Does the media refer more to PTEN or APA?

In the previous week, APA had 28 more articles in the media than Patterson-UTI Energy. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for APA and 11 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat APA's score of 0.85 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Patterson-UTI Energy 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive APA 14 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer PTEN or CHRD?

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 6 more articles in the media than Chord Energy. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 5 mentions for Chord Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Chord Energy's score of 1.08 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Patterson-UTI Energy 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Chord Energy 2 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer PTEN or HAL?

In the previous week, Halliburton had 28 more articles in the media than Patterson-UTI Energy. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Halliburton and 11 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Halliburton's score of 1.14 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Patterson-UTI Energy 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Halliburton 28 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to HP or PTEN?

In the previous week, Helmerich & Payne and Helmerich & Payne both had 11 articles in the media. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Helmerich & Payne's score of 0.60 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Helmerich & Payne 7 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Patterson-UTI Energy 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor MTDR or PTEN?

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 14 more articles in the media than Patterson-UTI Energy. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Matador Resources and 11 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Matador Resources' score of 0.68 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Matador Resources 12 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Patterson-UTI Energy 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN) Competitors

$12.34 +0.16 (+1.31%)

As of 08/21/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

PTEN vs. APA, CHRD, HAL, HP, and MTDR

Should you buy Patterson-UTI Energy stock or one of its competitors? Patterson-UTI Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include APA (APA), Chord Energy (CHRD), Halliburton (HAL), Helmerich & Payne (HP), and Matador Resources (MTDR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to APA?

Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) and APA (NASDAQ:APA) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, APA has a beta of 0.35, indicating that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of APA shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of APA shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

APA has a net margin of 19.48% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -1.92%. APA's return on equity of 24.84% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Patterson-UTI Energy	-1.92%	-1.68%	-0.98%
APA	19.48%	24.84%	10.15%

Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. APA pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -173.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. APA pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Patterson-UTI Energy currently has a consensus price target of $12.95, suggesting a potential upside of 4.94%. APA has a consensus price target of $41.50, suggesting a potential downside of 4.36%. Given Patterson-UTI Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more favorable than APA.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Patterson-UTI Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
APA	4 Sell rating(s)	16 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.20

In the previous week, APA had 28 more articles in the media than Patterson-UTI Energy. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for APA and 11 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat APA's score of 0.85 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Patterson-UTI Energy	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
APA	14 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

APA has higher revenue and earnings than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than APA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Patterson-UTI Energy	$4.83B	0.98	-$93.64M	-$0.23	N/A
APA	$9.22B	1.65	$1.43B	$4.73	9.17

Summary

APA beats Patterson-UTI Energy on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Chord Energy?

Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) and Chord Energy (NASDAQ:CHRD) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

Chord Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chord Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Patterson-UTI Energy	$4.83B	0.98	-$93.64M	-$0.23	N/A
Chord Energy	$6.32B	1.28	$44.46M	$14.92	9.91

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chord Energy has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

Patterson-UTI Energy presently has a consensus target price of $12.95, suggesting a potential upside of 4.94%. Chord Energy has a consensus target price of $152.54, suggesting a potential upside of 3.17%. Given Patterson-UTI Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more favorable than Chord Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Patterson-UTI Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Chord Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.69

Chord Energy has a net margin of 13.42% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -1.92%. Chord Energy's return on equity of 10.18% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Patterson-UTI Energy	-1.92%	-1.68%	-0.98%
Chord Energy	13.42%	10.18%	6.24%

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 6 more articles in the media than Chord Energy. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 5 mentions for Chord Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Chord Energy's score of 1.08 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Patterson-UTI Energy	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Chord Energy	2 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -173.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chord Energy pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chord Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Chord Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Chord Energy beats Patterson-UTI Energy on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Halliburton?

Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) and Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Patterson-UTI Energy	$4.83B	0.98	-$93.64M	-$0.23	N/A
Halliburton	$22.18B	1.33	$1.28B	$1.91	18.52

Patterson-UTI Energy presently has a consensus target price of $12.95, suggesting a potential upside of 4.94%. Halliburton has a consensus target price of $43.10, suggesting a potential upside of 21.81%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Patterson-UTI Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Halliburton	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.68

In the previous week, Halliburton had 28 more articles in the media than Patterson-UTI Energy. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Halliburton and 11 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Halliburton's score of 1.14 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Patterson-UTI Energy	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Halliburton	28 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Halliburton has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -1.92%. Halliburton's return on equity of 18.71% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Patterson-UTI Energy	-1.92%	-1.68%	-0.98%
Halliburton	7.16%	18.71%	7.89%

97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Halliburton shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -173.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Halliburton pays out 35.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Halliburton has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Halliburton beats Patterson-UTI Energy on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Helmerich & Payne?

Helmerich & Payne (NYSE:HP) and Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and valuation.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a net margin of -1.92% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of -3.43%. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -1.68% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Helmerich & Payne	-3.43%	-2.35%	-0.99%
Patterson-UTI Energy	-1.92%	-1.68%	-0.98%

Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Helmerich & Payne pays out -70.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -173.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

96.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Patterson-UTI Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Helmerich & Payne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Helmerich & Payne	$4.00B	1.09	-$163.70M	-$1.41	N/A
Patterson-UTI Energy	$4.83B	0.98	-$93.64M	-$0.23	N/A

Helmerich & Payne currently has a consensus price target of $41.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.03%. Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $12.95, indicating a potential upside of 4.94%. Given Patterson-UTI Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more favorable than Helmerich & Payne.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Helmerich & Payne	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.36
Patterson-UTI Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

In the previous week, Helmerich & Payne and Helmerich & Payne both had 11 articles in the media. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Helmerich & Payne's score of 0.60 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Helmerich & Payne	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Patterson-UTI Energy	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Patterson-UTI Energy beats Helmerich & Payne on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Matador Resources?

Matador Resources (NYSE:MTDR) and Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 14 more articles in the media than Patterson-UTI Energy. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Matador Resources and 11 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Matador Resources' score of 0.68 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Matador Resources	12 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Patterson-UTI Energy	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Matador Resources has a net margin of 19.85% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -1.92%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 13.18% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Matador Resources	19.85%	13.18%	6.46%
Patterson-UTI Energy	-1.92%	-1.68%	-0.98%

Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Matador Resources pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -173.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matador Resources has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

92.0% of Matador Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Matador Resources has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Matador Resources presently has a consensus price target of $66.07, suggesting a potential upside of 12.92%. Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $12.95, suggesting a potential upside of 4.94%. Given Matador Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Matador Resources is more favorable than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Matador Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76
Patterson-UTI Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Matador Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matador Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Matador Resources	$3.84B	1.89	$759.22M	$5.83	10.04
Patterson-UTI Energy	$4.83B	0.98	-$93.64M	-$0.23	N/A

Summary

Matador Resources beats Patterson-UTI Energy on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Patterson-UTI Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PTEN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PTEN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Patterson-UTI Energy	Energy Equipment & Services Industry	Energy Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$4.65B	$3.74B	$10.02B	$12.77B
Dividend Yield	3.28%	13.36%	11.67%	11.08%
P/E Ratio	-53.65	44.09	20.62	24.24
Price / Sales	0.98	31.93	383.42	129.21
Price / Cash	5.19	21.20	36.19	53.23
Price / Book	1.51	2.23	3.03	6.38
Net Income	-$93.64M	$67.81M	$4.33B	$348.73M
7 Day Performance	8.53%	-1.59%	1.89%	0.08%
1 Month Performance	15.11%	2.44%	4.25%	2.91%
1 Year Performance	112.39%	48.37%	38.88%	17.19%

Patterson-UTI Energy Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PTEN Patterson-UTI Energy	2.6774 of 5 stars	$12.34 +1.3%	$12.95 +4.9%	+128.9%	$4.65B	$4.83B	N/A	7,900	Analyst Forecast
APA APA	3.5243 of 5 stars	$41.58 +2.7%	$41.26 -0.8%	+110.3%	$14.18B	$8.81B	8.79	1,791	Trending News Analyst Upgrade Analyst Revision
CHRD Chord Energy	3.3297 of 5 stars	$142.88 +4.0%	$152.54 +6.8%	+45.0%	$7.51B	$4.88B	9.58	530	Positive News
HAL Halliburton	4.9123 of 5 stars	$34.81 +1.1%	$43.10 +23.8%	+66.5%	$28.68B	$22.18B	18.23	46,000	Trending News Insider Trade
HP Helmerich & Payne	2.1508 of 5 stars	$44.73 +1.2%	$40.50 -9.5%	+143.8%	$4.42B	$3.75B	N/A	6,200	Ex-Dividend Analyst Forecast Insider Trade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:PTEN) was last updated on 8/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN) Competitors

PTEN vs. APA, CHRD, HAL, HP, and MTDR

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to APA?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Chord Energy?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Halliburton?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Helmerich & Payne?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Matador Resources?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PTEN vs. The Competition

Patterson-UTI Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN) Competitors

PTEN vs. APA, CHRD, HAL, HP, and MTDR

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to APA?

Which has more volatility and risk, PTEN or APA?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PTEN or APA?

Is PTEN or APA more profitable?

Is PTEN or APA a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate PTEN or APA?

Does the media refer more to PTEN or APA?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, PTEN or APA?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Chord Energy?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, PTEN or CHRD?

Which has more risk & volatility, PTEN or CHRD?

Do analysts recommend PTEN or CHRD?

Is PTEN or CHRD more profitable?

Does the media prefer PTEN or CHRD?

Is PTEN or CHRD a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in PTEN or CHRD?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Halliburton?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, PTEN or HAL?

Do analysts prefer PTEN or HAL?

Does the media prefer PTEN or HAL?

Is PTEN or HAL more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of PTEN or HAL?

Is PTEN or HAL a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, PTEN or HAL?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Helmerich & Payne?

Is HP or PTEN more profitable?

Is HP or PTEN a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in HP or PTEN?

Which has more risk & volatility, HP or PTEN?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, HP or PTEN?

Do analysts recommend HP or PTEN?

Does the media refer more to HP or PTEN?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Matador Resources?

Does the media favor MTDR or PTEN?

Is MTDR or PTEN more profitable?

Is MTDR or PTEN a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MTDR or PTEN?

Which has more risk & volatility, MTDR or PTEN?

Do analysts rate MTDR or PTEN?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, MTDR or PTEN?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PTEN vs. The Competition

Patterson-UTI Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools