Free Trial

Armstrong World Industries (AWI) Competitors

Armstrong World Industries logo
$158.70 -0.73 (-0.46%)
As of 11:00 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

AWI vs. BLD, EXP, ITT, MAS, and OC

Should you be buying Armstrong World Industries stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Armstrong World Industries include TopBuild (BLD), Eagle Materials (EXP), ITT (ITT), Masco (MAS), and Owens Corning (OC).

How does Armstrong World Industries compare to TopBuild?

TopBuild (NYSE:BLD) and Armstrong World Industries (NYSE:AWI) are both construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and valuation.

95.7% of TopBuild shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Armstrong World Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of TopBuild shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Armstrong World Industries shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TopBuild presently has a consensus target price of $466.77, indicating a potential upside of 11.28%. Armstrong World Industries has a consensus target price of $211.86, indicating a potential upside of 33.49%. Given Armstrong World Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Armstrong World Industries is more favorable than TopBuild.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TopBuild
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.47
Armstrong World Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70

Armstrong World Industries has a net margin of 18.59% compared to TopBuild's net margin of 8.95%. Armstrong World Industries' return on equity of 36.71% beat TopBuild's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TopBuild8.95% 23.53% 8.61%
Armstrong World Industries 18.59%36.71%16.86%

TopBuild has higher revenue and earnings than Armstrong World Industries. Armstrong World Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TopBuild, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TopBuild$5.41B2.18$521.73M$17.8023.56
Armstrong World Industries$1.62B4.18$308.70M$7.0522.51

TopBuild has a beta of 1.85, indicating that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, TopBuild had 8 more articles in the media than Armstrong World Industries. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for TopBuild and 6 mentions for Armstrong World Industries. Armstrong World Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat TopBuild's score of 0.46 indicating that Armstrong World Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TopBuild
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Armstrong World Industries
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Armstrong World Industries beats TopBuild on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Armstrong World Industries compare to Eagle Materials?

Eagle Materials (NYSE:EXP) and Armstrong World Industries (NYSE:AWI) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Eagle Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Armstrong World Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Eagle Materials pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Armstrong World Industries pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Armstrong World Industries has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Armstrong World Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Armstrong World Industries had 2 more articles in the media than Eagle Materials. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Armstrong World Industries and 4 mentions for Eagle Materials. Armstrong World Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Eagle Materials' score of 1.06 indicating that Armstrong World Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Eagle Materials
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Armstrong World Industries
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Eagle Materials has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Eagle Materials presently has a consensus target price of $228.82, suggesting a potential upside of 14.06%. Armstrong World Industries has a consensus target price of $211.86, suggesting a potential upside of 33.49%. Given Armstrong World Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Armstrong World Industries is more favorable than Eagle Materials.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Eagle Materials
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.08
Armstrong World Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70

96.1% of Eagle Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Armstrong World Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Eagle Materials shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Armstrong World Industries shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Eagle Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Armstrong World Industries. Eagle Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Armstrong World Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Eagle Materials$2.26B2.79$463.42M$13.2115.19
Armstrong World Industries$1.62B4.18$308.70M$7.0522.51

Eagle Materials has a net margin of 18.70% compared to Armstrong World Industries' net margin of 18.59%. Armstrong World Industries' return on equity of 36.71% beat Eagle Materials' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Eagle Materials18.70% 28.96% 12.44%
Armstrong World Industries 18.59%36.71%16.86%

Summary

Armstrong World Industries beats Eagle Materials on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Armstrong World Industries compare to ITT?

ITT (NYSE:ITT) and Armstrong World Industries (NYSE:AWI) are related companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

91.6% of ITT shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Armstrong World Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of ITT shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Armstrong World Industries shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ITT has higher revenue and earnings than Armstrong World Industries. Armstrong World Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ITT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ITT$3.94B4.59$488M$5.6735.63
Armstrong World Industries$1.62B4.18$308.70M$7.0522.51

ITT pays an annual dividend of $1.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Armstrong World Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. ITT pays out 27.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Armstrong World Industries pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ITT has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Armstrong World Industries has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Armstrong World Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

ITT presently has a consensus target price of $234.91, suggesting a potential upside of 16.27%. Armstrong World Industries has a consensus target price of $211.86, suggesting a potential upside of 33.49%. Given Armstrong World Industries' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Armstrong World Industries is more favorable than ITT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ITT
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91
Armstrong World Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70

Armstrong World Industries has a net margin of 18.59% compared to ITT's net margin of 10.80%. Armstrong World Industries' return on equity of 36.71% beat ITT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ITT10.80% 16.83% 8.61%
Armstrong World Industries 18.59%36.71%16.86%

ITT has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, ITT had 28 more articles in the media than Armstrong World Industries. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for ITT and 6 mentions for Armstrong World Industries. Armstrong World Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat ITT's score of 0.66 indicating that Armstrong World Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ITT
8 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
14 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Armstrong World Industries
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Armstrong World Industries beats ITT on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Armstrong World Industries compare to Masco?

Armstrong World Industries (NYSE:AWI) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are both construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Armstrong World Industries has a net margin of 18.59% compared to Masco's net margin of 10.90%. Masco's return on equity of 815.20% beat Armstrong World Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Armstrong World Industries18.59% 36.71% 16.86%
Masco 10.90%815.20%16.32%

In the previous week, Masco had 9 more articles in the media than Armstrong World Industries. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Masco and 6 mentions for Armstrong World Industries. Armstrong World Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Masco's score of 1.00 indicating that Armstrong World Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Armstrong World Industries
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Masco
6 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Armstrong World Industries currently has a consensus target price of $211.86, suggesting a potential upside of 33.49%. Masco has a consensus target price of $80.07, suggesting a potential upside of 15.55%. Given Armstrong World Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Armstrong World Industries is more favorable than Masco.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Armstrong World Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70
Masco
1 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.30

Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Armstrong World Industries. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Armstrong World Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Armstrong World Industries$1.62B4.18$308.70M$7.0522.51
Masco$7.56B1.85$810M$4.0317.19

Armstrong World Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Masco pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Armstrong World Industries pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Masco pays out 31.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Armstrong World Industries has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Masco has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Masco is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

98.9% of Armstrong World Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Armstrong World Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Armstrong World Industries beats Masco on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Armstrong World Industries compare to Owens Corning?

Armstrong World Industries (NYSE:AWI) and Owens Corning (NYSE:OC) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Owens Corning had 21 more articles in the media than Armstrong World Industries. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Owens Corning and 6 mentions for Armstrong World Industries. Armstrong World Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Owens Corning's score of 0.72 indicating that Armstrong World Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Armstrong World Industries
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Owens Corning
7 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
12 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Armstrong World Industries has a net margin of 18.59% compared to Owens Corning's net margin of -5.43%. Armstrong World Industries' return on equity of 36.71% beat Owens Corning's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Armstrong World Industries18.59% 36.71% 16.86%
Owens Corning -5.43%19.86%6.32%

Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Owens Corning has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

Armstrong World Industries has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Owens Corning. Owens Corning is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Armstrong World Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Armstrong World Industries$1.62B4.18$308.70M$7.0522.51
Owens Corning$10.10B0.94-$522M-$6.61N/A

98.9% of Armstrong World Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.4% of Owens Corning shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Armstrong World Industries shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Owens Corning shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Armstrong World Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Owens Corning pays an annual dividend of $3.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Armstrong World Industries pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Owens Corning pays out -47.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Armstrong World Industries has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Owens Corning has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Owens Corning is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Armstrong World Industries presently has a consensus price target of $211.86, indicating a potential upside of 33.49%. Owens Corning has a consensus price target of $144.82, indicating a potential upside of 22.52%. Given Armstrong World Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Armstrong World Industries is more favorable than Owens Corning.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Armstrong World Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70
Owens Corning
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53

Summary

Armstrong World Industries beats Owens Corning on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Armstrong World Industries News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AWI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AWI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

AWI vs. The Competition

MetricArmstrong World IndustriesBLDG&CONST IndustryConstruction SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$6.77B$10.75B$9.76B$22.77B
Dividend Yield0.84%1.35%1.78%4.03%
P/E Ratio22.5221.4818.2328.62
Price / Sales4.181.784.14103.86
Price / Cash15.7316.9517.8619.21
Price / Book7.609.255.234.60
Net Income$308.70M$848.68M$554.91M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-3.39%-4.42%-1.87%-0.98%
1 Month Performance-9.48%-1.58%2.71%3.02%
1 Year Performance1.52%14.03%16.10%24.10%

Armstrong World Industries Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
AWI
Armstrong World Industries
4.581 of 5 stars
$158.70
-0.5%
$211.86
+33.5%
+4.6%$6.77B$1.62B22.523,800
BLD
TopBuild
3.5011 of 5 stars
$431.47
-1.7%
$447.21
+3.6%
+43.5%$12.36B$5.41B23.5814,707
EXP
Eagle Materials
2.4558 of 5 stars
$204.63
-2.9%
$228.82
+11.8%
-10.7%$6.63B$2.26B15.492,500
ITT
ITT
4.2739 of 5 stars
$209.05
-0.4%
$225.55
+7.9%
+44.5%$18.76B$3.94B34.2111,600
MAS
Masco
4.8842 of 5 stars
$68.52
-3.8%
$80.07
+16.8%
+13.6%$13.82B$7.68B17.0018,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:AWI) was last updated on 5/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners