Helmerich & Payne Competitors

Helmerich & Payne (NYSE:HP) and Evergy (NYSE:EVRG) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and profitability.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

88.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.1% of Evergy shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Evergy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Helmerich & Payne and Evergy's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Evergy has higher revenue and earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Evergy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Evergy pays an annual dividend of $2.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Helmerich & Payne pays out -116.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Evergy pays out 74.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Helmerich & Payne has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Evergy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Helmerich & Payne and Evergy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Helmerich & Payne presently has a consensus price target of $21.6842, suggesting a potential downside of 20.57%. Evergy has a consensus price target of $64.8571, suggesting a potential upside of 17.30%. Given Evergy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Evergy is more favorable than Helmerich & Payne.

Profitability

This table compares Helmerich & Payne and Evergy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 2.25, suggesting that its stock price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Evergy has a beta of 0.35, suggesting that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Evergy beats Helmerich & Payne on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Helmerich & Payne (NYSE:HP) and Sunrun (NASDAQ:RUN) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Helmerich & Payne and Sunrun's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Helmerich & Payne and Sunrun, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Helmerich & Payne presently has a consensus price target of $21.6842, suggesting a potential downside of 20.57%. Sunrun has a consensus price target of $80.00, suggesting a potential upside of 33.09%. Given Sunrun's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Sunrun is more favorable than Helmerich & Payne.

Risk & Volatility

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 2.25, indicating that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sunrun has a beta of 2.32, indicating that its share price is 132% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Helmerich & Payne and Sunrun's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Sunrun has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sunrun, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

88.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.4% of Sunrun shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of Sunrun shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Sunrun beats Helmerich & Payne on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) and Helmerich & Payne (NYSE:HP) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Dividends

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Diamondback Energy pays out 21.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out -116.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Helmerich & Payne has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Helmerich & Payne is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Diamondback Energy and Helmerich & Payne's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

92.1% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Diamondback Energy and Helmerich & Payne's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Diamondback Energy and Helmerich & Payne, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Diamondback Energy presently has a consensus price target of $66.0893, suggesting a potential upside of 0.01%. Helmerich & Payne has a consensus price target of $21.6842, suggesting a potential downside of 20.57%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than Helmerich & Payne.

Risk and Volatility

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 2.59, suggesting that its stock price is 159% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 2.25, suggesting that its stock price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats Helmerich & Payne on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Helmerich & Payne (NYSE:HP) and Magellan Midstream Partners (NYSE:MMP) are both mid-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Magellan Midstream Partners pays an annual dividend of $4.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. Helmerich & Payne pays out -116.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magellan Midstream Partners pays out 86.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Helmerich & Payne has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Magellan Midstream Partners has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Risk & Volatility

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 2.25, meaning that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Magellan Midstream Partners has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

88.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.0% of Magellan Midstream Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Magellan Midstream Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Helmerich & Payne and Magellan Midstream Partners, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Helmerich & Payne currently has a consensus target price of $21.6842, indicating a potential downside of 20.57%. Magellan Midstream Partners has a consensus target price of $50.0526, indicating a potential upside of 20.06%. Given Magellan Midstream Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Magellan Midstream Partners is more favorable than Helmerich & Payne.

Profitability

This table compares Helmerich & Payne and Magellan Midstream Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Helmerich & Payne and Magellan Midstream Partners' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Magellan Midstream Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magellan Midstream Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Magellan Midstream Partners beats Helmerich & Payne on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Helmerich & Payne (NYSE:HP) and Continental Resources (NYSE:CLR) are both mid-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Helmerich & Payne and Continental Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Helmerich & Payne and Continental Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.

Helmerich & Payne currently has a consensus target price of $21.6842, indicating a potential downside of 20.57%. Continental Resources has a consensus target price of $17.7381, indicating a potential downside of 23.84%. Given Helmerich & Payne's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Helmerich & Payne is more favorable than Continental Resources.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Helmerich & Payne and Continental Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Continental Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Continental Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

88.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.8% of Continental Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 79.6% of Continental Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 2.25, indicating that its stock price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Continental Resources has a beta of 3.37, indicating that its stock price is 237% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Continental Resources beats Helmerich & Payne on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Helmerich & Payne (NYSE:HP) and Marathon Oil (NYSE:MRO) are both mid-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

88.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.1% of Marathon Oil shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Marathon Oil shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Helmerich & Payne and Marathon Oil, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Helmerich & Payne currently has a consensus price target of $21.6842, indicating a potential downside of 20.57%. Marathon Oil has a consensus price target of $7.6921, indicating a potential downside of 27.77%. Given Helmerich & Payne's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Helmerich & Payne is more favorable than Marathon Oil.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Helmerich & Payne and Marathon Oil's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Marathon Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Marathon Oil pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Helmerich & Payne pays out -116.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marathon Oil pays out 16.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Helmerich & Payne has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Marathon Oil has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Helmerich & Payne is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Helmerich & Payne and Marathon Oil's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 2.25, suggesting that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Marathon Oil has a beta of 3.36, suggesting that its share price is 236% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Helmerich & Payne beats Marathon Oil on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.