Masco (MAS) Competitors

Armstrong World Industries has a net margin of 18.60% compared to Masco's net margin of 11.61%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Armstrong World Industries' return on equity.

In the previous week, Masco had 7 more articles in the media than Armstrong World Industries. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Masco and 11 mentions for Armstrong World Industries. Armstrong World Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Masco's score of 1.34 indicating that Armstrong World Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Masco has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Armstrong World Industries. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Armstrong World Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Masco currently has a consensus price target of $79.88, suggesting a potential upside of 13.72%. Armstrong World Industries has a consensus price target of $213.25, suggesting a potential upside of 26.11%. Given Armstrong World Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Armstrong World Industries is more favorable than Masco.

93.9% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Armstrong World Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Masco shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Armstrong World Industries shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Armstrong World Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Masco pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Armstrong World Industries pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Masco has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Armstrong World Industries has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Masco is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Masco had 3 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Masco and 15 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Masco's score of 1.34 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Masco presently has a consensus price target of $79.88, indicating a potential upside of 13.72%. Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $55.71, indicating a potential upside of 30.39%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than Masco.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Innovations. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Masco has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

93.9% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Masco shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Masco pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Masco has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Fortune Brands Innovations has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Masco has a net margin of 11.61% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 3.39%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity.

Home Depot pays an annual dividend of $9.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Home Depot pays out 65.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Masco pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Home Depot has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years and Masco has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Home Depot is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

70.9% of Home Depot shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Home Depot shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Home Depot has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Home Depot currently has a consensus target price of $375.54, indicating a potential upside of 17.47%. Masco has a consensus target price of $79.88, indicating a potential upside of 13.72%. Given Home Depot's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Home Depot is more favorable than Masco.

Masco has a net margin of 11.61% compared to Home Depot's net margin of 8.41%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Home Depot's return on equity.

In the previous week, Home Depot had 177 more articles in the media than Masco. MarketBeat recorded 195 mentions for Home Depot and 18 mentions for Masco. Home Depot's average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Masco's score of 1.34 indicating that Home Depot is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Home Depot has higher revenue and earnings than Masco. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Home Depot, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Mohawk Industries currently has a consensus target price of $130.50, indicating a potential upside of 4.13%. Masco has a consensus target price of $79.88, indicating a potential upside of 13.72%. Given Masco's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Masco is more favorable than Mohawk Industries.

Masco has a net margin of 11.61% compared to Mohawk Industries' net margin of 4.15%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Mohawk Industries' return on equity.

In the previous week, Masco had 5 more articles in the media than Mohawk Industries. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Masco and 13 mentions for Mohawk Industries. Mohawk Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.49 beat Masco's score of 1.34 indicating that Mohawk Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Masco has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Mohawk Industries. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mohawk Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

79.0% of Mohawk Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.9% of Mohawk Industries shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mohawk Industries has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.