Flowserve (FLS) Competitors

$65.95 +0.88 (+1.35%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$67.02 +1.07 (+1.61%)

As of 07:11 PM Eastern

FLS vs. AIT, CAT, CR, EMR, and GGG

Should you buy Flowserve stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Flowserve with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Flowserve include Applied Industrial Technologies (AIT), Caterpillar (CAT), Crane (CR), Emerson Electric (EMR), and Graco (GGG). These companies are all part of the "industrials" sector.

How does Flowserve compare to Applied Industrial Technologies?

Applied Industrial Technologies (NYSE:AIT) and Flowserve (NYSE:FLS) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Applied Industrial Technologies has a net margin of 8.34% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 7.61%. Applied Industrial Technologies' return on equity of 21.64% beat Flowserve's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Applied Industrial Technologies	8.34%	21.64%	12.91%
Flowserve	7.61%	21.46%	8.54%

Applied Industrial Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Flowserve. Flowserve is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Applied Industrial Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Applied Industrial Technologies	$4.56B	2.47	$392.99M	$10.59	28.78
Flowserve	$4.73B	1.78	$346.25M	$2.70	24.43

93.5% of Applied Industrial Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Flowserve shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Applied Industrial Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Flowserve shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Applied Industrial Technologies has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flowserve has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Applied Industrial Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Flowserve pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Applied Industrial Technologies pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Flowserve pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Industrial Technologies has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years and Flowserve has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Applied Industrial Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $313.67, suggesting a potential upside of 2.90%. Flowserve has a consensus target price of $87.70, suggesting a potential upside of 32.98%. Given Flowserve's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Flowserve is more favorable than Applied Industrial Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Applied Industrial Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Flowserve	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73

In the previous week, Flowserve had 11 more articles in the media than Applied Industrial Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Flowserve and 3 mentions for Applied Industrial Technologies. Applied Industrial Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Flowserve's score of 0.97 indicating that Applied Industrial Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Applied Industrial Technologies	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Flowserve	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Applied Industrial Technologies beats Flowserve on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Flowserve compare to Caterpillar?

Flowserve (NYSE:FLS) and Caterpillar (NYSE:CAT) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Caterpillar has a net margin of 13.33% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 7.61%. Caterpillar's return on equity of 48.21% beat Flowserve's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Flowserve	7.61%	21.46%	8.54%
Caterpillar	13.33%	48.21%	10.11%

Caterpillar has higher revenue and earnings than Flowserve. Flowserve is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Caterpillar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Flowserve	$4.73B	1.78	$346.25M	$2.70	24.43
Caterpillar	$67.59B	5.88	$8.88B	$20.09	42.93

Flowserve has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Caterpillar has a beta of 1.63, suggesting that its stock price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Flowserve currently has a consensus target price of $87.70, indicating a potential upside of 32.98%. Caterpillar has a consensus target price of $923.14, indicating a potential upside of 7.03%. Given Flowserve's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Flowserve is more favorable than Caterpillar.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Flowserve	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73
Caterpillar	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.64

In the previous week, Caterpillar had 81 more articles in the media than Flowserve. MarketBeat recorded 95 mentions for Caterpillar and 14 mentions for Flowserve. Caterpillar's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Flowserve's score of 0.97 indicating that Caterpillar is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Flowserve	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Caterpillar	56 Very Positive mention(s)	10 Positive mention(s)	16 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Flowserve pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Caterpillar pays an annual dividend of $6.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Flowserve pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Caterpillar pays out 30.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Flowserve has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Caterpillar has raised its dividend for 30 consecutive years.

93.9% of Flowserve shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.0% of Caterpillar shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Flowserve shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Caterpillar shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Caterpillar beats Flowserve on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Flowserve compare to Crane?

Crane (NYSE:CR) and Flowserve (NYSE:FLS) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Flowserve had 4 more articles in the media than Crane. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Flowserve and 10 mentions for Crane. Flowserve's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Crane's score of 0.89 indicating that Flowserve is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Crane	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Flowserve	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Crane pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Flowserve pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Crane pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Flowserve pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Crane has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Flowserve has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Crane has a net margin of 13.10% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 7.61%. Crane's return on equity of 24.45% beat Flowserve's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Crane	13.10%	24.45%	10.14%
Flowserve	7.61%	21.46%	8.54%

75.1% of Crane shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Flowserve shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Crane shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Flowserve shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Crane has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Flowserve. Flowserve is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crane, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Crane	$2.44B	4.03	$401.10M	$5.56	30.71
Flowserve	$4.73B	1.78	$346.25M	$2.70	24.43

Crane has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flowserve has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Crane currently has a consensus price target of $226.33, indicating a potential upside of 32.56%. Flowserve has a consensus price target of $87.70, indicating a potential upside of 32.98%. Given Flowserve's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Flowserve is more favorable than Crane.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Crane	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.13
Flowserve	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73

Summary

Crane beats Flowserve on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Flowserve compare to Emerson Electric?

Emerson Electric (NYSE:EMR) and Flowserve (NYSE:FLS) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

Emerson Electric has a net margin of 13.35% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 7.61%. Flowserve's return on equity of 21.46% beat Emerson Electric's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Emerson Electric	13.35%	17.18%	8.24%
Flowserve	7.61%	21.46%	8.54%

74.3% of Emerson Electric shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Flowserve shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Emerson Electric shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Flowserve shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Emerson Electric has higher revenue and earnings than Flowserve. Flowserve is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Emerson Electric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Emerson Electric	$18.02B	4.11	$2.29B	$4.33	30.51
Flowserve	$4.73B	1.78	$346.25M	$2.70	24.43

Emerson Electric has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flowserve has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Emerson Electric pays an annual dividend of $2.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Flowserve pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Emerson Electric pays out 51.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Flowserve pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Emerson Electric has raised its dividend for 68 consecutive years and Flowserve has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Emerson Electric is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Emerson Electric had 10 more articles in the media than Flowserve. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Emerson Electric and 14 mentions for Flowserve. Flowserve's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Emerson Electric's score of 0.47 indicating that Flowserve is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Emerson Electric	8 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Flowserve	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Emerson Electric presently has a consensus price target of $163.24, suggesting a potential upside of 23.57%. Flowserve has a consensus price target of $87.70, suggesting a potential upside of 32.98%. Given Flowserve's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Flowserve is more favorable than Emerson Electric.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Emerson Electric	1 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.48
Flowserve	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73

Summary

Emerson Electric beats Flowserve on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Flowserve compare to Graco?

Flowserve (NYSE:FLS) and Graco (NYSE:GGG) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation and profitability.

Flowserve currently has a consensus target price of $87.70, suggesting a potential upside of 32.98%. Graco has a consensus target price of $94.25, suggesting a potential upside of 23.54%. Given Flowserve's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Flowserve is more favorable than Graco.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Flowserve	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73
Graco	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43

Graco has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Flowserve. Flowserve is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Graco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Flowserve	$4.73B	1.78	$346.25M	$2.70	24.43
Graco	$2.24B	5.66	$521.84M	$3.07	24.85

In the previous week, Flowserve had 1 more articles in the media than Graco. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Flowserve and 13 mentions for Graco. Flowserve's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Graco's score of -0.29 indicating that Flowserve is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Flowserve	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Graco	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

93.9% of Flowserve shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Graco shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Flowserve shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Graco shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Graco has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Graco has a net margin of 22.96% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 7.61%. Flowserve's return on equity of 21.46% beat Graco's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Flowserve	7.61%	21.46%	8.54%
Graco	22.96%	18.66%	15.22%

Flowserve pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Graco pays an annual dividend of $1.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Flowserve pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Graco pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Flowserve has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Graco has increased its dividend for 29 consecutive years. Graco is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Flowserve beats Graco on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Flowserve News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FLS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FLS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Flowserve	MACH Industry	Industrials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$8.32B	$15.37B	$9.25B	$22.81B
Dividend Yield	1.35%	1.35%	3.59%	4.12%
P/E Ratio	24.43	43.35	25.06	29.86
Price / Sales	1.78	6.60	4,451.15	92.36
Price / Cash	14.47	36.59	27.40	18.80
Price / Book	3.72	5.00	4.79	4.59
Net Income	$346.25M	$444.52M	$794.33M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-6.81%	-2.37%	-1.19%	-1.35%
1 Month Performance	-21.42%	0.90%	0.63%	-1.29%
1 Year Performance	27.81%	31.29%	35.48%	21.88%

Flowserve Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FLS Flowserve	4.9177 of 5 stars	$65.95 +1.4%	$87.70 +33.0%	+26.1%	$8.32B	$4.73B	24.43	16,000	Dividend Announcement Analyst Downgrade
AIT Applied Industrial Technologies	3.7582 of 5 stars	$314.02 +1.1%	$313.67 -0.1%	+30.3%	$11.61B	$4.56B	29.65	6,800	Positive News Ex-Dividend
CAT Caterpillar	4.4242 of 5 stars	$909.09 -1.9%	$911.77 +0.3%	+151.4%	$418.37B	$67.59B	45.21	118,000	Trending News Insider Trade Analyst Revision
CR Crane	4.7321 of 5 stars	$181.20 -0.8%	$226.33 +24.9%	-3.6%	$10.46B	$2.44B	24.00	11,000
EMR Emerson Electric	4.8032 of 5 stars	$136.49 -2.1%	$164.24 +20.3%	+10.3%	$76.45B	$18.02B	31.52	71,000	Ex-Dividend Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:FLS) was last updated on 5/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Flowserve (FLS) Competitors

FLS vs. AIT, CAT, CR, EMR, and GGG

How does Flowserve compare to Applied Industrial Technologies?

Summary

How does Flowserve compare to Caterpillar?

Summary

How does Flowserve compare to Crane?

Summary

How does Flowserve compare to Emerson Electric?

Summary

How does Flowserve compare to Graco?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FLS vs. The Competition

Flowserve Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Flowserve (FLS) Competitors

FLS vs. AIT, CAT, CR, EMR, and GGG

How does Flowserve compare to Applied Industrial Technologies?

Is AIT or FLS more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, AIT or FLS?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of AIT or FLS?

Which has more risk & volatility, AIT or FLS?

Is AIT or FLS a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer AIT or FLS?

Does the media refer more to AIT or FLS?

Summary

How does Flowserve compare to Caterpillar?

Is FLS or CAT more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, FLS or CAT?

Which has more risk & volatility, FLS or CAT?

Do analysts recommend FLS or CAT?

Does the media refer more to FLS or CAT?

Is FLS or CAT a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in FLS or CAT?

Summary

How does Flowserve compare to Crane?

Does the media refer more to CR or FLS?

Is CR or FLS a better dividend stock?

Is CR or FLS more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in CR or FLS?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, CR or FLS?

Which has more volatility & risk, CR or FLS?

Do analysts recommend CR or FLS?

Summary

How does Flowserve compare to Emerson Electric?

Is EMR or FLS more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in EMR or FLS?

Which has better valuation and earnings, EMR or FLS?

Which has more risk & volatility, EMR or FLS?

Is EMR or FLS a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer EMR or FLS?

Do analysts recommend EMR or FLS?

Summary

How does Flowserve compare to Graco?

Do analysts recommend FLS or GGG?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, FLS or GGG?

Does the media favor FLS or GGG?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in FLS or GGG?

Which has more volatility & risk, FLS or GGG?

Is FLS or GGG more profitable?

Is FLS or GGG a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FLS vs. The Competition

Flowserve Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools