Go Pro

Lithia Motors (LAD) Competitors

Lithia Motors logo
$371.96 +1.29 (+0.35%)
As of 08/21/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

LAD vs. RUSHA, ABG, AN, BC, and GPI

Should you buy Lithia Motors stock or one of its competitors? Lithia Motors's main competitors and comparable companies include Rush Enterprises (RUSHA), Asbury Automotive Group (ABG), AutoNation (AN), Brunswick (BC), and Group 1 Automotive (GPI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Lithia Motors compare to Rush Enterprises?

Rush Enterprises (NASDAQ:RUSHA) and Lithia Motors (NYSE:LAD) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

84.4% of Rush Enterprises shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.7% of Rush Enterprises shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Lithia Motors shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Rush Enterprises has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lithia Motors has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Rush Enterprises has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Lithia Motors' net margin of 1.88%. Lithia Motors' return on equity of 12.16% beat Rush Enterprises' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rush Enterprises3.67% 11.65% 5.84%
Lithia Motors 1.88%12.16%3.14%

Lithia Motors has higher revenue and earnings than Rush Enterprises. Lithia Motors is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rush Enterprises, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rush Enterprises$7.43B0.82$263.78M$3.3223.73
Lithia Motors$37.63B0.22$819.60M$30.1512.34

In the previous week, Lithia Motors had 5 more articles in the media than Rush Enterprises. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Lithia Motors and 1 mentions for Rush Enterprises. Rush Enterprises' average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Lithia Motors' score of 0.71 indicating that Rush Enterprises is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Rush Enterprises
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Lithia Motors
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Rush Enterprises currently has a consensus target price of $58.00, suggesting a potential downside of 26.38%. Lithia Motors has a consensus target price of $436.33, suggesting a potential upside of 17.31%. Given Lithia Motors' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Lithia Motors is more favorable than Rush Enterprises.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Rush Enterprises
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Lithia Motors
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55

Rush Enterprises pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Lithia Motors pays an annual dividend of $2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Rush Enterprises pays out 22.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lithia Motors pays out 9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Rush Enterprises has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Lithia Motors has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years.

Summary

Lithia Motors beats Rush Enterprises on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithia Motors compare to Asbury Automotive Group?

Asbury Automotive Group (NYSE:ABG) and Lithia Motors (NYSE:LAD) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Asbury Automotive Group currently has a consensus price target of $246.71, suggesting a potential upside of 14.54%. Lithia Motors has a consensus price target of $436.33, suggesting a potential upside of 17.31%. Given Lithia Motors' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Lithia Motors is more favorable than Asbury Automotive Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Asbury Automotive Group
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11
Lithia Motors
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55

Asbury Automotive Group has a net margin of 2.83% compared to Lithia Motors' net margin of 1.88%. Asbury Automotive Group's return on equity of 12.72% beat Lithia Motors' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Asbury Automotive Group2.83% 12.72% 4.31%
Lithia Motors 1.88%12.16%3.14%

Lithia Motors has higher revenue and earnings than Asbury Automotive Group. Asbury Automotive Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lithia Motors, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Asbury Automotive Group$17.98B0.22$492M$26.748.05
Lithia Motors$37.63B0.22$819.60M$30.1512.34

Asbury Automotive Group has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lithia Motors has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Asbury Automotive Group had 1 more articles in the media than Lithia Motors. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Asbury Automotive Group and 6 mentions for Lithia Motors. Asbury Automotive Group's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Lithia Motors' score of 0.71 indicating that Asbury Automotive Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Asbury Automotive Group
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Lithia Motors
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Lithia Motors beats Asbury Automotive Group on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithia Motors compare to AutoNation?

Lithia Motors (NYSE:LAD) and AutoNation (NYSE:AN) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

94.6% of AutoNation shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Lithia Motors shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of AutoNation shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lithia Motors has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AutoNation has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Lithia Motors has higher revenue and earnings than AutoNation. AutoNation is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lithia Motors, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithia Motors$37.63B0.22$819.60M$30.1512.34
AutoNation$27.45B0.24$649.10M$21.599.21

Lithia Motors presently has a consensus target price of $436.33, suggesting a potential upside of 17.31%. AutoNation has a consensus target price of $250.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.72%. Given AutoNation's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe AutoNation is more favorable than Lithia Motors.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lithia Motors
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55
AutoNation
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

AutoNation has a net margin of 2.82% compared to Lithia Motors' net margin of 1.88%. AutoNation's return on equity of 31.24% beat Lithia Motors' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lithia Motors1.88% 12.16% 3.14%
AutoNation 2.82%31.24%4.97%

In the previous week, AutoNation had 11 more articles in the media than Lithia Motors. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for AutoNation and 6 mentions for Lithia Motors. AutoNation's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Lithia Motors' score of 0.71 indicating that AutoNation is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lithia Motors
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
AutoNation
10 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

AutoNation beats Lithia Motors on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithia Motors compare to Brunswick?

Brunswick (NYSE:BC) and Lithia Motors (NYSE:LAD) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lithia Motors has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Lithia Motors has a net margin of 1.88% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Brunswick's return on equity of 15.28% beat Lithia Motors' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brunswick-1.53% 15.28% 4.60%
Lithia Motors 1.88%12.16%3.14%

Brunswick presently has a consensus price target of $88.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.67%. Lithia Motors has a consensus price target of $436.33, suggesting a potential upside of 17.31%. Given Lithia Motors' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Lithia Motors is more favorable than Brunswick.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brunswick
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Lithia Motors
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55

In the previous week, Lithia Motors had 1 more articles in the media than Brunswick. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Lithia Motors and 5 mentions for Brunswick. Lithia Motors' average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Brunswick's score of 0.71 indicating that Lithia Motors is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brunswick
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Lithia Motors
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Lithia Motors pays an annual dividend of $2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Brunswick pays out -134.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lithia Motors pays out 9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Brunswick has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Lithia Motors has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Brunswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Lithia Motors has higher revenue and earnings than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lithia Motors, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brunswick$5.36B0.98-$137.30M-$1.31N/A
Lithia Motors$37.63B0.22$819.60M$30.1512.34

99.3% of Brunswick shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Brunswick shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Lithia Motors shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Lithia Motors beats Brunswick on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lithia Motors compare to Group 1 Automotive?

Group 1 Automotive (NYSE:GPI) and Lithia Motors (NYSE:LAD) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Lithia Motors has a net margin of 1.88% compared to Group 1 Automotive's net margin of 1.31%. Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 15.66% beat Lithia Motors' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Group 1 Automotive1.31% 15.66% 4.43%
Lithia Motors 1.88%12.16%3.14%

In the previous week, Group 1 Automotive and Group 1 Automotive both had 6 articles in the media. Lithia Motors' average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Group 1 Automotive's score of 0.62 indicating that Lithia Motors is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Group 1 Automotive
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Lithia Motors
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Lithia Motors has higher revenue and earnings than Group 1 Automotive. Group 1 Automotive is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lithia Motors, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Group 1 Automotive$22.15B0.14$325.20M$24.0110.91
Lithia Motors$37.63B0.22$819.60M$30.1512.34

99.9% of Group 1 Automotive shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Group 1 Automotive shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Lithia Motors shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lithia Motors has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Group 1 Automotive currently has a consensus target price of $392.44, indicating a potential upside of 49.80%. Lithia Motors has a consensus target price of $436.33, indicating a potential upside of 17.31%. Given Group 1 Automotive's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Group 1 Automotive is more favorable than Lithia Motors.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Group 1 Automotive
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.30
Lithia Motors
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55

Group 1 Automotive pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Lithia Motors pays an annual dividend of $2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Group 1 Automotive pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lithia Motors pays out 9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Group 1 Automotive has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Lithia Motors has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Group 1 Automotive is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Lithia Motors beats Group 1 Automotive on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lithia Motors News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LAD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LAD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LAD vs. The Competition

MetricLithia MotorsSpecialty Retail IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$8.15B$11.45B$13.23B$24.30B
Dividend Yield0.76%120.57%56.57%3.70%
P/E Ratio12.3426.2746.9630.31
Price / Sales0.2218.7888.7519.89
Price / Cash6.9013.5629.1332.49
Price / Book1.275.693.936.77
Net Income$819.60M$438.66M$445.72M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-1.42%-1.32%-0.26%-0.65%
1 Month Performance11.17%2.31%2.74%3.38%
1 Year Performance13.82%-4.12%-1.57%14.90%

Lithia Motors Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LAD
Lithia Motors
4.7477 of 5 stars
$371.96
+0.3%
$436.33
+17.3%
+13.8%$8.15B$37.63B12.3430,000
RUSHA
Rush Enterprises
3.6212 of 5 stars
$82.13
-0.1%
$58.00
-29.4%
+100.6%$6.40B$7.43B24.747,355
ABG
Asbury Automotive Group
4.6638 of 5 stars
$208.10
-1.2%
$246.71
+18.6%
-15.0%$3.78B$18.00B7.7815,000
AN
AutoNation
4.8915 of 5 stars
$204.93
-2.1%
$250.00
+22.0%
-9.1%$6.92B$27.63B9.4924,800
BC
Brunswick
3.2147 of 5 stars
$82.33
-0.4%
$88.00
+6.9%
+22.9%$5.36B$5.36BN/A14,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:LAD) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners