S&P 500   3,890.65 (-0.29%)
DOW   31,533.47 (+-0.01%)
QQQ   321.03 (-0.79%)
AAPL   126.11 (-1.31%)
MSFT   234.63 (-0.97%)
FB   264.50 (-0.15%)
GOOGL   2,074.55 (+0.24%)
TSLA   705.43 (-1.81%)
AMZN   3,139.73 (-0.20%)
NVDA   545.52 (-1.47%)
BABA   238.23 (-1.43%)
CGC   35.78 (+3.02%)
GE   13.07 (-0.31%)
MU   92.21 (-2.69%)
NIO   44.47 (-10.63%)
AMD   85.36 (-1.19%)
T   28.41 (+1.14%)
F   12.46 (+4.01%)
ACB   11.44 (+3.62%)
DIS   195.12 (+0.07%)
BA   223.70 (-0.31%)
NFLX   552.28 (+0.30%)
BAC   35.64 (-0.42%)
S&P 500   3,890.65 (-0.29%)
DOW   31,533.47 (+-0.01%)
QQQ   321.03 (-0.79%)
AAPL   126.11 (-1.31%)
MSFT   234.63 (-0.97%)
FB   264.50 (-0.15%)
GOOGL   2,074.55 (+0.24%)
TSLA   705.43 (-1.81%)
AMZN   3,139.73 (-0.20%)
NVDA   545.52 (-1.47%)
BABA   238.23 (-1.43%)
CGC   35.78 (+3.02%)
GE   13.07 (-0.31%)
MU   92.21 (-2.69%)
NIO   44.47 (-10.63%)
AMD   85.36 (-1.19%)
T   28.41 (+1.14%)
F   12.46 (+4.01%)
ACB   11.44 (+3.62%)
DIS   195.12 (+0.07%)
BA   223.70 (-0.31%)
NFLX   552.28 (+0.30%)
BAC   35.64 (-0.42%)
S&P 500   3,890.65 (-0.29%)
DOW   31,533.47 (+-0.01%)
QQQ   321.03 (-0.79%)
AAPL   126.11 (-1.31%)
MSFT   234.63 (-0.97%)
FB   264.50 (-0.15%)
GOOGL   2,074.55 (+0.24%)
TSLA   705.43 (-1.81%)
AMZN   3,139.73 (-0.20%)
NVDA   545.52 (-1.47%)
BABA   238.23 (-1.43%)
CGC   35.78 (+3.02%)
GE   13.07 (-0.31%)
MU   92.21 (-2.69%)
NIO   44.47 (-10.63%)
AMD   85.36 (-1.19%)
T   28.41 (+1.14%)
F   12.46 (+4.01%)
ACB   11.44 (+3.62%)
DIS   195.12 (+0.07%)
BA   223.70 (-0.31%)
NFLX   552.28 (+0.30%)
BAC   35.64 (-0.42%)
S&P 500   3,890.65 (-0.29%)
DOW   31,533.47 (+-0.01%)
QQQ   321.03 (-0.79%)
AAPL   126.11 (-1.31%)
MSFT   234.63 (-0.97%)
FB   264.50 (-0.15%)
GOOGL   2,074.55 (+0.24%)
TSLA   705.43 (-1.81%)
AMZN   3,139.73 (-0.20%)
NVDA   545.52 (-1.47%)
BABA   238.23 (-1.43%)
CGC   35.78 (+3.02%)
GE   13.07 (-0.31%)
MU   92.21 (-2.69%)
NIO   44.47 (-10.63%)
AMD   85.36 (-1.19%)
T   28.41 (+1.14%)
F   12.46 (+4.01%)
ACB   11.44 (+3.62%)
DIS   195.12 (+0.07%)
BA   223.70 (-0.31%)
NFLX   552.28 (+0.30%)
BAC   35.64 (-0.42%)
Log in
NYSE:SNA

Snap-on Competitors

$209.46
+0.78 (+0.37 %)
(As of 03/2/2021 12:02 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$207.79
Now: $209.46
$209.84
50-Day Range
$168.57
MA: $184.46
$206.82
52-Week Range
$90.72
Now: $209.46
$210.49
Volume6,788 shs
Average Volume557,309 shs
Market Capitalization$11.35 billion
P/E Ratio19.58
Dividend Yield2.42%
Beta1.29

Competitors

Snap-on (NYSE:SNA) Vs. ITW, PH, SWK, IR, XYL, and DOV

Should you be buying SNA stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "industrial machinery" are considered alternatives and competitors to Snap-on, including Illinois Tool Works (ITW), Parker-Hannifin (PH), Stanley Black & Decker (SWK), Ingersoll Rand (IR), Xylem (XYL), and Dover (DOV).

Snap-on (NYSE:SNA) and Illinois Tool Works (NYSE:ITW) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Snap-on and Illinois Tool Works, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Snap-on22302.14
Illinois Tool Works111402.19

Snap-on presently has a consensus price target of $155.20, indicating a potential downside of 25.61%. Illinois Tool Works has a consensus price target of $204.6875, indicating a potential downside of 0.63%. Given Illinois Tool Works' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Illinois Tool Works is more favorable than Snap-on.

Profitability

This table compares Snap-on and Illinois Tool Works' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Snap-on16.95%17.17%10.12%
Illinois Tool Works16.77%80.95%14.37%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Snap-on and Illinois Tool Works' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Snap-on$3.73 billion3.04$693.50 million$12.2617.08
Illinois Tool Works$14.11 billion4.63$2.52 billion$7.7526.61

Illinois Tool Works has higher revenue and earnings than Snap-on. Snap-on is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Illinois Tool Works, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Snap-on pays an annual dividend of $4.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Illinois Tool Works pays an annual dividend of $4.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Snap-on pays out 40.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Illinois Tool Works pays out 58.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Snap-on has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years and Illinois Tool Works has increased its dividend for 50 consecutive years. Snap-on is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

91.6% of Snap-on shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.4% of Illinois Tool Works shares are held by institutional investors. 4.2% of Snap-on shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Illinois Tool Works shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Snap-on has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its share price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Illinois Tool Works has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its share price is 7% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Illinois Tool Works beats Snap-on on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Snap-on (NYSE:SNA) and Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

91.6% of Snap-on shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by institutional investors. 4.2% of Snap-on shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Snap-on and Parker-Hannifin's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Snap-on16.95%17.17%10.12%
Parker-Hannifin8.75%22.77%7.13%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Snap-on and Parker-Hannifin, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Snap-on22302.14
Parker-Hannifin001403.00

Snap-on presently has a consensus price target of $155.20, indicating a potential downside of 25.61%. Parker-Hannifin has a consensus price target of $283.5385, indicating a potential downside of 4.56%. Given Parker-Hannifin's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Parker-Hannifin is more favorable than Snap-on.

Dividends

Snap-on pays an annual dividend of $4.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Snap-on pays out 40.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Parker-Hannifin pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Snap-on has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years and Parker-Hannifin has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Snap-on is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Risk and Volatility

Snap-on has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its share price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.74, suggesting that its share price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Snap-on and Parker-Hannifin's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Snap-on$3.73 billion3.04$693.50 million$12.2617.08
Parker-Hannifin$13.70 billion2.79$1.21 billion$10.7927.43

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Snap-on. Snap-on is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats Snap-on on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Snap-on (NYSE:SNA) and Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

91.6% of Snap-on shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.4% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.2% of Snap-on shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Snap-on and Stanley Black & Decker's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Snap-on16.95%17.17%10.12%
Stanley Black & Decker6.98%15.05%5.46%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Snap-on and Stanley Black & Decker, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Snap-on22302.14
Stanley Black & Decker13902.62

Snap-on currently has a consensus price target of $155.20, indicating a potential downside of 25.61%. Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $184.6154, indicating a potential upside of 1.67%. Given Stanley Black & Decker's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Stanley Black & Decker is more favorable than Snap-on.

Dividends

Snap-on pays an annual dividend of $4.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Stanley Black & Decker pays an annual dividend of $2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Snap-on pays out 40.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker pays out 33.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Snap-on has raised its dividend for 11 consecutive years and Stanley Black & Decker has raised its dividend for 54 consecutive years.

Volatility and Risk

Snap-on has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.47, indicating that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Snap-on and Stanley Black & Decker's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Snap-on$3.73 billion3.04$693.50 million$12.2617.08
Stanley Black & Decker$14.44 billion2.03$955.80 million$8.4021.71

Stanley Black & Decker has higher revenue and earnings than Snap-on. Snap-on is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stanley Black & Decker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Stanley Black & Decker beats Snap-on on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Snap-on (NYSE:SNA) and Ingersoll Rand (NYSE:IR) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

91.6% of Snap-on shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.9% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.2% of Snap-on shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Snap-on and Ingersoll Rand's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Snap-on16.95%17.17%10.12%
Ingersoll Rand-3.97%-2.27%-1.25%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Snap-on and Ingersoll Rand, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Snap-on22302.14
Ingersoll Rand06802.57

Snap-on currently has a consensus price target of $155.20, indicating a potential downside of 25.61%. Ingersoll Rand has a consensus price target of $45.3846, indicating a potential downside of 3.85%. Given Ingersoll Rand's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ingersoll Rand is more favorable than Snap-on.

Volatility & Risk

Snap-on has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its share price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.53, meaning that its share price is 53% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Snap-on and Ingersoll Rand's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Snap-on$3.73 billion3.04$693.50 million$12.2617.08
Ingersoll Rand$2.45 billion7.99$159.10 million$0.7661.68

Snap-on has higher revenue and earnings than Ingersoll Rand. Snap-on is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ingersoll Rand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Snap-on beats Ingersoll Rand on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Snap-on (NYSE:SNA) and Xylem (NYSE:XYL) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

91.6% of Snap-on shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.9% of Xylem shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.2% of Snap-on shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Xylem shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Snap-on and Xylem's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Snap-on16.95%17.17%10.12%
Xylem5.09%14.72%5.44%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Snap-on and Xylem, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Snap-on22302.14
Xylem311201.94

Snap-on currently has a consensus price target of $155.20, indicating a potential downside of 25.61%. Xylem has a consensus price target of $78.4167, indicating a potential downside of 23.06%. Given Xylem's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Xylem is more favorable than Snap-on.

Dividends

Snap-on pays an annual dividend of $4.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Xylem pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Snap-on pays out 40.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Xylem pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Snap-on has raised its dividend for 11 consecutive years and Xylem has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Snap-on is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Volatility and Risk

Snap-on has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Xylem has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Snap-on and Xylem's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Snap-on$3.73 billion3.04$693.50 million$12.2617.08
Xylem$5.25 billion3.50$401 million$3.0233.71

Snap-on has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Xylem. Snap-on is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xylem, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Snap-on beats Xylem on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Snap-on (NYSE:SNA) and Dover (NYSE:DOV) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

91.6% of Snap-on shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.7% of Dover shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.2% of Snap-on shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Dover shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Snap-on and Dover's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Snap-on16.95%17.17%10.12%
Dover10.02%26.73%9.24%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Snap-on and Dover, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Snap-on22302.14
Dover05602.55

Snap-on currently has a consensus price target of $155.20, indicating a potential downside of 25.61%. Dover has a consensus price target of $120.60, indicating a potential downside of 5.32%. Given Dover's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Dover is more favorable than Snap-on.

Dividends

Snap-on pays an annual dividend of $4.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Dover pays an annual dividend of $1.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Snap-on pays out 40.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dover pays out 33.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Snap-on has raised its dividend for 11 consecutive years and Dover has raised its dividend for 59 consecutive years.

Volatility and Risk

Snap-on has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dover has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Snap-on and Dover's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Snap-on$3.73 billion3.04$693.50 million$12.2617.08
Dover$7.14 billion2.56$677.92 million$5.9321.46

Snap-on has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Dover. Snap-on is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dover, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Dover beats Snap-on on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.


Snap-on Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Illinois Tool Works logo
ITW
Illinois Tool Works
2.7$206.22+0.1%$65.37 billion$14.11 billion31.25
Parker-Hannifin logo
PH
Parker-Hannifin
2.3$295.95+0.6%$38.41 billion$13.70 billion32.38Increase in Short Interest
Stanley Black & Decker logo
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker
2.6$182.37+0.9%$29.08 billion$14.44 billion29.61
Ingersoll Rand logo
IR
Ingersoll Rand
1.4$46.88+1.2%$19.82 billion$2.45 billion-126.70Analyst Report
Xylem logo
XYL
Xylem
1.9$101.80+0.4%$18.43 billion$5.25 billion73.24Increase in Short Interest
Dover logo
DOV
Dover
2.4$127.26+0.1%$18.30 billion$7.14 billion27.67Unusual Options Activity
IDEX logo
IEX
IDEX
1.7$197.90+1.0%$15.13 billion$2.49 billion40.47Increase in Short Interest
Graco logo
GGG
Graco
1.8$69.94+1.5%$11.98 billion$1.65 billion40.20
Nordson logo
NDSN
Nordson
2.0$192.48+0.7%$11.26 billion$2.12 billion45.08Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Pentair logo
PNR
Pentair
2.2$57.55+1.3%$9.68 billion$2.96 billion27.40
The Middleby logo
MIDD
The Middleby
1.2$160.28+0.6%$8.86 billion$2.96 billion33.53Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
News Coverage
Donaldson logo
DCI
Donaldson
2.0$58.89+2.1%$7.59 billion$2.58 billion29.74Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Woodward logo
WWD
Woodward
1.6$117.13+1.8%$7.51 billion$2.90 billion30.19
ITT logo
ITT
ITT
1.6$85.25+1.3%$7.47 billion$2.85 billion48.99Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
Lincoln Electric logo
LECO
Lincoln Electric
2.0$118.92+1.2%$7.18 billion$3.00 billion35.39
The Timken logo
TKR
The Timken
2.4$79.40+2.6%$6.17 billion$3.79 billion17.57Increase in Short Interest
Rexnord logo
RXN
Rexnord
1.8$46.25+0.6%$5.60 billion$2.07 billion36.13
Chart Industries logo
GTLS
Chart Industries
1.4$146.89+2.9%$5.45 billion$1.30 billion83.94Analyst Report
Colfax logo
CFX
Colfax
1.4$44.52+2.3%$5.40 billion$3.33 billion-890.40
Valmont Industries logo
VMI
Valmont Industries
1.8$242.22+1.0%$5.19 billion$2.77 billion36.98Dividend Increase
Increase in Short Interest
RBC Bearings logo
ROLL
RBC Bearings
1.2$197.98+2.4%$5.10 billion$727.46 million46.04
Crane logo
CR
Crane
1.9$86.80+0.3%$5.03 billion$3.28 billion228.43
Flowserve logo
FLS
Flowserve
1.7$37.54+1.6%$4.97 billion$3.94 billion37.92Analyst Revision
John Bean Technologies logo
JBT
John Bean Technologies
1.5$146.73+2.7%$4.78 billion$1.95 billion39.02Dividend Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Proto Labs logo
PRLB
Proto Labs
0.7$145.95+3.4%$4.16 billion$458.73 million69.50
Altra Industrial Motion logo
AIMC
Altra Industrial Motion
1.4$60.30+1.9%$3.98 billion$1.83 billion-200.99
Watts Water Technologies logo
WTS
Watts Water Technologies
1.7$113.96+1.6%$3.89 billion$1.60 billion33.52
Kennametal logo
KMT
Kennametal
1.5$38.54+4.1%$3.35 billion$1.89 billion-94.00
ESCO Technologies logo
ESE
ESCO Technologies
1.6$107.22+1.1%$2.82 billion$732.91 million27.42News Coverage
Albany International logo
AIN
Albany International
1.6$83.00+1.2%$2.71 billion$1.05 billion26.86
Barnes Group logo
B
Barnes Group
2.1$52.31+2.3%$2.71 billion$1.49 billion30.95Decrease in Short Interest
SPX FLOW logo
FLOW
SPX FLOW
1.3$63.30+1.3%$2.70 billion$1.51 billion-16.57Analyst Upgrade
Mueller Industries logo
MLI
Mueller Industries
2.5$41.55+1.9%$2.42 billion$2.43 billion17.83
Mueller Water Products logo
MWA
Mueller Water Products
2.2$13.05+1.5%$2.10 billion$964.10 million29.00
Kadant logo
KAI
Kadant
1.8$176.02+2.7%$2.08 billion$704.64 million42.62
EnPro Industries logo
NPO
EnPro Industries
2.1$84.37+0.9%$1.75 billion$1.21 billion8.92
Omega Flex logo
OFLX
Omega Flex
0.7$163.13+5.1%$1.73 billion$111.36 million90.13News Coverage
Gap Down
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling logo
HY
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling
1.1$87.96+0.9%$1.49 billion$3.29 billion54.30Earnings Announcement
Harsco logo
HSC
Harsco
1.7$17.94+3.6%$1.47 billion$1.50 billion74.75Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
TriMas logo
TRS
TriMas
1.1$32.33+4.3%$1.46 billion$723.53 million-21.13Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
Tennant logo
TNC
Tennant
1.9$77.46+1.0%$1.45 billion$1.14 billion34.12Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
Standex International logo
SXI
Standex International
2.0$102.58+0.7%$1.26 billion$604.53 million72.24Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
Columbus McKinnon logo
CMCO
Columbus McKinnon
1.8$51.75+1.0%$1.25 billion$809.16 million70.89Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Down
Piedmont Lithium logo
PLL
Piedmont Lithium
0.7$83.37+11.6%$1.03 billionN/A-122.60Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
Energy Recovery logo
ERII
Energy Recovery
1.0$17.42+4.9%$1.02 billion$86.94 million43.55
DMC Global logo
BOOM
DMC Global
1.1$64.08+0.5%$991.36 million$397.55 million-164.30Insider Selling
Decrease in Short Interest
The Gorman-Rupp logo
GRC
The Gorman-Rupp
1.7$32.44+1.2%$857.19 million$398.18 million31.50
The ExOne logo
XONE
The ExOne
1.0$39.55+7.1%$812.95 million$53.28 million-44.94Unusual Options Activity
CIRCOR International logo
CIR
CIRCOR International
1.5$39.44+0.2%$787.12 million$964.31 million-4.65Upcoming Earnings
Lydall logo
LDL
Lydall
1.1$38.75+1.7%$703.51 million$837.40 million-4.65Earnings Announcement
This page was last updated on 3/2/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.