Go Pro
→ Your book attached (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free FBIN Stock Alerts

Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN) Competitors

Fortune Brands Innovations logo
$49.35 +0.10 (+0.21%)
Closing price 07/31/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$49.28 -0.07 (-0.15%)
As of 07/31/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

FBIN vs. UFPI, BCC, BLDR, MAS, and MHK

Should you buy Fortune Brands Innovations stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Fortune Brands Innovations with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Fortune Brands Innovations include UFP Industries (UFPI), Boise Cascade (BCC), Builders FirstSource (BLDR), Masco (MAS), and Mohawk Industries (MHK).

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to UFP Industries?

Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) and UFP Industries (NASDAQ:UFPI) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.8% of UFP Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of UFP Industries shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UFP Industries has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Fortune Brands Innovations has higher earnings, but lower revenue than UFP Industries. UFP Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Brands Innovations$4.46B1.32$298.80M$2.2521.94
UFP Industries$6.32B0.78$294.79M$4.3619.89

In the previous week, UFP Industries had 1 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for UFP Industries and 13 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat UFP Industries' score of 0.86 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fortune Brands Innovations
9 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
UFP Industries
6 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Fortune Brands Innovations has a net margin of 6.12% compared to UFP Industries' net margin of 3.99%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 17.72% beat UFP Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Brands Innovations6.12% 17.72% 6.40%
UFP Industries 3.99%8.00%6.11%

Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. UFP Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 46.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. UFP Industries pays out 33.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fortune Brands Innovations has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and UFP Industries has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

Fortune Brands Innovations presently has a consensus price target of $54.62, indicating a potential upside of 10.66%. UFP Industries has a consensus price target of $103.75, indicating a potential upside of 19.61%. Given UFP Industries' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe UFP Industries is more favorable than Fortune Brands Innovations.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortune Brands Innovations
2 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.19
UFP Industries
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17

Summary

Fortune Brands Innovations beats UFP Industries on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Boise Cascade?

Boise Cascade (NYSE:BCC) and Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Fortune Brands Innovations had 6 more articles in the media than Boise Cascade. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations and 7 mentions for Boise Cascade. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Boise Cascade's score of 0.95 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Boise Cascade
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fortune Brands Innovations
9 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

96.2% of Boise Cascade shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Boise Cascade shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Boise Cascade presently has a consensus price target of $92.80, indicating a potential upside of 21.44%. Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $54.62, indicating a potential upside of 10.66%. Given Boise Cascade's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Boise Cascade is more favorable than Fortune Brands Innovations.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Boise Cascade
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Fortune Brands Innovations
2 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.19

Fortune Brands Innovations has a net margin of 6.12% compared to Boise Cascade's net margin of 1.73%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 17.72% beat Boise Cascade's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Boise Cascade1.73% 5.55% 3.46%
Fortune Brands Innovations 6.12%17.72%6.40%

Boise Cascade has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

Fortune Brands Innovations has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Boise Cascade. Fortune Brands Innovations is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Boise Cascade, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Boise Cascade$6.40B0.42$132.84M$2.9625.82
Fortune Brands Innovations$4.46B1.32$298.80M$2.2521.94

Boise Cascade pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Boise Cascade pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 46.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Boise Cascade has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Fortune Brands Innovations has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Summary

Fortune Brands Innovations beats Boise Cascade on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Builders FirstSource?

Builders FirstSource (NYSE:BLDR) and Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Fortune Brands Innovations has a net margin of 6.12% compared to Builders FirstSource's net margin of 0.71%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 17.72% beat Builders FirstSource's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Builders FirstSource0.71% 11.73% 4.32%
Fortune Brands Innovations 6.12%17.72%6.40%

Builders FirstSource has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Builders FirstSource, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Builders FirstSource$15.19B0.47$435.20M$0.9173.01
Fortune Brands Innovations$4.46B1.32$298.80M$2.2521.94

Builders FirstSource has a beta of 1.44, suggesting that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.31, suggesting that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Builders FirstSource had 21 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Builders FirstSource and 13 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Builders FirstSource's score of 0.05 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Builders FirstSource
11 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
5 Negative mention(s)
3 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Fortune Brands Innovations
9 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Builders FirstSource presently has a consensus price target of $90.59, indicating a potential upside of 36.36%. Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $54.62, indicating a potential upside of 10.66%. Given Builders FirstSource's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Builders FirstSource is more favorable than Fortune Brands Innovations.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Builders FirstSource
2 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.30
Fortune Brands Innovations
2 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.19

95.5% of Builders FirstSource shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Builders FirstSource shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Builders FirstSource beats Fortune Brands Innovations on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Masco?

Masco (NYSE:MAS) and Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Masco pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 46.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Masco has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Fortune Brands Innovations has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Masco has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

Masco has a net margin of 11.61% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 6.12%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Masco11.61% 2,379.08% 17.21%
Fortune Brands Innovations 6.12%17.72%6.40%

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Innovations. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Masco$7.62B1.85$810M$4.3516.44
Fortune Brands Innovations$4.46B1.32$298.80M$2.2521.94

In the previous week, Masco had 29 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Masco and 13 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Masco's score of 0.51 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Masco
15 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
9 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fortune Brands Innovations
9 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Masco currently has a consensus target price of $79.80, indicating a potential upside of 11.58%. Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus target price of $54.62, indicating a potential upside of 10.66%. Given Masco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Masco is more favorable than Fortune Brands Innovations.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Masco
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42
Fortune Brands Innovations
2 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.19

93.9% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Masco shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Masco beats Fortune Brands Innovations on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Mohawk Industries?

Mohawk Industries (NYSE:MHK) and Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and risk.

Mohawk Industries has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

Mohawk Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Innovations. Mohawk Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mohawk Industries$10.79B0.69$369.90M$7.5516.29
Fortune Brands Innovations$4.46B1.32$298.80M$2.2521.94

In the previous week, Mohawk Industries had 6 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Mohawk Industries and 13 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Mohawk Industries' score of 0.81 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Mohawk Industries
7 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fortune Brands Innovations
9 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

79.0% of Mohawk Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. 17.9% of Mohawk Industries shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fortune Brands Innovations has a net margin of 6.12% compared to Mohawk Industries' net margin of 4.15%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 17.72% beat Mohawk Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mohawk Industries4.15% 7.50% 4.60%
Fortune Brands Innovations 6.12%17.72%6.40%

Mohawk Industries presently has a consensus price target of $124.42, indicating a potential upside of 1.17%. Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $54.62, indicating a potential upside of 10.66%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than Mohawk Industries.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mohawk Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Fortune Brands Innovations
2 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.19

Summary

Fortune Brands Innovations beats Mohawk Industries on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fortune Brands Innovations News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FBIN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FBIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FBIN vs. The Competition

Export
MetricFortune Brands InnovationsBuilding Products IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$5.88B$8.45B$10.62B$23.69B
Dividend Yield2.11%2.14%120.66%4.22%
P/E Ratio21.9463.4227.5130.98
Price / Sales1.3218.56310.0119.22
Price / Cash9.3614.7924.0718.73
Price / Book2.487.334.724.76
Net Income$298.80M$4.96B$610.65M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-3.73%-1.58%0.25%0.35%
1 Month Performance-7.43%-2.73%-2.39%-0.55%
1 Year Performance-11.60%-0.54%12.50%19.21%

Fortune Brands Innovations Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations
4.2542 of 5 stars		$49.35
+0.2%		$54.62
+10.7%		-11.6%$5.88B$4.46B21.9410,000
UFPI
UFP Industries
4.5355 of 5 stars		$88.21
+0.3%		$103.75
+17.6%		-11.2%$4.97B$6.32B19.2613,800
BCC
Boise Cascade
4.9238 of 5 stars		$78.23
+0.5%		$92.80
+18.6%		-8.1%$2.74B$6.40B26.437,660
BLDR
Builders FirstSource
4.2468 of 5 stars		$72.59
-0.4%		$100.35
+38.2%		-49.0%$7.84B$15.19B27.8128,000
MAS
Masco
4.377 of 5 stars		$81.11
+2.3%		$80.67
-0.6%		+3.7%$15.99B$7.56B20.1318,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:FBIN) was last updated on 8/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump’s $250 Bill – See Immediately
Former Goldman Sachs VP Dr. David Eifrig is warning that July 28 could trigger the biggest wealth reset in mod...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
A 50-year dollar arrangement just ended - what it means for you
In 1974, Henry Kissinger helped create the U.S.-Saudi Arabia Joint Commission on Economic Cooperation - a litt...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
The dollar just broke
Bloomberg research shows the U.S. dollar's share of global reserves has fallen to the lowest level this centur...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your withdrawal order could cost you in taxes
If you have $2M or more saved, the 4% rule points to roughly $92,000 a year - but it's a single-variable answe...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Read this before the market closes
Jason Bodner says a stock market anomaly could shift a small group of stocks starting August 14. In a recen...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
AI Thursday Payouts: $252. $264. $259.
A small income fund is turning AI stock holdings into weekly cash payouts. The last three Thursdays paid out 2...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel