Parker-Hannifin (PH) Competitors

$878.61 -0.22 (-0.02%)

As of 01:59 PM Eastern

PH vs. AIT, AME, DOV, ETN, and FLS

Should you be buying Parker-Hannifin stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Parker-Hannifin include Applied Industrial Technologies (AIT), AMETEK (AME), Dover (DOV), Eaton (ETN), and Flowserve (FLS).

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Applied Industrial Technologies?

Applied Industrial Technologies (NYSE:AIT) and Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Parker-Hannifin has a net margin of 16.58% compared to Applied Industrial Technologies' net margin of 8.34%. Parker-Hannifin's return on equity of 27.97% beat Applied Industrial Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Applied Industrial Technologies	8.34%	21.64%	12.91%
Parker-Hannifin	16.58%	27.97%	13.00%

93.5% of Applied Industrial Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Applied Industrial Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Industrial Technologies. Applied Industrial Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Applied Industrial Technologies	$4.56B	2.52	$392.99M	$10.59	29.40
Parker-Hannifin	$20.99B	5.28	$3.53B	$27.11	32.41

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 17 more articles in the media than Applied Industrial Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 8 mentions for Applied Industrial Technologies. Parker-Hannifin's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Applied Industrial Technologies' score of 0.66 indicating that Parker-Hannifin is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Applied Industrial Technologies	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Parker-Hannifin	16 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Applied Industrial Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $313.67, suggesting a potential upside of 0.76%. Parker-Hannifin has a consensus target price of $1,022.30, suggesting a potential upside of 16.35%. Given Parker-Hannifin's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Parker-Hannifin is more favorable than Applied Industrial Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Applied Industrial Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Parker-Hannifin	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

Applied Industrial Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Applied Industrial Technologies pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Parker-Hannifin pays out 29.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Industrial Technologies has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years and Parker-Hannifin has increased its dividend for 70 consecutive years. Parker-Hannifin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Applied Industrial Technologies has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats Applied Industrial Technologies on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to AMETEK?

Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) and AMETEK (NYSE:AME) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, risk and profitability.

Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AMETEK has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.

AMETEK has a net margin of 20.11% compared to Parker-Hannifin's net margin of 16.58%. Parker-Hannifin's return on equity of 27.97% beat AMETEK's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Parker-Hannifin	16.58%	27.97%	13.00%
AMETEK	20.11%	16.63%	11.06%

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than AMETEK. Parker-Hannifin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AMETEK, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Parker-Hannifin	$20.99B	5.28	$3.53B	$27.11	32.41
AMETEK	$7.60B	7.04	$1.48B	$6.62	35.26

In the previous week, AMETEK had 5 more articles in the media than Parker-Hannifin. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for AMETEK and 25 mentions for Parker-Hannifin. Parker-Hannifin's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat AMETEK's score of 0.61 indicating that Parker-Hannifin is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Parker-Hannifin	16 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
AMETEK	11 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	11 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of AMETEK shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of AMETEK shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. AMETEK pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Parker-Hannifin pays out 29.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AMETEK pays out 20.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Parker-Hannifin has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years and AMETEK has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Parker-Hannifin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Parker-Hannifin currently has a consensus target price of $1,022.30, suggesting a potential upside of 16.35%. AMETEK has a consensus target price of $252.33, suggesting a potential upside of 8.11%. Given Parker-Hannifin's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Parker-Hannifin is more favorable than AMETEK.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Parker-Hannifin	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81
AMETEK	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.79

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats AMETEK on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Dover?

Dover (NYSE:DOV) and Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Dover has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Dover. Dover is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Dover	$8.09B	3.69	$1.09B	$8.02	27.62
Parker-Hannifin	$20.99B	5.28	$3.53B	$27.11	32.41

Parker-Hannifin has a net margin of 16.58% compared to Dover's net margin of 13.30%. Parker-Hannifin's return on equity of 27.97% beat Dover's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Dover	13.30%	18.01%	10.10%
Parker-Hannifin	16.58%	27.97%	13.00%

Dover currently has a consensus target price of $237.36, suggesting a potential upside of 7.16%. Parker-Hannifin has a consensus target price of $1,022.30, suggesting a potential upside of 16.35%. Given Parker-Hannifin's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Parker-Hannifin is more favorable than Dover.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Dover	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
Parker-Hannifin	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 8 more articles in the media than Dover. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 17 mentions for Dover. Parker-Hannifin's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Dover's score of 0.76 indicating that Parker-Hannifin is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Dover	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Parker-Hannifin	16 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Dover pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Dover pays out 25.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Parker-Hannifin pays out 29.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Dover has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years and Parker-Hannifin has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years. Dover is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

84.5% of Dover shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Dover shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats Dover on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Eaton?

Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) and Eaton (NYSE:ETN) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment and dividends.

Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Eaton has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than Parker-Hannifin. Parker-Hannifin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eaton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Parker-Hannifin	$20.99B	5.28	$3.53B	$27.11	32.41
Eaton	$27.45B	5.93	$4.09B	$10.23	40.97

Parker-Hannifin has a net margin of 16.58% compared to Eaton's net margin of 13.99%. Parker-Hannifin's return on equity of 27.97% beat Eaton's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Parker-Hannifin	16.58%	27.97%	13.00%
Eaton	13.99%	24.72%	10.69%

Parker-Hannifin presently has a consensus price target of $1,022.30, indicating a potential upside of 16.35%. Eaton has a consensus price target of $420.95, indicating a potential upside of 0.45%. Given Parker-Hannifin's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Parker-Hannifin is more favorable than Eaton.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Parker-Hannifin	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81
Eaton	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

In the previous week, Eaton had 34 more articles in the media than Parker-Hannifin. MarketBeat recorded 59 mentions for Eaton and 25 mentions for Parker-Hannifin. Parker-Hannifin's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Eaton's score of 0.64 indicating that Parker-Hannifin is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Parker-Hannifin	16 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Eaton	19 Very Positive mention(s)	10 Positive mention(s)	13 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Eaton pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Parker-Hannifin pays out 29.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Eaton pays out 43.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Parker-Hannifin has increased its dividend for 70 consecutive years.

82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of Eaton shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Eaton shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Parker-Hannifin and Eaton tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Flowserve?

Flowserve (NYSE:FLS) and Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Flowserve. Flowserve is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Flowserve	$4.65B	1.95	$346.25M	$2.70	26.25
Parker-Hannifin	$20.99B	5.28	$3.53B	$27.11	32.41

Flowserve pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Flowserve pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Parker-Hannifin pays out 29.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Flowserve has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Parker-Hannifin has increased its dividend for 70 consecutive years.

Parker-Hannifin has a net margin of 16.58% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 7.61%. Parker-Hannifin's return on equity of 27.97% beat Flowserve's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Flowserve	7.61%	21.46%	8.54%
Parker-Hannifin	16.58%	27.97%	13.00%

Flowserve has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

93.9% of Flowserve shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Flowserve shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Flowserve presently has a consensus target price of $87.70, suggesting a potential upside of 23.74%. Parker-Hannifin has a consensus target price of $1,022.30, suggesting a potential upside of 16.35%. Given Flowserve's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Flowserve is more favorable than Parker-Hannifin.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Flowserve	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73
Parker-Hannifin	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 21 more articles in the media than Flowserve. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 4 mentions for Flowserve. Flowserve's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Parker-Hannifin's score of 1.07 indicating that Flowserve is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Flowserve	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Parker-Hannifin	16 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats Flowserve on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Parker-Hannifin News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PH vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Parker-Hannifin	MACH Industry	Industrials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$110.83B	$15.93B	$9.41B	$22.92B
Dividend Yield	0.81%	1.29%	3.55%	4.02%
P/E Ratio	32.39	44.86	25.03	29.00
Price / Sales	5.28	7.64	6,066.18	24.48
Price / Cash	25.14	36.34	27.62	19.21
Price / Book	8.20	5.10	4.77	4.66
Net Income	$3.53B	$424.52M	$791.02M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	N/A	N/A	N/A	-0.89%
1 Month Performance	-10.71%	6.82%	5.10%	4.15%
1 Year Performance	35.67%	41.83%	41.28%	29.23%

Parker-Hannifin Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PH Parker-Hannifin	4.8593 of 5 stars	$878.61 0.0%	$1,022.30 +16.4%	+35.6%	$110.83B	$20.99B	32.39	57,950	Positive News Ex-Dividend Analyst Forecast
AIT Applied Industrial Technologies	4.023 of 5 stars	$298.86 +1.9%	$295.00 -1.3%	+40.4%	$11.15B	$4.75B	28.44	6,800
AME AMETEK	4.3083 of 5 stars	$233.02 +0.0%	$244.67 +5.0%	+35.2%	$53.38B	$7.40B	36.41	22,500	Dividend Announcement Analyst Downgrade
DOV Dover	4.4032 of 5 stars	$226.18 +0.6%	$237.36 +4.9%	+24.8%	$30.46B	$8.09B	28.20	24,000	Dividend Announcement Analyst Revision
ETN Eaton	3.9187 of 5 stars	$416.38 -1.8%	$396.50 -4.8%	+29.4%	$161.55B	$27.45B	39.81	97,000	Earnings Report Ex-Dividend Analyst Forecast Insider Trade Analyst Revision

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PH) was last updated on 5/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Parker-Hannifin (PH) Competitors

PH vs. AIT, AME, DOV, ETN, and FLS

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Applied Industrial Technologies?

Summary

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to AMETEK?

Summary

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Dover?

Summary

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Eaton?

Summary

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Flowserve?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PH vs. The Competition

Parker-Hannifin Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Parker-Hannifin (PH) Competitors

PH vs. AIT, AME, DOV, ETN, and FLS

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Applied Industrial Technologies?

Is AIT or PH more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in AIT or PH?

Which has better valuation and earnings, AIT or PH?

Does the media prefer AIT or PH?

Do analysts prefer AIT or PH?

Is AIT or PH a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, AIT or PH?

Summary

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to AMETEK?

Which has more risk & volatility, PH or AME?

Is PH or AME more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, PH or AME?

Does the media favor PH or AME?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in PH or AME?

Is PH or AME a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend PH or AME?

Summary

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Dover?

Which has more volatility & risk, DOV or PH?

Which has better valuation and earnings, DOV or PH?

Is DOV or PH more profitable?

Do analysts recommend DOV or PH?

Does the media refer more to DOV or PH?

Is DOV or PH a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in DOV or PH?

Summary

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Eaton?

Which has more risk & volatility, PH or ETN?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, PH or ETN?

Is PH or ETN more profitable?

Do analysts recommend PH or ETN?

Does the media prefer PH or ETN?

Is PH or ETN a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PH or ETN?

Summary

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Flowserve?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, FLS or PH?

Is FLS or PH a better dividend stock?

Is FLS or PH more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, FLS or PH?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in FLS or PH?

Do analysts rate FLS or PH?

Does the media prefer FLS or PH?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PH vs. The Competition

Parker-Hannifin Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools