Flowserve Competitors

Illinois Tool Works (NYSE:ITW) and Flowserve (NYSE:FLS) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

77.4% of Illinois Tool Works shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of Flowserve shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Illinois Tool Works shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Flowserve shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Illinois Tool Works has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its share price is 7% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Flowserve has a beta of 1.75, indicating that its share price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Illinois Tool Works and Flowserve's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Illinois Tool Works and Flowserve's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Illinois Tool Works has higher revenue and earnings than Flowserve. Flowserve is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Illinois Tool Works, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Illinois Tool Works pays an annual dividend of $4.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Flowserve pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Illinois Tool Works pays out 58.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Flowserve pays out 36.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Illinois Tool Works has increased its dividend for 50 consecutive years and Flowserve has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Illinois Tool Works is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Illinois Tool Works and Flowserve, as reported by MarketBeat.

Illinois Tool Works currently has a consensus price target of $206.0625, indicating a potential downside of 7.84%. Flowserve has a consensus price target of $35.3750, indicating a potential downside of 11.07%. Given Illinois Tool Works' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Illinois Tool Works is more favorable than Flowserve.

Summary

Illinois Tool Works beats Flowserve on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) and Flowserve (NYSE:FLS) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Parker-Hannifin and Flowserve's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Parker-Hannifin and Flowserve's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Flowserve. Flowserve is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Parker-Hannifin and Flowserve, as reported by MarketBeat.

Parker-Hannifin currently has a consensus price target of $307.00, indicating a potential downside of 4.41%. Flowserve has a consensus price target of $35.3750, indicating a potential downside of 11.07%. Given Parker-Hannifin's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Parker-Hannifin is more favorable than Flowserve.

Volatility & Risk

Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its share price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Flowserve has a beta of 1.75, indicating that its share price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Flowserve pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Parker-Hannifin pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Flowserve pays out 36.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Parker-Hannifin has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Flowserve has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

77.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of Flowserve shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Flowserve shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats Flowserve on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Flowserve (NYSE:FLS) and Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Flowserve and Stanley Black & Decker's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Flowserve and Stanley Black & Decker's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Stanley Black & Decker has higher revenue and earnings than Flowserve. Flowserve is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stanley Black & Decker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Flowserve and Stanley Black & Decker, as reported by MarketBeat.

Flowserve presently has a consensus target price of $35.3750, indicating a potential downside of 11.07%. Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus target price of $189.3077, indicating a potential downside of 7.27%. Given Stanley Black & Decker's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Stanley Black & Decker is more favorable than Flowserve.

Risk and Volatility

Flowserve has a beta of 1.75, meaning that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.47, meaning that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Flowserve pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Stanley Black & Decker pays an annual dividend of $2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Flowserve pays out 36.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker pays out 33.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Flowserve has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Stanley Black & Decker has increased its dividend for 54 consecutive years.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

98.4% of Flowserve shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.4% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Flowserve shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Stanley Black & Decker beats Flowserve on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Flowserve (NYSE:FLS) and Ingersoll Rand (NYSE:IR) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Flowserve and Ingersoll Rand's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Flowserve and Ingersoll Rand's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Flowserve has higher revenue and earnings than Ingersoll Rand. Flowserve is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ingersoll Rand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Flowserve and Ingersoll Rand, as reported by MarketBeat.

Flowserve presently has a consensus target price of $35.3750, indicating a potential downside of 11.07%. Ingersoll Rand has a consensus target price of $47.3846, indicating a potential downside of 5.51%. Given Ingersoll Rand's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ingersoll Rand is more favorable than Flowserve.

Volatility & Risk

Flowserve has a beta of 1.75, indicating that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.53, indicating that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

98.4% of Flowserve shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.9% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Flowserve shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Flowserve beats Ingersoll Rand on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Flowserve (NYSE:FLS) and Dover (NYSE:DOV) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Flowserve and Dover's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Flowserve and Dover's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than Flowserve. Flowserve is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dover, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Flowserve and Dover, as reported by MarketBeat.

Flowserve presently has a consensus target price of $35.3750, indicating a potential downside of 11.07%. Dover has a consensus target price of $129.25, indicating a potential downside of 8.00%. Given Dover's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Dover is more favorable than Flowserve.

Risk and Volatility

Flowserve has a beta of 1.75, meaning that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dover has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Flowserve pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Dover pays an annual dividend of $1.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Flowserve pays out 36.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dover pays out 33.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Flowserve has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Dover has increased its dividend for 59 consecutive years.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

98.4% of Flowserve shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.7% of Dover shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Flowserve shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Dover shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Dover beats Flowserve on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Flowserve (NYSE:FLS) and Xylem (NYSE:XYL) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Flowserve and Xylem's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Flowserve and Xylem's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Xylem has higher revenue and earnings than Flowserve. Flowserve is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xylem, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Flowserve and Xylem, as reported by MarketBeat.

Flowserve presently has a consensus target price of $35.3750, indicating a potential downside of 11.07%. Xylem has a consensus target price of $84.5455, indicating a potential downside of 22.01%. Given Flowserve's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Flowserve is more favorable than Xylem.

Risk and Volatility

Flowserve has a beta of 1.75, meaning that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Xylem has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Flowserve pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Xylem pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Flowserve pays out 36.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Xylem pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Flowserve has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Xylem has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Flowserve is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

98.4% of Flowserve shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.9% of Xylem shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Flowserve shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Xylem shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Xylem beats Flowserve on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.