Does the media refer more to AIT or PH?

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 35 more articles in the media than Applied Industrial Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 60 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 25 mentions for Applied Industrial Technologies. Parker-Hannifin's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat Applied Industrial Technologies' score of 0.74 indicating that Parker-Hannifin is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Applied Industrial Technologies 8 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Parker-Hannifin 55 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, AME or PH?

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than AMETEK. AMETEK is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio AMETEK $7.40B 7.54 $1.48B $6.84 35.59 Parker-Hannifin $21.50B 6.00 $3.65B $28.49 35.88

Is AME or PH more profitable?

AMETEK has a net margin of 20.04% compared to Parker-Hannifin's net margin of 16.97%. Parker-Hannifin's return on equity of 28.48% beat AMETEK's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets AMETEK 20.04% 16.93% 11.26% Parker-Hannifin 16.97% 28.48% 13.49%

Does the media prefer AME or PH?

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 21 more articles in the media than AMETEK. MarketBeat recorded 60 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 39 mentions for AMETEK. Parker-Hannifin's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat AMETEK's score of 1.50 indicating that Parker-Hannifin is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment AMETEK 27 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Parker-Hannifin 55 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Which has better earnings & valuation, PH or DOV?

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Dover. Dover is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Parker-Hannifin $21.50B 6.00 $3.65B $28.49 35.88 Dover $8.09B 3.37 $1.09B $8.30 24.37

Is PH or DOV more profitable?

Parker-Hannifin has a net margin of 16.97% compared to Dover's net margin of 13.48%. Parker-Hannifin's return on equity of 28.48% beat Dover's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Parker-Hannifin 16.97% 28.48% 13.49% Dover 13.48% 18.32% 10.26%

Does the media favor PH or DOV?

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 48 more articles in the media than Dover. MarketBeat recorded 60 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 12 mentions for Dover. Parker-Hannifin's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat Dover's score of 1.24 indicating that Parker-Hannifin is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Parker-Hannifin 55 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Dover 9 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, ETN or PH?

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than Parker-Hannifin. Parker-Hannifin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eaton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Eaton $27.45B 6.00 $4.09B $9.83 43.14 Parker-Hannifin $21.50B 6.00 $3.65B $28.49 35.88

Is ETN or PH more profitable?

Parker-Hannifin has a net margin of 16.97% compared to Eaton's net margin of 12.75%. Parker-Hannifin's return on equity of 28.48% beat Eaton's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Eaton 12.75% 24.58% 9.98% Parker-Hannifin 16.97% 28.48% 13.49%

Does the media refer more to ETN or PH?

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 10 more articles in the media than Eaton. MarketBeat recorded 60 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 50 mentions for Eaton. Parker-Hannifin's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat Eaton's score of 0.56 indicating that Parker-Hannifin is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Eaton 18 Very Positive mention(s) 9 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Parker-Hannifin 55 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, PH or FLS?

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Flowserve. Flowserve is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Parker-Hannifin $21.50B 6.00 $3.65B $28.49 35.88 Flowserve $4.73B 2.09 $346.25M $2.85 27.27

Does the media favor PH or FLS?

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 43 more articles in the media than Flowserve. MarketBeat recorded 60 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 17 mentions for Flowserve. Parker-Hannifin's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat Flowserve's score of 0.89 indicating that Parker-Hannifin is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Parker-Hannifin 55 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Flowserve 5 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Parker-Hannifin (PH) Competitors

$1,018.89 -4.36 (-0.43%)

As of 09:56 AM Eastern

Compare

PH vs. AIT, AME, DOV, ETN, and FLS

Should you buy Parker-Hannifin stock or one of its competitors? Parker-Hannifin's main competitors and comparable companies include Applied Industrial Technologies (AIT), AMETEK (AME), Dover (DOV), Eaton (ETN), and Flowserve (FLS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Applied Industrial Technologies?

Applied Industrial Technologies (NYSE:AIT) and Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Applied Industrial Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $384.29, indicating a potential upside of 10.82%. Parker-Hannifin has a consensus price target of $1,100.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.60%. Given Applied Industrial Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Applied Industrial Technologies is more favorable than Parker-Hannifin.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Applied Industrial Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Parker-Hannifin	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

Applied Industrial Technologies has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Parker-Hannifin has a net margin of 16.97% compared to Applied Industrial Technologies' net margin of 8.35%. Parker-Hannifin's return on equity of 28.48% beat Applied Industrial Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Applied Industrial Technologies	8.35%	22.17%	13.43%
Parker-Hannifin	16.97%	28.48%	13.49%

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Industrial Technologies. Applied Industrial Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Applied Industrial Technologies	$4.97B	2.56	$414.52M	$10.96	31.64
Parker-Hannifin	$21.50B	6.00	$3.65B	$28.49	35.88

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 35 more articles in the media than Applied Industrial Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 60 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 25 mentions for Applied Industrial Technologies. Parker-Hannifin's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat Applied Industrial Technologies' score of 0.74 indicating that Parker-Hannifin is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Applied Industrial Technologies	8 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Parker-Hannifin	55 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

93.5% of Applied Industrial Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Applied Industrial Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Parker-Hannifin shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Applied Industrial Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Applied Industrial Technologies pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Parker-Hannifin pays out 28.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Industrial Technologies has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years and Parker-Hannifin has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years. Parker-Hannifin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats Applied Industrial Technologies on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to AMETEK?

AMETEK (NYSE:AME) and Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

AMETEK pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. AMETEK pays out 19.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Parker-Hannifin pays out 28.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. AMETEK has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Parker-Hannifin has increased its dividend for 70 consecutive years. Parker-Hannifin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 21 more articles in the media than AMETEK. MarketBeat recorded 60 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 39 mentions for AMETEK. Parker-Hannifin's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat AMETEK's score of 1.50 indicating that Parker-Hannifin is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
AMETEK	27 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Parker-Hannifin	55 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

AMETEK presently has a consensus price target of $266.80, suggesting a potential upside of 9.60%. Parker-Hannifin has a consensus price target of $1,100.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.60%. Given AMETEK's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe AMETEK is more favorable than Parker-Hannifin.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
AMETEK	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Parker-Hannifin	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

87.4% of AMETEK shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of AMETEK shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than AMETEK. AMETEK is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
AMETEK	$7.40B	7.54	$1.48B	$6.84	35.59
Parker-Hannifin	$21.50B	6.00	$3.65B	$28.49	35.88

AMETEK has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

AMETEK has a net margin of 20.04% compared to Parker-Hannifin's net margin of 16.97%. Parker-Hannifin's return on equity of 28.48% beat AMETEK's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
AMETEK	20.04%	16.93%	11.26%
Parker-Hannifin	16.97%	28.48%	13.49%

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats AMETEK on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Dover?

Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) and Dover (NYSE:DOV) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Dover shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Dover shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Parker-Hannifin currently has a consensus price target of $1,100.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.60%. Dover has a consensus price target of $238.29, suggesting a potential upside of 17.79%. Given Dover's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Dover is more favorable than Parker-Hannifin.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Parker-Hannifin	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81
Dover	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Parker-Hannifin has a net margin of 16.97% compared to Dover's net margin of 13.48%. Parker-Hannifin's return on equity of 28.48% beat Dover's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Parker-Hannifin	16.97%	28.48%	13.49%
Dover	13.48%	18.32%	10.26%

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 48 more articles in the media than Dover. MarketBeat recorded 60 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 12 mentions for Dover. Parker-Hannifin's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat Dover's score of 1.24 indicating that Parker-Hannifin is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Parker-Hannifin	55 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Dover	9 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Dover. Dover is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Parker-Hannifin	$21.50B	6.00	$3.65B	$28.49	35.88
Dover	$8.09B	3.37	$1.09B	$8.30	24.37

Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dover has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its share price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Dover pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Parker-Hannifin pays out 28.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dover pays out 25.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Parker-Hannifin has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years and Dover has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years. Dover is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats Dover on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Eaton?

Eaton (NYSE:ETN) and Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and valuation.

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 10 more articles in the media than Eaton. MarketBeat recorded 60 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 50 mentions for Eaton. Parker-Hannifin's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat Eaton's score of 0.56 indicating that Parker-Hannifin is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Eaton	18 Very Positive mention(s)	9 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Parker-Hannifin	55 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Eaton presently has a consensus price target of $437.41, indicating a potential upside of 3.14%. Parker-Hannifin has a consensus price target of $1,100.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.60%. Given Parker-Hannifin's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Parker-Hannifin is more favorable than Eaton.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Eaton	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.89
Parker-Hannifin	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than Parker-Hannifin. Parker-Hannifin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eaton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Eaton	$27.45B	6.00	$4.09B	$9.83	43.14
Parker-Hannifin	$21.50B	6.00	$3.65B	$28.49	35.88

Eaton has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

83.0% of Eaton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Eaton shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Eaton pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Eaton pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Parker-Hannifin pays out 28.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Parker-Hannifin has increased its dividend for 70 consecutive years.

Parker-Hannifin has a net margin of 16.97% compared to Eaton's net margin of 12.75%. Parker-Hannifin's return on equity of 28.48% beat Eaton's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Eaton	12.75%	24.58%	9.98%
Parker-Hannifin	16.97%	28.48%	13.49%

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats Eaton on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Flowserve?

Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) and Flowserve (NYSE:FLS) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Parker-Hannifin has a net margin of 16.97% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 8.01%. Parker-Hannifin's return on equity of 28.48% beat Flowserve's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Parker-Hannifin	16.97%	28.48%	13.49%
Flowserve	8.01%	21.42%	8.34%

Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Flowserve pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Parker-Hannifin pays out 28.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Flowserve pays out 30.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Parker-Hannifin has increased its dividend for 70 consecutive years and Flowserve has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 43 more articles in the media than Flowserve. MarketBeat recorded 60 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 17 mentions for Flowserve. Parker-Hannifin's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat Flowserve's score of 0.89 indicating that Parker-Hannifin is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Parker-Hannifin	55 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Flowserve	5 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flowserve has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Parker-Hannifin currently has a consensus price target of $1,100.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.60%. Flowserve has a consensus price target of $86.60, suggesting a potential upside of 11.41%. Given Flowserve's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Flowserve is more favorable than Parker-Hannifin.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Parker-Hannifin	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81
Flowserve	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.64

82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Flowserve shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Flowserve shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Flowserve. Flowserve is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Parker-Hannifin	$21.50B	6.00	$3.65B	$28.49	35.88
Flowserve	$4.73B	2.09	$346.25M	$2.85	27.27

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats Flowserve on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Parker-Hannifin News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PH vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Parker-Hannifin	Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$129.02B	$11.53B	$10.72B	$24.19B
Dividend Yield	0.76%	2.19%	97.12%	3.73%
P/E Ratio	35.88	20.94	26.77	30.14
Price / Sales	6.00	65.07	346.82	19.90
Price / Cash	25.88	23.31	24.59	31.97
Price / Book	8.36	4.11	4.53	6.84
Net Income	$3.65B	$358.84M	$610.97M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-3.28%	-0.93%	-0.97%	-0.57%
1 Month Performance	7.61%	1.17%	3.20%	2.97%
1 Year Performance	37.72%	13.46%	15.27%	18.26%

Parker-Hannifin Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PH Parker-Hannifin	4.2995 of 5 stars	$1,018.72 -0.4%	$1,100.00 +8.0%	+37.3%	$128.45B	$21.50B	35.76	57,950	Positive News
AIT Applied Industrial Technologies	4.4785 of 5 stars	$359.24 -0.7%	$384.29 +7.0%	+32.0%	$13.28B	$4.97B	32.78	6,900	Earnings Report
AME AMETEK	4.6974 of 5 stars	$254.81 +0.0%	$266.80 +4.7%	+31.5%	$58.40B	$7.40B	37.25	22,500	Trending News Analyst Revision
DOV Dover	4.8477 of 5 stars	$206.71 -0.2%	$238.29 +15.3%	+12.7%	$27.84B	$8.09B	24.90	24,000	Positive News
ETN Eaton	4.4948 of 5 stars	$457.04 +1.2%	$431.78 -5.5%	+21.7%	$177.51B	$27.45B	46.49	97,000	Trending News Analyst Revision

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PH) was last updated on 8/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Parker-Hannifin (PH) Competitors

PH vs. AIT, AME, DOV, ETN, and FLS

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Applied Industrial Technologies?

Summary

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to AMETEK?

Summary

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Dover?

Summary

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Eaton?

Summary

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Flowserve?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PH vs. The Competition

Parker-Hannifin Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Parker-Hannifin (PH) Competitors

PH vs. AIT, AME, DOV, ETN, and FLS

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Applied Industrial Technologies?

Do analysts recommend AIT or PH?

Which has more risk and volatility, AIT or PH?

Is AIT or PH more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, AIT or PH?

Does the media refer more to AIT or PH?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in AIT or PH?

Is AIT or PH a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to AMETEK?

Is AME or PH a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer AME or PH?

Do analysts recommend AME or PH?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in AME or PH?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, AME or PH?

Which has more volatility & risk, AME or PH?

Is AME or PH more profitable?

Summary

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Dover?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PH or DOV?

Do analysts recommend PH or DOV?

Is PH or DOV more profitable?

Does the media favor PH or DOV?

Which has better earnings & valuation, PH or DOV?

Which has more volatility & risk, PH or DOV?

Is PH or DOV a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Eaton?

Does the media refer more to ETN or PH?

Do analysts rate ETN or PH?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, ETN or PH?

Which has more risk & volatility, ETN or PH?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in ETN or PH?

Is ETN or PH a better dividend stock?

Is ETN or PH more profitable?

Summary

How does Parker-Hannifin compare to Flowserve?

Is PH or FLS more profitable?

Is PH or FLS a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor PH or FLS?

Which has more volatility & risk, PH or FLS?

Do analysts prefer PH or FLS?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PH or FLS?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, PH or FLS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PH vs. The Competition

Parker-Hannifin Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools