Does the media favor SWK or NDSN?

In the previous week, Stanley Black & Decker had 13 more articles in the media than Nordson. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Stanley Black & Decker and 9 mentions for Nordson. Stanley Black & Decker's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Nordson's score of 0.97 indicating that Stanley Black & Decker is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Stanley Black & Decker 9 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Nordson 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer SWK or UFPI?

In the previous week, Stanley Black & Decker had 20 more articles in the media than UFP Industries. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Stanley Black & Decker and 2 mentions for UFP Industries. UFP Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Stanley Black & Decker's score of 1.04 indicating that UFP Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Stanley Black & Decker 9 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive UFP Industries 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to SWK or BC?

In the previous week, Stanley Black & Decker had 15 more articles in the media than Brunswick. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Stanley Black & Decker and 7 mentions for Brunswick. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Stanley Black & Decker's score of 1.04 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Stanley Black & Decker 9 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Brunswick 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer FBIN or SWK?

In the previous week, Stanley Black & Decker had 14 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Stanley Black & Decker and 8 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Stanley Black & Decker's score of 1.04 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fortune Brands Innovations 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Stanley Black & Decker 9 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer SWK or FND?

In the previous week, Stanley Black & Decker had 20 more articles in the media than Floor & Decor. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Stanley Black & Decker and 2 mentions for Floor & Decor. Floor & Decor's average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat Stanley Black & Decker's score of 1.04 indicating that Floor & Decor is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Stanley Black & Decker 9 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Floor & Decor 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) Competitors

$91.76 -2.05 (-2.18%)

Closing price 09/9/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$91.84 +0.07 (+0.08%)

As of 09/9/2026 07:30 PM Eastern

Compare

SWK vs. NDSN, UFPI, BC, FBIN, and FND

Should you buy Stanley Black & Decker stock or one of its competitors? Stanley Black & Decker's main competitors and comparable companies include Nordson (NDSN), UFP Industries (UFPI), Brunswick (BC), Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN), and Floor & Decor (FND). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Stanley Black & Decker compare to Nordson?

Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) and Nordson (NASDAQ:NDSN) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Stanley Black & Decker had 13 more articles in the media than Nordson. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Stanley Black & Decker and 9 mentions for Nordson. Stanley Black & Decker's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Nordson's score of 0.97 indicating that Stanley Black & Decker is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Stanley Black & Decker	9 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Nordson	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nordson has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Stanley Black & Decker pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Nordson pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Stanley Black & Decker pays out 82.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Nordson pays out 33.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker has increased its dividend for 58 consecutive years and Nordson has increased its dividend for 62 consecutive years.

Stanley Black & Decker currently has a consensus target price of $92.25, suggesting a potential upside of 0.53%. Nordson has a consensus target price of $326.57, suggesting a potential upside of 4.02%. Given Nordson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Nordson is more favorable than Stanley Black & Decker.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Stanley Black & Decker	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.20
Nordson	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63

Nordson has a net margin of 18.63% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 4.07%. Nordson's return on equity of 20.49% beat Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Stanley Black & Decker	4.07%	8.78%	3.73%
Nordson	18.63%	20.49%	10.88%

Nordson has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Stanley Black & Decker. Stanley Black & Decker is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nordson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Stanley Black & Decker	$15.13B	0.92	$401.90M	$4.10	22.38
Nordson	$2.79B	6.26	$484.47M	$9.89	31.74

87.8% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.1% of Nordson shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Nordson shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Nordson beats Stanley Black & Decker on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Stanley Black & Decker compare to UFP Industries?

Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) and UFP Industries (NASDAQ:UFPI) are related companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

Stanley Black & Decker has higher revenue and earnings than UFP Industries. UFP Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stanley Black & Decker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Stanley Black & Decker	$15.13B	0.92	$401.90M	$4.10	22.38
UFP Industries	$6.32B	0.72	$294.79M	$4.36	18.82

In the previous week, Stanley Black & Decker had 20 more articles in the media than UFP Industries. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Stanley Black & Decker and 2 mentions for UFP Industries. UFP Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Stanley Black & Decker's score of 1.04 indicating that UFP Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Stanley Black & Decker	9 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
UFP Industries	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Stanley Black & Decker pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. UFP Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Stanley Black & Decker pays out 82.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. UFP Industries pays out 33.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker has raised its dividend for 58 consecutive years and UFP Industries has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Stanley Black & Decker is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UFP Industries has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Stanley Black & Decker presently has a consensus price target of $92.25, suggesting a potential upside of 0.53%. UFP Industries has a consensus price target of $104.50, suggesting a potential upside of 27.35%. Given UFP Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe UFP Industries is more favorable than Stanley Black & Decker.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Stanley Black & Decker	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.20
UFP Industries	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

87.8% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.8% of UFP Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of UFP Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Stanley Black & Decker has a net margin of 4.07% compared to UFP Industries' net margin of 3.99%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 8.78% beat UFP Industries' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Stanley Black & Decker	4.07%	8.78%	3.73%
UFP Industries	3.99%	8.00%	6.11%

Summary

Stanley Black & Decker beats UFP Industries on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Stanley Black & Decker compare to Brunswick?

Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) and Brunswick (NYSE:BC) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Stanley Black & Decker pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Stanley Black & Decker pays out 82.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brunswick pays out -134.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker has increased its dividend for 58 consecutive years and Brunswick has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Stanley Black & Decker is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Stanley Black & Decker has a net margin of 4.07% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Brunswick's return on equity of 15.28% beat Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Stanley Black & Decker	4.07%	8.78%	3.73%
Brunswick	-1.53%	15.28%	4.60%

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunswick has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Stanley Black & Decker had 15 more articles in the media than Brunswick. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Stanley Black & Decker and 7 mentions for Brunswick. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Stanley Black & Decker's score of 1.04 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Stanley Black & Decker	9 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Brunswick	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Stanley Black & Decker currently has a consensus target price of $92.25, suggesting a potential upside of 0.53%. Brunswick has a consensus target price of $88.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.96%. Given Brunswick's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Brunswick is more favorable than Stanley Black & Decker.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Stanley Black & Decker	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.20
Brunswick	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Stanley Black & Decker has higher revenue and earnings than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stanley Black & Decker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Stanley Black & Decker	$15.13B	0.92	$401.90M	$4.10	22.38
Brunswick	$5.36B	0.86	-$137.30M	-$1.31	N/A

87.8% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.3% of Brunswick shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Brunswick shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Brunswick beats Stanley Black & Decker on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Stanley Black & Decker compare to Fortune Brands Innovations?

Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) and Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) are related companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.8% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Stanley Black & Decker has a net margin of 4.07% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 3.39%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 19.50% beat Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fortune Brands Innovations	3.39%	19.50%	7.09%
Stanley Black & Decker	4.07%	8.78%	3.73%

In the previous week, Stanley Black & Decker had 14 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Stanley Black & Decker and 8 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Stanley Black & Decker's score of 1.04 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fortune Brands Innovations	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Stanley Black & Decker	9 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Fortune Brands Innovations currently has a consensus price target of $55.71, suggesting a potential upside of 36.65%. Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $92.25, suggesting a potential upside of 0.53%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than Stanley Black & Decker.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fortune Brands Innovations	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.41
Stanley Black & Decker	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.20

Fortune Brands Innovations pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Stanley Black & Decker pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 84.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Stanley Black & Decker pays out 82.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Fortune Brands Innovations has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Stanley Black & Decker has increased its dividend for 58 consecutive years. Stanley Black & Decker is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Stanley Black & Decker has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Innovations. Stanley Black & Decker is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Brands Innovations	$4.46B	1.09	$298.80M	$1.23	33.15
Stanley Black & Decker	$15.13B	0.92	$401.90M	$4.10	22.38

Summary

Fortune Brands Innovations beats Stanley Black & Decker on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Stanley Black & Decker compare to Floor & Decor?

Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) and Floor & Decor (NYSE:FND) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

Floor & Decor has a net margin of 4.93% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 4.07%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 8.78% beat Floor & Decor's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Stanley Black & Decker	4.07%	8.78%	3.73%
Floor & Decor	4.93%	8.20%	3.58%

In the previous week, Stanley Black & Decker had 20 more articles in the media than Floor & Decor. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Stanley Black & Decker and 2 mentions for Floor & Decor. Floor & Decor's average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat Stanley Black & Decker's score of 1.04 indicating that Floor & Decor is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Stanley Black & Decker	9 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Floor & Decor	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Stanley Black & Decker has higher revenue and earnings than Floor & Decor. Floor & Decor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stanley Black & Decker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Stanley Black & Decker	$15.13B	0.92	$401.90M	$4.10	22.38
Floor & Decor	$4.68B	1.08	$208.65M	$2.15	22.12

