Halliburton (HAL) Competitors

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Halliburton had 21 more articles in the media than Patterson-UTI Energy. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Halliburton and 3 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Halliburton's score of 0.74 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Halliburton shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Halliburton has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -2.56%. Halliburton's return on equity of 19.04% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -129.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Halliburton pays out 37.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Halliburton has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Patterson-UTI Energy presently has a consensus target price of $11.80, indicating a potential downside of 4.14%. Halliburton has a consensus target price of $42.86, indicating a potential upside of 3.28%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 18.92% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 6.95%. Halliburton's return on equity of 19.04% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity.

62.5% of Kinder Morgan shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.7% of Kinder Morgan shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Halliburton shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kinder Morgan currently has a consensus target price of $34.20, suggesting a potential upside of 1.20%. Halliburton has a consensus target price of $42.86, suggesting a potential upside of 3.28%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Kinder Morgan.

Kinder Morgan pays an annual dividend of $1.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Kinder Morgan pays out 79.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Halliburton pays out 37.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kinder Morgan has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years and Halliburton has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Kinder Morgan is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Kinder Morgan has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Halliburton. Kinder Morgan is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Kinder Morgan had 5 more articles in the media than Halliburton. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Kinder Morgan and 24 mentions for Halliburton. Kinder Morgan's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Halliburton's score of 0.74 indicating that Kinder Morgan is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than Liberty Energy. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Halliburton had 16 more articles in the media than Liberty Energy. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Halliburton and 8 mentions for Liberty Energy. Liberty Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Halliburton's score of 0.74 indicating that Liberty Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Liberty Energy presently has a consensus price target of $30.42, suggesting a potential downside of 4.41%. Halliburton has a consensus price target of $42.86, suggesting a potential upside of 3.28%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Liberty Energy.

Halliburton has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Liberty Energy's net margin of 3.71%. Halliburton's return on equity of 19.04% beat Liberty Energy's return on equity.

Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Halliburton shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Liberty Energy pays out 39.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Halliburton pays out 37.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Liberty Energy has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Halliburton has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Halliburton is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 19.98% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 6.95%. Halliburton's return on equity of 19.04% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity.

Occidental Petroleum has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Halliburton. Occidental Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Halliburton has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 0.17, indicating that its share price is 83% less volatile than the broader market.

Halliburton presently has a consensus target price of $42.86, suggesting a potential upside of 3.28%. Occidental Petroleum has a consensus target price of $62.91, suggesting a potential upside of 6.96%. Given Occidental Petroleum's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Occidental Petroleum is more favorable than Halliburton.

In the previous week, Halliburton had 6 more articles in the media than Occidental Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Halliburton and 18 mentions for Occidental Petroleum. Halliburton's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Occidental Petroleum's score of 0.66 indicating that Halliburton is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Occidental Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Halliburton pays out 37.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 26.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Halliburton has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Occidental Petroleum has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Occidental Petroleum is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

85.2% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of Occidental Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Halliburton shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Occidental Petroleum shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.