Owens Corning Competitors

Owens Corning (NYSE:OC) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are both construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Owens Corning and Masco's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Masco has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Owens Corning. Owens Corning is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Masco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Owens Corning has a beta of 1.54, meaning that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Owens Corning and Masco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Owens Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Owens Corning pays out 22.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Masco pays out 24.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Owens Corning has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Masco has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Owens Corning is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Owens Corning and Masco, as reported by MarketBeat.

Owens Corning currently has a consensus target price of $113.60, indicating a potential upside of 40.21%. Masco has a consensus target price of $60.6944, indicating a potential upside of 14.04%. Given Owens Corning's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Owens Corning is more favorable than Masco.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

91.2% of Owens Corning shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Owens Corning shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Masco shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Masco beats Owens Corning on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Owens Corning (NYSE:OC) and Fortune Brands Home & Security (NYSE:FBHS) are both construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Owens Corning and Fortune Brands Home & Security's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Fortune Brands Home & Security has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Owens Corning. Owens Corning is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Home & Security, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Owens Corning has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its share price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Home & Security has a beta of 1.66, indicating that its share price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Owens Corning and Fortune Brands Home & Security's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Owens Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Fortune Brands Home & Security pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Owens Corning pays out 22.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Home & Security pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Owens Corning has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Fortune Brands Home & Security has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Owens Corning is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Owens Corning and Fortune Brands Home & Security, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Owens Corning presently has a consensus price target of $113.60, indicating a potential upside of 40.21%. Fortune Brands Home & Security has a consensus price target of $87.4375, indicating a potential upside of 5.17%. Given Owens Corning's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Owens Corning is more favorable than Fortune Brands Home & Security.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

91.2% of Owens Corning shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Owens Corning shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Fortune Brands Home & Security beats Owens Corning on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Owens Corning (NYSE:OC) and Trex (NYSE:TREX) are both construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Owens Corning and Trex's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Owens Corning has higher revenue and earnings than Trex. Owens Corning is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Owens Corning has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its share price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Trex has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its share price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Owens Corning and Trex's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Owens Corning and Trex, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Owens Corning presently has a consensus price target of $113.60, indicating a potential upside of 40.21%. Trex has a consensus price target of $78.8333, indicating a potential downside of 13.97%. Given Owens Corning's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Owens Corning is more favorable than Trex.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

91.2% of Owens Corning shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.6% of Trex shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Owens Corning shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Trex shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Owens Corning beats Trex on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Owens Corning (NYSE:OC) and Lennox International (NYSE:LII) are both construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Owens Corning and Lennox International, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Owens Corning presently has a consensus price target of $113.60, indicating a potential upside of 40.21%. Lennox International has a consensus price target of $254.0714, indicating a potential downside of 9.19%. Given Owens Corning's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Owens Corning is more favorable than Lennox International.

Volatility and Risk

Owens Corning has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its share price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lennox International has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its share price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

91.2% of Owens Corning shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.3% of Lennox International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Owens Corning shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Lennox International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Owens Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Lennox International pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Owens Corning pays out 22.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lennox International pays out 27.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Owens Corning has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Lennox International has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Owens Corning is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Owens Corning and Lennox International's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Lennox International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Owens Corning. Owens Corning is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lennox International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Owens Corning and Lennox International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Owens Corning beats Lennox International on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

A. O. Smith (NYSE:AOS) and Owens Corning (NYSE:OC) are both mid-cap industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for A. O. Smith and Owens Corning, as reported by MarketBeat.

A. O. Smith presently has a consensus price target of $54.1429, indicating a potential downside of 8.80%. Owens Corning has a consensus price target of $113.60, indicating a potential upside of 40.21%. Given Owens Corning's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Owens Corning is more favorable than A. O. Smith.

Risk & Volatility

A. O. Smith has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Owens Corning has a beta of 1.54, meaning that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

75.1% of A. O. Smith shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.2% of Owens Corning shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of A. O. Smith shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Owens Corning shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

A. O. Smith pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Owens Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. A. O. Smith pays out 46.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Owens Corning pays out 22.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. A. O. Smith has raised its dividend for 29 consecutive years and Owens Corning has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. A. O. Smith is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares A. O. Smith and Owens Corning's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Owens Corning has higher revenue and earnings than A. O. Smith. Owens Corning is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than A. O. Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares A. O. Smith and Owens Corning's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Owens Corning beats A. O. Smith on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Builders FirstSource (NASDAQ:BLDR) and Owens Corning (NYSE:OC) are both mid-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Volatility & Risk

Builders FirstSource has a beta of 2.65, suggesting that its stock price is 165% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Owens Corning has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Builders FirstSource and Owens Corning's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

95.3% of Builders FirstSource shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.2% of Owens Corning shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Builders FirstSource shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Owens Corning shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Builders FirstSource and Owens Corning's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Owens Corning has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Builders FirstSource. Owens Corning is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Builders FirstSource, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Builders FirstSource and Owens Corning, as reported by MarketBeat.

Builders FirstSource presently has a consensus price target of $38.9375, indicating a potential downside of 10.00%. Owens Corning has a consensus price target of $113.60, indicating a potential upside of 40.21%. Given Owens Corning's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Owens Corning is more favorable than Builders FirstSource.

Summary

Builders FirstSource beats Owens Corning on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.