Go Pro

Brunswick (BC) Competitors

Brunswick logo
$66.33 +2.12 (+3.29%)
As of 01:26 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BC vs. MBUU, MCFT, PATK, UFPI, and LCII

Should you buy Brunswick stock or one of its competitors? Brunswick's main competitors and comparable companies include Malibu Boats (MBUU), Mastercraft Boat (MCFT), Patrick Industries (PATK), UFP Industries (UFPI), and LCI Industries (LCII). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Brunswick compare to Malibu Boats?

Brunswick (NYSE:BC) and Malibu Boats (NASDAQ:MBUU) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Brunswick had 7 more articles in the media than Malibu Boats. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Brunswick and 0 mentions for Malibu Boats. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Malibu Boats' score of 0.00 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Brunswick Positive
Malibu Boats Neutral

99.3% of Brunswick shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.4% of Malibu Boats shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Brunswick shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Malibu Boats shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Malibu Boats has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Brunswick presently has a consensus price target of $88.00, suggesting a potential upside of 32.97%. Malibu Boats has a consensus price target of $31.60, suggesting a potential upside of 36.00%. Given Malibu Boats' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Malibu Boats is more favorable than Brunswick.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brunswick
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Malibu Boats
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13

Malibu Boats has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Malibu Boats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brunswick$5.36B0.80-$137.30M-$1.31N/A
Malibu Boats$914.59M0.50$1.65M$0.07331.93

Malibu Boats has a net margin of 0.18% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Brunswick's return on equity of 15.28% beat Malibu Boats' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brunswick-1.53% 15.28% 4.60%
Malibu Boats 0.18%4.78%2.85%

Summary

Brunswick beats Malibu Boats on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brunswick compare to Mastercraft Boat?

Brunswick (NYSE:BC) and Mastercraft Boat (NASDAQ:MCFT) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings and profitability.

Brunswick presently has a consensus price target of $88.00, indicating a potential upside of 32.97%. Mastercraft Boat has a consensus price target of $24.25, indicating a potential upside of 19.99%. Given Brunswick's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Brunswick is more favorable than Mastercraft Boat.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brunswick
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Mastercraft Boat
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

In the previous week, Brunswick had 5 more articles in the media than Mastercraft Boat. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Brunswick and 2 mentions for Mastercraft Boat. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Mastercraft Boat's score of -0.20 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brunswick
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Mastercraft Boat
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Mastercraft Boat has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Brunswick. Mastercraft Boat is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brunswick, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brunswick$5.36B0.80-$137.30M-$1.31N/A
Mastercraft Boat$348.90M1.41-$1.66M-$0.02N/A

Mastercraft Boat has a net margin of -0.48% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Brunswick's return on equity of 15.28% beat Mastercraft Boat's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brunswick-1.53% 15.28% 4.60%
Mastercraft Boat -0.48%11.08%8.08%

99.3% of Brunswick shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.6% of Mastercraft Boat shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Brunswick shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Mastercraft Boat shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mastercraft Boat has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Brunswick beats Mastercraft Boat on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brunswick compare to Patrick Industries?

Patrick Industries (NASDAQ:PATK) and Brunswick (NYSE:BC) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, risk, earnings and valuation.

Patrick Industries has a beta of 1.16, indicating that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunswick has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Patrick Industries has a net margin of 3.74% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Brunswick's return on equity of 15.28% beat Patrick Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Patrick Industries3.74% 12.69% 4.69%
Brunswick -1.53%15.28%4.60%

Patrick Industries presently has a consensus price target of $114.00, indicating a potential upside of 69.34%. Brunswick has a consensus price target of $88.00, indicating a potential upside of 32.97%. Given Patrick Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Patrick Industries is more favorable than Brunswick.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Patrick Industries
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Brunswick
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Brunswick had 2 more articles in the media than Patrick Industries. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Brunswick and 5 mentions for Patrick Industries. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Patrick Industries' score of 0.21 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Patrick Industries
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Brunswick
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Patrick Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Patrick Industries pays out 44.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brunswick pays out -134.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Patrick Industries has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Brunswick has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years.

Patrick Industries has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Patrick Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Patrick Industries$3.95B0.55$135.06M$4.2215.95
Brunswick$5.36B0.80-$137.30M-$1.31N/A

93.3% of Patrick Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.3% of Brunswick shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Patrick Industries shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Brunswick shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Patrick Industries and Brunswick tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brunswick compare to UFP Industries?

Brunswick (NYSE:BC) and UFP Industries (NASDAQ:UFPI) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk and media sentiment.

99.3% of Brunswick shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.8% of UFP Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Brunswick shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of UFP Industries shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

UFP Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UFP Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brunswick$5.36B0.80-$137.30M-$1.31N/A
UFP Industries$6.32B0.68$294.79M$4.3617.75

UFP Industries has a net margin of 3.99% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Brunswick's return on equity of 15.28% beat UFP Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brunswick-1.53% 15.28% 4.60%
UFP Industries 3.99%8.00%6.11%

Brunswick has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UFP Industries has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. UFP Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Brunswick pays out -134.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. UFP Industries pays out 33.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Brunswick has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years and UFP Industries has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Brunswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, UFP Industries had 3 more articles in the media than Brunswick. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for UFP Industries and 7 mentions for Brunswick. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat UFP Industries' score of 0.05 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brunswick
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
UFP Industries
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Brunswick currently has a consensus price target of $88.00, indicating a potential upside of 32.97%. UFP Industries has a consensus price target of $104.50, indicating a potential upside of 35.00%. Given UFP Industries' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe UFP Industries is more favorable than Brunswick.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brunswick
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
UFP Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Summary

Brunswick beats UFP Industries on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brunswick compare to LCI Industries?

Brunswick (NYSE:BC) and LCI Industries (NYSE:LCII) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

LCI Industries has a net margin of 5.24% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Brunswick's return on equity of 15.28% beat LCI Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brunswick-1.53% 15.28% 4.60%
LCI Industries 5.24%14.33%6.19%

Brunswick presently has a consensus price target of $88.00, suggesting a potential upside of 32.97%. LCI Industries has a consensus price target of $126.25, suggesting a potential upside of 52.12%. Given LCI Industries' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe LCI Industries is more favorable than Brunswick.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brunswick
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
LCI Industries
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

In the previous week, Brunswick had 3 more articles in the media than LCI Industries. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Brunswick and 4 mentions for LCI Industries. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat LCI Industries' score of 0.06 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brunswick
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
LCI Industries
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

99.3% of Brunswick shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.7% of LCI Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Brunswick shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of LCI Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LCI Industries has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. LCI Industries pays an annual dividend of $4.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Brunswick pays out -134.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. LCI Industries pays out 53.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Brunswick has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years and LCI Industries has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

LCI Industries has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LCI Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brunswick$5.36B0.80-$137.30M-$1.31N/A
LCI Industries$4.12B0.49$188.25M$8.609.65

Summary

Brunswick beats LCI Industries on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Brunswick News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BC vs. The Competition

MetricBrunswickLeisure Products IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$4.30B$3.02B$12.24B$22.67B
Dividend Yield2.74%2.62%69.35%3.74%
P/E Ratio-50.64566.0844.2427.77
Price / Sales0.8036.0493.1020.15
Price / Cash8.2318.3028.1739.56
Price / Book2.653.553.924.64
Net Income-$137.30M$80.91M$445.63M$1.08B
7 Day Performance-1.38%-0.18%-0.83%-1.06%
1 Month Performance-11.15%-2.37%-4.36%-5.03%
1 Year Performance1.86%-5.01%-7.55%5.75%

Brunswick Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BC
Brunswick
4.1017 of 5 stars
$66.34
+3.3%
$88.00
+32.7%
-0.1%$4.30B$5.36BN/A14,000
MBUU
Malibu Boats
3.5245 of 5 stars
$23.13
-4.0%
$31.60
+36.6%
-30.7%$474.04M$914.59M330.433,000
MCFT
Mastercraft Boat
3.7972 of 5 stars
$19.87
-3.5%
$24.25
+22.0%
-8.0%$501.15M$348.90MN/A1,400
PATK
Patrick Industries
4.7821 of 5 stars
$69.00
+0.7%
$114.00
+65.2%
-35.3%$2.20B$3.95B16.3510,000
UFPI
UFP Industries
4.7581 of 5 stars
$79.42
-0.1%
$104.50
+31.6%
-17.1%$4.38B$6.32B18.2213,800

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:BC) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners