Masco (MAS) Competitors

$67.28 +0.13 (+0.19%)

Closing price 05/22/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$67.26 -0.01 (-0.02%)

As of 05/22/2026 06:23 PM Eastern

MAS vs. AWI, BLD, FBIN, LOW, and OC

Should you buy Masco stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Masco with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Masco include Armstrong World Industries (AWI), TopBuild (BLD), Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN), Lowe's Companies (LOW), and Owens Corning (OC).

How does Masco compare to Armstrong World Industries?

Armstrong World Industries (NYSE:AWI) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are both construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Armstrong World Industries. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Armstrong World Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Armstrong World Industries	$1.62B	4.15	$308.70M	$7.05	22.35
Masco	$7.56B	1.79	$810M	$4.03	16.69

Armstrong World Industries currently has a consensus target price of $211.86, indicating a potential upside of 34.44%. Masco has a consensus target price of $80.07, indicating a potential upside of 19.01%. Given Armstrong World Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Armstrong World Industries is more favorable than Masco.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Armstrong World Industries	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70
Masco	1 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.35

98.9% of Armstrong World Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Armstrong World Industries shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Armstrong World Industries has a net margin of 18.59% compared to Masco's net margin of 10.90%. Masco's return on equity of 815.20% beat Armstrong World Industries' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Armstrong World Industries	18.59%	36.71%	16.86%
Masco	10.90%	815.20%	16.32%

In the previous week, Armstrong World Industries had 2 more articles in the media than Masco. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Armstrong World Industries and 6 mentions for Masco. Masco's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Armstrong World Industries' score of 0.31 indicating that Masco is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Armstrong World Industries	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Masco	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Armstrong World Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Armstrong World Industries pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Masco pays out 31.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Armstrong World Industries has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Masco has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Masco is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Armstrong World Industries beats Masco on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Masco compare to TopBuild?

TopBuild (NYSE:BLD) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability and media sentiment.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than TopBuild. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TopBuild, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TopBuild	$5.41B	2.12	$521.73M	$17.80	22.93
Masco	$7.56B	1.79	$810M	$4.03	16.69

Masco has a net margin of 10.90% compared to TopBuild's net margin of 8.95%. Masco's return on equity of 815.20% beat TopBuild's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TopBuild	8.95%	23.53%	8.61%
Masco	10.90%	815.20%	16.32%

In the previous week, TopBuild had 7 more articles in the media than Masco. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for TopBuild and 6 mentions for Masco. Masco's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat TopBuild's score of -0.31 indicating that Masco is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TopBuild	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Masco	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

TopBuild presently has a consensus price target of $466.77, indicating a potential upside of 14.38%. Masco has a consensus price target of $80.07, indicating a potential upside of 19.01%. Given Masco's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Masco is more favorable than TopBuild.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TopBuild	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.47
Masco	1 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.35

95.7% of TopBuild shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of TopBuild shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

TopBuild has a beta of 1.85, meaning that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Masco beats TopBuild on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Masco compare to Fortune Brands Innovations?

Masco (NYSE:MAS) and Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) are related companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Innovations. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Masco	$7.56B	1.79	$810M	$4.03	16.69
Fortune Brands Innovations	$4.46B	1.01	$298.80M	$2.25	16.73

Masco has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Masco presently has a consensus target price of $80.07, indicating a potential upside of 19.01%. Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus target price of $51.31, indicating a potential upside of 36.33%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than Masco.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Masco	1 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.35
Fortune Brands Innovations	2 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13

Masco has a net margin of 10.90% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 6.12%. Masco's return on equity of 815.20% beat Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Masco	10.90%	815.20%	16.32%
Fortune Brands Innovations	6.12%	17.72%	6.40%

In the previous week, Fortune Brands Innovations had 10 more articles in the media than Masco. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations and 6 mentions for Masco. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Masco's score of 0.71 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Masco	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Fortune Brands Innovations	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Masco pays out 31.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 46.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Masco has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Fortune Brands Innovations has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

93.9% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Masco shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Masco beats Fortune Brands Innovations on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Masco compare to Lowe's Companies?

Masco (NYSE:MAS) and Lowe's Companies (NYSE:LOW) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and risk.

Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Lowe's Companies pays an annual dividend of $4.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Masco pays out 31.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lowe's Companies pays out 40.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Masco has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Lowe's Companies has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years. Lowe's Companies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Masco has a net margin of 10.90% compared to Lowe's Companies' net margin of 7.51%. Masco's return on equity of 815.20% beat Lowe's Companies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Masco	10.90%	815.20%	16.32%
Lowe's Companies	7.51%	-67.96%	13.31%

In the previous week, Lowe's Companies had 115 more articles in the media than Masco. MarketBeat recorded 121 mentions for Lowe's Companies and 6 mentions for Masco. Masco's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Lowe's Companies' score of 0.15 indicating that Masco is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Masco	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Lowe's Companies	29 Very Positive mention(s)	16 Positive mention(s)	21 Neutral mention(s)	25 Negative mention(s)	8 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Masco has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lowe's Companies has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

93.9% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.1% of Lowe's Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Masco shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Lowe's Companies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lowe's Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Masco. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lowe's Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Masco	$7.56B	1.79	$810M	$4.03	16.69
Lowe's Companies	$86.29B	1.40	$6.65B	$11.83	18.20

Masco currently has a consensus price target of $80.07, indicating a potential upside of 19.01%. Lowe's Companies has a consensus price target of $264.57, indicating a potential upside of 22.89%. Given Lowe's Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Lowe's Companies is more favorable than Masco.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Masco	1 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.35
Lowe's Companies	2 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	23 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.58

Summary

Lowe's Companies beats Masco on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Masco compare to Owens Corning?

Owens Corning (NYSE:OC) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are both construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

88.4% of Owens Corning shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Owens Corning shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Owens Corning pays an annual dividend of $3.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Owens Corning pays out -47.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Masco pays out 31.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Owens Corning has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Masco has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Owens Corning is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Owens Corning currently has a consensus target price of $144.82, indicating a potential upside of 23.22%. Masco has a consensus target price of $80.07, indicating a potential upside of 19.01%. Given Owens Corning's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Owens Corning is more favorable than Masco.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Owens Corning	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.53
Masco	1 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.35

In the previous week, Owens Corning and Owens Corning both had 6 articles in the media. Owens Corning's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Masco's score of 0.71 indicating that Owens Corning is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Owens Corning	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Masco	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Masco has a net margin of 10.90% compared to Owens Corning's net margin of -5.43%. Masco's return on equity of 815.20% beat Owens Corning's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Owens Corning	-5.43%	19.86%	6.32%
Masco	10.90%	815.20%	16.32%

Masco has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Owens Corning. Owens Corning is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Masco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Owens Corning	$10.10B	0.94	-$522M	-$6.61	N/A
Masco	$7.56B	1.79	$810M	$4.03	16.69

Owens Corning has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Masco beats Owens Corning on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Masco News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MAS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MAS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Masco	BLDG&CONST Industry	Construction Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$13.57B	$10.27B	$9.36B	$23.17B
Dividend Yield	1.90%	1.41%	1.86%	4.10%
P/E Ratio	16.69	21.44	17.13	27.86
Price / Sales	1.79	1.72	3.95	24.45
Price / Cash	14.28	16.00	16.94	25.10
Price / Book	517.53	18.42	7.43	4.73
Net Income	$810M	$864.87M	$560.77M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	3.28%	0.72%	2.75%	1.94%
1 Month Performance	-10.78%	-6.87%	-1.48%	0.85%
1 Year Performance	8.89%	9.22%	13.51%	28.44%

Masco Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MAS Masco	4.8709 of 5 stars	$67.28 +0.2%	$80.07 +19.0%	+7.3%	$13.57B	$7.56B	16.69	18,000
AWI Armstrong World Industries	4.2914 of 5 stars	$158.13 +1.9%	$211.86 +34.0%	+1.4%	$6.62B	$1.62B	22.43	3,800	Positive News
BLD TopBuild	3.3404 of 5 stars	$406.65 +1.5%	$466.77 +14.8%	+45.6%	$11.28B	$5.41B	22.85	14,707	Trending News Analyst Revision
FBIN Fortune Brands Innovations	4.9222 of 5 stars	$33.72 -1.9%	$51.31 +52.2%	-25.8%	$4.10B	$4.46B	14.98	10,000	News Coverage Positive News Insider Trade
LOW Lowe's Companies	4.8435 of 5 stars	$218.19 -0.1%	$283.76 +30.0%	-3.8%	$122.33B	$86.29B	18.41	276,000	Trending News Earnings Report Dividend Increase Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MAS) was last updated on 5/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Masco (MAS) Competitors

MAS vs. AWI, BLD, FBIN, LOW, and OC

How does Masco compare to Armstrong World Industries?

Summary

How does Masco compare to TopBuild?

Summary

How does Masco compare to Fortune Brands Innovations?

Summary

How does Masco compare to Lowe's Companies?

Summary

How does Masco compare to Owens Corning?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MAS vs. The Competition

Masco Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Masco (MAS) Competitors

MAS vs. AWI, BLD, FBIN, LOW, and OC

How does Masco compare to Armstrong World Industries?

Which has more risk & volatility, AWI or MAS?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, AWI or MAS?

Do analysts rate AWI or MAS?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of AWI or MAS?

Is AWI or MAS more profitable?

Does the media refer more to AWI or MAS?

Is AWI or MAS a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Masco compare to TopBuild?

Which has better earnings & valuation, BLD or MAS?

Is BLD or MAS more profitable?

Does the media refer more to BLD or MAS?

Do analysts rate BLD or MAS?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in BLD or MAS?

Which has more risk and volatility, BLD or MAS?

Summary

How does Masco compare to Fortune Brands Innovations?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, MAS or FBIN?

Which has more volatility and risk, MAS or FBIN?

Do analysts prefer MAS or FBIN?

Is MAS or FBIN more profitable?

Does the media refer more to MAS or FBIN?

Is MAS or FBIN a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of MAS or FBIN?

Summary

How does Masco compare to Lowe's Companies?

Is MAS or LOW a better dividend stock?

Is MAS or LOW more profitable?

Does the media favor MAS or LOW?

Which has more volatility and risk, MAS or LOW?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in MAS or LOW?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, MAS or LOW?

Do analysts recommend MAS or LOW?

Summary

How does Masco compare to Owens Corning?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in OC or MAS?

Is OC or MAS a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend OC or MAS?

Does the media favor OC or MAS?

Is OC or MAS more profitable?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, OC or MAS?

Which has more risk and volatility, OC or MAS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MAS vs. The Competition

Masco Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools