Murphy USA (MUSA) Competitors

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Murphy USA. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Murphy USA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

80.8% of Murphy USA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.0% of Murphy USA shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 26 more articles in the media than Murphy USA. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Energy Transfer and 12 mentions for Murphy USA. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Murphy USA's score of 0.72 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Energy Transfer has a net margin of 4.66% compared to Murphy USA's net margin of 2.81%. Murphy USA's return on equity of 91.05% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Murphy USA presently has a consensus target price of $503.71, indicating a potential downside of 12.75%. Energy Transfer has a consensus target price of $22.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.99%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Murphy USA.

Murphy USA has a beta of 0.36, meaning that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Murphy USA pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Murphy USA pays out 8.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Murphy USA has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Energy Transfer has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Murphy USA has higher revenue and earnings than Global Partners. Global Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Murphy USA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

38.1% of Global Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.8% of Murphy USA shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.5% of Global Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.0% of Murphy USA shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Murphy USA had 3 more articles in the media than Global Partners. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Murphy USA and 9 mentions for Global Partners. Global Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Murphy USA's score of 0.72 indicating that Global Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Murphy USA has a net margin of 2.81% compared to Global Partners' net margin of 0.77%. Murphy USA's return on equity of 91.05% beat Global Partners' return on equity.

Global Partners currently has a consensus target price of $46.00, indicating a potential downside of 5.25%. Murphy USA has a consensus target price of $503.71, indicating a potential downside of 12.75%. Given Global Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Global Partners is more favorable than Murphy USA.

Global Partners has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Murphy USA has a beta of 0.36, indicating that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

Global Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Murphy USA pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Global Partners pays out 84.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Murphy USA pays out 8.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Partners has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Murphy USA has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Global Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Murphy USA currently has a consensus target price of $503.71, suggesting a potential downside of 12.75%. Liberty Energy has a consensus target price of $30.42, suggesting a potential downside of 8.71%. Given Liberty Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Liberty Energy is more favorable than Murphy USA.

80.8% of Murphy USA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.0% of Murphy USA shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Murphy USA and Murphy USA both had 12 articles in the media. Liberty Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Murphy USA's score of 0.72 indicating that Liberty Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Murphy USA pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Murphy USA pays out 8.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Liberty Energy pays out 39.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Murphy USA has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Liberty Energy has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Liberty Energy has a net margin of 3.71% compared to Murphy USA's net margin of 2.81%. Murphy USA's return on equity of 91.05% beat Liberty Energy's return on equity.

Murphy USA has a beta of 0.36, suggesting that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Murphy USA has higher revenue and earnings than Liberty Energy. Murphy USA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.8% of Murphy USA shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.0% of Murphy USA shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Murphy USA pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Marathon Petroleum pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Murphy USA pays out 8.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marathon Petroleum has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Murphy USA has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 3.36% compared to Murphy USA's net margin of 2.81%. Murphy USA's return on equity of 91.05% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity.

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than Murphy USA. Marathon Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Murphy USA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 30 more articles in the media than Murphy USA. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 12 mentions for Murphy USA. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Murphy USA's score of 0.72 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Murphy USA has a beta of 0.36, indicating that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

Marathon Petroleum presently has a consensus price target of $257.25, suggesting a potential upside of 2.00%. Murphy USA has a consensus price target of $503.71, suggesting a potential downside of 12.75%. Given Marathon Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Marathon Petroleum is more favorable than Murphy USA.