Rush Enterprises (RUSHB) Competitors

65.9% of International Bancshares shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.1% of Rush Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. 13.1% of International Bancshares shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.9% of Rush Enterprises shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

International Bancshares pays an annual dividend of $1.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Rush Enterprises pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. International Bancshares pays out 22.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Rush Enterprises pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. International Bancshares has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years and Rush Enterprises has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. International Bancshares is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, International Bancshares and International Bancshares both had 2 articles in the media. International Bancshares' average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Rush Enterprises' score of 0.41 indicating that International Bancshares is being referred to more favorably in the media.

International Bancshares presently has a consensus target price of $85.00, indicating a potential upside of 26.19%. Given International Bancshares' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe International Bancshares is more favorable than Rush Enterprises.

International Bancshares has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rush Enterprises has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

International Bancshares has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Rush Enterprises. International Bancshares is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rush Enterprises, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

International Bancshares has a net margin of 38.83% compared to Rush Enterprises' net margin of 3.67%. International Bancshares' return on equity of 12.67% beat Rush Enterprises' return on equity.

In the previous week, Lincoln Electric had 7 more articles in the media than Rush Enterprises. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Lincoln Electric and 2 mentions for Rush Enterprises. Lincoln Electric's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Rush Enterprises' score of 0.41 indicating that Lincoln Electric is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Lincoln Electric has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Rush Enterprises. Rush Enterprises is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lincoln Electric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Rush Enterprises has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lincoln Electric has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Rush Enterprises pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Lincoln Electric pays an annual dividend of $3.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Rush Enterprises pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lincoln Electric pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Rush Enterprises has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Lincoln Electric has raised its dividend for 30 consecutive years. Lincoln Electric is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Lincoln Electric has a net margin of 12.35% compared to Rush Enterprises' net margin of 3.67%. Lincoln Electric's return on equity of 39.23% beat Rush Enterprises' return on equity.

Lincoln Electric has a consensus price target of $307.22, suggesting a potential upside of 17.01%. Given Lincoln Electric's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Lincoln Electric is more favorable than Rush Enterprises.

18.1% of Rush Enterprises shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.6% of Lincoln Electric shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.9% of Rush Enterprises shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Lincoln Electric shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Rush Enterprises is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rush Enterprises, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Rush Enterprises had 2 more articles in the media than Rush Enterprises. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Rush Enterprises and 2 mentions for Rush Enterprises. Rush Enterprises' average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Rush Enterprises' score of 0.39 indicating that Rush Enterprises is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

84.4% of Rush Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.1% of Rush Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. 12.7% of Rush Enterprises shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.9% of Rush Enterprises shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Rush Enterprises presently has a consensus target price of $46.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.42%. Given Rush Enterprises' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Rush Enterprises is more favorable than Rush Enterprises.

Rush Enterprises pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Rush Enterprises pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Rush Enterprises pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Rush Enterprises pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Rush Enterprises has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Rush Enterprises has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Rush Enterprises has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rush Enterprises has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

UFP Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Rush Enterprises pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. UFP Industries pays out 33.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Rush Enterprises pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. UFP Industries has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Rush Enterprises has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

UFP Industries has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Rush Enterprises. UFP Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rush Enterprises, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

UFP Industries has a net margin of 3.99% compared to Rush Enterprises' net margin of 3.67%. Rush Enterprises' return on equity of 11.65% beat UFP Industries' return on equity.

UFP Industries currently has a consensus price target of $104.50, suggesting a potential upside of 37.77%. Given UFP Industries' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe UFP Industries is more favorable than Rush Enterprises.

81.8% of UFP Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.1% of Rush Enterprises shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of UFP Industries shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.9% of Rush Enterprises shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, UFP Industries had 6 more articles in the media than Rush Enterprises. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for UFP Industries and 2 mentions for Rush Enterprises. Rush Enterprises' average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat UFP Industries' score of 0.16 indicating that Rush Enterprises is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

UFP Industries has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rush Enterprises has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.