Liberty Energy and 14 mentions for Matador Resources. Liberty Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Matador Resources' score of 0.76 indicating that Liberty Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Liberty Energy pays out 48.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matador Resources has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Liberty Energy has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Matador Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

92.0% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Matador Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Liberty Energy. Matador Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Matador Resources has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.