Polaris (PII) Competitors

Patrick Industries has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Polaris. Polaris is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Patrick Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

93.3% of Patrick Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.1% of Polaris shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of Patrick Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Polaris shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Patrick Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Polaris pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Patrick Industries pays out 48.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Polaris pays out -34.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Patrick Industries has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Polaris has raised its dividend for 30 consecutive years. Polaris is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Patrick Industries had 8 more articles in the media than Polaris. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Patrick Industries and 3 mentions for Polaris. Patrick Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Polaris' score of 0.04 indicating that Patrick Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Patrick Industries presently has a consensus target price of $122.63, suggesting a potential upside of 44.21%. Polaris has a consensus target price of $64.44, suggesting a potential upside of 2.31%. Given Patrick Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Patrick Industries is more favorable than Polaris.

Patrick Industries has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polaris has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Patrick Industries has a net margin of 3.46% compared to Polaris' net margin of -6.13%. Patrick Industries' return on equity of 13.24% beat Polaris' return on equity.

In the previous week, Brunswick and Brunswick both had 3 articles in the media. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Polaris' score of 0.04 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Polaris pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Brunswick pays out -83.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Polaris pays out -34.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Brunswick has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Polaris has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years. Polaris is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Brunswick has a net margin of -2.47% compared to Polaris' net margin of -6.13%. Brunswick's return on equity of 13.30% beat Polaris' return on equity.

Brunswick presently has a consensus target price of $87.00, suggesting a potential upside of 9.89%. Polaris has a consensus target price of $64.44, suggesting a potential upside of 2.31%. Given Brunswick's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Brunswick is more favorable than Polaris.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polaris has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

99.3% of Brunswick shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.1% of Polaris shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Brunswick shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Polaris shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Brunswick has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Polaris. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polaris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Polaris pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Polaris pays out -34.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 46.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Polaris has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years and Fortune Brands Innovations has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Polaris is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

88.1% of Polaris shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of Polaris shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fortune Brands Innovations has a net margin of 6.12% compared to Polaris' net margin of -6.13%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 17.72% beat Polaris' return on equity.

Polaris currently has a consensus target price of $64.44, suggesting a potential upside of 2.31%. Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus target price of $53.23, suggesting a potential downside of 0.16%. Given Polaris' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Polaris is more favorable than Fortune Brands Innovations.

Polaris has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Fortune Brands Innovations has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Polaris. Polaris is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Fortune Brands Innovations had 10 more articles in the media than Polaris. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations and 3 mentions for Polaris. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Polaris' score of 0.04 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Polaris has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LCI Industries has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Polaris pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. LCI Industries pays an annual dividend of $4.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Polaris pays out -34.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. LCI Industries pays out 56.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Polaris has raised its dividend for 30 consecutive years and LCI Industries has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

LCI Industries has a net margin of 4.84% compared to Polaris' net margin of -6.13%. LCI Industries' return on equity of 14.03% beat Polaris' return on equity.

LCI Industries has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Polaris. Polaris is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LCI Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Polaris presently has a consensus target price of $64.44, indicating a potential upside of 2.31%. LCI Industries has a consensus target price of $145.71, indicating a potential upside of 41.07%. Given LCI Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe LCI Industries is more favorable than Polaris.

88.1% of Polaris shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.7% of LCI Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of Polaris shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of LCI Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, LCI Industries had 11 more articles in the media than Polaris. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for LCI Industries and 3 mentions for Polaris. LCI Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Polaris' score of 0.04 indicating that LCI Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.