Polaris (PII) Competitors

Mastercraft Boat has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Polaris. Polaris is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mastercraft Boat, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Mastercraft Boat had 1 more articles in the media than Polaris. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Mastercraft Boat and 0 mentions for Polaris. Mastercraft Boat's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Polaris' score of 0.00 indicating that Mastercraft Boat is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

88.1% of Polaris shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.6% of Mastercraft Boat shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of Polaris shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Mastercraft Boat shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Mastercraft Boat has a net margin of 3.72% compared to Polaris' net margin of -3.50%. Polaris' return on equity of 16.77% beat Mastercraft Boat's return on equity.

Polaris presently has a consensus price target of $67.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.36%. Mastercraft Boat has a consensus price target of $25.40, suggesting a potential upside of 2.96%. Given Mastercraft Boat's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Mastercraft Boat is more favorable than Polaris.

Polaris has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mastercraft Boat has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Patrick Industries had 6 more articles in the media than Polaris. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Patrick Industries and 0 mentions for Polaris. Patrick Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Polaris' score of 0.00 indicating that Patrick Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Polaris currently has a consensus target price of $67.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.36%. Patrick Industries has a consensus target price of $113.13, suggesting a potential upside of 30.84%. Given Patrick Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Patrick Industries is more favorable than Polaris.

Polaris has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Patrick Industries has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Patrick Industries has a net margin of 3.74% compared to Polaris' net margin of -3.50%. Polaris' return on equity of 16.77% beat Patrick Industries' return on equity.

Polaris pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Patrick Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Polaris pays out -58.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Patrick Industries pays out 44.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Polaris has raised its dividend for 30 consecutive years and Patrick Industries has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Polaris is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Patrick Industries has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Polaris. Polaris is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Patrick Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

88.1% of Polaris shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of Patrick Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Polaris shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Patrick Industries shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Brunswick presently has a consensus price target of $88.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.76%. Polaris has a consensus price target of $67.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.36%. Given Brunswick's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Brunswick is more favorable than Polaris.

In the previous week, Brunswick had 10 more articles in the media than Polaris. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Brunswick and 0 mentions for Polaris. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Polaris' score of 0.00 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Polaris pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Brunswick pays out -134.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Polaris pays out -58.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Brunswick has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Polaris has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years. Polaris is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polaris has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

99.3% of Brunswick shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.1% of Polaris shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Brunswick shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Polaris shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Brunswick has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Polaris. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polaris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Brunswick has a net margin of -1.53% compared to Polaris' net margin of -3.50%. Polaris' return on equity of 16.77% beat Brunswick's return on equity.

LCI Industries has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Polaris. Polaris is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LCI Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

LCI Industries has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polaris has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

LCI Industries currently has a consensus price target of $126.25, indicating a potential upside of 18.13%. Polaris has a consensus price target of $67.00, indicating a potential downside of 2.36%. Given LCI Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe LCI Industries is more favorable than Polaris.

In the previous week, LCI Industries had 14 more articles in the media than Polaris. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for LCI Industries and 0 mentions for Polaris. LCI Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Polaris' score of 0.00 indicating that LCI Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

LCI Industries pays an annual dividend of $4.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Polaris pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. LCI Industries pays out 53.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Polaris pays out -58.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. LCI Industries has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Polaris has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years.

99.7% of LCI Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.1% of Polaris shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of LCI Industries shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Polaris shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

LCI Industries has a net margin of 5.24% compared to Polaris' net margin of -3.50%. Polaris' return on equity of 16.77% beat LCI Industries' return on equity.