Polaris (PII) Competitors

Patrick Industries has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Polaris. Polaris is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Patrick Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Patrick Industries has a net margin of 3.46% compared to Polaris' net margin of -6.13%. Patrick Industries' return on equity of 13.24% beat Polaris' return on equity.

Polaris pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Patrick Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Polaris pays out -34.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Patrick Industries pays out 48.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Polaris has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years and Patrick Industries has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Polaris is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Patrick Industries had 1 more articles in the media than Polaris. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Patrick Industries and 6 mentions for Polaris. Patrick Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Polaris' score of -0.34 indicating that Patrick Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Polaris currently has a consensus price target of $64.44, indicating a potential downside of 4.99%. Patrick Industries has a consensus price target of $122.63, indicating a potential upside of 34.95%. Given Patrick Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Patrick Industries is more favorable than Polaris.

Polaris has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Patrick Industries has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

88.1% of Polaris shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of Patrick Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Polaris shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Patrick Industries shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

99.3% of Brunswick shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.1% of Polaris shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Brunswick shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Polaris shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Brunswick presently has a consensus target price of $87.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.48%. Polaris has a consensus target price of $64.44, indicating a potential downside of 4.99%. Given Brunswick's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Brunswick is more favorable than Polaris.

Brunswick has a net margin of -2.47% compared to Polaris' net margin of -6.13%. Brunswick's return on equity of 13.30% beat Polaris' return on equity.

In the previous week, Brunswick had 3 more articles in the media than Polaris. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Brunswick and 6 mentions for Polaris. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat Polaris' score of -0.34 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Brunswick has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Polaris. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polaris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polaris has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Polaris pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Brunswick pays out -83.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Polaris pays out -34.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Brunswick has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Polaris has raised its dividend for 30 consecutive years. Polaris is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Harley-Davidson has a net margin of 5.68% compared to Polaris' net margin of -6.13%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 7.03% beat Polaris' return on equity.

Polaris pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Harley-Davidson pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Polaris pays out -34.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Harley-Davidson pays out 42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Polaris has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years and Harley-Davidson has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Polaris is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Harley-Davidson had 19 more articles in the media than Polaris. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Harley-Davidson and 6 mentions for Polaris. Harley-Davidson's average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat Polaris' score of -0.34 indicating that Harley-Davidson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Polaris has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Polaris presently has a consensus target price of $64.44, indicating a potential downside of 4.99%. Harley-Davidson has a consensus target price of $24.22, indicating a potential upside of 1.83%. Given Harley-Davidson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Harley-Davidson is more favorable than Polaris.

88.1% of Polaris shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of Harley-Davidson shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Polaris shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Harley-Davidson shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Harley-Davidson has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Polaris. Polaris is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harley-Davidson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

LCI Industries has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Polaris. Polaris is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LCI Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

LCI Industries presently has a consensus target price of $149.29, suggesting a potential upside of 33.75%. Polaris has a consensus target price of $64.44, suggesting a potential downside of 4.99%. Given LCI Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe LCI Industries is more favorable than Polaris.

In the previous week, Polaris had 3 more articles in the media than LCI Industries. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Polaris and 3 mentions for LCI Industries. LCI Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Polaris' score of -0.34 indicating that LCI Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

LCI Industries has a net margin of 4.84% compared to Polaris' net margin of -6.13%. LCI Industries' return on equity of 14.03% beat Polaris' return on equity.

99.7% of LCI Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.1% of Polaris shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of LCI Industries shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Polaris shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

LCI Industries pays an annual dividend of $4.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Polaris pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. LCI Industries pays out 56.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Polaris pays out -34.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. LCI Industries has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Polaris has raised its dividend for 30 consecutive years.

LCI Industries has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polaris has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.