NYSE:FLS

Flowserve Competitors

$39.78
+0.04 (+0.10 %)
(As of 04/12/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$39.42
Now: $39.78
$39.88
50-Day Range
$37.00
MA: $39.40
$41.40
52-Week Range
$21.05
Now: $39.78
$42.24
Volume451,461 shs
Average Volume1.35 million shs
Market Capitalization$5.18 billion
P/E Ratio40.18
Dividend Yield2.01%
Beta1.75

Competitors

Flowserve (NYSE:FLS) Vs. ITW, PH, SWK, IR, DOV, and XYL

Should you be buying FLS stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "industrial machinery" are considered alternatives and competitors to Flowserve, including Illinois Tool Works (ITW), Parker-Hannifin (PH), Stanley Black & Decker (SWK), Ingersoll Rand (IR), Dover (DOV), and Xylem (XYL).

Illinois Tool Works (NYSE:ITW) and Flowserve (NYSE:FLS) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

77.4% of Illinois Tool Works shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of Flowserve shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Illinois Tool Works shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Flowserve shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Illinois Tool Works has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its share price is 7% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Flowserve has a beta of 1.75, indicating that its share price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Illinois Tool Works and Flowserve's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Illinois Tool Works16.77%80.95%14.37%
Flowserve3.38%14.41%5.07%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Illinois Tool Works and Flowserve's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Illinois Tool Works$14.11 billion5.02$2.52 billion$7.7528.85
Flowserve$3.94 billion1.31$253.67 million$2.2018.08

Illinois Tool Works has higher revenue and earnings than Flowserve. Flowserve is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Illinois Tool Works, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Illinois Tool Works pays an annual dividend of $4.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Flowserve pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Illinois Tool Works pays out 58.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Flowserve pays out 36.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Illinois Tool Works has increased its dividend for 50 consecutive years and Flowserve has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Illinois Tool Works is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Illinois Tool Works and Flowserve, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Illinois Tool Works111402.19
Flowserve08102.11

Illinois Tool Works currently has a consensus price target of $206.0625, indicating a potential downside of 7.84%. Flowserve has a consensus price target of $35.3750, indicating a potential downside of 11.07%. Given Illinois Tool Works' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Illinois Tool Works is more favorable than Flowserve.

Summary

Illinois Tool Works beats Flowserve on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) and Flowserve (NYSE:FLS) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Parker-Hannifin and Flowserve's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Parker-Hannifin8.75%22.77%7.13%
Flowserve3.38%14.41%5.07%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Parker-Hannifin and Flowserve's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Parker-Hannifin$13.70 billion3.03$1.21 billion$10.7929.77
Flowserve$3.94 billion1.31$253.67 million$2.2018.08

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Flowserve. Flowserve is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Parker-Hannifin and Flowserve, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Parker-Hannifin001303.00
Flowserve08102.11

Parker-Hannifin currently has a consensus price target of $307.00, indicating a potential downside of 4.41%. Flowserve has a consensus price target of $35.3750, indicating a potential downside of 11.07%. Given Parker-Hannifin's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Parker-Hannifin is more favorable than Flowserve.

Volatility & Risk

Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its share price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Flowserve has a beta of 1.75, indicating that its share price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Flowserve pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Parker-Hannifin pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Flowserve pays out 36.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Parker-Hannifin has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Flowserve has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

77.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of Flowserve shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Flowserve shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats Flowserve on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Flowserve (NYSE:FLS) and Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Flowserve and Stanley Black & Decker's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Flowserve3.38%14.41%5.07%
Stanley Black & Decker6.98%15.05%5.46%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Flowserve and Stanley Black & Decker's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flowserve$3.94 billion1.31$253.67 million$2.2018.08
Stanley Black & Decker$14.44 billion2.27$955.80 million$8.4024.30

Stanley Black & Decker has higher revenue and earnings than Flowserve. Flowserve is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stanley Black & Decker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Flowserve and Stanley Black & Decker, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Flowserve08102.11
Stanley Black & Decker04902.69

Flowserve presently has a consensus target price of $35.3750, indicating a potential downside of 11.07%. Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus target price of $189.3077, indicating a potential downside of 7.27%. Given Stanley Black & Decker's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Stanley Black & Decker is more favorable than Flowserve.

Risk and Volatility

Flowserve has a beta of 1.75, meaning that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.47, meaning that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Flowserve pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Stanley Black & Decker pays an annual dividend of $2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Flowserve pays out 36.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker pays out 33.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Flowserve has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Stanley Black & Decker has increased its dividend for 54 consecutive years.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

98.4% of Flowserve shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.4% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Flowserve shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Stanley Black & Decker beats Flowserve on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Flowserve (NYSE:FLS) and Ingersoll Rand (NYSE:IR) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Flowserve and Ingersoll Rand's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Flowserve3.38%14.41%5.07%
Ingersoll Rand-3.97%-2.27%-1.25%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Flowserve and Ingersoll Rand's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flowserve$3.94 billion1.31$253.67 million$2.2018.08
Ingersoll Rand$2.45 billion8.57$159.10 million$0.7665.99

Flowserve has higher revenue and earnings than Ingersoll Rand. Flowserve is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ingersoll Rand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Flowserve and Ingersoll Rand, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Flowserve08102.11
Ingersoll Rand05802.62

Flowserve presently has a consensus target price of $35.3750, indicating a potential downside of 11.07%. Ingersoll Rand has a consensus target price of $47.3846, indicating a potential downside of 5.51%. Given Ingersoll Rand's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ingersoll Rand is more favorable than Flowserve.

Volatility & Risk

Flowserve has a beta of 1.75, indicating that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.53, indicating that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

98.4% of Flowserve shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.9% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Flowserve shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Flowserve beats Ingersoll Rand on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Flowserve (NYSE:FLS) and Dover (NYSE:DOV) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Flowserve and Dover's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Flowserve3.38%14.41%5.07%
Dover10.02%26.73%9.24%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Flowserve and Dover's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flowserve$3.94 billion1.31$253.67 million$2.2018.08
Dover$7.14 billion2.83$677.92 million$5.9323.69

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than Flowserve. Flowserve is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dover, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Flowserve and Dover, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Flowserve08102.11
Dover05402.44

Flowserve presently has a consensus target price of $35.3750, indicating a potential downside of 11.07%. Dover has a consensus target price of $129.25, indicating a potential downside of 8.00%. Given Dover's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Dover is more favorable than Flowserve.

Risk and Volatility

Flowserve has a beta of 1.75, meaning that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dover has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Flowserve pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Dover pays an annual dividend of $1.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Flowserve pays out 36.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dover pays out 33.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Flowserve has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Dover has increased its dividend for 59 consecutive years.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

98.4% of Flowserve shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.7% of Dover shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Flowserve shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Dover shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Dover beats Flowserve on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Flowserve (NYSE:FLS) and Xylem (NYSE:XYL) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Flowserve and Xylem's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Flowserve3.38%14.41%5.07%
Xylem5.09%14.72%5.44%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Flowserve and Xylem's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flowserve$3.94 billion1.31$253.67 million$2.2018.08
Xylem$5.25 billion3.73$401 million$3.0235.90

Xylem has higher revenue and earnings than Flowserve. Flowserve is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xylem, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Flowserve and Xylem, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Flowserve08102.11
Xylem28302.08

Flowserve presently has a consensus target price of $35.3750, indicating a potential downside of 11.07%. Xylem has a consensus target price of $84.5455, indicating a potential downside of 22.01%. Given Flowserve's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Flowserve is more favorable than Xylem.

Risk and Volatility

Flowserve has a beta of 1.75, meaning that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Xylem has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Flowserve pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Xylem pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Flowserve pays out 36.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Xylem pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Flowserve has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Xylem has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Flowserve is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

98.4% of Flowserve shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.9% of Xylem shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Flowserve shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Xylem shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Xylem beats Flowserve on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.


Flowserve Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Illinois Tool Works logo
ITW
Illinois Tool Works
2.5$223.60+0.4%$70.76 billion$14.11 billion33.88Analyst Report
Parker-Hannifin logo
PH
Parker-Hannifin
2.1$321.18+0.0%$41.46 billion$13.70 billion35.14Analyst Report
Stanley Black & Decker logo
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker
2.3$204.14+1.1%$32.84 billion$14.44 billion33.14Analyst Revision
Ingersoll Rand logo
IR
Ingersoll Rand
1.4$50.15+0.9%$21.00 billion$2.45 billion-135.54Analyst Report
News Coverage
Dover logo
DOV
Dover
2.1$140.49+0.4%$20.21 billion$7.14 billion30.54Analyst Report
Xylem logo
XYL
Xylem
1.7$108.41+0.4%$19.55 billion$5.25 billion77.99
IDEX logo
IEX
IDEX
1.8$218.24+0.4%$16.57 billion$2.49 billion44.63
Snap-on logo
SNA
Snap-on
2.3$236.32+0.3%$12.86 billion$3.73 billion22.09Insider Selling
Graco logo
GGG
Graco
1.8$74.08+0.9%$12.51 billion$1.65 billion42.57
Nordson logo
NDSN
Nordson
2.1$203.58+0.2%$11.83 billion$2.12 billion47.68
Pentair logo
PNR
Pentair
2.0$63.35+2.0%$10.52 billion$2.96 billion30.17Analyst Report
The Middleby logo
MIDD
The Middleby
1.4$164.86+1.4%$9.17 billion$2.96 billion34.49Analyst Revision
ITT logo
ITT
ITT
1.6$91.66+0.3%$7.93 billion$2.85 billion52.68
Woodward logo
WWD
Woodward
1.5$123.95+1.0%$7.81 billion$2.90 billion31.95Analyst Revision
Donaldson logo
DCI
Donaldson
1.9$60.01+0.6%$7.57 billion$2.58 billion30.31
Lincoln Electric logo
LECO
Lincoln Electric
2.0$122.56+0.3%$7.31 billion$3.00 billion36.48Analyst Report
News Coverage
The Timken logo
TKR
The Timken
2.4$81.18+0.4%$6.17 billion$3.79 billion17.96Analyst Report
Rexnord logo
RXN
Rexnord
1.8$49.14+1.1%$5.91 billion$2.07 billion38.39
Colfax logo
CFX
Colfax
1.4$43.40+0.0%$5.87 billion$3.33 billion-868.00Analyst Report
Crane logo
CR
Crane
1.9$95.29+0.0%$5.54 billion$3.28 billion250.77
Chart Industries logo
GTLS
Chart Industries
1.2$143.45+0.3%$5.21 billion$1.30 billion81.97
Valmont Industries logo
VMI
Valmont Industries
1.8$235.30+0.4%$5.00 billion$2.77 billion35.92
RBC Bearings logo
ROLL
RBC Bearings
1.3$196.65+0.7%$4.94 billion$727.46 million45.73News Coverage
John Bean Technologies logo
JBT
John Bean Technologies
1.5$137.14+0.1%$4.35 billion$1.95 billion36.47
Altra Industrial Motion logo
AIMC
Altra Industrial Motion
1.4$61.93+1.8%$4.01 billion$1.83 billion-206.43
Watts Water Technologies logo
WTS
Watts Water Technologies
1.7$119.15+0.4%$4.01 billion$1.60 billion35.04News Coverage
Kennametal logo
KMT
Kennametal
1.3$42.19+0.8%$3.52 billion$1.89 billion-102.90Analyst Report
Proto Labs logo
PRLB
Proto Labs
1.1$110.90+2.9%$3.07 billion$458.73 million52.81
ESCO Technologies logo
ESE
ESCO Technologies
1.5$111.39+0.2%$2.90 billion$732.91 million28.49News Coverage
Albany International logo
AIN
Albany International
1.5$86.77+0.1%$2.80 billion$1.05 billion28.08
SPX FLOW logo
FLOW
SPX FLOW
1.6$65.57+0.1%$2.79 billion$1.51 billion-17.16
Barnes Group logo
B
Barnes Group
1.8$51.25+0.3%$2.60 billion$1.49 billion30.33
Mueller Industries logo
MLI
Mueller Industries
2.3$44.43+1.0%$2.54 billion$2.43 billion19.07
Mueller Water Products logo
MWA
Mueller Water Products
2.0$14.37+0.1%$2.28 billion$964.10 million31.93
Kadant logo
KAI
Kadant
1.8$184.29+0.0%$2.13 billion$704.64 million44.62
EnPro Industries logo
NPO
EnPro Industries
2.4$87.69+0.8%$1.81 billion$1.21 billion9.27
Omega Flex logo
OFLX
Omega Flex
0.7$150.70+1.1%$1.52 billion$111.36 million83.26Upcoming Earnings
Tennant logo
TNC
Tennant
1.6$81.80+0.7%$1.52 billion$1.14 billion36.04Insider Selling
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling logo
HY
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling
1.1$86.24+1.0%$1.45 billion$3.29 billion53.23
Harsco logo
HSC
Harsco
1.7$18.00+1.3%$1.42 billion$1.50 billion75.00
TriMas logo
TRS
TriMas
1.1$31.12+0.9%$1.34 billion$723.53 million-20.34
Columbus McKinnon logo
CMCO
Columbus McKinnon
1.8$54.03+1.5%$1.30 billion$809.16 million74.01Analyst Revision
Standex International logo
SXI
Standex International
2.0$96.52+0.1%$1.19 billion$604.53 million67.97
Piedmont Lithium logo
PLL
Piedmont Lithium
0.9$67.03+3.4%$1.06 billionN/A-98.57Analyst Report
Energy Recovery logo
ERII
Energy Recovery
1.0$18.32+1.8%$1.05 billion$86.94 million45.80
The Gorman-Rupp logo
GRC
The Gorman-Rupp
1.1$33.70+0.2%$879.87 million$398.18 million32.72
DMC Global logo
BOOM
DMC Global
1.1$52.11+1.1%$822.97 million$397.55 million-133.61
CIRCOR International logo
CIR
CIRCOR International
1.5$34.60+0.8%$697.36 million$964.31 million-4.08Unusual Options Activity
News Coverage
The ExOne logo
XONE
The ExOne
1.4$26.98+7.6%$595.56 million$53.28 million-30.66
Lydall logo
LDL
Lydall
1.1$31.97+0.2%$576.23 million$837.40 million-3.84
This page was last updated on 4/12/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.