Go Pro

Masco (MAS) Competitors

Masco logo
$82.80 +0.03 (+0.04%)
Closing price 07/2/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$82.48 -0.32 (-0.39%)
As of 07/2/2026 07:24 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

MAS vs. AWI, BLD, FBIN, MHK, and OC

Should you buy Masco stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Masco with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Masco include Armstrong World Industries (AWI), TopBuild (BLD), Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN), Mohawk Industries (MHK), and Owens Corning (OC).

How does Masco compare to Armstrong World Industries?

Masco (NYSE:MAS) and Armstrong World Industries (NYSE:AWI) are both construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

93.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Armstrong World Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Masco shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Armstrong World Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Armstrong World Industries. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Armstrong World Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Masco$7.56B2.21$810M$4.0320.55
Armstrong World Industries$1.62B4.17$308.70M$7.0522.47

Armstrong World Industries has a net margin of 18.59% compared to Masco's net margin of 10.90%. Masco's return on equity of 815.20% beat Armstrong World Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Masco10.90% 815.20% 16.32%
Armstrong World Industries 18.59%36.71%16.86%

Masco has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Masco currently has a consensus target price of $80.07, suggesting a potential downside of 3.30%. Armstrong World Industries has a consensus target price of $211.86, suggesting a potential upside of 33.72%. Given Armstrong World Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Armstrong World Industries is more favorable than Masco.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Masco
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.37
Armstrong World Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70

In the previous week, Masco had 7 more articles in the media than Armstrong World Industries. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Masco and 1 mentions for Armstrong World Industries. Masco's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Armstrong World Industries' score of 0.84 indicating that Masco is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Masco
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Armstrong World Industries
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Armstrong World Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Masco pays out 31.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Armstrong World Industries pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Masco has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Armstrong World Industries has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Masco is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Armstrong World Industries beats Masco on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Masco compare to TopBuild?

Masco (NYSE:MAS) and TopBuild (NYSE:BLD) are both construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Masco has a net margin of 10.90% compared to TopBuild's net margin of 8.95%. Masco's return on equity of 815.20% beat TopBuild's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Masco10.90% 815.20% 16.32%
TopBuild 8.95%23.53%8.61%

In the previous week, TopBuild had 1 more articles in the media than Masco. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for TopBuild and 8 mentions for Masco. Masco's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat TopBuild's score of 0.10 indicating that Masco is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Masco
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
TopBuild
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Masco has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TopBuild has a beta of 1.8, meaning that its share price is 80% more volatile than the broader market.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than TopBuild. TopBuild is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Masco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Masco$7.56B2.21$810M$4.0320.55
TopBuild$5.62B1.77$521.73M$17.8019.92

93.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.7% of TopBuild shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Masco shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TopBuild shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Masco presently has a consensus price target of $80.07, indicating a potential downside of 3.30%. TopBuild has a consensus price target of $460.00, indicating a potential upside of 29.75%. Given TopBuild's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe TopBuild is more favorable than Masco.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Masco
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.37
TopBuild
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.47

Summary

Masco beats TopBuild on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Masco compare to Fortune Brands Innovations?

Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are related companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Innovations. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Brands Innovations$4.46B1.43$298.80M$2.2523.70
Masco$7.56B2.21$810M$4.0320.55

Masco has a net margin of 10.90% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 6.12%. Masco's return on equity of 815.20% beat Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Brands Innovations6.12% 17.72% 6.40%
Masco 10.90%815.20%16.32%

In the previous week, Fortune Brands Innovations had 5 more articles in the media than Masco. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations and 8 mentions for Masco. Masco's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Fortune Brands Innovations' score of 0.97 indicating that Masco is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fortune Brands Innovations
7 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Masco
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Fortune Brands Innovations currently has a consensus target price of $53.23, indicating a potential downside of 0.16%. Masco has a consensus target price of $80.07, indicating a potential downside of 3.30%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than Masco.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortune Brands Innovations
2 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.19
Masco
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.37

87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 46.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Masco pays out 31.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fortune Brands Innovations has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Masco has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years.

Summary

Masco beats Fortune Brands Innovations on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Masco compare to Mohawk Industries?

Masco (NYSE:MAS) and Mohawk Industries (NYSE:MHK) are related companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Masco had 2 more articles in the media than Mohawk Industries. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Masco and 6 mentions for Mohawk Industries. Mohawk Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Masco's score of 1.03 indicating that Mohawk Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Masco
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Mohawk Industries
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

93.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.0% of Mohawk Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Masco shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of Mohawk Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Masco has a net margin of 10.90% compared to Mohawk Industries' net margin of 3.77%. Masco's return on equity of 815.20% beat Mohawk Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Masco10.90% 815.20% 16.32%
Mohawk Industries 3.77%6.96%4.23%

Masco presently has a consensus price target of $80.07, suggesting a potential downside of 3.30%. Mohawk Industries has a consensus price target of $123.33, suggesting a potential upside of 3.40%. Given Mohawk Industries' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Mohawk Industries is more favorable than Masco.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Masco
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.37
Mohawk Industries
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.27

Masco has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mohawk Industries. Mohawk Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Masco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Masco$7.56B2.21$810M$4.0320.55
Mohawk Industries$10.79B0.67$369.90M$6.6717.88

Masco has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mohawk Industries has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Masco beats Mohawk Industries on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Masco compare to Owens Corning?

Owens Corning (NYSE:OC) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Owens Corning had 6 more articles in the media than Masco. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Owens Corning and 8 mentions for Masco. Masco's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Owens Corning's score of 0.45 indicating that Masco is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Owens Corning
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Masco
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Owens Corning has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

88.4% of Owens Corning shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Owens Corning shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Masco has a net margin of 10.90% compared to Owens Corning's net margin of -5.43%. Masco's return on equity of 815.20% beat Owens Corning's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Owens Corning-5.43% 19.86% 6.32%
Masco 10.90%815.20%16.32%

Masco has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Owens Corning. Owens Corning is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Masco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Owens Corning$10.10B1.20-$522M-$6.61N/A
Masco$7.56B2.21$810M$4.0320.55

Owens Corning pays an annual dividend of $3.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Owens Corning pays out -47.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Masco pays out 31.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Owens Corning has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Masco has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Owens Corning is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Owens Corning presently has a consensus target price of $150.58, suggesting a potential downside of 0.28%. Masco has a consensus target price of $80.07, suggesting a potential downside of 3.30%. Given Owens Corning's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Owens Corning is more favorable than Masco.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Owens Corning
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Masco
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.37

Summary

Owens Corning and Masco tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Masco News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MAS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MAS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MAS vs. The Competition

MetricMascoBLDG&CONST IndustryConstruction SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$16.70B$11.11B$9.88B$23.54B
Dividend Yield1.55%1.16%1.95%3.98%
P/E Ratio20.5523.3521.0331.55
Price / Sales2.212.834.4422.15
Price / Cash17.5816.2317.3925.36
Price / Book223.7810.325.534.81
Net Income$810M$854.97M$560.79M$1.07B
7 Day Performance3.66%-2.88%-2.38%0.56%
1 Month Performance18.85%90.56%19.00%3.96%
1 Year Performance24.64%7.95%8.12%18.27%

Masco Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MAS
Masco
4.1197 of 5 stars
$82.80
+0.0%
$80.07
-3.3%
+23.1%$16.70B$7.56B20.5518,000
AWI
Armstrong World Industries
4.4075 of 5 stars
$159.15
-1.9%
$211.86
+33.1%
-4.6%$6.92B$1.62B22.573,800
BLD
TopBuild
4.2096 of 5 stars
$358.54
-15.7%
$460.00
+28.3%
N/A$11.93B$5.41B20.1414,707
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations
4.2036 of 5 stars
$50.87
+10.7%
$51.31
+0.9%
-1.8%$5.48B$4.46B22.6110,000
MHK
Mohawk Industries
3.2202 of 5 stars
$118.94
-0.7%
$123.33
+3.7%
+7.1%$7.30B$10.79B17.8340,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:MAS) was last updated on 7/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners