Armstrong World Industries Competitors

Armstrong World Industries (NYSE:AWI) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are both construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Armstrong World Industries and Masco, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Armstrong World Industries presently has a consensus price target of $87.3333, indicating a potential downside of 18.56%. Masco has a consensus price target of $62.7188, indicating a potential downside of 2.23%. Given Masco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Masco is more favorable than Armstrong World Industries.

Volatility & Risk

Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Armstrong World Industries and Masco's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Armstrong World Industries. Armstrong World Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Masco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

90.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Armstrong World Industries shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Masco shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Armstrong World Industries and Masco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Armstrong World Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Armstrong World Industries pays out 17.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Masco pays out 24.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Armstrong World Industries has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Masco has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Masco is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Masco beats Armstrong World Industries on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Armstrong World Industries (NYSE:AWI) and Fortune Brands Home & Security (NYSE:FBHS) are both construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Armstrong World Industries and Fortune Brands Home & Security, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Armstrong World Industries presently has a consensus price target of $87.3333, indicating a potential downside of 18.56%. Fortune Brands Home & Security has a consensus price target of $95.8824, indicating a potential downside of 11.18%. Given Fortune Brands Home & Security's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Brands Home & Security is more favorable than Armstrong World Industries.

Volatility & Risk

Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Home & Security has a beta of 1.66, suggesting that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Armstrong World Industries and Fortune Brands Home & Security's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Fortune Brands Home & Security has higher revenue and earnings than Armstrong World Industries. Armstrong World Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Home & Security, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

86.6% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Armstrong World Industries shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Armstrong World Industries and Fortune Brands Home & Security's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Armstrong World Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Fortune Brands Home & Security pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Armstrong World Industries pays out 17.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Home & Security pays out 28.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Armstrong World Industries has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Fortune Brands Home & Security has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Fortune Brands Home & Security beats Armstrong World Industries on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Armstrong World Industries (NYSE:AWI) and Lennox International (NYSE:LII) are both construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

66.3% of Lennox International shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Armstrong World Industries shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Lennox International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Armstrong World Industries and Lennox International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lennox International has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Armstrong World Industries and Lennox International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Armstrong World Industries presently has a consensus price target of $87.3333, indicating a potential downside of 18.56%. Lennox International has a consensus price target of $281.4167, indicating a potential downside of 19.79%. Given Armstrong World Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Armstrong World Industries is more favorable than Lennox International.

Dividends

Armstrong World Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Lennox International pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Armstrong World Industries pays out 17.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lennox International pays out 27.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Armstrong World Industries has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Lennox International has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Armstrong World Industries and Lennox International's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Lennox International has higher revenue and earnings than Armstrong World Industries. Armstrong World Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lennox International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Lennox International beats Armstrong World Industries on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Armstrong World Industries (NYSE:AWI) and Trex (NYSE:TREX) are both construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

98.6% of Trex shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Armstrong World Industries shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Trex shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Armstrong World Industries and Trex's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Trex has a beta of 1.46, indicating that its share price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Armstrong World Industries and Trex, as reported by MarketBeat.

Armstrong World Industries currently has a consensus price target of $87.3333, indicating a potential downside of 18.56%. Trex has a consensus price target of $95.8824, indicating a potential downside of 8.41%. Given Trex's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trex is more favorable than Armstrong World Industries.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Armstrong World Industries and Trex's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Armstrong World Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Trex. Armstrong World Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Trex beats Armstrong World Industries on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Armstrong World Industries (NYSE:AWI) and A. O. Smith (NYSE:AOS) are both construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

75.1% of A. O. Smith shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Armstrong World Industries shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of A. O. Smith shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Armstrong World Industries and A. O. Smith's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, A. O. Smith has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Armstrong World Industries and A. O. Smith, as reported by MarketBeat.

Armstrong World Industries currently has a consensus price target of $87.3333, indicating a potential downside of 18.56%. A. O. Smith has a consensus price target of $60.2857, indicating a potential downside of 16.00%. Given A. O. Smith's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe A. O. Smith is more favorable than Armstrong World Industries.

Dividends

Armstrong World Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. A. O. Smith pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Armstrong World Industries pays out 17.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. A. O. Smith pays out 46.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Armstrong World Industries has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and A. O. Smith has increased its dividend for 29 consecutive years. A. O. Smith is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Armstrong World Industries and A. O. Smith's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

A. O. Smith has higher revenue and earnings than Armstrong World Industries. Armstrong World Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than A. O. Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

A. O. Smith beats Armstrong World Industries on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Armstrong World Industries (NYSE:AWI) and Owens Corning (NYSE:OC) are both construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

91.2% of Owens Corning shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Armstrong World Industries shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Owens Corning shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Armstrong World Industries and Owens Corning's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Owens Corning has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its share price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Armstrong World Industries and Owens Corning, as reported by MarketBeat.

Armstrong World Industries currently has a consensus price target of $87.3333, indicating a potential downside of 18.56%. Owens Corning has a consensus price target of $82.3158, indicating a potential downside of 22.69%. Given Armstrong World Industries' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Armstrong World Industries is more favorable than Owens Corning.

Dividends

Armstrong World Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Owens Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Armstrong World Industries pays out 17.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Owens Corning pays out 22.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Armstrong World Industries has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Owens Corning has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Armstrong World Industries and Owens Corning's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Owens Corning has higher revenue and earnings than Armstrong World Industries. Armstrong World Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Owens Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Owens Corning beats Armstrong World Industries on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.