Does the media prefer APA or PTEN?

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 3 more articles in the media than APA. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 16 mentions for APA. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat APA's score of 1.03 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment APA 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Patterson-UTI Energy 4 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to CHRD or PTEN?

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 5 more articles in the media than Chord Energy. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 14 mentions for Chord Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Chord Energy's score of 1.05 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Chord Energy 6 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Patterson-UTI Energy 4 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer PTEN or HAL?

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Halliburton. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 15 mentions for Halliburton. Halliburton's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Patterson-UTI Energy's score of 1.14 indicating that Halliburton is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Patterson-UTI Energy 4 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Halliburton 12 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer PTEN or HP?

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 15 more articles in the media than Helmerich & Payne. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 4 mentions for Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Patterson-UTI Energy's score of 1.14 indicating that Helmerich & Payne is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Patterson-UTI Energy 4 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Helmerich & Payne 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer MTDR or PTEN?

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 8 more articles in the media than Matador Resources. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 11 mentions for Matador Resources. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Matador Resources' score of 0.54 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Matador Resources 3 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Patterson-UTI Energy 4 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN) Competitors

$12.85 -0.05 (-0.39%)

Closing price 09/11/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$12.77 -0.08 (-0.62%)

As of 09/11/2026 07:30 PM Eastern

Compare

PTEN vs. APA, CHRD, HAL, HP, and MTDR

Should you buy Patterson-UTI Energy stock or one of its competitors? Patterson-UTI Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include APA (APA), Chord Energy (CHRD), Halliburton (HAL), Helmerich & Payne (HP), and Matador Resources (MTDR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to APA?

APA (NASDAQ:APA) and Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

APA presently has a consensus price target of $42.76, suggesting a potential downside of 4.41%. Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $13.25, suggesting a potential upside of 3.11%. Given Patterson-UTI Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more favorable than APA.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
APA	4 Sell rating(s)	17 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.19
Patterson-UTI Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.53

APA has a beta of 0.37, indicating that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

APA has a net margin of 19.48% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -1.92%. APA's return on equity of 24.84% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
APA	19.48%	24.84%	10.15%
Patterson-UTI Energy	-1.92%	-1.68%	-0.98%

APA has higher revenue and earnings than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than APA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
APA	$9.22B	1.70	$1.43B	$4.73	9.46
Patterson-UTI Energy	$4.83B	1.02	-$93.64M	-$0.23	N/A

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 3 more articles in the media than APA. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 16 mentions for APA. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat APA's score of 1.03 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
APA	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Patterson-UTI Energy	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

83.0% of APA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of APA shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

APA pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. APA pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -173.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

APA and Patterson-UTI Energy tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Chord Energy?

Chord Energy (NASDAQ:CHRD) and Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Chord Energy has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Chord Energy has a net margin of 13.42% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -1.92%. Chord Energy's return on equity of 10.18% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chord Energy	13.42%	10.18%	6.24%
Patterson-UTI Energy	-1.92%	-1.68%	-0.98%

Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Chord Energy pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -173.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chord Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Chord Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

97.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 5 more articles in the media than Chord Energy. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 14 mentions for Chord Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Chord Energy's score of 1.05 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Chord Energy	6 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Patterson-UTI Energy	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Chord Energy currently has a consensus target price of $155.50, suggesting a potential upside of 2.30%. Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus target price of $13.25, suggesting a potential upside of 3.11%. Given Patterson-UTI Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more favorable than Chord Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chord Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76
Patterson-UTI Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.53

Chord Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chord Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chord Energy	$6.32B	1.32	$44.46M	$14.92	10.19
Patterson-UTI Energy	$4.83B	1.02	-$93.64M	-$0.23	N/A

Summary

Chord Energy beats Patterson-UTI Energy on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Halliburton?

Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) and Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Halliburton has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -1.92%. Halliburton's return on equity of 18.71% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Patterson-UTI Energy	-1.92%	-1.68%	-0.98%
Halliburton	7.16%	18.71%	7.89%

Patterson-UTI Energy currently has a consensus price target of $13.25, indicating a potential upside of 3.11%. Halliburton has a consensus price target of $43.10, indicating a potential upside of 20.12%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Patterson-UTI Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.53
Halliburton	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.68

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Halliburton. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 15 mentions for Halliburton. Halliburton's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Patterson-UTI Energy's score of 1.14 indicating that Halliburton is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Patterson-UTI Energy	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Halliburton	12 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Halliburton shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Patterson-UTI Energy	$4.83B	1.02	-$93.64M	-$0.23	N/A
Halliburton	$22.37B	1.34	$1.28B	$1.91	18.78

Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -173.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Halliburton pays out 35.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Halliburton has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Halliburton beats Patterson-UTI Energy on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Helmerich & Payne?

Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) and Helmerich & Payne (NYSE:HP) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -173.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out -70.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 15 more articles in the media than Helmerich & Payne. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 4 mentions for Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Patterson-UTI Energy's score of 1.14 indicating that Helmerich & Payne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Patterson-UTI Energy	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Helmerich & Payne	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Patterson-UTI Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Helmerich & Payne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Patterson-UTI Energy	$4.83B	1.02	-$93.64M	-$0.23	N/A
Helmerich & Payne	$3.75B	1.18	-$163.70M	-$1.41	N/A

97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Patterson-UTI Energy presently has a consensus target price of $13.25, indicating a potential upside of 3.11%. Helmerich & Payne has a consensus target price of $43.10, indicating a potential downside of 2.41%. Given Patterson-UTI Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more favorable than Helmerich & Payne.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Patterson-UTI Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.53
Helmerich & Payne	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.27

Patterson-UTI Energy has a net margin of -1.92% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of -3.43%. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -1.68% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Patterson-UTI Energy	-1.92%	-1.68%	-0.98%
Helmerich & Payne	-3.43%	-2.35%	-0.99%

Summary

Patterson-UTI Energy beats Helmerich & Payne on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Matador Resources?

Matador Resources (NYSE:MTDR) and Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment and valuation.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 19.85% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -1.92%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 13.18% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Matador Resources	19.85%	13.18%	6.46%
Patterson-UTI Energy	-1.92%	-1.68%	-0.98%

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 8 more articles in the media than Matador Resources. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 11 mentions for Matador Resources. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Matador Resources' score of 0.54 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Matador Resources	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Patterson-UTI Energy	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Matador Resources currently has a consensus target price of $65.93, indicating a potential upside of 7.92%. Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus target price of $13.25, indicating a potential upside of 3.11%. Given Matador Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Matador Resources is more favorable than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Matador Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82
Patterson-UTI Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.53

Matador Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matador Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Matador Resources	$3.70B	2.05	$759.22M	$5.83	10.48
Patterson-UTI Energy	$4.83B	1.02	-$93.64M	-$0.23	N/A

Matador Resources has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

92.0% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Matador Resources pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -173.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matador Resources has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Matador Resources beats Patterson-UTI Energy on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Patterson-UTI Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PTEN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PTEN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Patterson-UTI Energy	Energy Equipment & Services Industry	Energy Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$4.92B	$3.77B	$10.19B	$12.71B
Dividend Yield	3.10%	13.35%	10.54%	11.16%
P/E Ratio	-55.87	44.52	21.80	25.27
Price / Sales	1.02	31.38	510.26	99.48
Price / Cash	5.49	21.08	36.34	51.44
Price / Book	1.51	2.21	4.12	6.20
Net Income	-$93.64M	$67.53M	$4.33B	$358.27M
7 Day Performance	3.46%	0.24%	0.92%	-2.36%
1 Month Performance	16.61%	0.23%	4.62%	-2.77%
1 Year Performance	131.95%	46.71%	38.88%	7.64%

Patterson-UTI Energy Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PTEN Patterson-UTI Energy	1.9485 of 5 stars	$12.85 -0.4%	$13.25 +3.1%	+131.1%	$4.92B	$4.83B	N/A	7,900	Trending News Analyst Revision Gap Up
APA APA	3.6878 of 5 stars	$42.77 flat	$42.07 -1.6%	+94.6%	$14.98B	$9.22B	9.04	1,791	Positive News Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
CHRD Chord Energy	2.9909 of 5 stars	$146.39 flat	$153.46 +4.8%	+45.0%	$8.01B	$4.88B	9.81	530	News Coverage Analyst Upgrade
HAL Halliburton	4.8875 of 5 stars	$37.05 -0.1%	$43.10 +16.3%	+60.6%	$30.88B	$22.18B	19.40	46,000	Positive News
HP Helmerich & Payne	2.4908 of 5 stars	$44.33 -0.1%	$42.20 -4.8%	+111.3%	$4.43B	$3.75B	N/A	6,200	Analyst Forecast Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:PTEN) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN) Competitors

PTEN vs. APA, CHRD, HAL, HP, and MTDR

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to APA?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Chord Energy?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Halliburton?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Helmerich & Payne?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Matador Resources?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PTEN vs. The Competition

Patterson-UTI Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN) Competitors

PTEN vs. APA, CHRD, HAL, HP, and MTDR

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to APA?

Do analysts prefer APA or PTEN?

Which has more volatility & risk, APA or PTEN?

Is APA or PTEN more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, APA or PTEN?

Does the media prefer APA or PTEN?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in APA or PTEN?

Is APA or PTEN a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Chord Energy?

Which has more risk & volatility, CHRD or PTEN?

Is CHRD or PTEN more profitable?

Is CHRD or PTEN a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of CHRD or PTEN?

Does the media refer more to CHRD or PTEN?

Do analysts recommend CHRD or PTEN?

Which has better valuation & earnings, CHRD or PTEN?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Halliburton?

Is PTEN or HAL more profitable?

Do analysts recommend PTEN or HAL?

Which has more risk and volatility, PTEN or HAL?

Does the media prefer PTEN or HAL?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in PTEN or HAL?

Which has better earnings and valuation, PTEN or HAL?

Is PTEN or HAL a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Helmerich & Payne?

Is PTEN or HP a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer PTEN or HP?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PTEN or HP?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in PTEN or HP?

Which has more volatility and risk, PTEN or HP?

Do analysts recommend PTEN or HP?

Is PTEN or HP more profitable?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Matador Resources?

Is MTDR or PTEN more profitable?

Does the media prefer MTDR or PTEN?

Do analysts rate MTDR or PTEN?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, MTDR or PTEN?

Which has more volatility and risk, MTDR or PTEN?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MTDR or PTEN?

Is MTDR or PTEN a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PTEN vs. The Competition

Patterson-UTI Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools