Free Trial

Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN) Competitors

Patterson-UTI Energy logo
$11.21 -0.09 (-0.80%)
Closing price 05/29/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$11.24 +0.03 (+0.31%)
As of 05/29/2026 07:52 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PTEN vs. APA, HAL, HP, MGY, and MTDR

Should you buy Patterson-UTI Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Patterson-UTI Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Patterson-UTI Energy include APA (APA), Halliburton (HAL), Helmerich & Payne (HP), Magnolia Oil & Gas (MGY), and Matador Resources (MTDR). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to APA?

APA (NASDAQ:APA) and Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, media sentiment, profitability and institutional ownership.

APA presently has a consensus target price of $40.96, indicating a potential upside of 12.44%. Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus target price of $12.10, indicating a potential upside of 7.94%. Given APA's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe APA is more favorable than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
APA
4 Sell rating(s)
18 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13
Patterson-UTI Energy
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53

APA has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 3 more articles in the media than APA. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 14 mentions for APA. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat APA's score of 0.87 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
APA
5 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Patterson-UTI Energy
9 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

APA has higher revenue and earnings than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than APA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
APA$9.22B1.40$1.43B$4.298.49
Patterson-UTI Energy$4.83B0.88-$93.64M-$0.31N/A

83.0% of APA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of APA shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

APA pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. APA pays out 23.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -129.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

APA has a net margin of 17.38% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -2.56%. APA's return on equity of 20.70% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
APA17.38% 20.70% 8.14%
Patterson-UTI Energy -2.56%-2.32%-1.37%

Summary

APA and Patterson-UTI Energy tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Halliburton?

Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) and Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Halliburton$22.18B1.46$1.28B$1.8221.29
Patterson-UTI Energy$4.83B0.88-$93.64M-$0.31N/A

Halliburton currently has a consensus price target of $43.05, suggesting a potential upside of 11.07%. Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $12.10, suggesting a potential upside of 7.94%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Halliburton
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Patterson-UTI Energy
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53

Halliburton has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -2.56%. Halliburton's return on equity of 19.04% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Halliburton6.95% 19.04% 7.96%
Patterson-UTI Energy -2.56%-2.32%-1.37%

85.2% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Halliburton shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Halliburton had 8 more articles in the media than Patterson-UTI Energy. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Halliburton and 17 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Halliburton's score of 1.12 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Halliburton
15 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Patterson-UTI Energy
9 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Halliburton has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Halliburton pays out 37.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -129.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Halliburton has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Halliburton beats Patterson-UTI Energy on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Helmerich & Payne?

Helmerich & Payne (NYSE:HP) and Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Helmerich & Payne pays out -26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -129.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Helmerich & Payne currently has a consensus price target of $39.70, indicating a potential upside of 4.36%. Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $12.10, indicating a potential upside of 7.94%. Given Patterson-UTI Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more favorable than Helmerich & Payne.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Helmerich & Payne
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Patterson-UTI Energy
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Patterson-UTI Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Helmerich & Payne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Helmerich & Payne$3.75B1.01-$163.70M-$3.79N/A
Patterson-UTI Energy$4.83B0.88-$93.64M-$0.31N/A

Patterson-UTI Energy has a net margin of -2.56% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of -9.38%. Helmerich & Payne's return on equity of -1.16% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Helmerich & Payne-9.38% -1.16% -0.48%
Patterson-UTI Energy -2.56%-2.32%-1.37%

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 13 more articles in the media than Helmerich & Payne. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 4 mentions for Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne's average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat Patterson-UTI Energy's score of 1.21 indicating that Helmerich & Payne is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Helmerich & Payne
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Patterson-UTI Energy
9 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

96.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Patterson-UTI Energy beats Helmerich & Payne on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Magnolia Oil & Gas?

Magnolia Oil & Gas (NYSE:MGY) and Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Magnolia Oil & Gas$1.31B3.86$325.25M$1.7215.91
Patterson-UTI Energy$4.83B0.88-$93.64M-$0.31N/A

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 24.40% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -2.56%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 16.28% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Magnolia Oil & Gas24.40% 16.28% 11.26%
Patterson-UTI Energy -2.56%-2.32%-1.37%

Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -129.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 14 more articles in the media than Magnolia Oil & Gas. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 3 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas. Magnolia Oil & Gas' average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Patterson-UTI Energy's score of 1.21 indicating that Magnolia Oil & Gas is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Magnolia Oil & Gas
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Patterson-UTI Energy
9 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Magnolia Oil & Gas presently has a consensus target price of $31.42, indicating a potential upside of 14.82%. Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus target price of $12.10, indicating a potential upside of 7.94%. Given Magnolia Oil & Gas' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Magnolia Oil & Gas is more favorable than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Magnolia Oil & Gas
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.41
Patterson-UTI Energy
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Magnolia Oil & Gas beats Patterson-UTI Energy on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Matador Resources?

Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) and Matador Resources (NYSE:MTDR) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 14.41% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -2.56%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 11.20% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Patterson-UTI Energy-2.56% -2.32% -1.37%
Matador Resources 14.41%11.20%5.62%

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 3 more articles in the media than Matador Resources. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 14 mentions for Matador Resources. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Matador Resources' score of 0.59 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Patterson-UTI Energy
9 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Matador Resources
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Matador Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matador Resources has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Patterson-UTI Energy presently has a consensus price target of $12.10, indicating a potential upside of 7.94%. Matador Resources has a consensus price target of $65.08, indicating a potential upside of 21.50%. Given Matador Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Matador Resources is more favorable than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Patterson-UTI Energy
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53
Matador Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -129.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matador Resources has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Matador Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matador Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Patterson-UTI Energy$4.83B0.88-$93.64M-$0.31N/A
Matador Resources$3.70B1.80$759.22M$3.8913.77

Summary

Matador Resources beats Patterson-UTI Energy on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Patterson-UTI Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PTEN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PTEN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PTEN vs. The Competition

MetricPatterson-UTI EnergyOIL&GAS IndustryEnergy SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$4.26B$3.96B$10.03B$12.59B
Dividend Yield3.57%3.43%10.42%5.31%
P/E Ratio-36.1613.9519.2623.45
Price / Sales0.881.85825.46114.93
Price / Cash4.778.2937.3637.60
Price / Book1.321.554.286.86
Net Income-$93.64M-$52.06M$4.23B$337.26M
7 Day Performance-8.94%-6.16%-2.23%3.58%
1 Month Performance-8.27%-6.14%-2.35%5.71%
1 Year Performance100.54%124.43%50.45%39.70%

Patterson-UTI Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy
3.1996 of 5 stars
$11.21
-0.8%
$12.10
+7.9%
+100.5%$4.26B$4.83BN/A7,900
APA
APA
3.4054 of 5 stars
$40.15
+3.0%
$39.81
-0.9%
+112.4%$13.78B$9.22B9.361,791
HAL
Halliburton
4.4796 of 5 stars
$42.76
+2.4%
$42.45
-0.7%
+97.7%$34.89B$22.18B23.4946,000
HP
Helmerich & Payne
3.3445 of 5 stars
$41.52
+5.1%
$39.70
-4.4%
+149.0%$3.95B$3.75BN/A6,200
MGY
Magnolia Oil & Gas
3.6387 of 5 stars
$29.86
+1.0%
$31.00
+3.8%
+27.4%$5.47B$1.31B17.36210

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:PTEN) was last updated on 5/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners