Masco (MAS) Competitors

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Armstrong World Industries. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Armstrong World Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Masco has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Armstrong World Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Masco pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Armstrong World Industries pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Masco has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Armstrong World Industries has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Masco is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Masco presently has a consensus price target of $79.87, indicating a potential upside of 7.16%. Armstrong World Industries has a consensus price target of $213.00, indicating a potential upside of 16.01%. Given Armstrong World Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Armstrong World Industries is more favorable than Masco.

93.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Armstrong World Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Masco shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Armstrong World Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Armstrong World Industries has a net margin of 18.60% compared to Masco's net margin of 11.61%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Armstrong World Industries' return on equity.

In the previous week, Masco had 5 more articles in the media than Armstrong World Industries. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Masco and 5 mentions for Armstrong World Industries. Armstrong World Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Masco's score of 0.95 indicating that Armstrong World Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

In the previous week, Fortune Brands Innovations had 7 more articles in the media than Masco. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations and 10 mentions for Masco. Masco's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Fortune Brands Innovations' score of 0.88 indicating that Masco is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Masco has a net margin of 11.61% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 3.39%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity.

Masco has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

Masco presently has a consensus price target of $79.87, indicating a potential upside of 7.16%. Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $55.33, indicating a potential upside of 13.27%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than Masco.

Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Masco pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Masco has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Fortune Brands Innovations has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

93.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Masco shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Innovations. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Masco presently has a consensus price target of $79.87, suggesting a potential upside of 7.16%. Home Depot has a consensus price target of $373.18, suggesting a potential upside of 8.49%. Given Home Depot's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Home Depot is more favorable than Masco.

In the previous week, Home Depot had 52 more articles in the media than Masco. MarketBeat recorded 62 mentions for Home Depot and 10 mentions for Masco. Home Depot's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Masco's score of 0.95 indicating that Home Depot is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Masco has a net margin of 11.61% compared to Home Depot's net margin of 8.41%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Home Depot's return on equity.

Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Home Depot pays an annual dividend of $9.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Masco pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Home Depot pays out 66.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Masco has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Home Depot has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Home Depot is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Masco has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Home Depot has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

93.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.9% of Home Depot shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Masco shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Home Depot shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Home Depot has higher revenue and earnings than Masco. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Home Depot, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Masco has a net margin of 11.61% compared to Mohawk Industries' net margin of 4.15%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Mohawk Industries' return on equity.

Mohawk Industries has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Mohawk Industries presently has a consensus target price of $130.50, indicating a potential downside of 4.37%. Masco has a consensus target price of $79.87, indicating a potential upside of 7.16%. Given Masco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Masco is more favorable than Mohawk Industries.

Masco has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Mohawk Industries. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mohawk Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

79.0% of Mohawk Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. 17.9% of Mohawk Industries shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Masco had 3 more articles in the media than Mohawk Industries. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Masco and 7 mentions for Mohawk Industries. Masco's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Mohawk Industries' score of 0.71 indicating that Masco is being referred to more favorably in the news media.