Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN) Competitors

$11.86 +0.44 (+3.85%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$11.66 -0.20 (-1.64%)

As of 06:06 PM Eastern

PTEN vs. APA, HAL, HP, MGY, and MTDR

Should you be buying Patterson-UTI Energy stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Patterson-UTI Energy include APA (APA), Halliburton (HAL), Helmerich & Payne (HP), Magnolia Oil & Gas (MGY), and Matador Resources (MTDR). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to APA?

APA (NASDAQ:APA) and Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

APA pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. APA pays out 23.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -129.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

APA has higher revenue and earnings than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than APA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
APA	$8.61B	1.51	$1.43B	$4.29	8.55
Patterson-UTI Energy	$4.66B	0.97	-$93.64M	-$0.31	N/A

APA presently has a consensus target price of $39.85, suggesting a potential upside of 8.57%. Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus target price of $11.80, suggesting a potential downside of 0.51%. Given APA's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe APA is more favorable than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
APA	4 Sell rating(s)	19 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.16
Patterson-UTI Energy	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

83.0% of APA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of APA shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

APA has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 16 more articles in the media than APA. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 26 mentions for APA. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat APA's score of 0.50 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
APA	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	10 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Patterson-UTI Energy	16 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

APA has a net margin of 17.38% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -2.56%. APA's return on equity of 20.70% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
APA	17.38%	20.70%	8.14%
Patterson-UTI Energy	-2.56%	-2.32%	-1.37%

Summary

APA beats Patterson-UTI Energy on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Halliburton?

Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) and Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 11 more articles in the media than Halliburton. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 31 mentions for Halliburton. Halliburton's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Patterson-UTI Energy's score of 0.84 indicating that Halliburton is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Halliburton	20 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Patterson-UTI Energy	16 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Halliburton currently has a consensus target price of $41.91, suggesting a potential upside of 4.15%. Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus target price of $11.80, suggesting a potential downside of 0.51%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Halliburton	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
Patterson-UTI Energy	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Halliburton has a net margin of 6.95% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -2.56%. Halliburton's return on equity of 19.04% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Halliburton	6.95%	19.04%	7.96%
Patterson-UTI Energy	-2.56%	-2.32%	-1.37%

85.2% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Halliburton shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Halliburton pays out 37.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -129.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Halliburton has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Halliburton has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Halliburton has higher revenue and earnings than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Halliburton	$22.17B	1.52	$1.28B	$1.82	22.11
Patterson-UTI Energy	$4.66B	0.97	-$93.64M	-$0.31	N/A

Summary

Halliburton beats Patterson-UTI Energy on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Helmerich & Payne?

Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) and Helmerich & Payne (NYSE:HP) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a net margin of -2.56% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of -9.38%. Helmerich & Payne's return on equity of -1.16% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Patterson-UTI Energy	-2.56%	-2.32%	-1.37%
Helmerich & Payne	-9.38%	-1.16%	-0.48%

Patterson-UTI Energy currently has a consensus target price of $11.80, suggesting a potential downside of 0.51%. Helmerich & Payne has a consensus target price of $39.10, suggesting a potential upside of 1.15%. Given Helmerich & Payne's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Helmerich & Payne is more favorable than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Patterson-UTI Energy	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Helmerich & Payne	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Patterson-UTI Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Helmerich & Payne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Patterson-UTI Energy	$4.66B	0.97	-$93.64M	-$0.31	N/A
Helmerich & Payne	$3.75B	1.03	-$163.70M	-$3.79	N/A

97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its share price is 36% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 17 more articles in the media than Helmerich & Payne. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 25 mentions for Helmerich & Payne. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Helmerich & Payne's score of 0.50 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Patterson-UTI Energy	16 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Helmerich & Payne	8 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -129.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out -26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Patterson-UTI Energy beats Helmerich & Payne on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Magnolia Oil & Gas?

Magnolia Oil & Gas (NYSE:MGY) and Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 24.40% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -2.56%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 16.28% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Magnolia Oil & Gas	24.40%	16.28%	11.26%
Patterson-UTI Energy	-2.56%	-2.32%	-1.37%

Magnolia Oil & Gas presently has a consensus target price of $31.08, indicating a potential upside of 10.11%. Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus target price of $11.80, indicating a potential downside of 0.51%. Given Magnolia Oil & Gas' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Magnolia Oil & Gas is more favorable than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Magnolia Oil & Gas	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.53
Patterson-UTI Energy	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Magnolia Oil & Gas has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Magnolia Oil & Gas	$1.32B	3.99	$325.25M	$1.72	16.41
Patterson-UTI Energy	$4.66B	0.97	-$93.64M	-$0.31	N/A

Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -129.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its share price is 25% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.64, meaning that its share price is 36% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 30 more articles in the media than Magnolia Oil & Gas. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 12 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.73 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Magnolia Oil & Gas	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Patterson-UTI Energy	16 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Magnolia Oil & Gas beats Patterson-UTI Energy on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Matador Resources?

Matador Resources (NYSE:MTDR) and Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -129.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matador Resources has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Matador Resources presently has a consensus target price of $62.92, indicating a potential upside of 11.55%. Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus target price of $11.80, indicating a potential downside of 0.51%. Given Matador Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Matador Resources is more favorable than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Matador Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.69
Patterson-UTI Energy	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

92.0% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 23 more articles in the media than Matador Resources. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 19 mentions for Matador Resources. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Matador Resources' score of 0.59 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Matador Resources	5 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Patterson-UTI Energy	16 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Matador Resources has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its share price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its share price is 36% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Matador Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matador Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Matador Resources	$3.70B	1.90	$759.22M	$3.89	14.50
Patterson-UTI Energy	$4.66B	0.97	-$93.64M	-$0.31	N/A

Matador Resources has a net margin of 14.41% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -2.56%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 11.20% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Matador Resources	14.41%	11.20%	5.62%
Patterson-UTI Energy	-2.56%	-2.32%	-1.37%

Summary

Matador Resources beats Patterson-UTI Energy on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Patterson-UTI Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PTEN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PTEN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Patterson-UTI Energy	OIL&GAS Industry	Energy Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$4.50B	$4.17B	$10.41B	$12.27B
Dividend Yield	3.51%	3.42%	10.27%	5.22%
P/E Ratio	-38.26	9.49	17.36	25.70
Price / Sales	0.97	1.91	1,055.18	64.14
Price / Cash	4.86	8.59	37.10	36.27
Price / Book	1.40	1.64	4.63	6.74
Net Income	-$93.64M	-$52.06M	$4.24B	$333.09M
7 Day Performance	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.52%
1 Month Performance	18.01%	5.06%	4.19%	8.97%
1 Year Performance	98.00%	129.49%	57.53%	42.42%

Patterson-UTI Energy Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PTEN Patterson-UTI Energy	3.0652 of 5 stars	$11.86 +3.9%	$11.80 -0.5%	+90.7%	$4.50B	$4.66B	N/A	7,900	Positive News Analyst Revision
APA APA	3.4998 of 5 stars	$42.04 +4.7%	$39.50 -6.0%	+112.7%	$14.18B	$9.22B	10.54	1,791	Earnings Report Analyst Forecast Gap Up
HAL Halliburton	4.4505 of 5 stars	$42.00 +0.8%	$41.09 -2.2%	+95.5%	$34.80B	$22.18B	23.08	46,000
HP Helmerich & Payne	2.2349 of 5 stars	$40.51 +0.2%	$37.80 -6.7%	+107.2%	$4.04B	$3.75B	N/A	6,200	Earnings Report Analyst Forecast
MGY Magnolia Oil & Gas	3.5721 of 5 stars	$31.14 +3.5%	$31.08 -0.2%	+26.6%	$5.61B	$1.31B	18.10	210	Earnings Report

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:PTEN) was last updated on 5/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN) Competitors

PTEN vs. APA, HAL, HP, MGY, and MTDR

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to APA?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Halliburton?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Helmerich & Payne?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Magnolia Oil & Gas?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Matador Resources?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PTEN vs. The Competition

Patterson-UTI Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN) Competitors

PTEN vs. APA, HAL, HP, MGY, and MTDR

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to APA?

Is APA or PTEN a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, APA or PTEN?

Do analysts recommend APA or PTEN?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of APA or PTEN?

Which has more volatility and risk, APA or PTEN?

Does the media refer more to APA or PTEN?

Is APA or PTEN more profitable?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Halliburton?

Does the media prefer HAL or PTEN?

Do analysts recommend HAL or PTEN?

Is HAL or PTEN more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in HAL or PTEN?

Is HAL or PTEN a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, HAL or PTEN?

Which has better valuation & earnings, HAL or PTEN?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Helmerich & Payne?

Is PTEN or HP more profitable?

Do analysts prefer PTEN or HP?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, PTEN or HP?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PTEN or HP?

Which has more volatility & risk, PTEN or HP?

Does the media favor PTEN or HP?

Is PTEN or HP a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Magnolia Oil & Gas?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in MGY or PTEN?

Is MGY or PTEN more profitable?

Do analysts rate MGY or PTEN?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, MGY or PTEN?

Is MGY or PTEN a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, MGY or PTEN?

Does the media favor MGY or PTEN?

Summary

How does Patterson-UTI Energy compare to Matador Resources?

Is MTDR or PTEN a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend MTDR or PTEN?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in MTDR or PTEN?

Does the media refer more to MTDR or PTEN?

Which has more volatility & risk, MTDR or PTEN?

Which has better earnings and valuation, MTDR or PTEN?

Is MTDR or PTEN more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PTEN vs. The Competition

Patterson-UTI Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools