Masco (MAS) Competitors

In the previous week, Masco had 21 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Masco and 3 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Masco's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Fortune Brands Innovations' score of 0.59 indicating that Masco is being referred to more favorably in the media.

93.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Masco shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Innovations. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Masco has a net margin of 10.90% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 6.12%. Masco's return on equity of 815.20% beat Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity.

Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Masco pays out 31.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 46.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Masco has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Fortune Brands Innovations has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Masco has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Masco presently has a consensus price target of $80.67, indicating a potential upside of 4.23%. Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $54.38, indicating a potential upside of 9.02%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than Masco.

Masco has a net margin of 10.90% compared to Lowe's Companies' net margin of 7.51%. Masco's return on equity of 815.20% beat Lowe's Companies' return on equity.

Lowe's Companies presently has a consensus price target of $264.57, suggesting a potential upside of 31.06%. Masco has a consensus price target of $80.67, suggesting a potential upside of 4.23%. Given Lowe's Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Lowe's Companies is more favorable than Masco.

Lowe's Companies has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Lowe's Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Masco. Lowe's Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Masco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Lowe's Companies had 8 more articles in the media than Masco. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Lowe's Companies and 24 mentions for Masco. Lowe's Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Masco's score of 1.20 indicating that Lowe's Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

74.1% of Lowe's Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Lowe's Companies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lowe's Companies pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Lowe's Companies pays out 42.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Masco pays out 31.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lowe's Companies has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years and Masco has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Lowe's Companies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

79.0% of Mohawk Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.9% of Mohawk Industries shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Masco has a net margin of 10.90% compared to Mohawk Industries' net margin of 3.77%. Masco's return on equity of 815.20% beat Mohawk Industries' return on equity.

Mohawk Industries currently has a consensus price target of $124.42, indicating a potential upside of 12.84%. Masco has a consensus price target of $80.67, indicating a potential upside of 4.23%. Given Mohawk Industries' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Mohawk Industries is more favorable than Masco.

In the previous week, Masco had 13 more articles in the media than Mohawk Industries. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Masco and 11 mentions for Mohawk Industries. Mohawk Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Masco's score of 1.20 indicating that Mohawk Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Mohawk Industries has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Masco has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Mohawk Industries. Mohawk Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Masco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Owens Corning pays an annual dividend of $3.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Owens Corning pays out -47.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Masco pays out 31.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Owens Corning has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Masco has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Owens Corning is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Masco has a net margin of 10.90% compared to Owens Corning's net margin of -5.43%. Masco's return on equity of 815.20% beat Owens Corning's return on equity.

Owens Corning has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Masco had 16 more articles in the media than Owens Corning. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Masco and 8 mentions for Owens Corning. Owens Corning's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Masco's score of 1.20 indicating that Owens Corning is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Owens Corning presently has a consensus target price of $157.92, indicating a potential upside of 13.61%. Masco has a consensus target price of $80.67, indicating a potential upside of 4.23%. Given Owens Corning's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Owens Corning is more favorable than Masco.

Masco has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Owens Corning. Owens Corning is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Masco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

88.4% of Owens Corning shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Owens Corning shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.