Go Pro

PBF Energy (PBF) Competitors

PBF Energy logo
$73.56 +4.00 (+5.75%)
As of 08/21/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

PBF vs. CHRD, CVI, DINO, DK, and MPC

Should you buy PBF Energy stock or one of its competitors? PBF Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include Chord Energy (CHRD), CVR Energy (CVI), HF Sinclair (DINO), Delek US (DK), and Marathon Petroleum (MPC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil, gas & consumable fuels" industry.

How does PBF Energy compare to Chord Energy?

Chord Energy (NASDAQ:CHRD) and PBF Energy (NYSE:PBF) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Chord Energy currently has a consensus price target of $152.54, indicating a potential upside of 3.17%. PBF Energy has a consensus price target of $50.92, indicating a potential downside of 30.77%. Given Chord Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Chord Energy is more favorable than PBF Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chord Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.69
PBF Energy
5 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.94

Chord Energy has a net margin of 13.42% compared to PBF Energy's net margin of 3.94%. PBF Energy's return on equity of 11.27% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chord Energy13.42% 10.18% 6.24%
PBF Energy 3.94%11.27%4.67%

In the previous week, PBF Energy had 27 more articles in the media than Chord Energy. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for PBF Energy and 5 mentions for Chord Energy. Chord Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat PBF Energy's score of 0.63 indicating that Chord Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chord Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
PBF Energy
19 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

97.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.3% of PBF Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.5% of PBF Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. PBF Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Chord Energy pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PBF Energy pays out 9.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chord Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and PBF Energy has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Chord Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PBF Energy. PBF Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chord Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chord Energy$4.88B1.66$44.46M$14.929.91
PBF Energy$29.33B0.30-$158.50M$11.306.51

Chord Energy has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PBF Energy has a beta of 0.1, suggesting that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chord Energy beats PBF Energy on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PBF Energy compare to CVR Energy?

CVR Energy (NYSE:CVI) and PBF Energy (NYSE:PBF) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

CVR Energy currently has a consensus target price of $30.50, indicating a potential downside of 23.56%. PBF Energy has a consensus target price of $50.92, indicating a potential downside of 30.77%. Given CVR Energy's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe CVR Energy is more favorable than PBF Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CVR Energy
5 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.38
PBF Energy
5 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.94

CVR Energy has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PBF Energy has a beta of 0.1, indicating that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market.

CVR Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. PBF Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. CVR Energy pays out 58.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PBF Energy pays out 9.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CVR Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and PBF Energy has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. PBF Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

98.9% of CVR Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.3% of PBF Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 70.8% of CVR Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.5% of PBF Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CVR Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PBF Energy. PBF Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CVR Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CVR Energy$7.16B0.56$27M$0.6858.68
PBF Energy$29.33B0.30-$158.50M$11.306.51

PBF Energy has a net margin of 3.94% compared to CVR Energy's net margin of 0.81%. PBF Energy's return on equity of 11.27% beat CVR Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CVR Energy0.81% -15.21% -3.33%
PBF Energy 3.94%11.27%4.67%

In the previous week, PBF Energy had 28 more articles in the media than CVR Energy. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for PBF Energy and 4 mentions for CVR Energy. CVR Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.48 beat PBF Energy's score of 0.63 indicating that CVR Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CVR Energy
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
PBF Energy
19 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

PBF Energy beats CVR Energy on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PBF Energy compare to HF Sinclair?

PBF Energy (NYSE:PBF) and HF Sinclair (NYSE:DINO) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

HF Sinclair has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PBF Energy. PBF Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HF Sinclair, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PBF Energy$29.33B0.30-$158.50M$11.306.51
HF Sinclair$26.87B0.64$579M$10.489.27

96.3% of PBF Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.3% of HF Sinclair shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.5% of PBF Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of HF Sinclair shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

HF Sinclair has a net margin of 6.13% compared to PBF Energy's net margin of 3.94%. HF Sinclair's return on equity of 18.21% beat PBF Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PBF Energy3.94% 11.27% 4.67%
HF Sinclair 6.13%18.21%9.96%

PBF Energy has a beta of 0.1, meaning that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HF Sinclair has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, PBF Energy had 20 more articles in the media than HF Sinclair. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for PBF Energy and 12 mentions for HF Sinclair. HF Sinclair's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat PBF Energy's score of 0.63 indicating that HF Sinclair is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PBF Energy
19 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
HF Sinclair
10 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

PBF Energy currently has a consensus price target of $50.92, indicating a potential downside of 30.77%. HF Sinclair has a consensus price target of $81.25, indicating a potential downside of 16.35%. Given HF Sinclair's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe HF Sinclair is more favorable than PBF Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PBF Energy
5 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.94
HF Sinclair
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

PBF Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. HF Sinclair pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. PBF Energy pays out 9.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HF Sinclair pays out 20.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. PBF Energy has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and HF Sinclair has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. HF Sinclair is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

HF Sinclair beats PBF Energy on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PBF Energy compare to Delek US?

PBF Energy (NYSE:PBF) and Delek US (NYSE:DK) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

PBF Energy has a beta of 0.1, meaning that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Delek US has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

PBF Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Delek US pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. PBF Energy pays out 9.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Delek US pays out 28.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. PBF Energy has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Delek US has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. PBF Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

PBF Energy presently has a consensus target price of $50.92, indicating a potential downside of 30.77%. Delek US has a consensus target price of $53.15, indicating a potential downside of 25.34%. Given Delek US's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Delek US is more favorable than PBF Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PBF Energy
5 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.94
Delek US
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.47

PBF Energy has a net margin of 3.94% compared to Delek US's net margin of 1.86%. Delek US's return on equity of 109.03% beat PBF Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PBF Energy3.94% 11.27% 4.67%
Delek US 1.86%109.03%6.44%

In the previous week, PBF Energy had 14 more articles in the media than Delek US. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for PBF Energy and 18 mentions for Delek US. Delek US's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat PBF Energy's score of 0.63 indicating that Delek US is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PBF Energy
19 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Delek US
10 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

96.3% of PBF Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.0% of Delek US shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of PBF Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Delek US shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Delek US has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PBF Energy. PBF Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Delek US, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PBF Energy$29.33B0.30-$158.50M$11.306.51
Delek US$10.72B0.41-$22.80M$3.5620.00

Summary

Delek US beats PBF Energy on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PBF Energy compare to Marathon Petroleum?

Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) and PBF Energy (NYSE:PBF) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation and institutional ownership.

Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. PBF Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Marathon Petroleum pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PBF Energy pays out 9.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marathon Petroleum has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and PBF Energy has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. PBF Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PBF Energy has a beta of 0.1, suggesting that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market.

Marathon Petroleum presently has a consensus target price of $312.50, indicating a potential downside of 13.72%. PBF Energy has a consensus target price of $50.92, indicating a potential downside of 30.77%. Given Marathon Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Marathon Petroleum is more favorable than PBF Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Marathon Petroleum
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
PBF Energy
5 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.94

76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.3% of PBF Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.5% of PBF Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 38 more articles in the media than PBF Energy. MarketBeat recorded 70 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 32 mentions for PBF Energy. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat PBF Energy's score of 0.63 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Marathon Petroleum
65 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
PBF Energy
19 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 5.48% compared to PBF Energy's net margin of 3.94%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 31.96% beat PBF Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Marathon Petroleum5.48% 31.96% 8.88%
PBF Energy 3.94%11.27%4.67%

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than PBF Energy. PBF Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marathon Petroleum$135.22B0.78$4.05B$29.0912.45
PBF Energy$29.33B0.30-$158.50M$11.306.51

Summary

Marathon Petroleum beats PBF Energy on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PBF Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PBF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PBF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PBF vs. The Competition

MetricPBF EnergyOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$8.72B$11.49B$10.03B$24.30B
Dividend Yield1.50%11.41%11.64%3.70%
P/E Ratio6.5117.1920.6230.31
Price / Sales0.30494.37405.5219.95
Price / Cash45.6939.8836.2632.49
Price / Book1.333.213.036.77
Net Income-$158.50M$5.27B$4.33B$1.07B
7 Day Performance2.34%2.69%1.89%-0.65%
1 Month Performance18.98%4.21%3.84%3.38%
1 Year Performance203.09%37.09%38.56%14.90%

PBF Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PBF
PBF Energy
3.8735 of 5 stars
$73.56
+5.8%
$50.92
-30.8%
+203.1%$8.72B$29.33B6.513,678
CHRD
Chord Energy
3.3286 of 5 stars
$142.88
+4.0%
$152.54
+6.8%
+39.6%$7.51B$4.88B9.58530
CVI
CVR Energy
2.4966 of 5 stars
$36.40
+3.2%
$30.50
-16.2%
+46.6%$3.54B$7.16B53.531,532
DINO
HF Sinclair
3.6445 of 5 stars
$94.88
+1.3%
$81.25
-14.4%
+100.7%$16.65B$26.87B9.055,165
DK
Delek US
2.9542 of 5 stars
$67.14
+2.6%
$52.38
-22.0%
+190.3%$4.01B$10.72B18.861,902

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:PBF) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners