Go Pro

Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN) Competitors

Patterson-UTI Energy logo
$9.39 -0.01 (-0.11%)
Closing price 07/10/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$9.36 -0.03 (-0.27%)
As of 07/10/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PTEN vs. HAL, HP, MGY, MTDR, and MUR

Should you buy Patterson-UTI Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Patterson-UTI Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Patterson-UTI Energy include Halliburton (HAL), Helmerich & Payne (HP), Magnolia Oil & Gas (MGY), Matador Resources (MTDR), and Murphy Oil (MUR). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Halliburton?

Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) and Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Halliburton pays out 37.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -129.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Halliburton has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Halliburton$22.18B1.29$1.28B$1.8218.88
Patterson-UTI Energy$4.66B0.76-$93.64M-$0.31N/A

Halliburton presently has a consensus target price of $43.18, indicating a potential upside of 25.66%. Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus target price of $12.15, indicating a potential upside of 29.39%. Given Patterson-UTI Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more favorable than Halliburton.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Halliburton
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.68
Patterson-UTI Energy
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

In the previous week, Halliburton had 21 more articles in the media than Patterson-UTI Energy. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for Halliburton and 10 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy. Halliburton's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Patterson-UTI Energy's score of 0.64 indicating that Halliburton is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Halliburton
15 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Patterson-UTI Energy
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Halliburton has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

85.2% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Halliburton shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Halliburton has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -2.56%. Halliburton's return on equity of 19.04% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Halliburton6.95% 19.04% 7.96%
Patterson-UTI Energy -2.56%-2.32%-1.37%

Summary

Halliburton beats Patterson-UTI Energy on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Helmerich & Payne?

Helmerich & Payne (NYSE:HP) and Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and profitability.

96.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a net margin of -2.56% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of -9.38%. Helmerich & Payne's return on equity of -1.16% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Helmerich & Payne-9.38% -1.16% -0.48%
Patterson-UTI Energy -2.56%-2.32%-1.37%

Patterson-UTI Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Helmerich & Payne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Helmerich & Payne$4.00B0.83-$163.70M-$3.79N/A
Patterson-UTI Energy$4.66B0.76-$93.64M-$0.31N/A

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 6 more articles in the media than Helmerich & Payne. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 4 mentions for Helmerich & Payne. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Helmerich & Payne's score of -0.41 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Helmerich & Payne
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Patterson-UTI Energy
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Helmerich & Payne pays out -26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -129.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Helmerich & Payne presently has a consensus target price of $40.10, suggesting a potential upside of 20.36%. Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus target price of $12.15, suggesting a potential upside of 29.39%. Given Patterson-UTI Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more favorable than Helmerich & Payne.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Helmerich & Payne
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Patterson-UTI Energy
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Summary

Patterson-UTI Energy beats Helmerich & Payne on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Magnolia Oil & Gas?

Magnolia Oil & Gas (NYSE:MGY) and Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Magnolia Oil & Gas. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 6 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.59 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Magnolia Oil & Gas
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Patterson-UTI Energy
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Magnolia Oil & Gas presently has a consensus price target of $31.08, suggesting a potential upside of 20.59%. Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $12.15, suggesting a potential upside of 29.39%. Given Patterson-UTI Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more favorable than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Magnolia Oil & Gas
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.47
Patterson-UTI Energy
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -129.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Magnolia Oil & Gas$1.31B3.63$325.25M$1.7214.99
Patterson-UTI Energy$4.66B0.76-$93.64M-$0.31N/A

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 24.40% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -2.56%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 16.28% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Magnolia Oil & Gas24.40% 16.28% 11.26%
Patterson-UTI Energy -2.56%-2.32%-1.37%

Summary

Magnolia Oil & Gas beats Patterson-UTI Energy on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Matador Resources?

Matador Resources (NYSE:MTDR) and Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Matador Resources currently has a consensus target price of $64.38, suggesting a potential upside of 25.51%. Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus target price of $12.15, suggesting a potential upside of 29.39%. Given Patterson-UTI Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more favorable than Matador Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Matador Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.69
Patterson-UTI Energy
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Matador Resources has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 7 more articles in the media than Patterson-UTI Energy. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Matador Resources and 10 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Matador Resources' score of -0.15 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Matador Resources
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Patterson-UTI Energy
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -129.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matador Resources has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

92.0% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 14.41% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -2.56%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 11.20% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Matador Resources14.41% 11.20% 5.62%
Patterson-UTI Energy -2.56%-2.32%-1.37%

Matador Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matador Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Matador Resources$3.59B1.77$759.22M$3.8913.19
Patterson-UTI Energy$4.66B0.76-$93.64M-$0.31N/A

Summary

Matador Resources beats Patterson-UTI Energy on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Murphy Oil?

Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) and Murphy Oil (NYSE:MUR) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, risk and valuation.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Murphy Oil has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Murphy Oil has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Murphy Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Patterson-UTI Energy$4.66B0.76-$93.64M-$0.31N/A
Murphy Oil$2.72B1.78$104.23M$0.5957.15

Murphy Oil has a net margin of 3.02% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -2.56%. Murphy Oil's return on equity of 3.09% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Patterson-UTI Energy-2.56% -2.32% -1.37%
Murphy Oil 3.02%3.09%1.65%

97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.3% of Murphy Oil shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Murphy Oil shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Murphy Oil pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -129.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Murphy Oil pays out 237.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Murphy Oil has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 7 more articles in the media than Murphy Oil. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 3 mentions for Murphy Oil. Murphy Oil's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Patterson-UTI Energy's score of 0.64 indicating that Murphy Oil is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Patterson-UTI Energy
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Murphy Oil
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Patterson-UTI Energy currently has a consensus target price of $12.15, indicating a potential upside of 29.39%. Murphy Oil has a consensus target price of $38.58, indicating a potential upside of 14.43%. Given Patterson-UTI Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more favorable than Murphy Oil.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Patterson-UTI Energy
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Murphy Oil
2 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.06

Summary

Murphy Oil beats Patterson-UTI Energy on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Patterson-UTI Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PTEN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PTEN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PTEN vs. The Competition

MetricPatterson-UTI EnergyOIL&GAS IndustryEnergy SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$3.56B$3.55B$9.96B$12.61B
Dividend Yield4.12%3.92%10.72%7.83%
P/E Ratio-30.298.6518.7824.56
Price / Sales0.761.67628.68121.87
Price / Cash4.007.2737.0560.04
Price / Book1.101.414.126.39
Net Income-$93.64M-$58.71M$4.25B$331.76M
7 Day Performance8.43%1.90%0.78%0.37%
1 Month Performance-18.28%-11.37%-5.51%0.53%
1 Year Performance43.36%67.68%27.38%21.93%

Patterson-UTI Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy
4.0349 of 5 stars
$9.39
-0.1%
$12.15
+29.4%
+43.1%$3.56B$4.66BN/A7,900
HAL
Halliburton
4.8851 of 5 stars
$32.97
+0.0%
$43.32
+31.4%
+55.0%$27.53B$22.18B18.1246,000
HP
Helmerich & Payne
2.6688 of 5 stars
$30.56
-2.4%
$40.40
+32.2%
+93.6%$3.13B$3.75BN/A6,200
MGY
Magnolia Oil & Gas
3.9264 of 5 stars
$25.04
-0.6%
$31.33
+25.1%
+8.9%$4.66B$1.31B14.56210
MTDR
Matador Resources
4.8547 of 5 stars
$49.83
-0.7%
$64.38
+29.2%
-1.5%$6.23B$3.70B12.81290

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:PTEN) was last updated on 7/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners