Polaris (PII) Competitors

Polaris has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunswick has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

88.1% of Polaris shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.3% of Brunswick shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Polaris shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Brunswick shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Brunswick had 7 more articles in the media than Polaris. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Brunswick and 8 mentions for Polaris. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Polaris' score of 0.02 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Polaris presently has a consensus price target of $66.67, suggesting a potential upside of 25.80%. Brunswick has a consensus price target of $88.00, suggesting a potential upside of 32.81%. Given Brunswick's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Brunswick is more favorable than Polaris.

Brunswick has a net margin of -1.53% compared to Polaris' net margin of -3.50%. Polaris' return on equity of 16.77% beat Brunswick's return on equity.

Polaris pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Polaris pays out -58.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brunswick pays out -134.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Polaris has raised its dividend for 30 consecutive years and Brunswick has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Polaris is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Brunswick has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Polaris. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polaris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

99.7% of LCI Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.1% of Polaris shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of LCI Industries shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Polaris shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Polaris had 4 more articles in the media than LCI Industries. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Polaris and 4 mentions for LCI Industries. LCI Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Polaris' score of 0.02 indicating that LCI Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

LCI Industries pays an annual dividend of $4.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Polaris pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. LCI Industries pays out 53.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Polaris pays out -58.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. LCI Industries has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Polaris has raised its dividend for 30 consecutive years.

LCI Industries has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polaris has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

LCI Industries currently has a consensus price target of $126.25, suggesting a potential upside of 48.06%. Polaris has a consensus price target of $66.67, suggesting a potential upside of 25.80%. Given LCI Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe LCI Industries is more favorable than Polaris.

LCI Industries has a net margin of 5.24% compared to Polaris' net margin of -3.50%. Polaris' return on equity of 16.77% beat LCI Industries' return on equity.

LCI Industries has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Polaris. Polaris is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LCI Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

88.1% of Polaris shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Polaris shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Polaris presently has a consensus target price of $66.67, indicating a potential upside of 25.80%. Masco has a consensus target price of $79.56, indicating a potential upside of 16.57%. Given Polaris' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Polaris is more favorable than Masco.

Polaris has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Polaris. Polaris is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Masco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Masco has a net margin of 11.61% compared to Polaris' net margin of -3.50%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Polaris' return on equity.

Polaris pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Polaris pays out -58.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Masco pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Polaris has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years and Masco has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Polaris is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Polaris had 4 more articles in the media than Masco. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Polaris and 4 mentions for Masco. Masco's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Polaris' score of 0.02 indicating that Masco is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Mohawk Industries has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polaris has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Mohawk Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Polaris. Polaris is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mohawk Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Mohawk Industries has a net margin of 4.15% compared to Polaris' net margin of -3.50%. Polaris' return on equity of 16.77% beat Mohawk Industries' return on equity.

In the previous week, Mohawk Industries had 10 more articles in the media than Polaris. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Mohawk Industries and 8 mentions for Polaris. Mohawk Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Polaris' score of 0.02 indicating that Mohawk Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

79.0% of Mohawk Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.1% of Polaris shares are held by institutional investors. 17.9% of Mohawk Industries shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Polaris shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Mohawk Industries currently has a consensus target price of $130.50, suggesting a potential upside of 9.04%. Polaris has a consensus target price of $66.67, suggesting a potential upside of 25.80%. Given Polaris' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Polaris is more favorable than Mohawk Industries.