Log in
NYSE:MAS

Masco Competitors

$53.97
+0.20 (+0.37 %)
(As of 10/29/2020 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$52.89
Now: $53.97
$54.41
50-Day Range
$53.57
MA: $56.42
$59.40
52-Week Range
$27.04
Now: $53.97
$60.16
Volume2.00 million shs
Average Volume2.95 million shs
Market Capitalization$14.11 billion
P/E Ratio11.24
Dividend Yield1.04%
Beta1.51

Competitors

Masco (NYSE:MAS) Vs. FBHS, LII, AOS, TREX, OC, and SSD

Should you be buying MAS stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "building products" are considered alternatives and competitors to Masco, including Fortune Brands Home & Security (FBHS), Lennox International (LII), A. O. Smith (AOS), Trex (TREX), Owens Corning (OC), and Simpson Manufacturing (SSD).

Fortune Brands Home & Security (NYSE:FBHS) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are both large-cap industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and profitability.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Fortune Brands Home & Security and Masco's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Brands Home & Security$5.76 billion1.96$431.90 million$3.6022.74
Masco$6.71 billion2.10$935 million$2.2523.99

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Home & Security. Fortune Brands Home & Security is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Masco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Fortune Brands Home & Security and Masco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fortune Brands Home & Security7.61%21.65%8.23%
Masco19.23%-1,729.19%13.46%

Dividends

Fortune Brands Home & Security pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Fortune Brands Home & Security pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Masco pays out 24.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fortune Brands Home & Security has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Fortune Brands Home & Security is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Fortune Brands Home & Security and Masco, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fortune Brands Home & Security17902.47
Masco141402.68

Fortune Brands Home & Security presently has a consensus target price of $76.8824, suggesting a potential downside of 6.10%. Masco has a consensus target price of $55.8056, suggesting a potential upside of 3.40%. Given Masco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Masco is more favorable than Fortune Brands Home & Security.

Volatility and Risk

Fortune Brands Home & Security has a beta of 1.75, meaning that its share price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.51, meaning that its share price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

87.4% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.7% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Masco shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Masco beats Fortune Brands Home & Security on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lennox International (NYSE:LII) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and profitability.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

71.0% of Lennox International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.7% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of Lennox International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Masco shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Lennox International and Masco's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lennox International$3.81 billion2.78$408.70 million$11.1924.72
Masco$6.71 billion2.10$935 million$2.2523.99

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Lennox International. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lennox International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Lennox International and Masco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Lennox International9.95%-176.45%17.78%
Masco19.23%-1,729.19%13.46%

Volatility and Risk

Lennox International has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.51, meaning that its share price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Lennox International and Masco, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Lennox International211202.00
Masco141402.68

Lennox International presently has a consensus target price of $253.50, suggesting a potential downside of 8.34%. Masco has a consensus target price of $55.8056, suggesting a potential upside of 3.40%. Given Masco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Masco is more favorable than Lennox International.

Dividends

Lennox International pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Lennox International pays out 27.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Masco pays out 24.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Masco beats Lennox International on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

A. O. Smith (NYSE:AOS) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

78.4% of A. O. Smith shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.7% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of A. O. Smith shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Masco shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares A. O. Smith and Masco's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
A. O. Smith$2.99 billion2.88$370 million$2.2224.05
Masco$6.71 billion2.10$935 million$2.2523.99

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than A. O. Smith. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than A. O. Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares A. O. Smith and Masco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
A. O. Smith10.72%18.38%10.03%
Masco19.23%-1,729.19%13.46%

Risk & Volatility

A. O. Smith has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.51, suggesting that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for A. O. Smith and Masco, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
A. O. Smith27302.08
Masco141402.68

A. O. Smith presently has a consensus target price of $48.50, suggesting a potential downside of 9.14%. Masco has a consensus target price of $55.8056, suggesting a potential upside of 3.40%. Given Masco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Masco is more favorable than A. O. Smith.

Dividends

A. O. Smith pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. A. O. Smith pays out 43.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Masco pays out 24.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Masco beats A. O. Smith on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Trex (NYSE:TREX) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are both construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

99.7% of Trex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.7% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Trex shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Masco shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Trex and Masco's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trex$745.35 million11.10$144.74 million$1.2457.64
Masco$6.71 billion2.10$935 million$2.2523.99

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Trex. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Trex and Masco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Trex21.41%36.64%27.12%
Masco19.23%-1,729.19%13.46%

Risk & Volatility

Trex has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.51, meaning that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Trex and Masco, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Trex09302.25
Masco141402.68

Trex presently has a consensus target price of $64.0455, suggesting a potential downside of 10.39%. Masco has a consensus target price of $55.8056, suggesting a potential upside of 3.40%. Given Masco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Masco is more favorable than Trex.

Owens Corning (NYSE:OC) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are both construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Risk & Volatility

Owens Corning has a beta of 1.55, suggesting that its stock price is 55% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.51, suggesting that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Owens Corning and Masco's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Owens Corning$7.16 billion1.02$405 million$4.5414.82
Masco$6.71 billion2.10$935 million$2.2523.99

Masco has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Owens Corning. Owens Corning is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Masco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Owens Corning pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Owens Corning pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Masco pays out 24.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Owens Corning has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Owens Corning is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Owens Corning and Masco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Owens Corning-8.79%11.35%4.83%
Masco19.23%-1,729.19%13.46%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

94.6% of Owens Corning shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.7% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Owens Corning shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Masco shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Owens Corning and Masco, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Owens Corning112802.33
Masco141402.68

Owens Corning presently has a consensus target price of $64.2381, suggesting a potential downside of 4.55%. Masco has a consensus target price of $55.8056, suggesting a potential upside of 3.40%. Given Masco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Masco is more favorable than Owens Corning.

Summary

Owens Corning beats Masco on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Simpson Manufacturing (NYSE:SSD) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are both construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Volatility & Risk

Simpson Manufacturing has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its share price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.51, indicating that its share price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Simpson Manufacturing and Masco's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Simpson Manufacturing$1.14 billion3.38$133.98 million$2.9829.63
Masco$6.71 billion2.10$935 million$2.2523.99

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Simpson Manufacturing. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Simpson Manufacturing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Simpson Manufacturing pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Simpson Manufacturing pays out 30.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Masco pays out 24.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Simpson Manufacturing has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Simpson Manufacturing is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Simpson Manufacturing and Masco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Simpson Manufacturing13.71%18.50%13.90%
Masco19.23%-1,729.19%13.46%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

88.7% of Simpson Manufacturing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.7% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Simpson Manufacturing shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Masco shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Simpson Manufacturing and Masco, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Simpson Manufacturing01102.50
Masco141402.68

Simpson Manufacturing presently has a consensus target price of $105.00, suggesting a potential upside of 18.90%. Masco has a consensus target price of $55.8056, suggesting a potential upside of 3.40%. Given Simpson Manufacturing's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Simpson Manufacturing is more favorable than Masco.

Summary

Masco beats Simpson Manufacturing on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.


Masco Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Fortune Brands Home & Security logo
FBHS
Fortune Brands Home & Security
1.5$81.88+0.6%$11.31 billion$5.76 billion26.50Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Heavy News Reporting
Lennox International logo
LII
Lennox International
1.5$276.57+1.3%$10.59 billion$3.81 billion29.80Insider Selling
A. O. Smith logo
AOS
A. O. Smith
1.8$53.38+3.6%$8.62 billion$2.99 billion29.17Earnings Announcement
Heavy News Reporting
Trex logo
TREX
Trex
1.2$71.47+0.3%$8.27 billion$745.35 million49.80Upcoming Earnings
Owens Corning logo
OC
Owens Corning
1.5$67.30+3.3%$7.27 billion$7.16 billion-12.17Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Simpson Manufacturing logo
SSD
Simpson Manufacturing
1.6$88.31+1.1%$3.84 billion$1.14 billion24.19Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Analyst Revision
Builders FirstSource logo
BLDR
Builders FirstSource
1.6$30.01+1.7%$3.50 billion$7.28 billion17.05Earnings Announcement
AAON logo
AAON
AAON
1.0$58.98+2.5%$3.08 billion$469.33 million44.01
UFP Industries logo
UFPI
UFP Industries
1.6$50.21+0.9%$3.07 billion$4.42 billion15.79Dividend Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
Armstrong World Industries logo
AWI
Armstrong World Industries
1.6$60.60+2.3%$2.90 billion$1.04 billion-49.67Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Gibraltar Industries logo
ROCK
Gibraltar Industries
1.2$59.01+7.6%$1.91 billion$1.05 billion24.69Earnings Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
Heavy News Reporting
American Woodmark logo
AMWD
American Woodmark
1.2$83.86+3.2%$1.43 billion$1.65 billion22.07
Patrick Industries logo
PATK
Patrick Industries
2.4$57.62+1.3%$1.35 billion$2.34 billion21.18Earnings Announcement
Heavy News Reporting
Griffon logo
GFF
Griffon
2.1$21.89+0.0%$1.21 billion$2.21 billion19.37
PGT Innovations logo
PGTI
PGT Innovations
1.2$16.59+1.6%$978.20 million$744.96 million26.76Upcoming Earnings
Apogee Enterprises logo
APOG
Apogee Enterprises
1.7$24.00+2.6%$633.26 million$1.39 billion13.33
Quanex Building Products logo
NX
Quanex Building Products
1.6$18.23+1.5%$598.04 million$893.84 million-41.43
Insteel Industries logo
IIIN
Insteel Industries
0.9$21.32+3.6%$410.65 million$455.71 million41.80
This page was last updated on 10/30/2020 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.