Does the media refer more to UFPI or FBIN?

In the previous week, Fortune Brands Innovations had 3 more articles in the media than UFP Industries. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations and 2 mentions for UFP Industries. UFP Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat Fortune Brands Innovations' score of 1.16 indicating that UFP Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment UFP Industries 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Fortune Brands Innovations 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to FBIN or BCC?

In the previous week, Fortune Brands Innovations had 1 more articles in the media than Boise Cascade. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations and 4 mentions for Boise Cascade. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Boise Cascade's score of 0.74 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fortune Brands Innovations 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Boise Cascade 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer FBIN or BLDR?

In the previous week, Fortune Brands Innovations had 2 more articles in the media than Builders FirstSource. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations and 3 mentions for Builders FirstSource. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Builders FirstSource's score of 0.22 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fortune Brands Innovations 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Builders FirstSource 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer FBIN or MAS?

In the previous week, Masco had 1 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Masco and 5 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Masco's score of 0.57 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fortune Brands Innovations 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Masco 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer FBIN or MHK?

In the previous week, Mohawk Industries had 14 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Mohawk Industries and 5 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Mohawk Industries' score of -0.03 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fortune Brands Innovations 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Mohawk Industries 6 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN) Competitors

$41.04 -0.28 (-0.68%)

As of 02:10 PM Eastern

Compare

FBIN vs. UFPI, BCC, BLDR, MAS, and MHK

Should you buy Fortune Brands Innovations stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Fortune Brands Innovations with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Fortune Brands Innovations include UFP Industries (UFPI), Boise Cascade (BCC), Builders FirstSource (BLDR), Masco (MAS), and Mohawk Industries (MHK).

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to UFP Industries?

UFP Industries (NASDAQ:UFPI) and Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

UFP Industries presently has a consensus target price of $105.40, indicating a potential upside of 23.94%. Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus target price of $51.31, indicating a potential upside of 24.00%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than UFP Industries.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
UFP Industries	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.14
Fortune Brands Innovations	3 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.06

Fortune Brands Innovations has lower revenue, but higher earnings than UFP Industries. Fortune Brands Innovations is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UFP Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
UFP Industries	$6.32B	0.76	$294.79M	$4.58	18.57
Fortune Brands Innovations	$4.46B	1.11	$298.80M	$2.25	18.39

In the previous week, Fortune Brands Innovations had 3 more articles in the media than UFP Industries. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations and 2 mentions for UFP Industries. UFP Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat Fortune Brands Innovations' score of 1.16 indicating that UFP Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
UFP Industries	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Fortune Brands Innovations	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

UFP Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. UFP Industries pays out 31.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 46.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. UFP Industries has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Fortune Brands Innovations has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

81.8% of UFP Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of UFP Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

UFP Industries has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

Fortune Brands Innovations has a net margin of 6.12% compared to UFP Industries' net margin of 4.31%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 17.72% beat UFP Industries' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
UFP Industries	4.31%	8.50%	6.55%
Fortune Brands Innovations	6.12%	17.72%	6.40%

Summary

Fortune Brands Innovations beats UFP Industries on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Boise Cascade?

Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) and Boise Cascade (NYSE:BCC) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Fortune Brands Innovations has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Boise Cascade. Fortune Brands Innovations is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Boise Cascade, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Brands Innovations	$4.46B	1.11	$298.80M	$2.25	18.39
Boise Cascade	$6.40B	0.40	$132.84M	$2.96	24.48

In the previous week, Fortune Brands Innovations had 1 more articles in the media than Boise Cascade. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations and 4 mentions for Boise Cascade. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Boise Cascade's score of 0.74 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fortune Brands Innovations	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Boise Cascade	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Boise Cascade pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 46.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Boise Cascade pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fortune Brands Innovations has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Boise Cascade has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Boise Cascade has a beta of 1.09, indicating that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Fortune Brands Innovations presently has a consensus price target of $51.31, suggesting a potential upside of 24.00%. Boise Cascade has a consensus price target of $98.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.27%. Given Boise Cascade's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Boise Cascade is more favorable than Fortune Brands Innovations.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fortune Brands Innovations	3 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.06
Boise Cascade	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57

87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.2% of Boise Cascade shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Boise Cascade shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fortune Brands Innovations has a net margin of 6.12% compared to Boise Cascade's net margin of 1.73%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 17.72% beat Boise Cascade's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fortune Brands Innovations	6.12%	17.72%	6.40%
Boise Cascade	1.73%	5.55%	3.46%

Summary

Fortune Brands Innovations beats Boise Cascade on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Builders FirstSource?

Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) and Builders FirstSource (NYSE:BLDR) are both mid-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Builders FirstSource has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Builders FirstSource shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Builders FirstSource shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fortune Brands Innovations has a net margin of 6.12% compared to Builders FirstSource's net margin of 1.97%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 17.72% beat Builders FirstSource's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fortune Brands Innovations	6.12%	17.72%	6.40%
Builders FirstSource	1.97%	14.89%	5.52%

Fortune Brands Innovations currently has a consensus target price of $51.31, suggesting a potential upside of 24.00%. Builders FirstSource has a consensus target price of $101.88, suggesting a potential upside of 31.08%. Given Builders FirstSource's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Builders FirstSource is more favorable than Fortune Brands Innovations.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fortune Brands Innovations	3 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.06
Builders FirstSource	4 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.21

Builders FirstSource has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Builders FirstSource, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Brands Innovations	$4.46B	1.11	$298.80M	$2.25	18.39
Builders FirstSource	$15.19B	0.55	$435.20M	$2.61	29.78

In the previous week, Fortune Brands Innovations had 2 more articles in the media than Builders FirstSource. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations and 3 mentions for Builders FirstSource. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Builders FirstSource's score of 0.22 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fortune Brands Innovations	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Builders FirstSource	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Builders FirstSource beats Fortune Brands Innovations on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Masco?

Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are related companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Masco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Brands Innovations	$4.46B	1.11	$298.80M	$2.25	18.39
Masco	$7.68B	1.95	$810M	$4.03	18.44

Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 46.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Masco pays out 31.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fortune Brands Innovations has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Masco has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years.

Fortune Brands Innovations presently has a consensus price target of $51.31, suggesting a potential upside of 24.00%. Masco has a consensus price target of $80.07, suggesting a potential upside of 7.74%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than Masco.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fortune Brands Innovations	3 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.06
Masco	1 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.32

87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Masco has a net margin of 10.90% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 6.12%. Masco's return on equity of 815.20% beat Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fortune Brands Innovations	6.12%	17.72%	6.40%
Masco	10.90%	815.20%	16.32%

In the previous week, Masco had 1 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Masco and 5 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Masco's score of 0.57 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fortune Brands Innovations	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Masco	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Masco beats Fortune Brands Innovations on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Mohawk Industries?

Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) and Mohawk Industries (NYSE:MHK) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.0% of Mohawk Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of Mohawk Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Mohawk Industries had 14 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Mohawk Industries and 5 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Mohawk Industries' score of -0.03 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fortune Brands Innovations	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Mohawk Industries	6 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Mohawk Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Innovations. Mohawk Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Brands Innovations	$4.46B	1.11	$298.80M	$2.25	18.39
Mohawk Industries	$10.79B	0.62	$369.90M	$6.67	16.40

Fortune Brands Innovations currently has a consensus target price of $51.31, suggesting a potential upside of 24.00%. Mohawk Industries has a consensus target price of $123.33, suggesting a potential upside of 12.72%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than Mohawk Industries.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fortune Brands Innovations	3 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.06
Mohawk Industries	1 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.27

Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mohawk Industries has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Fortune Brands Innovations has a net margin of 6.12% compared to Mohawk Industries' net margin of 3.77%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 17.72% beat Mohawk Industries' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fortune Brands Innovations	6.12%	17.72%	6.40%
Mohawk Industries	3.77%	6.96%	4.23%

Summary

Fortune Brands Innovations beats Mohawk Industries on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fortune Brands Innovations News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FBIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FBIN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Fortune Brands Innovations	RETAIL Industry	Retail Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$4.94B	$37.22B	$26.23B	$23.20B
Dividend Yield	2.45%	3.59%	175.36%	4.06%
P/E Ratio	18.40	20.57	19.95	31.21
Price / Sales	1.11	6.50	3.69	21.09
Price / Cash	8.06	14.03	15.10	18.65
Price / Book	2.08	5.30	6.11	4.68
Net Income	$298.80M	$1.87B	$962.92M	$1.08B
7 Day Performance	-2.58%	0.79%	-1.08%	-0.85%
1 Month Performance	9.94%	-0.57%	1.31%	0.38%
1 Year Performance	-19.59%	-5.32%	0.76%	24.76%

Fortune Brands Innovations Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FBIN Fortune Brands Innovations	4.9401 of 5 stars	$41.04 -0.7%	$51.31 +25.0%	-17.7%	$4.90B	$4.46B	18.25	10,000	Positive News
UFPI UFP Industries	4.8571 of 5 stars	$84.65 +0.1%	$105.40 +24.5%	-11.3%	$4.78B	$6.32B	18.48	13,800
BCC Boise Cascade	4.7958 of 5 stars	$71.40 +0.4%	$98.00 +37.3%	-15.7%	$2.50B	$6.40B	24.12	7,660
BLDR Builders FirstSource	3.941 of 5 stars	$77.65 -0.2%	$101.88 +31.2%	-32.6%	$8.36B	$15.19B	29.75	28,000
MAS Masco	3.9342 of 5 stars	$74.28 +0.3%	$80.07 +7.8%	+20.2%	$14.93B	$7.56B	18.43	18,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:FBIN) was last updated on 6/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN) Competitors

FBIN vs. UFPI, BCC, BLDR, MAS, and MHK

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to UFP Industries?

Summary

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Boise Cascade?

Summary

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Builders FirstSource?

Summary

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Masco?

Summary

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Mohawk Industries?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FBIN vs. The Competition

Fortune Brands Innovations Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN) Competitors

FBIN vs. UFPI, BCC, BLDR, MAS, and MHK

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to UFP Industries?

Do analysts prefer UFPI or FBIN?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, UFPI or FBIN?

Does the media refer more to UFPI or FBIN?

Is UFPI or FBIN a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in UFPI or FBIN?

Which has more volatility and risk, UFPI or FBIN?

Is UFPI or FBIN more profitable?

Summary

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Boise Cascade?

Which has better valuation & earnings, FBIN or BCC?

Does the media refer more to FBIN or BCC?

Is FBIN or BCC a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, FBIN or BCC?

Do analysts prefer FBIN or BCC?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in FBIN or BCC?

Is FBIN or BCC more profitable?

Summary

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Builders FirstSource?

Which has more risk & volatility, FBIN or BLDR?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in FBIN or BLDR?

Is FBIN or BLDR more profitable?

Do analysts rate FBIN or BLDR?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, FBIN or BLDR?

Does the media prefer FBIN or BLDR?

Summary

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Masco?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, FBIN or MAS?

Which has more volatility & risk, FBIN or MAS?

Is FBIN or MAS a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate FBIN or MAS?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in FBIN or MAS?

Is FBIN or MAS more profitable?

Does the media prefer FBIN or MAS?

Summary

How does Fortune Brands Innovations compare to Mohawk Industries?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of FBIN or MHK?

Does the media prefer FBIN or MHK?

Which has better valuation & earnings, FBIN or MHK?

Do analysts recommend FBIN or MHK?

Which has more volatility & risk, FBIN or MHK?

Is FBIN or MHK more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FBIN vs. The Competition

Fortune Brands Innovations Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools