Does the media favor UFPI or FBIN?

In the previous week, UFP Industries had 9 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for UFP Industries and 8 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat UFP Industries' score of 0.32 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment UFP Industries 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Fortune Brands Innovations 5 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to FBIN or BCC?

In the previous week, Fortune Brands Innovations had 4 more articles in the media than Boise Cascade. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations and 4 mentions for Boise Cascade. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Boise Cascade's score of 0.43 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fortune Brands Innovations 5 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Boise Cascade 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer FBIN or BLDR?

In the previous week, Builders FirstSource had 8 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Builders FirstSource and 8 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Builders FirstSource's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Fortune Brands Innovations' score of 1.17 indicating that Builders FirstSource is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fortune Brands Innovations 5 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Builders FirstSource 12 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer FBIN or MAS?

In the previous week, Masco had 19 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Masco and 8 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Masco's score of 0.84 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fortune Brands Innovations 5 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Masco 14 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer FBIN or MHK?

In the previous week, Mohawk Industries had 14 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Mohawk Industries and 8 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Mohawk Industries' score of 0.69 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fortune Brands Innovations 5 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Mohawk Industries 9 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN) Competitors

$44.64 -0.34 (-0.76%)

As of 08/21/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

Compare

FBIN vs. UFPI, BCC, BLDR, MAS, and MHK

Should you buy Fortune Brands Innovations stock or one of its competitors? Fortune Brands Innovations's main competitors and comparable companies include UFP Industries (UFPI), Boise Cascade (BCC), Builders FirstSource (BLDR), Masco (MAS), and Mohawk Industries (MHK). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to UFP Industries?

UFP Industries (NASDAQ:UFPI) and Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

In the previous week, UFP Industries had 9 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for UFP Industries and 8 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat UFP Industries' score of 0.32 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
UFP Industries	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Fortune Brands Innovations	5 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

UFP Industries has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.31, suggesting that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

UFP Industries has a net margin of 3.99% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 3.39%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 19.50% beat UFP Industries' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
UFP Industries	3.99%	8.00%	6.11%
Fortune Brands Innovations	3.39%	19.50%	7.09%

Fortune Brands Innovations has lower revenue, but higher earnings than UFP Industries. UFP Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
UFP Industries	$6.23B	0.79	$294.79M	$4.36	20.37
Fortune Brands Innovations	$4.46B	1.19	$298.80M	$1.23	36.29

81.8% of UFP Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of UFP Industries shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

UFP Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. UFP Industries pays out 33.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. UFP Industries has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Fortune Brands Innovations has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

UFP Industries presently has a consensus target price of $103.75, suggesting a potential upside of 16.84%. Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus target price of $55.33, suggesting a potential upside of 23.95%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than UFP Industries.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
UFP Industries	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Fortune Brands Innovations	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.27

Summary

Fortune Brands Innovations beats UFP Industries on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Boise Cascade?

Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) and Boise Cascade (NYSE:BCC) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Boise Cascade has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

Fortune Brands Innovations currently has a consensus price target of $55.33, indicating a potential upside of 23.95%. Boise Cascade has a consensus price target of $93.60, indicating a potential upside of 13.37%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than Boise Cascade.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fortune Brands Innovations	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.27
Boise Cascade	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29

Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Boise Cascade pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Boise Cascade pays out 29.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Boise Cascade has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Fortune Brands Innovations has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Boise Cascade. Boise Cascade is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Brands Innovations	$4.46B	1.19	$298.80M	$1.23	36.29
Boise Cascade	$6.40B	0.45	$132.84M	$2.95	27.99

Fortune Brands Innovations has a net margin of 3.39% compared to Boise Cascade's net margin of 1.64%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 19.50% beat Boise Cascade's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fortune Brands Innovations	3.39%	19.50%	7.09%
Boise Cascade	1.64%	5.41%	3.34%

87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.2% of Boise Cascade shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Boise Cascade shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Fortune Brands Innovations had 4 more articles in the media than Boise Cascade. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations and 4 mentions for Boise Cascade. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Boise Cascade's score of 0.43 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fortune Brands Innovations	5 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Boise Cascade	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Fortune Brands Innovations beats Boise Cascade on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Builders FirstSource?

Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) and Builders FirstSource (NYSE:BLDR) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, Builders FirstSource had 8 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Builders FirstSource and 8 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Builders FirstSource's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Fortune Brands Innovations' score of 1.17 indicating that Builders FirstSource is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fortune Brands Innovations	5 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Builders FirstSource	12 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Builders FirstSource has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Builders FirstSource, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Brands Innovations	$4.46B	1.19	$298.80M	$1.23	36.29
Builders FirstSource	$15.19B	0.50	$435.20M	$0.91	76.95

Fortune Brands Innovations presently has a consensus target price of $55.33, indicating a potential upside of 23.95%. Builders FirstSource has a consensus target price of $90.35, indicating a potential upside of 29.04%. Given Builders FirstSource's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Builders FirstSource is more favorable than Fortune Brands Innovations.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fortune Brands Innovations	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.27
Builders FirstSource	3 Sell rating(s)	13 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.24

87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Builders FirstSource shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Builders FirstSource shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Builders FirstSource has a beta of 1.44, indicating that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

Fortune Brands Innovations has a net margin of 3.39% compared to Builders FirstSource's net margin of 0.71%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 19.50% beat Builders FirstSource's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fortune Brands Innovations	3.39%	19.50%	7.09%
Builders FirstSource	0.71%	11.73%	4.32%

Summary

Builders FirstSource beats Fortune Brands Innovations on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Masco?

Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and risk.

Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Masco pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Masco has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Innovations. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Brands Innovations	$4.46B	1.19	$298.80M	$1.23	36.29
Masco	$7.56B	1.91	$810M	$4.35	16.87

Masco has a net margin of 11.61% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 3.39%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fortune Brands Innovations	3.39%	19.50%	7.09%
Masco	11.61%	2,379.08%	17.21%

Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Masco had 19 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Masco and 8 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Masco's score of 0.84 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fortune Brands Innovations	5 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Masco	14 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Fortune Brands Innovations presently has a consensus target price of $55.33, indicating a potential upside of 23.95%. Masco has a consensus target price of $79.87, indicating a potential upside of 8.82%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than Masco.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fortune Brands Innovations	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.27
Masco	1 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Masco beats Fortune Brands Innovations on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Mohawk Industries?

Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) and Mohawk Industries (NYSE:MHK) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

Fortune Brands Innovations presently has a consensus price target of $55.33, suggesting a potential upside of 23.95%. Mohawk Industries has a consensus price target of $130.50, suggesting a potential downside of 4.37%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than Mohawk Industries.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fortune Brands Innovations	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.27
Mohawk Industries	0 Sell rating(s)	12 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.31

Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mohawk Industries has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Mohawk Industries has a net margin of 4.15% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 3.39%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 19.50% beat Mohawk Industries' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fortune Brands Innovations	3.39%	19.50%	7.09%
Mohawk Industries	4.15%	7.50%	4.60%

In the previous week, Mohawk Industries had 14 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Mohawk Industries and 8 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Mohawk Industries' score of 0.69 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fortune Brands Innovations	5 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Mohawk Industries	9 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Mohawk Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Innovations. Mohawk Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Brands Innovations	$4.46B	1.19	$298.80M	$1.23	36.29
Mohawk Industries	$10.79B	0.86	$369.90M	$7.55	18.08

87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.0% of Mohawk Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of Mohawk Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Fortune Brands Innovations beats Mohawk Industries on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fortune Brands Innovations News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FBIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FBIN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Fortune Brands Innovations	Building Products Industry	Industrials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$5.32B	$8.64B	$10.69B	$24.31B
Dividend Yield	2.34%	2.11%	97.23%	3.70%
P/E Ratio	36.29	52.89	26.69	30.26
Price / Sales	1.19	19.47	328.80	20.99
Price / Cash	8.47	15.09	24.47	32.49
Price / Book	2.31	3.84	4.49	6.77
Net Income	$298.80M	$4.88B	$612.35M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-6.72%	-1.56%	-1.41%	-0.65%
1 Month Performance	-10.51%	4.54%	2.54%	3.38%
1 Year Performance	-27.42%	-0.64%	12.36%	14.90%

Fortune Brands Innovations Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FBIN Fortune Brands Innovations	4.8138 of 5 stars	$44.64 -0.8%	$55.33 +24.0%	-27.4%	$5.32B	$4.46B	36.29	10,000	Positive News
UFPI UFP Industries	4.2546 of 5 stars	$88.29 -1.8%	$103.75 +17.5%	-17.1%	$4.96B	$6.32B	20.25	13,800	Trending News Analyst Revision
BCC Boise Cascade	4.3868 of 5 stars	$81.84 -1.7%	$93.60 +14.4%	-9.4%	$2.90B	$6.40B	27.74	7,660
BLDR Builders FirstSource	3.8068 of 5 stars	$70.17 -3.2%	$90.35 +28.8%	-51.5%	$7.80B	$15.19B	77.11	28,000	Positive News Analyst Forecast
MAS Masco	4.1477 of 5 stars	$73.79 -0.7%	$79.87 +8.2%	-2.9%	$14.66B	$7.62B	16.96	18,000	Trending News Analyst Revision

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:FBIN) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN) Competitors

FBIN vs. UFPI, BCC, BLDR, MAS, and MHK

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to UFP Industries?

Summary

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Boise Cascade?

Summary

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Builders FirstSource?

Summary

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Masco?

Summary

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Mohawk Industries?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FBIN vs. The Competition

Fortune Brands Innovations Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN) Competitors

FBIN vs. UFPI, BCC, BLDR, MAS, and MHK

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to UFP Industries?

Does the media favor UFPI or FBIN?

Which has more risk & volatility, UFPI or FBIN?

Is UFPI or FBIN more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, UFPI or FBIN?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of UFPI or FBIN?

Is UFPI or FBIN a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer UFPI or FBIN?

Summary

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Boise Cascade?

Which has more risk and volatility, FBIN or BCC?

Do analysts rate FBIN or BCC?

Is FBIN or BCC a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, FBIN or BCC?

Is FBIN or BCC more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in FBIN or BCC?

Does the media refer more to FBIN or BCC?

Summary

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Builders FirstSource?

Does the media prefer FBIN or BLDR?

Which has better valuation and earnings, FBIN or BLDR?

Do analysts rate FBIN or BLDR?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in FBIN or BLDR?

Which has more volatility & risk, FBIN or BLDR?

Is FBIN or BLDR more profitable?

Summary

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Masco?

Is FBIN or MAS a better dividend stock?

Which has better earnings & valuation, FBIN or MAS?

Is FBIN or MAS more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, FBIN or MAS?

Does the media prefer FBIN or MAS?

Do analysts rate FBIN or MAS?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in FBIN or MAS?

Summary

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Mohawk Industries?

Do analysts prefer FBIN or MHK?

Which has more volatility and risk, FBIN or MHK?

Is FBIN or MHK more profitable?

Does the media prefer FBIN or MHK?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, FBIN or MHK?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of FBIN or MHK?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FBIN vs. The Competition

Fortune Brands Innovations Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools