Free Trial
→ The REAL Reason Trump is Invading Iran (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free MAS Stock Alerts

Masco (MAS) Competitors

Masco logo
$73.98 +0.23 (+0.31%)
Closing price 06/12/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$74.04 +0.06 (+0.08%)
As of 06/12/2026 06:59 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

MAS vs. AWI, BLD, FBIN, OC, and OTIS

Should you buy Masco stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Masco with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Masco include Armstrong World Industries (AWI), TopBuild (BLD), Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN), Owens Corning (OC), and Otis Worldwide (OTIS).

How does Masco compare to Armstrong World Industries?

Masco (NYSE:MAS) and Armstrong World Industries (NYSE:AWI) are both construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Masco has a beta of 1.31, suggesting that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Armstrong World Industries has a net margin of 18.59% compared to Masco's net margin of 10.90%. Masco's return on equity of 815.20% beat Armstrong World Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Masco10.90% 815.20% 16.32%
Armstrong World Industries 18.59%36.71%16.86%

In the previous week, Masco had 1 more articles in the media than Armstrong World Industries. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Masco and 9 mentions for Armstrong World Industries. Masco's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Armstrong World Industries' score of 0.77 indicating that Masco is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Masco
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Armstrong World Industries
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

93.9% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Armstrong World Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Masco shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Armstrong World Industries shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Armstrong World Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Masco pays out 31.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Armstrong World Industries pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Masco has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Armstrong World Industries has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Masco is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Masco currently has a consensus price target of $80.07, suggesting a potential upside of 8.23%. Armstrong World Industries has a consensus price target of $211.86, suggesting a potential upside of 36.99%. Given Armstrong World Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Armstrong World Industries is more favorable than Masco.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Masco
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.32
Armstrong World Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Armstrong World Industries. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Armstrong World Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Masco$7.56B1.97$810M$4.0318.36
Armstrong World Industries$1.62B4.07$308.70M$7.0521.94

Summary

Armstrong World Industries beats Masco on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Masco compare to TopBuild?

Masco (NYSE:MAS) and TopBuild (NYSE:BLD) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Masco has a net margin of 10.90% compared to TopBuild's net margin of 8.95%. Masco's return on equity of 815.20% beat TopBuild's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Masco10.90% 815.20% 16.32%
TopBuild 8.95%23.53%8.61%

93.9% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.7% of TopBuild shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Masco shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TopBuild shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Masco had 5 more articles in the media than TopBuild. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Masco and 5 mentions for TopBuild. Masco's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat TopBuild's score of 0.84 indicating that Masco is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Masco
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
TopBuild
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Masco has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TopBuild has a beta of 1.8, indicating that its share price is 80% more volatile than the broader market.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than TopBuild. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TopBuild, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Masco$7.56B1.97$810M$4.0318.36
TopBuild$5.41B2.13$521.73M$17.8023.11

Masco presently has a consensus target price of $80.07, suggesting a potential upside of 8.23%. TopBuild has a consensus target price of $466.77, suggesting a potential upside of 13.49%. Given TopBuild's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TopBuild is more favorable than Masco.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Masco
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.32
TopBuild
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.47

Summary

Masco beats TopBuild on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Masco compare to Fortune Brands Innovations?

Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are related companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Innovations. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Brands Innovations$4.46B1.16$298.80M$2.2519.22
Masco$7.56B1.97$810M$4.0318.36

Masco has a net margin of 10.90% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 6.12%. Masco's return on equity of 815.20% beat Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortune Brands Innovations6.12% 17.72% 6.40%
Masco 10.90%815.20%16.32%

Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 46.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Masco pays out 31.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fortune Brands Innovations has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Masco has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years.

Fortune Brands Innovations presently has a consensus price target of $51.31, suggesting a potential upside of 18.66%. Masco has a consensus price target of $80.07, suggesting a potential upside of 8.23%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than Masco.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortune Brands Innovations
2 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13
Masco
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.32

In the previous week, Fortune Brands Innovations and Fortune Brands Innovations both had 10 articles in the media. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Masco's score of 1.26 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fortune Brands Innovations
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Masco
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Masco beats Fortune Brands Innovations on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Masco compare to Owens Corning?

Masco (NYSE:MAS) and Owens Corning (NYSE:OC) are both construction companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Masco had 4 more articles in the media than Owens Corning. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Masco and 6 mentions for Owens Corning. Masco's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Owens Corning's score of 1.14 indicating that Masco is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Masco
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Owens Corning
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Masco has a beta of 1.31, suggesting that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Owens Corning has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Owens Corning pays an annual dividend of $3.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Masco pays out 31.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Owens Corning pays out -47.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Masco has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Owens Corning has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Owens Corning is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Masco has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Owens Corning. Owens Corning is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Masco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Masco$7.56B1.97$810M$4.0318.36
Owens Corning$10.10B0.97-$522M-$6.61N/A

93.9% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.4% of Owens Corning shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Masco shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Owens Corning shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Masco currently has a consensus price target of $80.07, suggesting a potential upside of 8.23%. Owens Corning has a consensus price target of $144.82, suggesting a potential upside of 19.26%. Given Owens Corning's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Owens Corning is more favorable than Masco.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Masco
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.32
Owens Corning
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53

Masco has a net margin of 10.90% compared to Owens Corning's net margin of -5.43%. Masco's return on equity of 815.20% beat Owens Corning's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Masco10.90% 815.20% 16.32%
Owens Corning -5.43%19.86%6.32%

Summary

Masco beats Owens Corning on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Masco compare to Otis Worldwide?

Otis Worldwide (NYSE:OTIS) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

Otis Worldwide pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Otis Worldwide pays out 46.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Masco pays out 31.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Otis Worldwide has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Masco has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years.

Otis Worldwide has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

88.0% of Otis Worldwide shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Otis Worldwide shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Otis Worldwide presently has a consensus target price of $97.58, suggesting a potential upside of 37.88%. Masco has a consensus target price of $80.07, suggesting a potential upside of 8.23%. Given Otis Worldwide's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Otis Worldwide is more favorable than Masco.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Otis Worldwide
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Masco
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.32

Masco has a net margin of 10.90% compared to Otis Worldwide's net margin of 10.11%. Masco's return on equity of 815.20% beat Otis Worldwide's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Otis Worldwide10.11% -29.39% 14.86%
Masco 10.90%815.20%16.32%

In the previous week, Masco had 4 more articles in the media than Otis Worldwide. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Masco and 6 mentions for Otis Worldwide. Otis Worldwide's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Masco's score of 1.26 indicating that Otis Worldwide is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Otis Worldwide
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Masco
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Otis Worldwide has higher revenue and earnings than Masco. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Otis Worldwide, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Otis Worldwide$14.43B1.88$1.38B$3.7618.82
Masco$7.56B1.97$810M$4.0318.36

Summary

Masco beats Otis Worldwide on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Masco News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MAS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MAS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MAS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricMascoBLDG&CONST IndustryConstruction SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$14.88B$10.64B$9.77B$23.15B
Dividend Yield1.74%1.26%1.91%4.08%
P/E Ratio18.3622.1818.4431.33
Price / Sales1.972.764.1620.48
Price / Cash15.6616.0417.0324.24
Price / Book199.959.475.264.68
Net Income$810M$855.33M$564.03M$1.07B
7 Day Performance6.57%98.77%21.54%2.11%
1 Month Performance9.67%75.25%16.72%2.32%
1 Year Performance19.65%11.09%14.14%24.12%

Masco Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MAS
Masco
3.9991 of 5 stars		$73.98
+0.3%		$80.07
+8.2%		+16.0%$14.88B$7.56B18.3618,000
AWI
Armstrong World Industries
4.3082 of 5 stars		$152.04
-2.0%		$211.86
+39.3%		+0.5%$6.62B$1.62B21.573,800
BLD
TopBuild
2.694 of 5 stars		$398.89
-0.7%		$466.77
+17.0%		+32.9%$11.26B$5.41B22.4114,707
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations
4.927 of 5 stars		$39.52
+1.2%		$51.31
+29.8%		-16.4%$4.66B$4.46B17.5710,000
OC
Owens Corning
4.7694 of 5 stars		$119.21
+0.0%		$144.82
+21.5%		-12.5%$9.60B$10.10BN/A25,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MAS) was last updated on 6/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Your Download Link (Expiring) If you still haven't downloaded the free Simple Options Trading For Beginners...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Hey, it's Jon Najarian. The SpaceX IPO is right around the corner. But I discovered Elon may have something BIGGER planned. Check this out before June 9th...
After being invited to the SpaceX launch headquarters in Cape Canaveral from one of Elon's top lobbyists… Hall...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
From the man who predicted 2008 crash…
Porter Stansberry, founder of one of the largest financial research firms in the world, says he's breaking the...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
"Golden Dawn": the code name that should be on every investor's radar
Trump's team has officially code-named America's new AI initiative 'Golden Dawn' - a government project involv...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX is chump change compared to Elon’s $20T ‘iPhone’
Early Apple investors saw peak gains as high as 7,537% after the iPhone launched. Now, multiple insider source...
StocksToTrade | Sponsoredtc pixel