Parker-Hannifin (PH) Competitors

AMETEK has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

AMETEK has a net margin of 19.91% compared to Parker-Hannifin's net margin of 16.62%. Parker-Hannifin's return on equity of 28.80% beat AMETEK's return on equity.

AMETEK pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. AMETEK pays out 19.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Parker-Hannifin pays out 27.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. AMETEK has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Parker-Hannifin has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years. Parker-Hannifin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than AMETEK. Parker-Hannifin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AMETEK, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

AMETEK currently has a consensus price target of $278.06, suggesting a potential upside of 15.39%. Parker-Hannifin has a consensus price target of $1,146.35, suggesting a potential upside of 19.77%. Given Parker-Hannifin's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Parker-Hannifin is more favorable than AMETEK.

87.4% of AMETEK shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of AMETEK shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 5 more articles in the media than AMETEK. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 18 mentions for AMETEK. Parker-Hannifin's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat AMETEK's score of 0.57 indicating that Parker-Hannifin is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Dover pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Parker-Hannifin pays out 27.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dover pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Parker-Hannifin has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years and Dover has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years. Dover is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Parker-Hannifin has a net margin of 16.62% compared to Dover's net margin of 13.60%. Parker-Hannifin's return on equity of 28.80% beat Dover's return on equity.

Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dover has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

Parker-Hannifin presently has a consensus target price of $1,146.35, suggesting a potential upside of 19.77%. Dover has a consensus target price of $238.60, suggesting a potential upside of 13.94%. Given Parker-Hannifin's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Parker-Hannifin is more favorable than Dover.

82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Dover shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Dover shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Dover. Dover is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 3 more articles in the media than Dover. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 20 mentions for Dover. Dover's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Parker-Hannifin's score of 0.71 indicating that Dover is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Eaton presently has a consensus price target of $476.86, indicating a potential upside of 32.79%. Parker-Hannifin has a consensus price target of $1,146.35, indicating a potential upside of 19.77%. Given Eaton's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Eaton is more favorable than Parker-Hannifin.

In the previous week, Eaton had 6 more articles in the media than Parker-Hannifin. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Eaton and 23 mentions for Parker-Hannifin. Parker-Hannifin's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Eaton's score of 0.50 indicating that Parker-Hannifin is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Eaton has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than Parker-Hannifin. Parker-Hannifin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eaton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Eaton pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Eaton pays out 44.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Parker-Hannifin pays out 27.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Parker-Hannifin has increased its dividend for 70 consecutive years.

Parker-Hannifin has a net margin of 16.62% compared to Eaton's net margin of 12.18%. Parker-Hannifin's return on equity of 28.80% beat Eaton's return on equity.

83.0% of Eaton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Eaton shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flowserve has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Flowserve. Parker-Hannifin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flowserve, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Parker-Hannifin has a net margin of 16.62% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 5.42%. Parker-Hannifin's return on equity of 28.80% beat Flowserve's return on equity.

82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Flowserve shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Flowserve shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Flowserve pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Parker-Hannifin pays out 27.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Flowserve pays out 44.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Parker-Hannifin has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years and Flowserve has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 20 more articles in the media than Flowserve. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 3 mentions for Flowserve. Flowserve's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Parker-Hannifin's score of 0.71 indicating that Flowserve is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Parker-Hannifin presently has a consensus price target of $1,146.35, suggesting a potential upside of 19.77%. Flowserve has a consensus price target of $86.44, suggesting a potential upside of 3.40%. Given Parker-Hannifin's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Parker-Hannifin is more favorable than Flowserve.