Masco (MAS) Competitors

Armstrong World Industries has a net margin of 18.60% compared to Masco's net margin of 11.61%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Armstrong World Industries' return on equity.

Masco presently has a consensus target price of $79.12, suggesting a potential upside of 15.08%. Armstrong World Industries has a consensus target price of $213.25, suggesting a potential upside of 31.54%. Given Armstrong World Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Armstrong World Industries is more favorable than Masco.

Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Armstrong World Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Masco pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Armstrong World Industries pays out 18.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Masco has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Armstrong World Industries has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Masco is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

93.9% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Armstrong World Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Masco shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Armstrong World Industries shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Masco had 8 more articles in the media than Armstrong World Industries. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Masco and 4 mentions for Armstrong World Industries. Armstrong World Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Masco's score of 0.17 indicating that Armstrong World Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Masco has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Armstrong World Industries. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Armstrong World Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Masco pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Masco has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years.

Masco has a net margin of 11.61% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 3.39%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity.

Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Fortune Brands Innovations currently has a consensus price target of $52.63, indicating a potential upside of 34.75%. Masco has a consensus price target of $79.12, indicating a potential upside of 15.08%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than Masco.

In the previous week, Masco had 4 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Masco and 8 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Masco's average media sentiment score of 0.17 beat Fortune Brands Innovations' score of -0.14 indicating that Masco is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Innovations. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Home Depot pays an annual dividend of $9.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Home Depot pays out 65.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Masco pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Home Depot has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years and Masco has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Home Depot is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

70.9% of Home Depot shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Home Depot shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Home Depot currently has a consensus target price of $375.93, indicating a potential upside of 29.28%. Masco has a consensus target price of $79.12, indicating a potential upside of 15.08%. Given Home Depot's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Home Depot is more favorable than Masco.

Home Depot has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Masco has a net margin of 11.61% compared to Home Depot's net margin of 8.41%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Home Depot's return on equity.

Home Depot has higher revenue and earnings than Masco. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Home Depot, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Home Depot had 21 more articles in the media than Masco. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Home Depot and 12 mentions for Masco. Home Depot's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Masco's score of 0.17 indicating that Home Depot is being referred to more favorably in the media.

79.0% of Mohawk Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. 17.9% of Mohawk Industries shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Mohawk Industries has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its share price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Masco has a net margin of 11.61% compared to Mohawk Industries' net margin of 4.15%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Mohawk Industries' return on equity.

In the previous week, Masco had 5 more articles in the media than Mohawk Industries. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Masco and 7 mentions for Mohawk Industries. Mohawk Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Masco's score of 0.17 indicating that Mohawk Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Mohawk Industries presently has a consensus price target of $135.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.40%. Masco has a consensus price target of $79.12, indicating a potential upside of 15.08%. Given Masco's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Masco is more favorable than Mohawk Industries.

Masco has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Mohawk Industries. Mohawk Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Masco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.