Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) Competitors

Stanley Black & Decker logo
$86.69 -0.06 (-0.06%)
Closing price 06/18/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$86.95 +0.25 (+0.29%)
As of 06/18/2026 07:45 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SWK vs. NDSN, UFPI, AVNT, BC, and FBIN

Should you buy Stanley Black & Decker stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Stanley Black & Decker with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Stanley Black & Decker include Nordson (NDSN), UFP Industries (UFPI), Avient (AVNT), Brunswick (BC), and Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN).

How does Stanley Black & Decker compare to Nordson?

Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) and Nordson (NASDAQ:NDSN) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

Nordson has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Stanley Black & Decker. Nordson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stanley Black & Decker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Stanley Black & Decker$15.13B0.89$401.90M$2.4435.53
Nordson$2.79B5.91$484.47M$9.3831.55

In the previous week, Stanley Black & Decker had 1 more articles in the media than Nordson. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Stanley Black & Decker and 7 mentions for Nordson. Nordson's average media sentiment score of 1.59 beat Stanley Black & Decker's score of 0.91 indicating that Nordson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Stanley Black & Decker
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Nordson
7 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

87.8% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.1% of Nordson shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Nordson shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Nordson has a net margin of 18.19% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 2.44%. Nordson's return on equity of 20.08% beat Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Stanley Black & Decker2.44% 7.95% 3.29%
Nordson 18.19%20.08%10.39%

Stanley Black & Decker currently has a consensus target price of $88.44, indicating a potential upside of 2.02%. Nordson has a consensus target price of $311.29, indicating a potential upside of 5.19%. Given Nordson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Nordson is more favorable than Stanley Black & Decker.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Stanley Black & Decker
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Nordson
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Stanley Black & Decker pays an annual dividend of $3.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Nordson pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Stanley Black & Decker pays out 136.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Nordson pays out 35.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker has raised its dividend for 58 consecutive years and Nordson has raised its dividend for 62 consecutive years.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nordson has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Nordson beats Stanley Black & Decker on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Stanley Black & Decker compare to UFP Industries?

UFP Industries (NASDAQ:UFPI) and Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) are related companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation, earnings and dividends.

UFP Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Stanley Black & Decker pays an annual dividend of $3.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. UFP Industries pays out 31.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker pays out 136.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. UFP Industries has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Stanley Black & Decker has increased its dividend for 58 consecutive years. Stanley Black & Decker is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

81.8% of UFP Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.8% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are held by institutional investors. 2.5% of UFP Industries shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Stanley Black & Decker has higher revenue and earnings than UFP Industries. UFP Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stanley Black & Decker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
UFP Industries$6.32B0.77$294.79M$4.5818.90
Stanley Black & Decker$15.13B0.89$401.90M$2.4435.53

UFP Industries has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

UFP Industries has a net margin of 4.31% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 2.44%. UFP Industries' return on equity of 8.50% beat Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
UFP Industries4.31% 8.50% 6.55%
Stanley Black & Decker 2.44%7.95%3.29%

UFP Industries presently has a consensus price target of $105.40, indicating a potential upside of 21.74%. Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $88.44, indicating a potential upside of 2.02%. Given UFP Industries' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe UFP Industries is more favorable than Stanley Black & Decker.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
UFP Industries
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14
Stanley Black & Decker
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

In the previous week, Stanley Black & Decker had 6 more articles in the media than UFP Industries. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Stanley Black & Decker and 2 mentions for UFP Industries. Stanley Black & Decker's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat UFP Industries' score of 0.74 indicating that Stanley Black & Decker is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
UFP Industries
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Stanley Black & Decker
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Stanley Black & Decker beats UFP Industries on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Stanley Black & Decker compare to Avient?

Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) and Avient (NYSE:AVNT) are related companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Stanley Black & Decker pays an annual dividend of $3.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Avient pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Stanley Black & Decker pays out 136.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Avient pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker has increased its dividend for 58 consecutive years and Avient has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Stanley Black & Decker is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Avient has a net margin of 4.81% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 2.44%. Avient's return on equity of 11.11% beat Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Stanley Black & Decker2.44% 7.95% 3.29%
Avient 4.81%11.11%4.40%

87.8% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Avient shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Avient shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Stanley Black & Decker had 6 more articles in the media than Avient. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Stanley Black & Decker and 2 mentions for Avient. Stanley Black & Decker's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Avient's score of 0.33 indicating that Stanley Black & Decker is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Stanley Black & Decker
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Avient
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avient has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

Stanley Black & Decker presently has a consensus price target of $88.44, indicating a potential upside of 2.02%. Avient has a consensus price target of $45.71, indicating a potential upside of 21.42%. Given Avient's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Avient is more favorable than Stanley Black & Decker.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Stanley Black & Decker
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Avient
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Stanley Black & Decker has higher revenue and earnings than Avient. Avient is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stanley Black & Decker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Stanley Black & Decker$15.13B0.89$401.90M$2.4435.53
Avient$3.26B1.06$81.90M$1.7221.89

Summary

Avient beats Stanley Black & Decker on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Stanley Black & Decker compare to Brunswick?

Brunswick (NYSE:BC) and Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) are related companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

Stanley Black & Decker has higher revenue and earnings than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stanley Black & Decker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brunswick$5.52B0.98-$137.30M-$2.10N/A
Stanley Black & Decker$15.13B0.89$401.90M$2.4435.53

99.3% of Brunswick shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.8% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Brunswick shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Stanley Black & Decker had 2 more articles in the media than Brunswick. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Stanley Black & Decker and 6 mentions for Brunswick. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Stanley Black & Decker's score of 0.91 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brunswick
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Stanley Black & Decker
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Stanley Black & Decker has a net margin of 2.44% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -2.47%. Brunswick's return on equity of 13.30% beat Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brunswick-2.47% 13.30% 4.09%
Stanley Black & Decker 2.44%7.95%3.29%

Brunswick currently has a consensus price target of $87.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.31%. Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $88.44, indicating a potential upside of 2.02%. Given Brunswick's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Brunswick is more favorable than Stanley Black & Decker.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brunswick
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.47
Stanley Black & Decker
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Stanley Black & Decker pays an annual dividend of $3.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Brunswick pays out -83.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker pays out 136.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brunswick has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Stanley Black & Decker has raised its dividend for 58 consecutive years. Stanley Black & Decker is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Brunswick beats Stanley Black & Decker on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Stanley Black & Decker compare to Fortune Brands Innovations?

Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) and Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) are related companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk and earnings.

Stanley Black & Decker presently has a consensus target price of $88.44, suggesting a potential upside of 2.02%. Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus target price of $51.31, suggesting a potential upside of 20.89%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than Stanley Black & Decker.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Stanley Black & Decker
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Fortune Brands Innovations
3 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.06

In the previous week, Stanley Black & Decker had 2 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Stanley Black & Decker and 6 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Stanley Black & Decker's score of 0.91 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Stanley Black & Decker
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fortune Brands Innovations
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Stanley Black & Decker has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stanley Black & Decker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Stanley Black & Decker$15.13B0.89$401.90M$2.4435.53
Fortune Brands Innovations$4.46B1.13$298.80M$2.2518.86

Fortune Brands Innovations has a net margin of 6.12% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 2.44%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 17.72% beat Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Stanley Black & Decker2.44% 7.95% 3.29%
Fortune Brands Innovations 6.12%17.72%6.40%

Stanley Black & Decker pays an annual dividend of $3.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Stanley Black & Decker pays out 136.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 46.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker has increased its dividend for 58 consecutive years and Fortune Brands Innovations has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Stanley Black & Decker is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

87.8% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Stanley Black & Decker and Fortune Brands Innovations tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Stanley Black & Decker News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SWK and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SWK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SWK vs. The Competition

MetricStanley Black & DeckerMACH TLS&RL PRD IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$13.49B$13.08B$9.64B$23.20B
Dividend Yield3.83%1.59%3.55%4.06%
P/E Ratio35.5321.2125.9231.61
Price / Sales0.892.174,969.03112.08
Price / Cash11.0016.1627.9924.44
Price / Book1.483.514.694.68
Net Income$401.90M$442.14M$792.17M$1.08B
7 Day Performance3.74%5.75%1.53%-0.82%
1 Month Performance14.70%9.47%1.57%1.07%
1 Year Performance34.22%33.83%26.20%25.02%

Stanley Black & Decker Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker
3.7192 of 5 stars
$86.69
-0.1%
$88.44
+2.0%
+34.2%$13.49B$15.13B35.5343,500
NDSN
Nordson
4.3613 of 5 stars
$292.24
+1.4%
$311.29
+6.5%
+41.2%$16.06B$2.79B31.168,000
UFPI
UFP Industries
4.6909 of 5 stars
$84.65
+0.1%
$105.40
+24.5%
-10.1%$4.78B$6.32B18.4813,800
AVNT
Avient
4.4337 of 5 stars
$37.42
-0.9%
$45.71
+22.2%
+12.6%$3.46B$3.26B21.759,000
BC
Brunswick
4.0229 of 5 stars
$82.07
-0.6%
$87.00
+6.0%
+50.6%$5.36B$5.36BN/A14,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:SWK) was last updated on 6/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners