Masco (MAS) Competitors

Armstrong World Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Armstrong World Industries pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Masco pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Armstrong World Industries has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Masco has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Masco is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Armstrong World Industries currently has a consensus target price of $213.25, indicating a potential upside of 30.41%. Masco has a consensus target price of $79.56, indicating a potential upside of 14.80%. Given Armstrong World Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Armstrong World Industries is more favorable than Masco.

In the previous week, Masco had 2 more articles in the media than Armstrong World Industries. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Masco and 4 mentions for Armstrong World Industries. Armstrong World Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Masco's score of 0.42 indicating that Armstrong World Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Armstrong World Industries. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Armstrong World Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

98.9% of Armstrong World Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Armstrong World Industries shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Armstrong World Industries has a net margin of 18.60% compared to Masco's net margin of 11.61%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Armstrong World Industries' return on equity.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Innovations. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

93.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Masco shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Masco has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Masco has a net margin of 11.61% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 3.39%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity.

In the previous week, Masco had 4 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Masco and 2 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat Masco's score of 0.42 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Masco pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Masco has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Fortune Brands Innovations has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Masco currently has a consensus target price of $79.56, suggesting a potential upside of 14.80%. Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus target price of $55.43, suggesting a potential upside of 37.06%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than Masco.

In the previous week, Home Depot had 17 more articles in the media than Masco. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Home Depot and 6 mentions for Masco. Home Depot's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Masco's score of 0.42 indicating that Home Depot is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Home Depot pays an annual dividend of $9.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Home Depot pays out 65.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Masco pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Home Depot has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years and Masco has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Home Depot is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Home Depot has higher revenue and earnings than Masco. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Home Depot, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Home Depot currently has a consensus target price of $375.18, indicating a potential upside of 23.52%. Masco has a consensus target price of $79.56, indicating a potential upside of 14.80%. Given Home Depot's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Home Depot is more favorable than Masco.

Masco has a net margin of 11.61% compared to Home Depot's net margin of 8.41%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Home Depot's return on equity.

70.9% of Home Depot shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Home Depot shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Home Depot has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Masco has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mohawk Industries. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mohawk Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Masco has a net margin of 11.61% compared to Mohawk Industries' net margin of 4.15%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Mohawk Industries' return on equity.

Masco presently has a consensus price target of $79.56, indicating a potential upside of 14.80%. Mohawk Industries has a consensus price target of $130.50, indicating a potential upside of 7.37%. Given Masco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Masco is more favorable than Mohawk Industries.

93.9% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.0% of Mohawk Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Masco shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of Mohawk Industries shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Masco has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mohawk Industries has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Mohawk Industries had 18 more articles in the media than Masco. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Mohawk Industries and 6 mentions for Masco. Mohawk Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Masco's score of 0.42 indicating that Mohawk Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.