Helmerich & Payne (HP) Competitors

Patterson-UTI Energy has a net margin of -1.92% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of -3.43%. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -1.68% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity.

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 5 more articles in the media than Helmerich & Payne. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 11 mentions for Helmerich & Payne. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Helmerich & Payne's score of 0.66 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Patterson-UTI Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Helmerich & Payne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Helmerich & Payne currently has a consensus price target of $40.50, indicating a potential downside of 8.30%. Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $12.95, indicating a potential upside of 13.90%. Given Patterson-UTI Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more favorable than Helmerich & Payne.

96.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Helmerich & Payne pays out -70.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -173.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Helmerich & Payne pays out -70.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ConocoPhillips pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.11, suggesting that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the broader market.

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of -3.43%. ConocoPhillips' return on equity of 14.72% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity.

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 25 more articles in the media than Helmerich & Payne. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 11 mentions for Helmerich & Payne. ConocoPhillips' average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Helmerich & Payne's score of 0.66 indicating that ConocoPhillips is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Helmerich & Payne presently has a consensus target price of $40.50, indicating a potential downside of 8.30%. ConocoPhillips has a consensus target price of $137.68, indicating a potential upside of 8.70%. Given ConocoPhillips' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than Helmerich & Payne.

96.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Halliburton pays out 35.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out -70.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Halliburton has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Helmerich & Payne is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Halliburton has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

85.2% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Halliburton shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Helmerich & Payne had 1 more articles in the media than Halliburton. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Helmerich & Payne and 10 mentions for Halliburton. Helmerich & Payne's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Halliburton's score of 0.40 indicating that Helmerich & Payne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Halliburton has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of -3.43%. Halliburton's return on equity of 18.71% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Halliburton currently has a consensus target price of $43.10, suggesting a potential upside of 25.12%. Helmerich & Payne has a consensus target price of $40.50, suggesting a potential downside of 8.30%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Helmerich & Payne.

In the previous week, Magnolia Oil & Gas had 7 more articles in the media than Helmerich & Payne. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas and 11 mentions for Helmerich & Payne. Magnolia Oil & Gas' average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Helmerich & Payne's score of 0.66 indicating that Magnolia Oil & Gas is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

96.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.4% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Helmerich & Payne pays out -70.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Magnolia Oil & Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 28.77% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of -3.43%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 21.04% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity.

Helmerich & Payne presently has a consensus target price of $40.50, suggesting a potential downside of 8.30%. Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus target price of $31.58, suggesting a potential upside of 20.34%. Given Magnolia Oil & Gas' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Magnolia Oil & Gas is more favorable than Helmerich & Payne.

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.