Stanley Black & Decker currently has a consensus target price of $92.25, indicating a potential upside of 0.53%. Floor & Decor has a consensus target price of $59.42, indicating a potential upside of 24.94%. Given Floor & Decor's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Floor & Decor is more favorable than Stanley Black & Decker.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Stanley Black & Decker	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.20
Floor & Decor	2 Sell rating(s)	13 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.15

87.8% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Floor & Decor shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Floor & Decor has a beta of 1.55, meaning that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Stanley Black & Decker beats Floor & Decor on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Stanley Black & Decker News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SWK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SWK vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Stanley Black & Decker	Household Durables Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$14.17B	$5.24B	$12.84B	$23.49B
Dividend Yield	3.58%	3.58%	53.66%	3.76%
P/E Ratio	22.38	12.58	45.81	28.73
Price / Sales	0.92	61.90	92.45	20.66
Price / Cash	11.89	9.17	28.79	34.36
Price / Book	1.57	2.77	4.08	4.74
Net Income	$401.90M	$270.86M	$445.09M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-4.88%	-1.50%	-1.47%	-1.44%
1 Month Performance	-10.55%	-1.88%	-3.69%	-1.99%
1 Year Performance	19.27%	-6.76%	-5.62%	11.68%

Stanley Black & Decker Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SWK Stanley Black & Decker	4.3044 of 5 stars	$91.77 -2.2%	$92.25 +0.5%	+19.6%	$14.17B	$15.13B	22.38	43,500	Positive News Analyst Upgrade Analyst Revision
NDSN Nordson	4.2744 of 5 stars	$318.36 flat	$326.57 +2.6%	+41.3%	$17.73B	$2.79B	32.19	8,000
UFPI UFP Industries	4.6841 of 5 stars	$84.38 flat	$104.50 +23.8%	-18.3%	$4.65B	$6.32B	19.35	13,800	Positive News
BC Brunswick	4.4672 of 5 stars	$74.41 0.0%	$88.00 +18.3%	+8.6%	$4.82B	$5.36B	N/A	14,000	Positive News
FBIN Fortune Brands Innovations	4.8405 of 5 stars	$43.10 0.0%	$55.71 +29.3%	-30.7%	$5.15B	$4.46B	35.04	10,000	Positive News Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:SWK) was last updated on 9/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) Competitors

SWK vs. NDSN, UFPI, BC, FBIN, and FND

How does Stanley Black & Decker compare to Nordson?

Summary

How does Stanley Black & Decker compare to UFP Industries?

Summary

How does Stanley Black & Decker compare to Brunswick?

Summary

How does Stanley Black & Decker compare to Fortune Brands Innovations?

Summary

How does Stanley Black & Decker compare to Floor & Decor?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SWK vs. The Competition

Stanley Black & Decker Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) Competitors

SWK vs. NDSN, UFPI, BC, FBIN, and FND

How does Stanley Black & Decker compare to Nordson?

Does the media favor SWK or NDSN?

Which has more volatility and risk, SWK or NDSN?

Is SWK or NDSN a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer SWK or NDSN?

Is SWK or NDSN more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, SWK or NDSN?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in SWK or NDSN?

Summary

How does Stanley Black & Decker compare to UFP Industries?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, SWK or UFPI?

Does the media prefer SWK or UFPI?

Is SWK or UFPI a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, SWK or UFPI?

Do analysts recommend SWK or UFPI?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of SWK or UFPI?

Is SWK or UFPI more profitable?

Summary

How does Stanley Black & Decker compare to Brunswick?

Is SWK or BC a better dividend stock?

Is SWK or BC more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, SWK or BC?

Does the media refer more to SWK or BC?

Do analysts rate SWK or BC?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, SWK or BC?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of SWK or BC?

Summary

How does Stanley Black & Decker compare to Fortune Brands Innovations?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of FBIN or SWK?

Which has more risk and volatility, FBIN or SWK?

Is FBIN or SWK more profitable?

Does the media prefer FBIN or SWK?

Do analysts rate FBIN or SWK?

Is FBIN or SWK a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, FBIN or SWK?

Summary

How does Stanley Black & Decker compare to Floor & Decor?

Is SWK or FND more profitable?

Does the media prefer SWK or FND?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, SWK or FND?

Do analysts prefer SWK or FND?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in SWK or FND?

Which has more volatility and risk, SWK or FND?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SWK vs. The Competition

Stanley Black & Decker Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools