Go Pro
→ Earth's biggest energy source: near Grand Canyon (From Behind the Markets) (Ad)tc pixel Free FBIN Stock Alerts

Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN) Competitors

Fortune Brands Innovations logo
$40.69 +0.95 (+2.39%)
Closing price 09/11/2026 03:58 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$40.73 +0.04 (+0.10%)
As of 09/11/2026 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

FBIN vs. UFPI, BCC, BLDR, KBH, and MAS

Should you buy Fortune Brands Innovations stock or one of its competitors? Fortune Brands Innovations's main competitors and comparable companies include UFP Industries (UFPI), Boise Cascade (BCC), Builders FirstSource (BLDR), KB Home (KBH), and Masco (MAS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to UFP Industries?

UFP Industries (NASDAQ:UFPI) and Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

UFP Industries has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Fortune Brands Innovations has lower revenue, but higher earnings than UFP Industries. UFP Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
UFP Industries$6.32B0.70$294.79M$4.3618.48
Fortune Brands Innovations$4.39B1.11$298.80M$1.2333.08

81.8% of UFP Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of UFP Industries shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Fortune Brands Innovations had 2 more articles in the media than UFP Industries. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations and 3 mentions for UFP Industries. UFP Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Fortune Brands Innovations' score of 0.91 indicating that UFP Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
UFP Industries
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fortune Brands Innovations
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

UFP Industries has a net margin of 3.99% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 3.39%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 19.50% beat UFP Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
UFP Industries3.99% 8.00% 6.11%
Fortune Brands Innovations 3.39%19.50%7.09%

UFP Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. UFP Industries pays out 33.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. UFP Industries has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Fortune Brands Innovations has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

UFP Industries presently has a consensus price target of $104.50, suggesting a potential upside of 29.72%. Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $55.43, suggesting a potential upside of 36.23%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than UFP Industries.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
UFP Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Fortune Brands Innovations
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.41

Summary

Fortune Brands Innovations beats UFP Industries on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Boise Cascade?

Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) and Boise Cascade (NYSE:BCC) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings and risk.

Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Boise Cascade pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Boise Cascade pays out 31.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Boise Cascade has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Fortune Brands Innovations presently has a consensus target price of $55.43, suggesting a potential upside of 36.23%. Boise Cascade has a consensus target price of $93.60, suggesting a potential upside of 23.86%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than Boise Cascade.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortune Brands Innovations
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.41
Boise Cascade
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29

87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.2% of Boise Cascade shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Boise Cascade shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Boise Cascade had 2 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Boise Cascade and 5 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Boise Cascade's average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Fortune Brands Innovations' score of 0.91 indicating that Boise Cascade is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fortune Brands Innovations
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Boise Cascade
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Boise Cascade has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Fortune Brands Innovations has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Boise Cascade. Boise Cascade is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Brands Innovations$4.39B1.11$298.80M$1.2333.08
Boise Cascade$6.40B0.41$132.84M$2.9525.62

Fortune Brands Innovations has a net margin of 3.39% compared to Boise Cascade's net margin of 1.64%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 19.50% beat Boise Cascade's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Brands Innovations3.39% 19.50% 7.09%
Boise Cascade 1.64%5.41%3.34%

Summary

Fortune Brands Innovations beats Boise Cascade on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Builders FirstSource?

Builders FirstSource (NYSE:BLDR) and Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

Builders FirstSource presently has a consensus price target of $90.26, suggesting a potential upside of 49.14%. Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $55.43, suggesting a potential upside of 36.23%. Given Builders FirstSource's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Builders FirstSource is more favorable than Fortune Brands Innovations.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Builders FirstSource
3 Sell rating(s)
13 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.24
Fortune Brands Innovations
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.41

In the previous week, Builders FirstSource had 5 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Builders FirstSource and 5 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Builders FirstSource's score of 0.52 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Builders FirstSource
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fortune Brands Innovations
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Fortune Brands Innovations has a net margin of 3.39% compared to Builders FirstSource's net margin of 0.71%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 19.50% beat Builders FirstSource's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Builders FirstSource0.71% 11.73% 4.32%
Fortune Brands Innovations 3.39%19.50%7.09%

Builders FirstSource has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Builders FirstSource has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Builders FirstSource, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Builders FirstSource$15.19B0.43$435.20M$0.9166.50
Fortune Brands Innovations$4.39B1.11$298.80M$1.2333.08

95.5% of Builders FirstSource shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Builders FirstSource shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Fortune Brands Innovations beats Builders FirstSource on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to KB Home?

Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) and KB Home (NYSE:KBH) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and profitability.

KB Home has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Innovations. KB Home is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Brands Innovations$4.39B1.11$298.80M$1.2333.08
KB Home$5.50B0.55$428.79M$2.8717.11

Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. KB Home pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. KB Home pays out 34.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and KB Home has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

In the previous week, KB Home had 1 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for KB Home and 5 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat KB Home's score of 0.70 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fortune Brands Innovations
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
KB Home
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, KB Home has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Fortune Brands Innovations presently has a consensus price target of $55.43, suggesting a potential upside of 36.23%. KB Home has a consensus price target of $60.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.17%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than KB Home.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortune Brands Innovations
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.41
KB Home
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of KB Home shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of KB Home shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

KB Home has a net margin of 4.94% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 3.39%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 19.50% beat KB Home's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Brands Innovations3.39% 19.50% 7.09%
KB Home 4.94%7.67%4.37%

Summary

Fortune Brands Innovations beats KB Home on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Masco?

Masco (NYSE:MAS) and Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Masco had 2 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Masco and 5 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Masco's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Fortune Brands Innovations' score of 0.91 indicating that Masco is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Masco
7 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fortune Brands Innovations
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Masco presently has a consensus price target of $79.56, indicating a potential upside of 15.94%. Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $55.43, indicating a potential upside of 36.23%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than Masco.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Masco
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.32
Fortune Brands Innovations
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.41

Masco has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Masco has a net margin of 11.61% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 3.39%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Masco11.61% 2,379.08% 17.21%
Fortune Brands Innovations 3.39%19.50%7.09%

Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Masco pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Masco has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Fortune Brands Innovations has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Innovations. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Masco$7.56B1.79$810M$4.3515.78
Fortune Brands Innovations$4.39B1.11$298.80M$1.2333.08

93.9% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Masco shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Masco beats Fortune Brands Innovations on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fortune Brands Innovations News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FBIN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FBIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FBIN vs. The Competition

Export
MetricFortune Brands InnovationsBuilding Products IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$4.86B$8.19B$10.18B$23.19B
Dividend Yield2.55%2.18%97.17%3.56%
P/E Ratio33.0847.4925.7528.69
Price / Sales1.1118.49461.9199.79
Price / Cash7.5614.4823.7133.82
Price / Book2.057.164.844.74
Net Income$298.80M$4.88B$612.22M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-5.60%-2.22%-1.56%-1.99%
1 Month Performance-16.71%-5.04%-3.85%-2.68%
1 Year Performance-31.55%-2.27%6.34%10.45%

Fortune Brands Innovations Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations
4.7407 of 5 stars		$40.69
+2.4%		$55.43
+36.2%		-33.1%$4.86B$4.39B33.0810,000
UFPI
UFP Industries
4.6429 of 5 stars		$84.38
flat		$104.50
+23.8%		-21.3%$4.65B$6.32B19.3513,800
BCC
Boise Cascade
4.9586 of 5 stars		$79.27
+0.1%		$93.60
+18.1%		-15.1%$2.76B$6.40B26.877,660
BLDR
Builders FirstSource
3.3386 of 5 stars		$65.74
-0.1%		$90.35
+37.4%		-58.7%$7.08B$15.19B72.2428,000
KBH
KB Home
4.6455 of 5 stars		$52.28
+0.1%		$60.17
+15.1%		-27.2%$3.20B$6.24B18.222,118

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:FBIN) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Elon’s “nude” scandal – a big opportunity?
Elon Musk's SpaceX just hit a legal snag in Minnesota over Grok's AI nudification capabilities, with the state...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Bezos… DOOMED
A single FCC filing hints Elon Musk is planning his biggest project yet - bigger than Tesla, SpaceX, and X com...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
The retirement stock I'd buy before Nvidia today
In 2014, Marc Chaikin pointed readers toward Nvidia. Now the 60-year Wall Street veteran and creator of the Ch...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
This metric called 1929, 1969 and 2000 [it's screaming now]
The Buffett Indicator once flagged the 1929, 1969, and 2000 market peaks - and it's now at 231%, its highest r...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
How options let you do more with less capital
Would you rather spend $5,000 buying 100 shares of a $50 stock, or control those same 100 shares for a fractio...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The retirement income that answers “yes” when everything else says no
Todd Phillips has spent 30 years studying safe-money income. He says most so-called income sources fail one te...
Eagle Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My ‘one day’ retirement secret
TradeSmith's AI research team, backed by a $17 million investment and led by a former NSA codebreaker, built a...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel